fe STL ‘STL Donver 4955 Yarrow Steet Arvada, CO 80002 Tel: 308 736.0100 Fax; 303.431 7171 ew tne.com ANALYTICAL REPORT Project: A¢TFCT940K3104401 Doug Solon ASARCO PO Box 1111 EL Paso, TX 79999 STL DENVER Lh Patrick J. McEntee ‘March 15, 2005 Se Tet Laborato,Table Of Contents Standard Deliverables Report Contents Total Number of Pages Standard Deliverables The Cover Leter and the Report Cover page are considered integral arts ofthis Standard Deliverable packege. This report is acon leu as unless all pages indicated in this Table of Contents are included. $s * Table of Contents Case Narrative Executive Summary ~ Detection Highlights Methods Summary Method/Analyst Summary Sample Summary Analytical Results QC Data Association Summary QC Evaluation and/or Data Reports Chain-of-CustodyLot #: DSC020283 Case Narrative The results included in this report have been reviewed for compliance with STL's Quality Assurance/Quality Control (Q4/QC) plan. ‘The test results shown in this report meet all equirements of NELAC and any exceptions arc noted below Dilution factors and footnotes have been provided to assist in the interpretation of the results. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. STI utilizes USEPA approved methods in all analytical work. The samples presented inthis report were analyzed for the parameters listed on the analytical methods summary page in accordance with the ‘methods indicated. A summary of quality control parameters is provided below. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory Quality Control Summary for Lot D5C020283 ‘Sample Receiving > STL Denver received six aqueous samples under chai of custody on March 2, 2005, > The cooler temperature at receipt was acceptable at 2.6°C. > All sample containers were received intact. Holding Times > All analyses was performed within the prescribed holding times. ‘Total Metals Analysis, Method SW846 6010B > No anomalies were noted. ‘Total Metals Analysis, Methods SW846 6020 > The percent recovery for the Selenium MS and/or MSD performed on sample D5C020283-002 was above established control limits. Since the Laboratory Control Sample was in control, the data was accepted and the anomalies considered a result of matrix interference. ® The percent recoveries and RPD for the Arsenic MS and MSD performed on sample D5C020283- (002 could not be evaluated because the concentration of arsenic in the parent sample was greater than four times the spike amount. > No other anomalies were noted, General Chemistry > No anomalies were noted. All batch QC was in control,