Right
Attitude
for
making
Better
Predictions:
Be
Foxy
While
the
experts
performance
was
poor
in
the
aggregate,
however,
Tetlock
found
that
some
had
done
better
than
others.
On
the
losing
side
were
those
experts
whose
predictions
were
cited
most
frequently
in
the
media.
The
more
interviews
that
an
expert
had
done
with
the
press,
Tetlock
found,
the
worse
his
predictions
tended
to
be.
Another
subgroup
of
experts
had
done
relatively
well,
however,
Tetlock,
with
his
training
as
a
psychologist,
had
been
interested
in
the
experts
cognitive
styles
how
they
thought
about
the
world.
So
he
administered
some
questions
lifted
from
personality
tests
to
all
the
experts.
On
the
basis
of
their
responses
to
these
questions,
Tetlock
was
able
to
classify
his
experts
along
a
spectrum
between
what
he
called
hedgehogs
and
foxes.
The
reference
to
hedgehogs
and
foxes
comes
from
the
title
of
an
Isaiah
Berlin
essay
on
the
Russian
novelist
Leo
Tolstoy
The
Hedgehog
and
the
Fox.
Berlin
had
in
turn
borrowed
his
title
from
a
passage
attributed
to
the
Greek
poet
Archilochus:
The
fox
knows
many
little
things,
but
the
hedgehog
knows
one
big
thing.
Unless
you
are
a
fan
of
Tolstoy
or
of
flowery
prose
youll
have
no
particular
reason
to
read
Berlins
essay.
But
the
basic
idea
is
that
writers
and
thinkers
can
be
divided
into
two
broad
categories:
Hedgehogs
are
type
A
personalities
who
believe
in
Big
Ideas
in
governing
principles
about
the
world
that
behave
as
thought
they
were
physical
laws
and
undergird
virtually
every
interaction
in
society.
Think
Karl
Marx
and
class
struggle,
or
Sigmund
Freud
and
the
unconscious.
Or
Malcolm
Gladwell
and
the
tipping
point.
Foxes,
on
the
other
hand,
are
scrappy
creatures
who
believe
in
a
plethora
of
little
ideas
and
in
taking
a
multitude
of
approaches
to
a
problem.
They
tend
to
be
more
tolerant
of
nuance,
uncertainty,
complexity
and
dissenting
opinion.
If
hedgehogs
are
hunters,
always
looking
out
for
the
big
kill,
then
foxes
are
gatherers.
Foxes,
Tetlock
found,
are
considerably
better
at
forecasting
that
hedgehogs.
They
had
come
closer
to
the
mark
on
the
Soviet
Union,
for
instance.
Rather
than
seeing
the
USSR
in
highly
ideological
terms
as
an
intrinsically
evil
empire,
or
as
a
relatively
successful
(or
even
admirable)
example
of
a
Marxist
economic
system
they
instead
saw
it
for
what
it
was:
an
increasingly
dysfunctional
nation
that
was
in
danger
of
coming
apart
at
the
seams.
Whereas
the
hedgehogs
forecasts
were
barely
any
better
than
random
chance,
the
foxes
demonstrated
predictive
skill.
Silver,
Nate.
The
Signal
and
The
Noise
Why
so
many
Predictions
Fail
but
some
dont.
The
Penguin
Press,
New
York,
2012.
Pages
53
&
54.