STAT

Opinion: Graduate biomedical education needs an overhaul. Here’s our version

We need new ways to provide a steady supply of creative, dedicated scientists. Our initiative offers a new model for doing that.
Graduate biomedical education hasn't changed all that much since the 1800s. It needs a reboot.

One of the great educational success stories is that graduate training can teach individuals how to do deep scientific investigation. Today, such training, which dates back to the middle of the 19th century, is in desperate need of an overhaul.

The amount of scientific knowledge has exploded, giving rise to new fields in science with differing concepts, tools, and cultures. The training of new scientists has become a highly specialized endeavor that frequently emphasizes the acquisition of factual knowledge instead of skills that are essential for good scientific practice, such as critical thinking, rigorous research design, analysis, and philosophy of science. Many training programs today turn out young scientists with overly narrow interests and

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About FDA Dithering On Pharma Patents, WHO Pandemic Talks, And More
When it comes to a crucial controversy over patents for drug-and-device combination products, the FDA has been MIA.
STAT1 min read
STAT+: Element Biosciences, An Illumina Rival, On Its Genomics Ambitions — And Why It Hasn’t Gone Public
Element Biosciences' modest growth comes at a time when some other players are struggling in a sequencer market dominated by Illumina.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A Boy Dying In Pfizer Trial; AstraZeneca Yanking Covid Shot, And More
A young boy died in a clinical trial for an experimental Pfizer gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, about a year after receiving the therapy.

Related Books & Audiobooks