1 Overview
A passive optical network (PON) features a point-to-multi-point (P2MP) architecture to provide broadband access. The P2MP architecture has become the most popular solution for FTTx deployment among operators. PON-based FTTx has been widely deployed ever since 2004 when ITU-T Study Group 15 Q2 completed recommendations that defined GPON system [ITU-T series G.984]. As full services are provisioned by the massive deployment of PON networks worldwide, operators expect more from PONs. These include improved bandwidths and service support capabilities as well as enhanced performance of access nodes and supportive equipment over their existing PON networks. The direction of PON evolution is a key issue for the telecom industry. Full Service Access Network (FSAN) and ITU-T are the PON interest group and standard organization, respectively. In their view, the next-generation PONs are divided into two phases: NG-PON1 and NG-PON2. Mid-term upgrades in PON networks are defined as NG-PON1, while NG-PON2 is a long-term solution in PON evolution. Major requirements of NG-PON1 are the coexistence with the deployed GPON systems and the reuse of outside plant. The aforementioned requirements were tested in the recent Verizon field trials. Optical distribution networks (ODNs) account for 70% of the total investments in deploying PONs. Therefore, it is crucial for the NGPON evolution to be compatible with the deployed networks. With the specification of system coexistence and ODN reuse, the only hold-up of the migration from GPON to NG-PON1 is the maturity of the industry chain. Unlike NG-PON1 that has clear goals and emerging developments, there are many candidate technologies for NG-PON2. The selection of NG-PON2 is under discussion. However, one thing is clear, NG-PON2 technology must outperform NG-PON1 technologies in terms of ODN compatibility, bandwidth, capacity, and cost-efficiency. This paper describes the design principles and prospective technologies for NG-PONs. It introduces Huaweis views of NG-PON evolution, focusing on the discussion and evaluation of various technologies. All of the discussion follows the FSAN and ITU-T framework of NG-PON recommendations.
2 PON Evolution
2.1 Basic Principles
Ultra broadband and co-existence with existing technologies are the general requirements from network operations to direct PON evolution. Operators worldwide are seeking to increase revenue by developing bandwidth-consuming services. An exemplified service is HDTV, which requires about 20 Mbit/s per channel. In the near future, new business models, such as home video editing, online gaming, interactive E-learning, remote medical services, and next-generation 3D TV will dramatically increase bandwidth demand. The deployment of PON generally implies considerablely initial investments and slow return on investment (ROI). ODN deployment accounts for 76% of the total investments in greenfield FTTH networks, while optical network units (ONUs) account for 21%. Protecting investments by leveraging existing ODNs is essential to operators.
NG-PON2
XG-PON1
G-PON
2004
2010
~2015
NG-PON1 should leverage the use of existing GPON ODN to control cost. Moreover, driven by services, the downstream bandwidth demands will outpace upstream bandwidth demands for a long period. Therefore, FSAN decided to define NG-PON1 as an asymmetric 10G system with rates of 10G downstream and 2.5G upstream. The selected NG-PON1 system is essentially an enhanced TDM PON from GPON. Unlike NG-PON1, there are several types of prospective technologies that can be adopted for NG-PON2. Among the prospective technologies, a suggested baseline is to improve the rate to 40G from 10G by following the TDM technology. The second method is the employment of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) PON to achieve 40G access. The possible multiplexing schemes can be coarse wavelength division multiplexing (CWDM) or dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM). The ODSM PON topology based on TDMA+WDMA is also suggested, which dynamically manages user spectrum without modifying the ODN and ONUs. The third prospect is OCDMA-PON. OCDMA-PON uses code division multiple access (CDMA) to encode ONU singals, thereby avoiding the timeslot assignment for data transmission required by a time division multiple access (TDMA) systems. The O-OFDMA PON topology is an option that uses orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) technology to differentiate ONUs, thus effectively improving bandwidth usage. However, most of these technologies are still in the research phase. More study and test are highly desired to promote them as industry standard.
3
Started G.987.RE
Standarization developments
4
Completed framing specifications Completed G.987.3 Completed the G.988 draft (edition one) Revised jitter parameters Completed and published G.987/G.987.1/G.987.2
Completed scrambling and security specifications Completed G.987.3 draft (edition one) and stabilized G.988 Completed extended power budget specifications Completed G.987.3/G.988 Principal standards Completed G.987.2 revision Started enhanced XG-PON1
Beijing FSAN/Q2
200906
200910
201002
201006
201008
As an enhancement to GPON, XG-PON1 inherits the framing and management from GPON. XG-PON1 provides full-service operations via higher rate and larger split to support a flattened PON network structure. The baseline XG-PON1 standards have been completed. In October 2009, ITU-T consented general requirements and physical layer specifications of XG-PON1 and published them in March 2010, announcing the NG-PON era. In June 2010, the transmission convergence (TC) layer and optical network termination management and control interface (OMCI) standards for XGPON1 were consented in the general meeting of ITU-T SG15, and these standards will be published soon. Figure 3-1 shows the XG-PON1 standardization developments.
XG-PON
Cell site Business Residential FTTCell
CBU
FTTB
MTU
FTTO
SBU
FTTH
SFU
FTTB
MDU
FTTCurb/Cab
ONU
XG-PON1 coexists with GPON over the same ODN, thereby protecting the investments of operators on GPON. As indicated in XG-PON1 physical layer specifications, the upstream/downstream wavelength of XG-PON1 is different from that of GPON. Compatibility between XG-PON1 and GPON is achieved by implementing WDM in the downstream and WDMA in the upstream. That is, a WDM1r is deployed at the central office (CO) and a WBF is deployed at the user side (could be located inside an ONU, between an ONU and an optical splitter, or on an optical splitter) to multiplex or demultiplex wavelengths on multiple signals in downstream and upstream directions. The coexistence of GPON and XG-PON1 is shown in Figure 3-3. FSAN and ITU-T have proposed two evolution scenarios to greenfield and. Brownfield. Greenfield scenarios do not have any pre-existing optical fiber deployments. Hence, these scenarios can use XG-PON1 to replace legacy copper line systems. Greenfield scenarios require the deployment of new PON systems, which are straight-forward; therefore, this paper does not describe it in detail.
IF XGPON
IF XGPON
Rx WDM -X-L Tx
OLT (XG-PON)
Logic
WDM-X
OLT (G-PON)
Rx
Splitter
WDM1r
ONU (G-PON)
Logic Tx Rx WBF WDM-G
IF GPON
WDM -G-L Tx
Logic
IF GPON, IF Video
IF Video
OLT (video)
WBF
WDM-G
V-Tx
ODN
Brownfield scenarios (that is, coexistence with existing deployments) use the pre-existing GPON deployments of operators. As the bandwidth requirement increases, operators can upgrade ONUs over the ODN batch by batch or all at once when migrating to XG-PON1. The selection between these two types of upgrades is decided by how long GPON and XG-PON1 will be coexist in the same ODN. To achieve a successful GPON-to-XG-PON1 upgrade, the OLT and each ONU must support [ITU-T G.984.5 AMD 1] compliant wavelength plans. Figure 3-4 shows coexistence of GPON and XG-PON1 using WDM stacking.
ONU
ONU
XG-PON1 OLT
WDMr1 ONU
G-PON1 OLT
GPON and XGPON1 use the same 1:32 optical splitter for optical splitting. Every GPON user enjoys a bandwidth of about 80 Mbit/s (downstream)/40 Mbit/s (upstream) and every XGPON1 user enjoys a bandwidth of about 320 Mbit/s (downstream)/80 Mbit/s (upstream).
Power budget
Line rate [2] Split ratio Maximum physical transmission reach Maximum logical transmission reach Maximum differential logical reach
C band. L band, and O band were compared in the selection of upstream wavelength.. The first option of C band was eliminated because it overlaps with for the RF video channel. The L band was also eliminated due to the insufficient guard band between upstream and downstream wavelengths. The candidate wavelength was narrowed down to O- band and O+ band. After comparing the pros and cons (such as complexity and costs), O- band was selected because O+ band has higher requirements on filters. [2] The downstream rate of XG-PON1 was specified to 10 Gbps, which was driven by the well-established and low-cost 10 Gbps continuous transmission technology in the industry. The exact rate is determined as 9.95328 Gbps to keep the consistency with typical ITU-T rates. This is different from the rate of the IEEE 10GE-PON, which is in the rate of 10.3125 Gbps. There were 2.5G and 10G proposals for the XG-PON1 upstream rate. After carefully studying application scenarios and component cost, 2.5G upstream rate was selected for specification. The 10G upstream system was not considered as the focus, mainly due to its high cost and limited application scenarios in the near future.
facilitates backward compatibility with GPON and minimizing of changes. OMCI management is a management mechanism in GPON that carries OMCI data over a special GEM connection. The special GEM connection is also called an OMCI channel. An OLT manages and configures ONUs through the OMCI channel. The OLT and the ONU exchange management information base (MIB) information to establish and maintain an OMCI model. OMCI management and configuration covers configuration management, fault management, performance management, and security management of the ONUs. XG-PON1 inherits almost 90% of the GPON OMCI technology with minor modifications to [G.984.4]. Consider the management and configuration of a Layer-2 data service as an example. As far as the service is concerned, it does not matter which specific lower-layer technology is adopted. The key point is that a Layer-2 channel should be properly configured to ensure normal forwarding of service data. The OMCI L2 model covers all possible L2 configurations from the network side to the user side (ANI-TCONT-GEM-MAC bridge-UNI). This model is applicable to GPON as well as to XG-PON1 because they both have the same definitions for the network-side channel and userside interface. The ONU management and configuration mechanisms are pretty stable from A /B-PON to GPON and to XG-PON1. Therefore, it was decided that the ITUT's TDM PON series require only one general OMCI standard that is applicable to all PON systems. This is the concept of generic OMCI, which gained wide recognition and support from the industry. ITU-T/Q2 applied for an ITU-T program numbered [G.988] for the Generic OMCI Standard to distinguish the standard from the PON system. The [G.988] document was developed based on the latest version of [G.984.4]. The difference is that [G.988] excludes descriptions that are specifically related to the technical features of PONs. In this way, [G.988] is specified to cover the general OMCI in PONs. The terminal management of XG-PON1 fully retains the GPON features. In the FTTH scenario, the default management of ONUs in XG-PON1 is via OMCI. In the FTTB/FTTC scenario, XG-PON1 can manage ONUs through OMCI or other management protocols (i.e., dual management). The dual management mechanism is to first set up an OMCI channel, which serves as the Layer-2 channel required by other management protocols for interoperation; then, use the virtual port of the OMCI as a division point for transparently transmitting the packets of other management protocols over the PON link. The flexibility of dual management enables GPON and XG-PON1 to address
10
various management requirements in different scenarios. The first draft of [G.988] was completed in February 2010. In April 2010, the official draft of [G.988] was finished. In June 2010, [G.988] was approved by ITU-T.
3.5 Interoperability
Interoperability is the most impressive feature of GPON and XG-PON1. FSAN established the OMCI implementation study group (OISG) in 2008 during the GPON era. The group members were restricted to system vendors and chip vendors to study the [G.984.4] OMCI interoperability specification. The [G.984.4] Recommendation defines the establishment of an ONT management and control channel (OMCC), update of the MIB after an ONU goes online, MIB/alarm synchronization, software version upgrade, L2 service configuration, multicast configuration, and QoS management. The first edition of [G.984.4] was finished in December 2008 and second edition was finished in October 2009. Both editions were approved and quickly released by ITU-T. The official number of [G.984.4] is [ITU-T G.impl984.4] and is also called the OMCI implementation guide. Since then, FSAN has been using [G.impl984.4] as the primary specification for interoperability test cases. Three interoperability tests were performed between 2009 and the first half of 2010. After the interoperability tests were completed in the first half of 2010, FSAN operators were satisfied with the test results and did press release to highlight the superb interoperability of GPON. FSAN considers the GPON interoperability test has reached a remarkable milestone and the further research of this subject will be conducted in the broadband forum (BBF, the original DSL forum). FSAN will move on to the interoperability testing of XGPON1. [G.988] Recommendation basically adopts [G.impl984.4] directly. Hence, the mandatory appendix of [G.988] incorporates all contents of [G.impl984.4], meaning that XG-PON1 inherits the superb interoperability of GPON.
11
4.1 WDM-PON
A typical wavelength division multiplexing PON (WDM-PON) architecture is shown in Figure 4-1. The wavelength division MUX/DEMUX is employed in the ODN. In the example in Figure 4-1, array waveguide gratings (AWGs) are used to MUX and DEMUX wavelengths to or from ONUs. Signal transmission in WDM-PON is similar to that in the point to point GE (P2P GE). The difference between the two systems is that WDM-PON is based on the isolation of different wavelengths on the same optical fiber. Each ONU in WDM-PON exclusively enjoys the bandwidth resources of a wavelength. In other words, WDM-PON features a logical P2MP topology, as shown in Figure 4-2. In the WDM-PON system in Figure 4-1, each port of the AWG is wavelengthdependent, and the optical transceiver on each ONU must transmit optical signals in a specified wavelength determined by the port on the AWG. Optical transceivers with specified wavelengths are called colored optical transceivers. Colored optical transceivers introduce complexity in processes such as service provisioning and device storage. In addition, AWG components are sensitive to temperature. Therefore, WDM-PON has the following two major challenges. Challenge 1: Addressing the real-time consistency between the wavelength of optical transceivers and the connecting AWG port. Colorless optical source technology is used to resolve this issue. Colorless optical source solutions can be classified into tunable laser and seeded laser according to whether a seed source is involved. According to the source of the seed light, the solutions can be further defined as self-injection, external injection (including ASE seed light injection and array laser injection), and wavelength re-use.
12
CO
Tx/Rx Tx/Rx Tx/Rx Tx/Rx
1, 2, 3, 4...
Remote Node
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
AWG1
AWG AWG
AWG2
4
3 Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Rx Tx
AWG Rx Tx
n
WDM-PON
Rx Tx Rx Tx
AWG
Challenge 2: Addressing the real-time consistency between the wavelengths of the port on the local AWG (at the CO) and the port on the remote AWG. Wavelength alignment technology is used to resolve this issue. Wavelength alignment technology includes optical power monitoring and temperatureinsensitive AWG. Optical power monitoring was a solution proposed in the early stage of WDM-PON research. The recent solution to wavelength alignment is the temperature-insensitive AWG technology. In addition to the aforementioned issues, other challenging factors to WDMPON include the industry chain maturity, technology availability, cost, and insufficient bandwidth drive from the end users. It is not anticipated to have large scale deployment of WDM-PON in FTTH scenarios in the next 35 years. WDM-PON may, however, have fans in bandwidth-hungry and costinsensitive applications, such as FTTB/FTTbusiness and FTTMobile.
13
AWG
4.2 ODSM-PON
Opportunistic and dynamic spectrum management PON (ODSM-PON) was proposed a couple of years ago. It addresses operator requirements in exploiting the potential of deployed networks for smooth network evolution. It keeps the ODN and ONUs untouched, providing a salient solution to CO consolidation and cost control. End users in ODSM-PON enjoy the new communication experience made available by optical broadband with affordable cost.
ODSM OLT
Tx Array Rx Array
Old CO
WDM split
A solution shown in Figure 4-3 was proposed in 2010. In this solution, the four GPON/XG-PON1 OLT line cards previously deployed at the "Old CO" can be replaced with one passive WDM splitter for network upgrade. The network from the CO to user premises remains unchanged after the upgrade. The new ODSM OLT communicates with GPON/XG-PON1 ONUs, as demonstrated by Figure 4-3. In the downstream, ODSM-PON adopts WDM. The data carried over various wavelengths transmitted by the OLT transmitter array is split by the WDM splitter and then distributed to GPON/XG-PON1 ONUs. In the upstream, ODSM PON adopts dynamic TDMA+WDMA. The data transmitted by the GPON/XG-PON1 ONUs is combined by the WDM splitter and then transmitted to the OLT receiver array. ODSM-PON has the following features: Leverages the existing ODN from the CO to user premises. Leverages the existing ONU at user premises.
14
Cost reduction and power saving with the passive Old CO. Substantially improves (by 10-fold) the fiber sharing between the CO and metro devices. Follows GPON/XG-PON1 deployment policies by,allowing for an upgradeas-required mode. ODSM PON offers a brand new choice to the industry.
WDM
SP
XGPON1 ONT
XGPON1 OLT
A similar proposal of stacked G-PON technology was discussed in the FSAN NG-PON1 study period. FSAN members conclude that it was more of a network deployment technology than a system required standards. When the focus of the standardization was recently shifted to NG-PON2, stacked XGPON became one of the study topics once again.
OLT
reception only when the locally-oscillated light and signal light meet the coherent conditions of frequency, phase, and polarization. In this way, the OLT and ONU can select their wavelengths by dynamically changing their locally-oscillated light frequencies. Furthermore, coherent WDM-PON uses passive technology to resolve the issue of power budget. Coherent WDM-PON directly applies the optical coherent transport technology into the optical access networks. This introduces the concern of cost control, which is the design principle of any access technologies. Beside, the ONUs in coherent WDM-PON are more complicated that those in other NG-PON2 technologies. Such a technology is more in the status of research and lab demo. Concerns to cost and complexity challenge its applicability in the access network.
10G PON Upgraded to 10G GPON Adopt FTTB/C/H Upgrade ADSL2+ to VDSL2 GPON 2011: IPTV ratio: 10%, 30% being internet service Per-user bandwidth PON Ds BW DSLAM 20M 1.07G MDU Us BW (24 users) 67.2M 2013: IPTV ratio: 40%, 60% being internet service Per-user bandwidth PON Ds BW 50M 3.0G MDU Us BW (24 users) 187.8M
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
10G PON supports a maximum 10G downstream rate, which can accommodate the access requirements of future users. On the issue of PON cost, however, 10G PON will cost 35 times of GPON in the next 23 years. Considering the enormous network deployment cost, FTTB/C scenarios are the initial applications of 10G PON, where cost can be shared among more users. ONU cost takes up about 60% of the total cost of FTTH equipment. Therefore, the large scale deployment of 10G PON in the FTTH scenario depends on the development of the chips and optical components for 10G PON. It is anticipated that, in 2015, the cost of 10G PON products will be
17
approximately the same as that of the current GPON products. Therefore, by 2015, operators can select 10G PON to increase the bandwidth of residential users to 100M and commercial users to 1G.
10G PON Upgraded to 10G GPON High HD service adoption rate GPON 2013: IPTV ratio: 40%, 60% being internet service Per-user bandwidth GPON Ds BW (1:128) 50M 1440M 2015: IPTV ratio: 60%, 40% being internet service Per-user bandwidth 10G GPON Ds BW (1:128) 100M 1980M
2011: IPTV ratio: 10%, 30% being internet service Per-user bandwidth DSLAM GPON Ds BW (1:128) 20M 867M
Note: concurrency: 50%; installation ratio: 75%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Optical components and PON chipset account for over 60% of the total ONT cost. Meanwhile, the cost of current 10G PON optical components and chipset are 3050 times higher than those of GPON's. Therefore, large scale application of ONT products relies on cost reduction. MDU, which is for FTTB/C, has a different cost distribution in ONT. See the following figure.
30%
The cost of the optical transceiver and PON chipset of an MDU take up only about 25% of the total cost. At the same time, a single FTTB/C MDU usually services over 24 users and the per-user cost is lower. The cost of MDU optical components and PON chipsets will be affordable if falling down to 46 times of current GPON components. With the growth of 10G PON users, 10G PON is estimated to reach a 500k scale in 2013 when the costs will drop to 2-3 times of GPON. The following figure shows the estimated data.
Therefore, it is anticipated that 10G PON will enter small scale commercial application for FTTB/C in 2013, and large scale commercial application in 2015.
20
21
Copyright Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Trademark Notice , HUAWEI, and are trademarks or registered trademarks of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Other trademarks, product, service and company names mentioned are the property of their respective owners. NO WARRANTY
THE CONTENTS OF THIS MANUAL ARE PROVIDED AS IS. EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAWS, NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE MADE IN RELATION TO THE ACCURACY, RELIABILITY OR CONTENTS OF THIS MANUAL. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO CASE SHALL HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS, REVENUE, DATA, GOODWILL OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THIS MANUAL.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R. China Tel: +86-755-28780808 Version No.: M3-013030802-20100925-C-1.0 www.huawei.com