The KISS Interviews
()
About this ebook
Read more from Warren Lapine
New Thought Bundle #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Shadows & Reflections: A Roger Zelazny Tribute Anthology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Night Kings and Night Heirs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJust Like the Jetsons (with linked TOC) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to The KISS Interviews
Related ebooks
First KISS: My 40-Year Obsession with the Hottest Band in the World Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Rock 'n' Roll Archives, Volume Five: Rockin' 'round the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKISS FAQ: All That's Left to Know About the Hottest Band in the Land Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy AC/DC Matters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Kiss Interviews Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Who FAQ: All That's Left to Know About Fifty Years of Maximum R&B Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLed Zeppelin FAQ: All That's Left to Know About the Greatest Hard Rock Band of All Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTake It Off: KISS Truly Unmasked Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anvil!: The Story of Anvil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5PEOPLE The Beatles: Sgt. Pepper at 50! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat's Exactly The Matter With Me?: Memoirs of a life in music Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBoogie Chillun: The Reverend's Archives, Volume 4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRock, Paper, Slippers Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Underrated Rock Book Too!: 200 More Overlooked Albums: Underrated Rock Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThirty Six Albums That Matter: Pop Gallery eBooks, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElvis Music FAQ: All That's Left to Know About the King's Recorded Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rock 'n' Roll Archives, Volume Four: Cult Rockers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vinyl Dialogues: Stories Behind Memorable Albums Of The 1970s As Told By The Artists Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Even Keel: Life On The Streets Of Rock & Roll Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Neil Young: Love to Burn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5SMIP - Sublime Moments In Pop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Strange Way to Live: A Story of Rock 'n' Roll Resurrection Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Kiss Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Music That Matters: Classic Pop: Pop Gallery eBooks, #13 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJust a Shot Away: 1969 Revisited Part 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassic Rock Revisited Vol. 1: Rock Icons & Metal Gods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNothin' to Lose: The Making of KISS 1972–1975 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shout It Out Loud: The Story of Kiss's Destroyer and the Making of an American Icon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Is Gonna Hurt: Music, Photography and Life Through the Distorted Lens of Nikki Sixx Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conversations with Phantoms: Exclusive Interviews About the 1978 TV Movie, Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Industries For You
YouTube Secrets: The Ultimate Guide to Growing Your Following and Making Money as a Video I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5YouTube 101: The Ultimate Guide to Start a Successful YouTube channel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArtpreneur: The Step-by-Step Guide to Making a Sustainable Living From Your Creativity Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Music Law: How to Run Your Band's Business Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsINSPIRED: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Powerhouse: The Untold Story of Hollywood's Creative Artists Agency Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Energy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disney's Land: Walt Disney and the Invention of the Amusement Park That Changed the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bottle of Lies: The Inside Story of the Generic Drug Boom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shopify For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Market Gardener: A Successful Grower's Handbook for Small-Scale Organic Farming Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Story Wins: How to Leverage Hollywood Storytelling in Business & Beyond Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Audition for Your Career, Not the Job: Mastering the On-camera Audition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Weird Things Customers Say in Bookstores Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary and Analysis of The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals 1: Based on the Book by Michael Pollan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks About Being Sick in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Excellence Wins: A No-Nonsense Guide to Becoming the Best in a World of Compromise Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Study of the Federal Reserve and its Secrets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Setting the Table: The Transforming Power of Hospitality in Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best American Food Writing 2018 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The KISS Interviews
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The KISS Interviews - Warren Lapine
THE KISS INTERVIEWS
By Warren Lapine
Wilder Publications, Inc.
Copyright © 2014
All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever.
Manufactured in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 978-1-62755-785-6
Table of Contents
Dedication
An Interview with Paul Stanley
An Interview with Gene Simmons
An Interview with Bruce Kulick
An Interview with Tommy Thayer
An Interview with Eric Singer
An Interview with Mike Brandvold
An Interview with Paco Zimmerman
Pictures
An Interview with Doc McGhee
An Interview with Gene Simmons
An Interview with Paul Stanley
The Painter’s KISS: The Art of Paul Stanley
KISS Rocks the Corps
A Rock The Nation Experience
Kiss and NASCAR
The KISS Jet, a Profile
KISS Coffeehouse: A Behind the Scenes Look
This book is dedicated to
Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons
Thanks for all the music.
An Interview with Paul Stanley
WL: How different do you think your life would have been if the Wicked Lester album had been released and had managed a Top Forty hit?
Paul Stanley: Had that album come out, we probably wouldn’t have even merited the VH1 segment on Behind the Music. We’d be a footnote in late sixties or early seventies music. We were smart enough to realize that what we were doing was neither a reflection of us, nor good enough to compete with what was out there. I give us credit for dismantling a band that already had an album finished. You need to look early on to whether your architecture and design is sound; if it’s not, you have to fix the foundation before you build on top of it. Wicked Lester was a learning experience which, thankfully, didn’t affect us in any other way except to give us some studio experience in what we should do and what we shouldn’t.
WL: Looking back on the Wicked Lester days, could you have imagined still playing with Gene Simmons thirty years later?
PS: No, but I couldn’t have imagined being in a band thirty years later. You have to remember that there was no precedent, at that point, for a band lasting more than perhaps eight years. So the idea of being able to do this thirty years on was preposterous, preposterous and inconceivable. There was no template, no one had done it. What changed was the evolution of rock and roll. As rock and roll grew up, it became obvious to the bands and the people making it that, like the blues, if rock and roll reflected the people making it, it could stay viable because it would reflect the audience.
WL: So in the sixties, rock and roll didn’t realize it was going to grow up with its listeners?
PS: Probably, because prior to bands writing their own material, teen idols were really a commodity that was handled or manufactured by managers and record companies, and they were disposable. There was nothing except the flavor of the week, and when the audience grew tired of that person, the same song-writing team would be writing for someone else. So the performer was just the image and the physical presence of the music, but was not representative of the music in the sense that they wrote it. As teens would grow tired of Fabian, they could get Frankie Avalon. When the Beatles came along, it became a whole new ball game; a door opened to a whole other way of doing things. The bands grew up listening to mostly black R&B, the Everly Brothers, Elvis, and things of that sort, and wound up emulating it by writing their own music. So you wound up with groups which were a real reflection of the music because they wrote it. There was no obsolescence, because the music was so valid that, as long as the music continued to connect with the audience, it didn’t matter that the musicians got older. That was the major difference. Certainly when I first started in a band, that was not the blueprint that had ever been followed before. The idea of doing this for thirty years was absurd. I was hoping for five years.
WL: On October 31, 1976, I was twelve and I rushed home from trick or treating to see KISS on the Paul Lynde Halloween Special. When I turned on the television set, I was a kid, and when I turned it off, I was an adolescent. Did you realize at the time that your appearance on that show was going to change a generation of kids, much the way that the Beatles’ and Elvis’ appearance on The Ed Sullivan show had?
PS: I think that part of success— although it can be planned— is that the naivete of the people doing it is imperative. If you really knew the impact you were going to have, you couldn’t do it as well. You wouldn’t be able to see clearly because you’d be clouded by your own bloated sense of self-importance. I think that’s true of writing, too. I listen to songs that I wrote when the band first started that I couldn’t possibly write today. Not that I’m not technically a better writer, but the writing process was different because I didn’t know the rules. When we first started, my intention, certainly, was to take over the world. Perhaps when you’re doing it, you’re not aware that the process has already begun.
WL: Have you ever worn the makeup of any of the other members of the band?
PS: No, no, why on Earth . . . no. Never even contemplated it. It would be like wearing someone else’s underwear. It’s not acceptable.
WL: How does KISS with the makeup feel differently than KISS without the makeup?
PS: I think it’s a validation and a magnification of who we are anyway. When I put on the makeup, it’s Paul Stanley on steroids. It’s one hundred percent me and it’s totally comfortable, but it is a magnification of a certain part of me taken to epic proportions. It’s very empowering.
WL: Is Paul Stanley any more important to KISS with or without the makeup?
PS: Well, not to blow my own horn, I think I proved my importance over the years with and without. It’s doubtful that there would have been a band at certain points of our history had I not rolled up my sleeves.
WL: Crazy Nights
reached number four in the U.K., Shandi
was a number one hit in Australia; do you ever finish writing a song and say to yourself, This is going to be huge in the U.K., but I think the Australians are going to hate it?
PS: That’s interesting . . . nope. But I’ve certainly written songs where I said a certain segment of our audience might not like this. It’s important for people to understand that part of the reason I’m in KISS is to make my own rules. As much as I want to please as many people as I can, I also can’t sell myself short or not avail myself of the freedom that I’ve earned. There certainly are times when I’ve written certain songs and said, Gee, some people might not like ‘Forever.’ Or some people are not going to like ‘I Was Made For Loving You.’
It’s a two-way street; if someone doesn’t like it, they don’t have to listen to it. In the scheme of things, it all seems to balance out.
WL: I like to play your solo album for people who have never heard it, and then ask them when they think it was released. They invariably say between 1984 and 1988. Obviously, you had the eighties’ metal/hard rock sound down ten years before it came to dominate the airwaves. Has it ever occurred to you that your solo album may have shaped what the eighties sound was going to be?
PS: I’ve always managed to reflect the music that I love without blatantly copying something. I think that my influences come through. It started with me trying to write songs that I heard on the radio that I couldn’t afford to buy. When I was in New York in my teens, there was a radio show called The British Power Hour. They would play the top ten from England each week, which was drastically different than what was on the charts here, and I loved those songs. When I would hear them, I’d try to retain some of them, and I would write my version of what I had heard. That’s basically how Fire House
and some of those other songs came to be. My roots are clear; maybe for some people, that became their roots and was a template for them.
WL: I understand you are currently working on a solo album. Can you tell me anything about it?
PS: Anyone who has heard any of it thinks it’s great. But then again, there’s no shortage of people to tell you how great you are. You have to be discerning enough to realize that a compliment is only as good as who it came from. I think it’s great, there’s great singing on it, the songs are really good. There’s no reason for me, at this point, to do a one-man