Union River Ironclad 1861–65
By Angus Konstam and Tony Bryan
4/5
()
About this ebook
Angus Konstam
Angus Konstam is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and has written widely on naval history, with well over a hundred books in print. He is a former Royal Navy officer, maritime archaeologist and museum curator, who has worked in the Royal Armouries, Tower of London, and Mel Fisher Maritime Museum. Now a full-time author and historian, he lives in Orkney.
Read more from Angus Konstam
Salerno 1943: The Allied Invasion of Italy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Pirate World: A History of the Most Notorious Sea Robbers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blackbeard: America's Most Notorious Pirate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mutiny on the Spanish Main: HMS Hermione and the Royal Navy’s revenge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBig Guns: Artillery on the Battlefield Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHunt the Bismarck: The pursuit of Germany's most famous battleship Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sovereigns of the Sea: The Quest to Build the Perfect Renaissance Battleship Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ship Spotter’s Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings100 Greatest Battles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Union River Ironclad 1861–65
Titles in the series (4)
Union River Ironclad 1861–65 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5US Submarines 1900–35 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Kurdish Armour Against ISIS: YPG/SDF tanks, technicals and AFVs in the Syrian Civil War, 2014–19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTanks at the Iron Curtain 1946–60: Early Cold War armor in Central Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
US Submarines 1900–35 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A History of Ironclads: The Power of Iron Over Wood Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Civil War Ironclads: The Dawn Of Naval Armor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRiver Gunboats: An Illustrated Encyclopaedia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWarship 2019 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe E-Boat Threat Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ironclads and Columbiads: The Coast Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHunter-Killer: U.S. Escort Carriers in the Battle of the Atlantic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5M12 Gun Motor Carriage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Cruisers of the Victorian Era Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The British Army of the Crimea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5British Battle Tanks: Post-war Tanks 1946–2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArtillery Through the Ages: A Short, Illustrated History of the Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Light Division in the Peninsular War, 1811–1814 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArgyll and Sutherland Highlanders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5U.S. Marine Corps Women's Reserve: 'They Are Marines': Uniforms and Equipment in World War II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rise of the Tank: Armoured Vehicles and Their Use in the First World War Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Royal Armoured Corps in the Cold War, 1946–1990 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5British Battle Tanks: World War I to 1939 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Artillery In Korea: Massing Fires And Reinventing The Wheel [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Arms and Armor of the Pilgrims, 1620-1692 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe French Army in the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe German Army from Mobilisation to First Ypres Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting the Great War at Sea: Strategy, Tactics and Technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Armor in the Pacific Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sturmartillerie: Spearhead of the infantry Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Axis & Allied Armored Fighting Vehicles: World War II AFV Plans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tank Hunter: World War One Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mein Kampf: The Original, Accurate, and Complete English Translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bill O'Reilly's Legends and Lies: The Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Union River Ironclad 1861–65
7 ratings1 review
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A fantastic overview of the topic. Good history, good individual ship profiles, outstanding illustrations.
Book preview
Union River Ironclad 1861–65 - Angus Konstam
COMMENTARY
UNION RIVER IRONCLAD 1861–65
INTRODUCTION
The books in this series covering the warships of the Civil War have described a range of strange-looking vessels, both iron and steel, Confederate and Union. Of these, no group of ships looked more unusual than the ironclads built by the Union to fight on the Mississippi River and its tributaries. Using the shipbuilding methods and designs developed for the commercial riverboats of the region, Union naval architects produced a type of vessel that was uniquely suited to the Mississippi theater. These river ironclads combined the attributes of contemporary mercantile riverboats with the protection of an armored iron casemate, and they carried a formidable array of the latest smoothbore and rifled guns. Although much is made of the famous battle between the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia (formerly the USS Merrimac) in March 1862, these were not the first ironclads to see action during the Civil War. Instead, the real pioneers were the ugly, cumbersome black warships of the Union Western Gunboat Flotilla who contested the waters of the Mississippi River bordering Confederate territory, and who attacked Fort Henry and Fort Donelson guarding the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers in February 1862.
These ironclad turtles
lacked the glamor of the USS Monitor, and apart from a brief campaign fighting the CSS Arkansas around Vicksburg, Mississippi, none saw action in a dramatic engagement with other ironclads. Even the fighting against the Arkansas was less than glorious for the Union fleet, as it resulted in the near-loss of the ironclad USS Carondolet, and the temporary humiliation of the rest of the Western Gunboat Flotilla. Despite this, the ironclads on America’s western waters were the real arbiters of victory in the Civil War. Without them the Union would have been virtually unable to reduce the Confederate forts guarding the Mississippi River and its main tributaries (the Cumberland, Tennessee, Yazoo and Red Rivers), and it would have been hard-pressed to support the advance of Union armies into the Confederate heartlands in the Western Theater.
The City class ironclad USS Cairo, photographed on the Mississippi River in 1862. It has been suggested that the port is Cairo, Illinois, the forward base used by the Navy for the attacks on Fort Henry, Fort Donelson, and Island No. 10. Like most of her class, her casemate was ringed with up to 16 heavy guns. (USNHC)
Above all, the Union river ironclads which saw active service in the Mississippi campaign proved superior to the array of forts, heavy artillery, gunboats and torpedoes (mines) which the Confederates relied upon to block any Union advance down the strategically vital artery of the Mississippi River. Although they lacked the thick armor found on contemporary ocean-going Union monitors or even on most Confederate ironclads, they were well suited to their environment, and their fragility was more than compensated for by their sheer versatility. Above all, they proved to be highly effective strategic tools, a crucial element in the concerted attack by land and river which split the Confederacy in two and decided the outcome of the war.
DESIGN
Background
The strategic need for a Union fleet on the Mississippi River and its tributaries has already been dealt with in this series (Osprey New Vanguard Series 49: Mississippi River Gunboats of the American Civil War 1861–65), so to avoid repetition we will only provide a brief summary of the situation. The Anaconda Plan
devised by General Winfield Scott, President Abraham Lincoln, and Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles was a strategy that envisioned the slow strangulation of the Confederacy, and the reduction of the ability of the secessionist states to wage war. It involved two main elements: the naval blockade of the Southern coastline, from the Potomac River to the Rio Grande, and the division of the Confederacy in two along the axis of the Mississippi River. The latter element called for a drive by land and naval forces southwards from Illinois and Missouri (supported by ancillary drives into Kentucky and Tennessee along the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers), and a second assault from the Gulf of Mexico. This would involve the capture of New Orleans to seal off the river, then it would continue northwards to link up with the Union forces heading south. By wresting control of the Mississippi River from the South, the Union would split the Confederacy in two, and deny it access to the produce, resources and manpower of Texas and the trans-Mississippi regions.
A Union seaman serving in the Western Gunboat Flotilla during the first years of the war. Although rarer on the Mississippi Theater than on the Atlantic coast, a number of black sailors served in the US Navy during the war. (Author’s collection)
What the strategic plan failed to take into account was the lack of resources to carry out the task. Although the United States of America was a burgeoning industrial giant in 1861, and most of this industrial capacity was concentrated in the North, it would take time for this to begin producing the weapons of war needed to put