a. INTRODUCTION
The fact of the question requires details upon the freedoms and
FC) provides for the rights of liberty for a person. 1 Based upon the
article, one could basically see that the matters are more concerning
could see that A cannot say that the government had used force labour for
trials. 3 This can be seen where B had done a strict liability offence, such
as parking his car by the ‘yellow line’. Then, he will be facing a penalty.
Therefore, the law had prescribed the punishment to such offence cannot
Organisation X for 20 years and D (a male) has been working in the same
department for 7 years. When promotion had been announced, it was found
that it had been made to D and not C. The reason behind this was an
D). The main reason given was that, C is a female; therefore she cannot
hold the responsible. One would be of the opinion that the organisation
3
Ibid
4
Id, 17
5
Ibid
has been practicing gander biasness. Thus, leading to an inequality in the
Sabah and Sarawak with his passport. This has clearly provided under
Art 9 (3) . 7 As can be seen, Sabah and Sarawak enjoys unique position
though this article provides for such freedoms, nevertheless there are
Clauses (2), (3) and (4) . The reason is in fact to ensure ‘sensitive issues’
generally provide for the freedom of religion. 9 Even though this particular
6
Id, 18
7
Ibid
8
Ibid
9
Id, 19
Further, this article prevents law relating to public order, public health or
morality.
refuse a student who is a ‘free thinker ’. Thus, it does not mean that a
person without any ‘beliefs’ should be cast or being enforce fees upon him
c. CONCLUSION
To conclude, based upon the list given, it is clear to one that the
10
Id, 20
11
Ibid