business ethics case 1 1) THE SUSPENSION

WAS FAIR, AS JOAN HAS REPEATED THE OFFENCE ONCE AGAIN.

2) JOAN DID ACT RIGHTLY, BUT WAS NOT CONVINCING. 3) JOAN S SUSPENSION WAS THE RIGHT APPROACH AND NOT OUTRIGHT FIRING FROM T HE JOB. -------------------case 2 1) YES, YOU SHOULD INFORM THE BUYERS IN AN INFORMAL WAY. 2) NOT NECESSARY, BUT 3) ONLY C GIVE THEM A VOLUME DISCOUNT.

THE SENIOR EMPLOYEES LIKE THE SUPERVISOR/ FOREMAN/ SALES MANAGER ET

4) I WOULD USE IT BY MIXING WITH QUALITY CEMENTS. --------------------------------------case 3 1) FRED SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED, BECAUSE HE had been fired for poor performance and absenteeism 2) THE COMPANY WAS RIGHT IN HELPING FRED TO RECEIVE THE TREATMENT.

3) YES, HE ACTED ETHICALLY TOWARD FRED. 4) YES, he acted ethically for his company 5) It would not be fair to other employees to ---------------------------reinstate FRED.

case 4 1) THE CAPTAIN MR.SLOSH IS RESPOPNSIBLE FOR THE INCIDENT. 2) THE CRIMINAL CHARGES SHOULD BE LEVIED AGAINST THE CAPTAIN P. OF THE SHI

3) THE CORPORATION SHOULD BE PUNISHED WITH A HEAVY FINE AND THE P COST. 4) THE CEO SHOULD BE ASKED TO RESIGN.

CLEAN U