Russell Main, Moses Cho, Jan van Aardt, and Bongani Majeke
Chlorophyll
Red band 630 – 685 657
absorption
Plant-biomass
NIR band 845 – 890 867
estimates
(690
(520
nm)
nm)
Slide 4
Materials and Methods
• Study site
• KwaZulu-Natal midlands, South Africa
• 4 year old E. grandis
• Site qualities (good, medium, poor) based
on Total Available Water (TAW) in soil
(Smith 2005)
• Spectral measurements
• ASD spectroradiometer
• Using a cherry picker
• Four measurements using 250 at 1m to
1.5m above canopy
• 68 canopies sampled
Slide 5
KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750
Slide 11 Wavelength (nm)
Not significant Significant
Results
• Assessing differences in site quality
• ANOVA results
Datt Index
(R850+R710) / (R850-R680)
Datt Index 2
R850 / R710
Slide 12
0.43
Results 0.42
0.41
0.40
0.38
0.37
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.33
Good Medium Poor
Site quality
a) ASD MSI
0.955 0.090
F(2, 65)=4.1383, p=.02034
F(2, 65)=4.8543, p=.01084 0.085
0.950
0.080
0.070
0.940 0.065
0.060
0.935
0.055
0.050
0.930
0.045
0.925 0.040
Good Medium Poor Good Medium Poor
Site quality Site quality
Slide 13
b) AVIRIS WI c) HyMap NDWI
0.78 722.4
F(2, 65)=7.4464, p=.00123
722.2
F(2, 65)=5.0739, p=.00896
0.77
722.0
721.8
0.76
0.75 721.4
721.2
0.74 721.0
720.8
0.73
720.6
720.4
0.72
720.2
0.71 720.0
Good Medium Poor Good Medium Poor
Site quality Site quality
a) Hyperion Datt Index b) AVIRIS linear four point interpolation REP
0.80 724.2
F(2, 65)=7.7075, p=.00099
F(2, 65)=5.1974, p=.00806 724.0
0.79
723.8
723.6
0.77 723.4
723.2
0.76
723.0
0.75
722.8
0.74
Good Medium Poor 722.6
Good Medium Poor
Slide 14 Site quality © CSIR 2008 www.csir.co.za
Site quality
c) SumbandilaSat Datt Index d) HyMap linear four point interpolation REP
Summary
• Hyperspectral results:
• As can be expected
• Revealed the potential of water and chlorophyll spectral features for
discriminating between site qualities as defined by TAW
• Broadband (SumbandilaSat) results:
• Reduced number of spectral features
• However, two broadband chlorophyll-related indices were successful
• These two involved the Red Edge band (690-730nm)
• In line with literature (i.e. Datt 1999; Coops 2003; Mutanga 2004)
• Xanthophyll-related indices found no significant differences
• Canopy-scale relationships sensitive to canopy structure, soil
noise, atmospheric effects etc.
• The CSIR
Materials and methods
• Results
Using foliar nutrient
concentrations
Using predicted foliar nutrient
concentrations
Using spectral indices
Slide 20 © CSIR 2008 www.csir.co.za
Background (Cont.)
Carnegie Airborne Observatory
• Landscape level
LIDAR
• Sumbandila satellite:
• Multi-spectral sensor
• 6 bands – 2 are experimental
i.e. red edge (690 – 730nm) and
xanthophyll bands (520 – 540nm)
• 6.25m spatial resolution
Chlorophyll indices
R700/R675 0.55 0.67 0.62 0.36 0.95
R750/R550 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.68
R750 / R700 0.01* 0.01* 0.01* 0.04*
Xanthophyll indices
Background
Slide 28
Formula Physiological significance References
Water-related indices
Chlorophyll indices
• ANOVA results
Slide 30
Results
• Assessing differences in site quality using broadband indices
• Only four of the chlorophyll-related indices and none of the water-related
indices could be calculated
Slide 31