Bluefield State College

Shelia Sargent-Martin (as private and confidential)

Course Evaluation Results

Dear Dr. Sargent-Martin, This email contains evaluation results for The Reading Process / SEEQ1: The global indicators are listed first, followed by the individual average values, consisting of the following scales: - LEARNING - ENTHUSIASM - ORGANIZATION - GROUP INTERACTION - INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT - BREADTH - EXAMINATIONS - ASSIGNMENTS - OVERALL In the second part of the analysis the average values of all individual questions are listed. Your Class Climate Administrator

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

Shelia Sargent-Martin
The Reading Process (S12202881) No. of responses = 21

Overall indicators

Global Index
1. LEARNING ( = 0.91) 2. ENTHUSIASM ( = 0.94) 3. ORGANIZATION ( = 0.85) 4. GROUP INTERACTION ( = 0.97) 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT ( = 0.66) 6. BREADTH ( = 0.88) 7. EXAMINATIONS ( = 0.88) 8. ASSIGNMENTS ( = 0.88) 9. OVERALL ( = 0.78)

av.=4.62 dev.=0.6 av.=4.56 dev.=0.65 av.=4.69 dev.=0.57 av.=4.39 dev.=0.81 av.=4.87 dev.=0.34 av.=4.75 dev.=0.51 av.=4.65 dev.=0.54 av.=4.51 dev.=0.71 av.=4.43 dev.=0.81 av.=4.75 dev.=0.43

Legend
Question text

Relative Frequencies of answers

Left pole

Std. Dev. 25%

Mean 0% 50%

Median 0%

Quantile 25%
Right pole

1 Scale

4 Histogram

n=No. of responses av.=Mean md=Median dev.=Std. Dev. ab.=Abstention

1. LEARNING
1.1)

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

9.5%

38.1%

52.4%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.43 md=5 dev.=0.68

1
1.2)

2 0%

3 0%

4 23.8%

5 76.2%
Strongly agree

You have learned something which you consider valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.44

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 1

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

1.3)

Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

9.5%

28.6%

61.9%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.52 md=5 dev.=0.68

1
1.4)

2 4.8%

3 4.8%

4 23.8%

5 66.7%
Strongly agree

You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.52 md=5 dev.=0.81

2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

4.8%

14.3%

81%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.54

1
2.2)

2 0%

3 5%

4 20%

5 75%
Strongly agree

Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course

0%
Strongly disagree

1
2.3)

2 0%

3 0%

4 23.8%

5 76.2%
Strongly agree

n=20 av.=4.7 md=5 dev.=0.57 ab.=1 n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.44

Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor

0%
Strongly disagree

1
2.4)

2 4.8%

3 0%

4 33.3%

5 61.9%
Strongly agree

Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.52 md=5 dev.=0.75

3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)

Instructor's explanations were clear

0%
Strongly disagree

4.8%

9.5%

23.8%

61.9%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.43 md=5 dev.=0.87

1
3.2)

2 4.8%

3 9.5%

4 38.1%

5 42.9%
Strongly agree

Course materials were well-prepared and carefully explained

4.8%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.1 md=4 dev.=1.09

1
3.3)

2 0%

3 4.8%

4 33.3%

5 61.9%
Strongly agree

Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.57 md=5 dev.=0.6

1
3.4)

2 0%

3 9.5%

4 33.3%

5 57.1%
Strongly agree

Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.48 md=5 dev.=0.68

4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

0%

14.3%

85.7%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.86 md=5 dev.=0.36

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 2

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

4.2)

Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

0%

9.5%

90.5%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.9 md=5 dev.=0.3

1
4.3)

2 0%

3 0%

4 14.3%

5 85.7%
Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.86 md=5 dev.=0.36

1
4.4)

2 0%

3 0%

4 14.3%

5 85.7%
Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.86 md=5 dev.=0.36

5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)

Instructor was friendly toward individual students

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

4.8%

19%

76.2%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.71 md=5 dev.=0.56

1
5.2)

2 0%

3 0%

4 14.3%

5 85.7%
Strongly agree

Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice in or outside of class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.86 md=5 dev.=0.36

1
5.3)

2 0%

3 4.8%

4 14.3%

5 81%
Strongly agree

Instructor had genuine interest in individual students

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.54

1
5.4)

2 0%

3 4.8%

4 23.8%

5 71.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.67 md=5 dev.=0.58

6. BREADTH
6.1)

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

9.5%

23.8%

66.7%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.57 md=5 dev.=0.68

1
6.2)

2 0%

3 4.8%

4 33.3%

5 61.9%
Strongly agree

Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.57 md=5 dev.=0.6

1
6.3)

2 0%

3 0%

4 28.6%

5 71.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor presented points of view other than his/ her own when appropriate

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.71 md=5 dev.=0.46

1
6.4)

2 0%

3 0%

4 23.8%

5 76.2%
Strongly agree

Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.44

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 3

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

4.8%

14.3%

28.6%

52.4%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.29 md=5 dev.=0.9

1
7.2)

2 0%

3 4.8%

4 14.3%

5 81%
Strongly agree

Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.76 md=5 dev.=0.54

1
7.3)

2 0%

3 9.5%

4 33.3%

5 57.1%
Strongly agree

Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the instructor

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.48 md=5 dev.=0.68

8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)

Required readings/texts were valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

4.8%

9.5%

28.6%

57.1%
Strongly agree

n=21 av.=4.38 md=5 dev.=0.86

1
8.2)

2 4.8%

3 0%

4 38.1%

5 57.1%
Strongly agree

Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

0%
Strongly disagree

n=21 av.=4.48 md=5 dev.=0.75

9. OVERALL
9.1)

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...

0%
Very poor

0%

0%

38.1%

61.9%
Very good

n=21 av.=4.62 md=5 dev.=0.5

1
9.2)

2 0%

3 0%

4 19%

5 81%
Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...

0%
Very poor

n=21 av.=4.81 md=5 dev.=0.4

1
9.3)

2 0%

3 0%

4 19%

5 81%
Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...

0%
Very poor

n=21 av.=4.81 md=5 dev.=0.4

10. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS

10.1)

Assignments were true to the content of the course. I gained a lot from doing the assignments and observation hours required for the course. Enjoyed the class! Dr. Martin was fun to learn from! Great class! I truly enjoyed Dr.Martin's class. She is a wonderfule education teacher. She takes her teaching very serious and makes every single student feel special. I very much enjoyed the class and I as a student recieved a lot from the class. The only thing I have to say is that the teacher was not very organized when it came to assignments and it kind of made you worried because you never know your grade and you never really know when something is due.
06/18/2012 Class Climate evaluation Page 4

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

I wish we had deadlines on the assignments instead of just handing them out and saying due in two or three weeks. If the class was a three day class it would be more beneficial because sitting in there for that long was hard and everyone had trouble paying attention after a certain point. Mrs. Martin, it has been a priviledge to have had Mrs. Martin as a teacher, and I look forward to having her again in the future. I have learned more about the reading process than I ever knew existed. Mrs. Martin allows us to be ourselves, and she has this thing about her that makes me feel so comfortable around her. She lets us know that she has been in our shoes and she understands the nerves and butterfly feelings that we experience when teaching a lesson that we will get through it the more we do it! It has been great having her as a teacher. This was a very good class. I enjoyed it very much. She was slightly unorganized towards the end of the semester but she still had good lectures and the assignments for very beneficial to the course. she is very nice, and a good teacher. Needs to improve on giving students guidance and give more due dates and deadlines for assignments.

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 5

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

Histogram for scaled questions

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

You have learned something which you consider valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.43 dev. = 0.68

100% 75%

av. = 4.76
76%

100% 75%

av. = 4.52 dev. = 0.68 n = 21

dev. = 0.44
50% 50%

62%

50%
38%

52%

25%
10%

n = 21

25%

24%

n = 21

25%
10%

29%

You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%
67%

av. = 4.52 dev. = 0.81

100% 75% 50%

81%

av. = 4.76 dev. = 0.54

100% 75% 50%

av. = 4.7
75%

dev. = 0.57 n = 20
20%

50% 25%

24%

n = 21

25%
14%

n = 21

25%

Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor's explanations were clear

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75% 50% 25%

av. = 4.76
76%

100% 75%

av. = 4.52 dev. = 0.75

100% 75%

av. = 4.43 dev. = 0.87 n = 21

dev. = 0.44
50%

62%

62%

50%
33%

24%

n = 21

25%

n = 21

25%
10%

24%

Course materials were well-prepared and carefully explained

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.1 dev. = 1.09

100% 75%
62%

av. = 4.57 dev. = 0.6

100% 75% 50%

57% 33% 10%

av. = 4.48 dev. = 0.68 n = 21

50%
38% 43%

50%

25%
10%

n = 21

25%

33%

n = 21

25%

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75% 50% 25%

14% 86%

av. = 4.86 dev. = 0.36

100%
90%

av. = 4.9 dev. = 0.3

100% 75% 50%

86%

av. = 4.86 dev. = 0.36 n = 21

14%

75% 50%

n = 21

25%
10%

n = 21

25%

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 6

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was friendly toward individual students

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice in or outside of class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75% 50% 25%

14% 86%

av. = 4.86 dev. = 0.36

100% 75% 50%

av. = 4.71
76%

100% 75%
86%

av. = 4.86 dev. = 0.36

dev. = 0.56
50%

n = 21

25%
19%

n = 21

25%
14%

n = 21

Instructor had genuine interest in individual students

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75% 50% 25%

14% 81%

av. = 4.76 dev. = 0.54

100% 75%
71%

av. = 4.67 dev. = 0.58

100% 75%
67%

av. = 4.57 dev. = 0.68 n = 21

50%

50%

n = 21

25%

24%

n = 21

25%
10%

24%

Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/ concepts developed in class

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%
62%

av. = 4.57 dev. = 0.6

100% 75%
71%

av. = 4.71 dev. = 0.46

100% 75% 50%

av. = 4.76
76%

dev. = 0.44 n = 21

50% 25%
33%

50%

n = 21

25%

29%

n = 21

25%

24%

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the instructor

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.29 dev. = 0.9

100% 75%
81%

av. = 4.76 dev. = 0.54

100% 75% 50%

57% 33% 10%

av. = 4.48 dev. = 0.68 n = 21

50% 25%
14% 29%

52%

50%

n = 21

25%
14%

n = 21

25%

Required readings/texts were valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
Very poor Very good

100% 75% 50% 25%

10% 29% 57%

av. = 4.38 dev. = 0.86

100% 75% 50%

57% 38%

av. = 4.48 dev. = 0.75

100% 75%
62%

av. = 4.62 dev. = 0.5 n = 21

50%

n = 21

25%

n = 21

38%

25%

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 7

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good

100% 75% 50% 25%

19% 81%

av. = 4.81 dev. = 0.4

100% 75% 50%

81%

av. = 4.81 dev. = 0.4 n = 21

19%

n = 21

25%

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 8

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin The Reading Process (S12202881)

1. LEARNING
n=21 av.=4.43 n=21 av.=4.76 n=21 av.=4.52 n=21 av.=4.52

1.1)

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating You have learned something which you consider valuable Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

1.2)

1.3)

1.4)

2. ENTHUSIASM
n=21 av.=4.76 n=20 av.=4.7 n=21 av.=4.76 n=21 av.=4.52

2.1)

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

2.2)

2.3)

2.4)

3. ORGANIZATION
n=21 av.=4.43 n=21 av.=4.1 n=21 av.=4.57 n=21 av.=4.48

3.1)

Instructor's explanations were clear Course materials were well-prepared and carefully explained Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

3.2)

3.3)

3.4)

4. GROUP INTERACTION
n=21 av.=4.86 n=21 av.=4.9 n=21 av.=4.86 n=21 av.=4.86

4.1)

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

4.2)

4.3)

4.4)

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 9

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
n=21 av.=4.71 n=21 av.=4.86 n=21 av.=4.76 n=21 av.=4.67

5.1)

Instructor was friendly toward individual students Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice in or outside of class Instructor had genuine interest in individual students Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

5.2)

5.3)

5.4)

6. BREADTH
n=21 av.=4.57 n=21 av.=4.57 n=21 av.=4.71 n=21 av.=4.76

6.1)

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

6.2)

6.3)

6.4)

7. EXAMINATIONS
n=21 av.=4.29 n=21 av.=4.76 n=21 av.=4.48

7.1)

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the instructor

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

7.2)

7.3)

8. ASSIGNMENTS
n=21 av.=4.38 n=21 av.=4.48

8.1)

Required readings/texts were valuable Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree

8.2)

9. OVERALL
n=21 av.=4.62 n=21 av.=4.81 n=21 av.=4.81

9.1)

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was... Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was... Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...

Very poor Very poor Very poor

Very good Very good Very good

9.2)

9.3)

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 10

Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process

Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin The Reading Process (S12202881)

1. LEARNING 2. ENTHUSIASM 3. ORGANIZATION 4. GROUP INTERACTION 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT 6. BREADTH 7. EXAMINATIONS 8. ASSIGNMENTS 9. OVERALL

+ + + + + + + + +

av.=4.56 av.=4.69 av.=4.39 av.=4.87 av.=4.75 av.=4.65 av.=4.51 av.=4.43 av.=4.75

06/18/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 11