Anda di halaman 1dari 4

Frequencies

Statistics Umur Responden N Valid Missing 36 0 jenkel 36 0 didik 36 0 kerja 36 0

Frequency Table
Umur Responden Frequenc y Valid < 35 tahun > 35 tahun Total 36 100.0 100.0 18 50.0 50.0 100.0 18 Percent 50.0 Valid Percent 50.0 Cumulative Percent 50.0

jenkel Frequenc y Valid L P Total 23 13 36 Percent 63.9 36.1 100.0 Valid Percent 63.9 36.1 100.0 Cumulative Percent 63.9 100.0

Didik Frequenc y Valid SD SLTP SLTA 6 5 25 Percent 16.7 13.9 69.4 Valid Percent 16.7 13.9 69.4 Cumulative Percent 16.7 30.6 100.0

Total

36

100.0

100.0

Kerja Frequenc y Valid Pegawai Swasta Wiraswasta/Usahawan Lainnya Total 7 20 9 36 Percent 19.4 55.6 25.0 100.0 Valid Percent 19.4 55.6 25.0 100.0 100.0 Cumulative Percent 19.4 75.6

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan * Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas 36 Percent 100.0% N 0 Missing Percent .0% N 36 Total Percent 100.0%

Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan * Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas Crosstabulation Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas Tidak Puas Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Kinerja Kurang Baik Count % within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Kinerja Baik Count % within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Total Count 16 7 35.0% 9 56.3%

% within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan

44.4%

Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan * Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas Crosstabulation Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas Puas Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Kinerja Kurang Baik Count % within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Kinerja Baik Count % within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Total Count % within Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan 20 55.6% 36 100.0% 13 65.0% 20 100.0% 7 43.8% Total 16 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 36 1.580 1 .209
b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

df 1 1 1

(2-sided) .202 .349 .201

1.626a .879 1.633

.313

.174

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.11. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Directional Measures Value Nominal by Interval Eta Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan Dependent .212

Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas Dependent

.213

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Kinerja Pelayanan Kesehatan (Kinerja Kurang Baik / Kinerja Baik) For cohort Kepuasan Pengguna Jamkesmas = Tidak Puas For cohort Kepuasan Pengguna Ja mkesmas = Puas N of Valid Cases 36 .673 .354 1.279 1.607 .769 3.359 2.388 Lower .620 Upper 9.202

Anda mungkin juga menyukai