Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The King's Grave: The Discovery of Richard III's Lost Burial Place and the Clues It Holds
The King's Grave: The Discovery of Richard III's Lost Burial Place and the Clues It Holds
The King's Grave: The Discovery of Richard III's Lost Burial Place and the Clues It Holds
Audiobook9 hours

The King's Grave: The Discovery of Richard III's Lost Burial Place and the Clues It Holds

Written by Michael Jones and Philippa Langley

Narrated by Corrie James

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

About this audiobook

On 22 August 1485, Richard III was killed at Bosworth Field, the last king of England to die in battle. His victorious opponent, Henry Tudor (the future Henry VII), went on to found one of our most famous ruling dynasties. Richard's body was displayed in undignified fashion for two days in nearby Leicester and then hurriedly buried in the church of the Greyfriars. Fifty years later, at the time of the dissolution of the monasteries, the king's grave was lost-its contents believed to be emptied into the river Soar-and Richard III's reputation buried under a mound of Tudor propaganda. Its culmination was Shakespeare's compelling portrayal of a deformed and murderous villain, written over a hundred years after Richard's death. Now-in an incredible find-Richard III's remains have been uncovered beneath a car park in Leicester. The King's Grave traces this remarkable journey. In alternate chapters, Philippa Langley, whose years of research and belief that she would find Richard in this exact spot inspired the project, reveals the inside story of the search for the king's grave, and historian Michael Jones tells of Richard's fifteenth-century life and death. The result is a compelling portrayal of one of our greatest archaeological discoveries, allowing a complete re-evaluation of our most controversial monarch-one that discards the distortions of later Tudor histories and puts the man firmly back into the context of his times.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateOct 29, 2013
ISBN9781452687377
The King's Grave: The Discovery of Richard III's Lost Burial Place and the Clues It Holds
Author

Michael Jones

Michael Jones did his Ph.D. on the Beaufort family, and subsequently taught at the University of South West England, the University of Glasgow, and Winchester College.  He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and now works as a writer and media presenter.  He is the author of six books, including The King's Mother, a highly praised biography of Margaret Beaufort, which was shortlisted for the Whitfield Prize.

More audiobooks from Michael Jones

Related to The King's Grave

Related audiobooks

History For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The King's Grave

Rating: 4.055555555555555 out of 5 stars
4/5

18 ratings10 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Loved this book! An engaging, fascinating read about the unearthing of the remains of King Richard III, along with a concise, well-written history of his life, brief reign, and death in battle. Langley has channeled her quest for redemption of the much maligned king into a strong case for further exploration and study; especially by this reader!
    I knew not much about Richard III, except for descriptions of his appearance, and the supposition that he ruthlessly killed his nephews, the Princes in the Tower. That was until I viewed the recent British television series, "The White Queen", based on the novel by Philippa Gregory, when my view of Richard was subtly changed.

    I anxiously look forward to reading more about the House of York, and I hope I can one day visit the future museum and resting place of King Richard III.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    published-2013, medieval5c-16c, nonfiction, e-book, plantagenet-1154-1485, archaeology, lifestyles-deathstyles, net-galleyRead from September 11 to 16, 2013ARC from NetGalley via ♥St. Martin's Press♥Blurbification: The first full-length book about the discover of Richard III's remains by the person who led the team and the historian whose book spurred her on.Colour me excited.Opening: On 22 August 1485 two armies faced each other at Bosworth Field in Leicestershire.There is a quote by Eco that could be altered slightly to encompass the fever that has surrounded the disinterment of Richard's skeleton and tapeworm eggs from the carpark in Leicester:“The lunatic is all idée fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense, by his flashes of inspiration, and by the fact that sooner or later he brings up the Templars.”Change 'Templars' into 'Ricardians' and you have it nailed.This is a co-authored work of differing ideas as to Richard III's character. Was he the instigator of the murder of the Princes in the Tower? We will never know and that is why this subject will always be alluring; people will cling onto their pet theories until hell freezes over.Although Langley and Jones display mutual admiration, they disagree on several points yet never let the subject disintegrate into full-on spat. All is measured discussion and maybe this is why it loses a star.This is a book that will have you resembling a cat with a mouse no matter which view you subscribe to. You pick it up and hold it close, then just as quickly toss it away only to grasp it once again, and heaven help the person who would relieve you of it thinking that would be the charitable thing to do.Where do my loyalties lay, you wonder. How could Richard III be other than as so brilliantly portrayed by Ian McKellen.Recommended.Cross-posted: Goodreads, Anobii, LibraryThing, NetGalley3 likes
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Most of us know Richard III from Shakespeare’s famous play, notably written for a Tudor audience, as a monster, crippled both in body and soul, who viciously killed the innocent princes in the tower so that he could steal the throne.However, there are many who don’t share this Tudor depiction of Richard including the authors of The King’s Grave: The Search for Richard III. The book is divided between two stories. In one, Philippa Langley who spearheaded the ‘Looking for Richard” project, gives us an account of the search and eventual recovery of Richard’s skeleton. Historian Michael Jones discusses Richard’s short reign including his death at Bosworth. The two authors give two decidedly different reactions to Richard III. Langley’s views of Richard are much more emotional. She seems to see Richard not as an historical figure but rather as someone she feels a strong personal attachment to; someone she must protect from any and all detractors. Her actions are guided by her ‘intuition’. When she sees an R mark in a public car park (R for Reserved), she gets ‘goosebumps’, convinced that Richard’s body will be found there. When, as it turns out, she was right, she is moved to tears when the skeleton has a markedly curved spine not because she is thrilled at an important historical discovery but because she is convinced that this will reinforce the Shakespearian portrait of Richard as a hunchbacked monster. Jones, on the other hand, gives a much more objective and nuanced view of Richard although still a fairly positive one. According to him, Richard, rather than being a monster, was intelligent and pious with a fine sense of justice. It is probably not surprising, though, that the two disagree on the fate of the young princes. The discovery of Richard’s skeleton gives us little new in terms of Richard’s rule. However, it is an important discovery in terms of the forensic science involved and of the historical portrait of the man. Thanks to Langley’s efforts, we now know more about Richard III’s physical appearance. He was not a hunchback but he did have scoliosis so that one shoulder was higher than the other. He also did not have a withered arm. We also have a better understanding of what happened at Bosworth based on the wounds discovered on his skeleton. Although it adds little to our knowledge of the motivations and actions of the historical Richard, still, his story is an interesting one and, as the last English monarch to die in battle, it is hard not to feel some of Langley’s emotions towards both the discovery of his skeleton and the details of his death.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The War of the Roses, for me at least, is a confusing piece of English history - too many Richards, Henrys, Edwards, Woodvilles and Nevilles, on top of their titles, and controversies over legitimate and illegitimate children. For the newcomer it takes some time to get to grips with the deluge of information. With the help of some diagrams of family trees, this book has helped my unravel this somewhat. It focuses on the last few years of this long family disagreement, when Richard III wrested power, set to rule for couple of years, and then was defeated by a young pretender who had spent most of his life in France. Ultimately, of course, as the title suggests, this book focuses on his death, or more correctly the quest to find his body. It's also an attempt to rehabilitate his character, one that had been trashed by the Tudors and their friends. I'm no expert, but the authors put forward a good case that the impression that most people have, mainly through a play by William Shakespeare, is incorrect.This proof comes partly through finding the body, and that it was not deformed, that he was not a hunchback.Sitting on top of all this, this book describes the quest, particularly of Philippa Langley, to find the body of Richard III. Through her tenacious efforts, she identified a likely site, gained the interest from stakeholders, and raised the funds for the archaeology. She has been criticised for being less than objective - however, she tells it as it is. She describes her feelings and emotions, especially when she see the 'R' in the car park. She herself writes that it was 'bonkers'; however, in the end it was correct. Finding the skeleton on the first day in the first trench is quite bonkers too. Ultimately it was a team effort, with plenty of people giving objective and scientific input. Without her emotional involvement the project may never have started, and who knows, the car park will be (or may have been) developed in the future, and done a 'better' job than the Victorians did when they destroyed the feet.I enjoyed reading the book. It's pity that the photos were in black and white. However, there is plenty of material online to satisfy the curious.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Hugely entertaining account of the discovery of Richard III's skeleton in a car park in Leicester in 2012. Chapters alternate between the current time and the work to uncover the skeleton and a re-visioned history of the last English king to be killed in battle. Did Richard murder the princes in the tower? Was he deformed madman? While the jury remains out on the murder question this book does bring some justice to RIchard and shows that perhaps he wasn't exactly the Richard portrayed by Shakespeare.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Philippa Langley had been the driving force behind the re-discovery of the English king Richard III. In the media reporting about the event, she has been mostly elbowed aside by the professionals and gadflies of the university of Leicester. She was also very unfortunately presented as an emotional simpleton in the Channel 4 documentary ("Richard III was a human:" and other rather inane statements were all she was shown to contribute as well as a copious amount of the opposite of a stiff upper lip. How she and historian Dr John Ashdown-Hill were pushed off the limelight was a nasty case study of the English class system at work.This personal account of the project to unearth a king shows how difficult the realization of the project was, in convincing the authorities as well as financing the project. The largest cost element of the project was paying for the parking of the social services employees as the dig had cost them access to their beloved car park. The gloating city of Leicester which will rake in many tourist pounds (if they manage to hold on to the body) could have had at least shown the grace of returning those funds. The employees of the university of Leicester who first had to be dragged screaming and kicking to perform the task as hired help soon discovered that they could push their nominal sponsor into the offside. For their next project, they should add a political heavyweight to block the bureaucracy from taking over.The second strand of the book is Michael Jones' account of Richard's life which is fine but a bit too rosy. Yes, RIII was not the devil character written by Shakespeare but neither was he a saintly king. Rule in the 15th century meant to act ruthlessly and dispose of one's enemies. Richard made two miscalculations that cost him his life. He believed he still had the support of the Stanleys and he failed to notice the bloody effectiveness of the pike block which had already cost his brother-in-law Charles the Bold his life in 1477. I read Richard's desperate cavalry charge as atonement of the infanfry battle lost against the French pikes.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I received this as an Advance Reader Copy from NetGalley.I was the odd 12-year-old with an obsession for Richard III. I read Josephine Tey's famous book The Daughter of Time and was utterly convinced that Richard had been thoroughly maligned by Tudor propagandists and did not murder the princes in the Tower. I have read more about Richard and the War of the Roses over the years. Therefore, the recent news of the discovery of bones and their identification as Richard III was of keen interest to me.Philippa Langley was the woman behind the search for Richard III. She was working on a screenplay and wanted a full idea of the "real" Richard. She spear-headed the effort, gathered the funding, and the result was extraordinary. Not only did they find Richard III, but he was found the very first day they began the dig.Langley comes from a staunchly Ricardian background, She's a member of the Richard III Society and believes the king did not have the princes murdered, nor was he the warped villain as portrayed by Shakespeare. The co-author, Michael Jones, wants a more complete picture of Richard but he does believe that Richard murdered the princes, though this act must be viewed in context of the times. Together, I felt they provided an interesting balance to the book. They bring up oft-quoted passages by Sir Thomas More, but also explored a few other contemporary sources I had never read before. They go into great detail about Richard's character--even having a psychological profile done--talking about his piety, how he likely witnessed his mother's rape when he was a child and had firm views on sexual morality as an adult, how he was chivalrous and tried to act in a just way, even with the bodies of his enemies. This is a noteworthy aspect, considering how he was treated at the end: scalped and stabbed in the head, stripped and flung over a horse, stabbed in the buttocks, then crammed into a grave he didn't fit in. Then, after the dissolution of the church centuries ago, he is found today beneath a parking lot.The chapters flow back and forth from a detail history of Richard, to place him in the context of his times, and about Langley's modern quest to find him. If a reader is unfamiliar with the War of the Roses, this likely is not a good book to start on the subject. It crams in a lot of material and there are many names to keep track of, many of them the same name (especially Edward). I found it all fascinating, but then, I have read on the era before. It was intriguing to learn about the modern science involved in his identification. I thought the psychological profile was a bit silly, but otherwise the authors placed good emphasis on viewing Richard in the context of his times.Since I read an ARC ebook, I'm not sure if I missed out on illustrations or maps that are in the full version. I really would have liked more photographs and data along those lines. I'm in America and I'm not sure if or when I'll be able to see the full TV special by Langley, "Looking for Richard," though I certainly hope to at some point.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Philippa Langley was behind the discovery of King Richard III's body under the car park in England. This book gives an account of Richard's life, showing differences in the real Richard III and the Tudor version of Richard III, as well as the account of the discovery of his resting place. The authors alternated between the two portions of the story, and that particular arrangement did not work well for me. I was far more interested in the events leading up to the discovery and the archaeological dig and testing done to determine this was indeed Richard than in a reconstruction of his life which has been the subject of numerous other histories. I felt that more details of the dig itself and of the testing and results could have been presented if the authors had left parts of the story of Richard which had no bearings on the forensics presented in the volume to other histories. I was quite interested in the DNA analysis and was disappointed that there was not more on that presented in the book and that there was no appendix presenting detailed findings of the mitochondrial match. Although I was disappointed in some aspects of the book, it was interesting to read about the discovery and understand a little more of what drove the team and of the cooperation they had from others to make the discovery. This review is based on an advance e-galley received from the publisher through NetGalley with the expectation that a review be written.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Richard lll, the War of the Roses, the mysterious disappearances of the two princes in the tower, have long fascinated many , myself included. I was very excited to hear that they had found his bones under a municipal parking lot and wondered how it had come to pass that this is where his bones had been buried. This book answers all these questions and more.It also tells how Richard's story and life had come to portray him as a villain, of course that was helped along by Shakespeare, and that this may not have been his true character. Of course Tudor revisionist history also helped in this portrayal. So this tells the story of tracking down documents, getting permits, funding all the other fundamentals and details to get permission for this huge undertaking.Along the way we learn about Richard, his life, his battle, favorite castles and learn from historical documents that he most likely was wrongly portrayed. While I found much of this interesting reading, the historical part definitely being my favorite there were a few things that kept me from rating this higher. I think the author would have been better served to have left out the tingly feelings she kept getting in the parking lot, supposedly at the exact spot they later found his bones. Also the vomiting on learning that the bones were of a man who had scoliosis which apparently was what Richard was thought to have suffered from. All this might be true, but it calls out the skeptic in me and makes me feel a little differently about what I am reading. Maybe that is not fair, but it is how I felt. I am glad I read this book, loved the pictures that were included and admire the author's tenacity in pursuing this project.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've been a Ricardian ever since I read Sharon Kay Penman's wonderful book on Richard III, The Sunne in Splendour. It caused me to do a lot of research and reading on the King and to re-examine the Shakespeare play (which I also love) as Tudor propaganda. Richard III is a great reminder of the way the victors shape the stories of the vanquished. I was really excited when the King's remains were discovered and even more excited to read this book about the search and discovery process.The King's Grave is at its best when it is telling the story of Philippa Langley's undying affection for Richard III and her quest to locate his bones (and locate them she did). A lot of hard work and effort went into this dig and its primary discovery - archaeology is complicated. Ms. Langley is at times a bit burbley and a bit self-congratulatory, but given the finding I'm willing to put up with it from her. For me the parts of the book regarding Richard's history were less compelling and a bit dry, although that may be because I've already read so much about it. If you're interested in knowing more about this controversial King and the discovery of his bones, you'll like this book. When you're finished with it, go read The Sunne in Splendour if you haven't already and then read or re-read the Shakespeare play. So many perspectives about one singular man. I imagine the truth is somewhere in the middle, but it's fun to read along the edges and ponder.