Background
In close collaboration with local partners, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC) of
BauhausUniversitt Weimar initiated a TurkishGerman joint research project on Seismic Risk
AssessmentandMitigationintheAntakyaMaraRegion(SERAMAR).
In this context, the instrumental investigation of buildings being representative for the study
area becomes an essential part of the project to calibrate the models and to predict reliable
capacity curves as well as scenariodependent damage pattern or failure modes. Based on
differentdecisioncriteria,threemultistoryRCframestructureshavebeenchosenandequipped
withmodernSeismicBuildingMonitoringSystems(BMS)eachofwhichconsistsoffourtriaxial
strongmotionaccelerometersoftypeMR2002+.Aftera2yeartestperiod,firstresultsfromthe
permanent instrumentation are available and provide a preliminary basis to reinterpret the
structuralresponseunderseismicaction.
Intotheprojectoneofthesebuildings(seeFig.1and2)willbeinvestigatedandmeasureddata
willbeanalyzedindetail.
Themainpurposeofthisprojectwillbetoapplyasmuchofthetheoreticalbackgroundtaught
duringthelessonsonEarthquakeEngineeringandStructuralDesignandSeismicMonitoring.
2. ObjectivesofProject
Theinterpretationofthestructuralsysteminviewofearthquakeresistance(ERD).
ThedesignandanalysisofthestructuralsystemusingthesoftwareETABSNonlinearfor
thegivenbuildinglayoutwith(a)andwithout(b)masonryinfillwalls.
Theanalysisoftheinstrumentalvibrationdatainordertoidentifydynamicstructural
parameters.
Thecomparisonoftheexperimentallygainedresultswithoutcomesofthestructural
analysis.
Theproposalofstrengtheningandretrofittingmeasures.
Page 1 of 29
3. LayoutandGeometry
Figure1.5storeybuilding
Figure2.Siteplan
Page 2 of 29
storyheight(ofeachstory)
thicknessofslabs
thicknessofstairandstairplatform
outermasonryinfillwalls
innermasonryinfillwalls
:3,00m
:0,12m
:0,15m
:0,20m
:0,20m
GridCoordinate
Ydirection
Axes
[m]
1
0.8
2
0
3
0.7
4
2.7
5
4.05
6
4.6
7
5.35
8
6.1
9
6.75
10
7.35
11
7.75
12
8.325
13
9.025
14
9.625
15
10.375
16
10.825
17
11.275
18
11.925
19
12.625
20
13.325
21
13.875
22
15.125
23
16.525
24
17.225
25
17.925
26
18.725
XDirection
Axes
[m]
A
0.8
B
0
C
0.9
D
2.2
E
3.65
F
4.375
G
5.1
H
5.8
I
7
J
7.7
K
11
L
14.3
M
15
N
15.95
O
16.9
P
17.625
Q
18.35
R
19.8
S
21.1
T
22
Table1.Gridcoordinateofstructure
Page 3 of 29
Crosssectionofstructureelements
Figure3.Crosssectionofelements
Page 4 of 29
4. MaterialProperties
ReinforcedConcrete:
Youngsmodulus
Poissonratio
Massdensity
Weight
ConcreteStrength
SteelStrength
Masonry:
Youngsmodulus
Poissonratio
Massdensity
Weight
MasonryStrength
:2,80e+07kN/m
:0,2
:2,55t/m
:25kN/m
:25.000kN/m
:420.000kN/m
:2.1e+6kN/m
:0,15
:0,918t/m
:9,0kN/m
:0.60MN/m
5. Loads
5.1 DeadLoadandLiveLoad
Basedonthepurposeoftheprojectthefollowingloadswillbeapplied:
2,0kN/montheroofasloadfortheroofconstruction
1,0kN/monthefloorslabsasloadforinterioretc.
Forthepurposeofstrengtheningandretrofittingitsnecessarytoapplyloadsaccordingto
therequirementsfromEC1andtheapplicationoftheloadcombinationsaccordingtoEC8.
Figure4.EARTHQUAKEZONESACCORDINGTOTHETURKISHNATIONALSPECIFICATIONSFROM
1998
Page 5 of 29
5.2 Designspectra(acc.toEC8)forZone1,Turkishearthquakezoningmap
TodesignabuildingtowithstandearthquakeloadingaccordingtoEC8intheinitialstagea
designordemandspectrummustbeestablishedinordertocalculatethehorizontalforces
thebuildingwillbesubjectedto.ThedesignspectrumasspecifiedinEC8dependson:the
soil type the structure is built on, the order of earthquake magnitude (Surface wave
magnitudeMS>or<=5.5),themaximumgroundaccelerationtobeexpectedatthesite.
According to the Turkish Earthquake Zoning Map in the National Specifications from 1998
(Fig. 6), the town of Antakya is located in zone 1, which poses the highest demands
regardingearthquakesafety.Thepeakgroundaccelerationgivenforthiszoneis40%g,or
3.924m/s2(4m/s2).ForthedesignshallbeusedgroundtypeB.
Ground
S
TB(s)
Tc(s)
TD(s)
Type
A
1.00
0.15
0.40
2.00
B
1.20
0.15
0.50
2.00
C
1.15
0.20
0.60
2.00
D
1.35
0.20
0.80
2.00
E
1.40
0.15
0.50
2.00
Table2.Valuefortheresponsespectratype1(acctoEC.8)
Figure5.ElasticdesignspectrumEuroCode
5.3TimeHistoryData
The time history data are taken from seismograph measurement which was placed on
basement.Inthiscalculation,thechannel3onbasementandchannel1onthetopareused
tohaveresponsespectrawhichisdisplayedasfollowinggraphsbelow:
Page 6 of 29
figure6.ResponseSpectrumrecordedfromTopandBottomChannel
Page 7 of 29
Figure7.ResponseSpectrafromMatlab
Page 8 of 29
6. CalibrationofResponseSpectra
According to the Time History data above, before doing Pushover with ETABS software, we
shouldcalibratetheresponsespectrawhichareproducedbyMATLABandETABS.Iftheresultis
relativelysimilar,itmeans,thematerialpropertiesanddimensionofstructurearenearlyreality.
Figure8.CalibrationofresponsespectrabetweenMatlabandEtabs
Page 9 of 29
7. Wallasstructuralelements
Reliable predictions of the seismic response of building structures with infilled frames are not
possiblewithouttakingintoaccounttheeffectsofinfills.Unfortunately,modernseismiccodes,
includingEurocode8,neglecttheseeffectsortakethemintoaccounttoaverylimitedextent.
Themainreasonforthissituationisthelackofasimpleandrobustnumericalmethodologyfor
analysisanddesignofframestructureswithinfills.
AccordingtoFEMA306,thediagonalbracesforinfilliscalculatedasfollowingbelow:
Effectivewidthofdiagonal(a)
0.4
1 col
inf
14
Where:
h
me inf
= tan 1 inf
Linf
fe col inf
tinf
=Thicknessofinfillpanelandequivalentstrut
Eme
=Expectedmodulusofelasticityofinfillmaterial(2.10e+6)
Efe
=Expectedmodulusofelasticityofframematerial
Icol
=Momentofinertialofcolumn
a = 0.175 ( .h
.r
E .t .sin 2
=
4.E I h
Bracing
1
2
3
4
a
[m]
0.563
0.485
0.475
0.798
0.693
0.4335
0.6449
0.6462
0.3629
0.3224
hcol
rinf
[m]
3
3
3
3
3
[m]
3.57
3.61
3.54
4.72
3.91
Eme
tinf
2
[kN/m ]
2.10E+06
2.10E+06
2.10E+06
2.10E+06
2.10E+06
[m]
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
Efe
Icol
2
[kN/m ]
2.80E+07
2.80E+07
2.80E+07
2.80E+07
2.80E+07
[m ]
0.0425
0.0087
0.0086
0.0778
0.0683
hinf
Linf
[m]
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
[m]
2.55
2.60
2.50
4.00
3.00
Table3.Infillcalculation
8. Period
Page 10 of 29
0.775
0.766
0.785
0.559
0.695
sin 2
1.000
0.999
1.000
0.899
0.984
9. PushoverDesign
9.1 CapacitySpectrumMethod
Tousethecapacityspectrummethoditisnecessarytoconvertthecapacitycurve,whichis
intermsofbaseshearandroofdisplacementtowhatiscalledacapacityspectrum,whichis
a representation of the capacity curve in AccelerationDisplacement Response Spectra
(ADRS)format.Therequiredequationstomakethetransformationare:
mii
i1
= N
N
wi
2
g mii1
i =1 i =1
2
Sa Vb 1
=
g
w
Sd =
1 = MPF1 =
m
m
i i1
2
i i1
roof
MPF1 roof 1
Where:
MPF1 =ModalParticipationFactorforthefirstnaturalmode.
=modalmasscoefficientforthefirstnaturalmode
1
Wi/g =massassignedtoleveli
=amplitudeofmode1atleveli
i1
N
=LevelN,thelevelwhichistheuppermostinthemainportionofthestructure.
V
=baseshear
W
=Buildingloadweightpluslikelyliveloads
roof =roofdisplacement(Vandtheassociatedroofmakeuppointsonthecapacity
curve
Sa
=Spectralacceleration
Sd
= Spectral displacement (Sa and the associated Sd make up points on the
capacityspectrum
9.2 DemandSpectrum
The general process for converting the capacity curve to the capacity spectrum, that is,
converting the capacity curve into the ADRS format, is to first calculate the modal
participationfactor(MPF1)andthemodalmasscoefficienta1usingequationabove.Then
foreachpointonthecapacitycurve,V,droof,calculatetheassociatedpointSa,Sdonthe
capacityspectrumusingequationsabovetoo.
IntheADRSformat,linesradiatingfromtheoriginhaveconstantperiod.Foranypointon
theADRSspectrum,theperiod,T,canbecomputedusing
Page 11 of 29
T = 2
Sd
S
T 2 = 4 2 d
Sa
Sa
Thenthespectraldisplacementis S d =
T 2 Sa
4 2
Whenperiodintheinelasticdisplacement,therelationbetweenspectralaccelerationand
displacementis
Sa Cv
=
=
g
T
Cv
2
Sd
Sa
Cv 2
Sa Cv 2 x9,81 0.248Cv 2
Sa 2
=
=
=
g 2 4 2 Sd
g
4 2 * S d
Sd
Sa
AccordingtoEuroCode8
Cv = ag * S * * 2.5* Tc
Figure9.IllustrationofDemandSpectrum
9.3 ConstructionofBilinearRepresentationofCapacitySpectrum
Abilinearrepresentationofthecapacityspectrumisneededtoestimatetheeffectivedamping
and appropriate reduction of spectral demand. Construction of the bilinear representation
requires definition of the point api and dpi. This point is the trial performance point which is
estimatedbytheengineertodevelopareduceddemandresponsespectrum.
Page 12 of 29
Ifthereducedresponsespectrumisfoundtointersectthecapacityspectrumattheestimated
api, dpi point, then that point is the performance point. The first estimate of point api, dpi is
designatedap1,dp1,thesecondpointap2,dp2,andsoon.
figure10.Illustrationofbilinearcalculation
a' ay
d' dy
Atpointapi,dpi,thenthegradientofpascaelasticiscomputedby:
Postyieldslope=
a pi a y
d pi d y
Becauseofgradientisconstant,then:
(a a )(d
'
api=
y
'
pi
d dy
dy )
+ ay
Page 13 of 29
Figure11.Derivationofdampingforspectralreduction
Figure12.DerivationofenergydissipatedbyDamping,ED
ED=4*(api.dpi2A12A22A3)
=4*(apidpiaydy(dpidy)(apiay)2dy(apiay))
=4*(aydpidyapi)
Accordingtothegraphabove,
Eso=apidpi/2
o=
63.7 ( a y d pi d y a pi )
1 4 ( a y d pi d y a pi )
=
4
a pi d pi 2
a pi d pi
Effectiveviscousdampingis:
eff=5+k0= 5 +
63.7 (a y d pi d y a pi )
a pi d pi
Page 14 of 29
Performance point
Capacity spectrum
5% Damped response spectrum
a'
ay
dy
d'
Spectral displacements, inches
Figure13.Performancepoint
Valuefordampingmodificationfactor()
StructuralBehaviorFactor
16.25
1.0
>16.25
TypeA
1.13
0.51( a y d pi d y d pi )
25
>25
TypeB
TypeC
a pi d pi
0.67
0.845
Anyvalue
0.446 ( a y d pi d y d pi )
a pi d pi
0.33
Table4.Valuefordampingmodificationfactor()
9.4 NumericalDerivationofSpectralReductions
Theequationsforthereductionfactorsofacceleration(SRA)andvelocity(SRV)aregivenby:
SRA =
SRV =
3, 21 0, 68ln ( eff
2,12
Page 15 of 29
StructuralBehaviorType
SRA
SRv
TypeA
0.33
0.5
TypeB
0.44
0.56
TypeC
0.56
0.67
Table5.Structuralbehaviorvalue
Figure14.illustrationofPerformancepointdetermination
WhenPeriodof5%dampedspectrumisinaccelerationrange,then
Sa
= 2,5SRA C A
g
Whenperiod(Ts)of5%dampedspectrumstartschangingfromconstantaccelerationrangeto
constantvelocityrange,then
Ts =
SRv * Cv
Sa
Sd =
T
= Sa s
2
2
Sa
Ts = 2
Sd
Sa
SR
*C
.g 1
SR
*C
SR
*C
Sa
v v
v v =
v v =
=
2
g
Ts
Sd
Sd
4
2
Sa
Page 16 of 29
9.5 PushoverMethods
In the general case, determination of the performance point requires a trial and error search.
Therearethreedifferentproceduresthatstandardizeandsimplifythisiterativeprocess.These
alternate procedures are all based on the same concepts and mathematical relationships but
vary in their dependence on analytical versus graphical techniques. These procedures are
followingbelow:
1. ProcedureA
ProcedureAistrulyiterative,butisformulabasedandeasilycanbeprogrammedintoa
spreadsheet. It is more an analytical method than a graphical method. It may be the
bestmethodforbeginnersbecauseitisthemostdirectapplicationofthemethodology,
andconsequentlyistheeasiestproceduretounderstand.
2. ProcedureB
Simplificationisintroducedinthebilinearmodelingofthecapacitycurvethatenablesa
relativelydirectsolutionfortheperformancepointwithlittleiteration.Likeprocedure
A,procedureBismoreananalyticalmethodthanagraphicalmethod.ProcedureBmay
bealesstransparentapplicationofthemethodologythanprocedureA.
3. ProcedureC
Procedure C is a pure graphical method to find the performance point, similar to the
originallyconceivedcapacityspectrummethod,andisconsistentwiththeconceptsand
mathematicalrelationships.Itisthemostconvenientmethodforhandanalysis.Itisnot
particularly convenient for spreadsheet programming. It is the least transparent
applicationofthemethodology.
10 PushOverResults
10.1
StructurewithInfill
10.1.1 XDirection
10.1.1.1 ProcedureA
Page 17 of 29
CapacitySpectrum
Point
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.00E+00
3.78E+00
7.64E+03
1.47E+04
2.15E+04
2.82E+04
3.44E+04
V/W
2.21E-05
3.58E-05
3.06E-02
6.19E-02
9.43E-02
1.27E-01
1.58E-01
MPF1
0
0.0003
0.5474
1.057
1.5443
2.0239
2.4685
1
0.312
1.322
1.319
1.317
1.313
1.311
1
0.12
0.753
0.757
0.756
0.755
0.754
Sa
Sd
0
0.002255
0.726943
1.39636
2.042777
2.680603
3.273854
2.21E-05
0.000115
0.023147
0.046929
0.071602
0.096497
0.120366
#DIV/0!
0.0721
0.0571
0.0586
0.0599
0.0607
0.0613
DemandSpectrum
T
[sec]
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Sa/g
[m/s 2]
0.432
0.648
0.865
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.081
1.009
0.925
0.854
0.793
0.740
0.694
0.653
0.616
0.584
0.555
Sd
[m]
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.006
0.011
0.017
0.025
0.034
0.044
0.055
0.068
0.077
0.084
0.091
0.098
0.105
0.112
0.119
0.126
0.134
0.141
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.35
1.40
1.45
1.50
1.55
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.75
1.80
1.85
1.90
1.95
2.00
2.05
2.10
2.15
2.20
2.25
2.30
2.35
2.40
2.45
2.50
0.528
0.504
0.482
0.462
0.444
0.427
0.411
0.396
0.383
0.370
0.358
0.347
0.336
0.326
0.317
0.308
0.300
0.292
0.285
0.277
0.264
0.252
0.240
0.229
0.219
0.210
0.201
0.193
0.185
0.178
0.148
0.155
0.162
0.169
0.176
0.183
0.190
0.197
0.204
0.211
0.218
0.225
0.232
0.239
0.246
0.253
0.260
0.267
0.274
0.281
0.295
0.310
0.325
0.340
0.356
0.372
0.388
0.405
0.422
0.439
2.55
2.60
2.65
2.70
2.75
2.80
2.85
2.90
2.95
3.00
3.05
3.10
3.15
3.20
3.25
3.30
3.35
3.40
3.45
3.50
3.55
3.60
3.65
3.70
3.75
3.80
3.85
3.90
3.95
4.00
0.171
0.164
0.158
0.152
0.147
0.142
0.137
0.132
0.128
0.123
0.119
0.115
0.112
0.108
0.105
0.102
0.099
0.096
0.093
0.091
0.088
0.086
0.083
0.081
0.079
0.077
0.075
0.073
0.071
0.069
0.457
0.475
0.493
0.512
0.531
0.551
0.571
0.591
0.612
0.632
0.654
0.675
0.697
0.720
0.742
0.765
0.789
0.812
0.836
0.861
0.886
0.911
0.936
0.962
0.988
1.015
1.042
1.069
1.096
1.124
Page 18 of 29
ay
dy
api
dpi
o
eff
SRA
SRV
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.59
0.018517
1.117852
0.037035
1.770721
1
6.770721
0.900673
0.924746
Accordingtographabove,performancepointisatintersectionpointwhichis:
api=1.1178m/s2
dpi=0.037m
Page 19 of 29
10.1.1.2
ProcedureB
ef f
5.4642
6.7683
6.5442
6.2988
6.1075
5.9613
Sa/g
1.1633
1.0809
1.0939
0.9269
0.8044
0.7103
5
10
15
20
5.4642
6.7683
6.5442
6.2988
6.1075
SRA
0.9979
0.7756
0.6455
0.5533
0.9694
0.9008
0.9116
0.9238
0.9337
SRV
1.0001
0.8278
0.7271
0.6556
0.9780
0.9248
0.9332
0.9427
0.9504
Sa
1.1975
0.9307
0.7746
0.6639
1.1633
1.0809
1.0939
1.1086
1.1205
Ts
0.5011
0.5337
0.5632
0.5925
0.5044
0.5133
0.5119
0.5102
0.5089
Sd
0.0762
0.0671
0.0622
0.0590
0.0750
0.0722
0.0726
0.0731
0.0735
5.9613
0.9415
0.9564
1.1298
0.5079
0.0738
b eff
5%
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
o
0.464154
1.768279
1.54417
1.298755
1.107466
0.961262
api
0.6323
1.2024
1.7725
2.3426
2.9127
3.4828
dpi
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Sd
0
0.5011
0.6011
0.7011
0.8011
0.9011
1.0011
1.1011
1.2011
1.3011
1.4011
1.5011
1.6011
1.7011
1.8011
1.9011
2.0011
2.1011
2.2011
2.3011
2.4011
2.5011
2.6011
2.7011
2.8011
0
0.0762
0.0914
0.1066
0.1218
0.1370
0.1522
0.1674
0.1826
0.1978
0.2130
0.2282
0.2434
0.2586
0.2738
0.2890
0.3042
0.3194
0.3346
0.3498
0.3649
0.3801
0.3953
0.4105
0.4257
10%
15%
20%
Sa/g
T
Sd
Sa/g
T
Sd
Sa/g
T
Sd
Sa/g
1.1975
0
0.9307
0
0.7746
0
0.6639
1.1975
0.5337
0.0671
0.9307
0.5632
0.0622
0.7746
0.5925
0.0590
0.6639
0.9983
0.6337
0.0797
0.7838
0.6632
0.0733
0.6578
0.6925
0.0690
0.5680
0.8559
0.7337
0.0923
0.6770
0.7632
0.0843
0.5716
0.7925
0.0790
0.4964
0.7490
0.8337
0.1049
0.5958
0.8632
0.0954
0.5054
0.8925
0.0889
0.4407
0.6659
0.9337
0.1175
0.5320
0.9632
0.1064
0.4529
0.9925
0.0989
0.3963
0.5994
1.0337
0.1301
0.4805
1.0632
0.1175
0.4103
1.0925
0.1089
0.3601
0.5450
1.1337
0.1426
0.4381
1.1632
0.1285
0.3751
1.1925
0.1188
0.3299
0.4996
1.2337
0.1552
0.4026
1.2632
0.1396
0.3454
1.2925
0.1288
0.3043
0.4612
1.3337
0.1678
0.3724
1.3632
0.1506
0.3200
1.3925
0.1387
0.2825
0.4283
1.4337
0.1804
0.3465
1.4632
0.1617
0.2982
1.4925
0.1487
0.2636
0.3997
1.5337
0.1930
0.3239
1.5632
0.1727
0.2791
1.5925
0.1587
0.2470
0.3748
1.6337
0.2055
0.3040
1.6632
0.1838
0.2623
1.6925
0.1686
0.2324
0.3527
1.7337
0.2181
0.2865
1.7632
0.1948
0.2474
1.7925
0.1786
0.2194
0.3332
1.8337
0.2307
0.2709
1.8632
0.2059
0.2341
1.8925
0.1886
0.2079
0.3156
1.9337
0.2433
0.2569
1.9632
0.2169
0.2222
1.9925
0.1985
0.1974
0.2999
2.0337
0.2559
0.2442
2.0632
0.2280
0.2114
2.0925
0.2085
0.1880
0.2856
2.1337
0.2685
0.2328
2.1632
0.2390
0.2017
2.1925
0.2185
0.1794
0.2726
2.2337
0.2810
0.2224
2.2632
0.2501
0.1928
2.2925
0.2284
0.1716
0.2608
2.3337
0.2936
0.2128
2.3632
0.2611
0.1846
2.3925
0.2384
0.1644
0.2499
2.4337
0.3062
0.2041
2.4632
0.2722
0.1771
2.4925
0.2484
0.1578
0.2399
2.5337
0.3188
0.1960
2.5632
0.2832
0.1702
2.5925
0.2583
0.1517
0.2307
2.6337
0.3314
0.1886
2.6632
0.2943
0.1638
2.6925
0.2683
0.1461
0.2222
2.7337
0.3439
0.1817
2.7632
0.3053
0.1579
2.7925
0.2782
0.1409
0.2142
2.8337
0.3565
0.1753
2.8632
0.3164
0.1524
2.8925
0.2882
0.1360
Page 20 of 29
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0
0.5044
0.6044
0.7044
0.8044
0.9044
1.0044
1.1044
1.2044
1.3044
1.4044
1.5044
1.6044
1.7044
1.8044
1.9044
2.0044
2.1044
2.2044
2.3044
2.4044
2.5044
2.6044
2.7044
2.8044
5.46
Sd
0
0.0750
0.0898
0.1047
0.1196
0.1344
0.1493
0.1642
0.1790
0.1939
0.2088
0.2236
0.2385
0.2533
0.2682
0.2831
0.2979
0.3128
0.3277
0.3425
0.3574
0.3723
0.3871
0.4020
0.4169
Sa/g
1.1633
1.1633
0.9709
0.8330
0.7295
0.6488
0.5842
0.5313
0.4872
0.4499
0.4178
0.3901
0.3657
0.3443
0.3252
0.3081
0.2928
0.2788
0.2662
0.2546
0.2441
0.2343
0.2253
0.2170
0.2092
T
0
0.5133
0.6133
0.7133
0.8133
0.9133
1.0133
1.1133
1.2133
1.3133
1.4133
1.5133
1.6133
1.7133
1.8133
1.9133
2.0133
2.1133
2.2133
2.3133
2.4133
2.5133
2.6133
2.7133
2.8133
6.77
Sd
0
0.0722
0.0862
0.1003
0.1143
0.1284
0.1424
0.1565
0.1705
0.1846
0.1987
0.2127
0.2268
0.2408
0.2549
0.2689
0.2830
0.2970
0.3111
0.3252
0.3392
0.3533
0.3673
0.3814
0.3954
Sa/g
1.0809
1.0809
0.9047
0.7779
0.6822
0.6075
0.5476
0.4984
0.4573
0.4225
0.3926
0.3667
0.3439
0.3239
0.3060
0.2900
0.2756
0.2626
0.2507
0.2399
0.2299
0.2208
0.2123
0.2045
0.1972
T
0
0.5119
0.6119
0.7119
0.8119
0.9119
1.0119
1.1119
1.2119
1.3119
1.4119
1.5119
1.6119
1.7119
1.8119
1.9119
2.0119
2.1119
2.2119
2.3119
2.4119
2.5119
2.6119
2.7119
2.8119
6.54
Sd
0
0.0726
0.0868
0.1010
0.1151
0.1293
0.1435
0.1577
0.1719
0.1861
0.2002
0.2144
0.2286
0.2428
0.2570
0.2712
0.2853
0.2995
0.3137
0.3279
0.3421
0.3563
0.3704
0.3846
0.3988
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0
0.5102
0.6102
0.7102
0.8102
0.9102
1.0102
1.1102
1.2102
1.3102
1.4102
1.5102
1.6102
1.7102
1.8102
1.9102
2.0102
2.1102
2.2102
2.3102
2.4102
2.5102
2.6102
2.7102
2.8102
6.30
Sd
0
0.0731
0.0874
0.1018
0.1161
0.1304
0.1447
0.1591
0.1734
0.1877
0.2020
0.2164
0.2307
0.2450
0.2594
0.2737
0.2880
0.3023
0.3167
0.3310
0.3453
0.3596
0.3740
0.3883
0.4026
Sa/g
1.1086
1.1086
0.9269
0.7964
0.6981
0.6214
0.5599
0.5095
0.4674
0.4317
0.4011
0.3745
0.3513
0.3307
0.3125
0.2961
0.2814
0.2680
0.2559
0.2448
0.2347
0.2253
0.2167
0.2087
0.2013
T
0
0.5089
0.6089
0.7089
0.8089
0.9089
1.0089
1.1089
1.2089
1.3089
1.4089
1.5089
1.6089
1.7089
1.8089
1.9089
2.0089
2.1089
2.2089
2.3089
2.4089
2.5089
2.6089
2.7089
2.8089
6.11
Sd
0
0.0735
0.0879
0.1024
0.1168
0.1313
0.1457
0.1602
0.1746
0.1891
0.2035
0.2179
0.2324
0.2468
0.2613
0.2757
0.2902
0.3046
0.3190
0.3335
0.3479
0.3624
0.3768
0.3913
0.4057
Sa/g
1.1205
1.1205
0.9365
0.8044
0.7049
0.6274
0.5652
0.5142
0.4717
0.4356
0.4047
0.3779
0.3544
0.3337
0.3152
0.2987
0.2838
0.2704
0.2581
0.2470
0.2367
0.2273
0.2186
0.2105
0.2030
T
0
0.5079
0.6079
0.7079
0.8079
0.9079
1.0079
1.1079
1.2079
1.3079
1.4079
1.5079
1.6079
1.7079
1.8079
1.9079
2.0079
2.1079
2.2079
2.3079
2.4079
2.5079
2.6079
2.7079
2.8079
5.96
Sd
0
0.0738
0.0884
0.1029
0.1174
0.1320
0.1465
0.1610
0.1756
0.1901
0.2046
0.2192
0.2337
0.2482
0.2628
0.2773
0.2919
0.3064
0.3209
0.3355
0.3500
0.3645
0.3791
0.3936
0.4081
Sa/g
1.0939
1.0939
0.9151
0.7866
0.6897
0.6140
0.5534
0.5036
0.4620
0.4268
0.3966
0.3704
0.3474
0.3271
0.3090
0.2929
0.2783
0.2651
0.2531
0.2422
0.2322
0.2229
0.2144
0.2065
0.1991
Sa/g
1.1298
1.1298
0.9440
0.8106
0.7103
0.6320
0.5693
0.5179
0.4751
0.4387
0.4076
0.3806
0.3569
0.3360
0.3174
0.3008
0.2858
0.2722
0.2599
0.2486
0.2383
0.2288
0.2200
0.2119
0.2044
Page 21 of 29
Accordingtographabove,performancepointisatintersectionpointwhichis:
api=1.096m/s2
dpi=0.036m
Page 22 of 29
10.1.2 YDirection
10.1.2.1
ProcedureA
ay
dy
api
dpi
ef f
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.6
0.026996
1.19318
0.053992
0.182048
1
5.182048
SRA
0.986445
SRV
0.991193
Page 23 of 29
10.1.2.2
ProcedureB
Accordingtographabove,performancepointisatintersectionpointwhichis:
api=1.161m/s2
dpi=0.052m
Page 24 of 29
10.2
StructurewithoutInfill
10.2.1 XDirection
10.2.1.1
ProcedureA
ay
dy
api
dpi
ef f
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.57
0.022248
1.087105
0.044496
1.549721
1
6.549721
SRA
0.911317
SRV
0.932992
Page 25 of 29
10.2.1.2 ProcedureB
Accordingtographabove,performancepointisatintersectionpointwhichis:
api=1.066m/s2
dpi=0.044m
Page 26 of 29
10.2.2 YDirection
10.2.2.1
ProcedureA
ay
dy
api
dpi
ef f
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.58
0.029311
1.112116
0.058622
1.371347
1
6.371347
SRA
0.920174
SRV
0.939853
Page 27 of 29
10.2.2.2ProcedureB
Accordingtographabove,performancepointisatintersectionpointwhichis:
api=0.932m/s2
dpi=0.047m
Page 28 of 29
11. Conclusions
1. Accordingtotheallpushoverresultsabove,wecouldconcludeandcompareallthe
performancepointsforeachconditionasfollowingbelow:
PerformancePointForAllPossibilities
Etabs
ProcedureB
ExpectedError
EtabsandProcA
api
dpi
EtabsandProcB
api
dpi
0.01%
0.00%
2.20%
0.10%
0.00%
0.11%
3.20%
0.30%
3.30%
0.20%
5.40%
0.20%
1.06%
0.70%
0.10%
api
2
[m/s ]
XDirection
withinfill
YDirection
withinfill
XDirection
withoutinfill
YDirection
withoutinfill
ProcedureA
dpi
[m]
api
2
[m/s ]
dpi
[m]
api
2
[m/s ]
dpi
[m]
2.
3.
4.
5.
ItcanbeclearlyseenthattheerrormarginbetweenEtabsandmanualcalculationare
nearlysimilarwhichisinterpretedbyerrorestimationvalue.
Accordingtotheregulation,thetolerancecriterionismoreless5%thantheexact
result.
BeforeworkingthepushoverbyETABS,weshouldcalibratetheresponsespectrawhich
aregeneratedbyMATLABandETABS.Theresponsespectragraphsshouldbenearly
similarbetweeneachothers.Itcanbedonebymodifyingthematerialpropertiesor
stiffnessofthestructuresintheETABS.
ProcedureBisrelativelymoreaccuratethantheprocedureAeventhoughitwillspeeda
lotoftimethantheprocedureA.
ProcedureCisrecommendedtobecalculatedasanadditionalcomparisonofthe
performancepointresults.
Accordingtotheperiodtableabove,thestructurewithinfillismuchrigidthanthe
structurewithoutinfill.
Page 29 of 29