Anda di halaman 1dari 3

Student

Name: MIGUEL LLOVERA LLOVERA DA CORTE Email: miguel.llovera_da_corte@okstate.edu Website URL: http://academicstrategies101.weebly.com/ Element Usability Colors and theme 12 points 10-12 points: The colors and theme clearly support the topic and content in a way that will enhance learning 6-9 points: The colors and theme are not clearly connected to the topic and theme but are not so distracting as to inhibit learning 0-5 points: The colors and theme are such a poor fit for the topic and content that they will likely distract the learner and inhibit learning Text-to-background contrast 13 points 10-13 points: The text-to-background contrast makes the site easy and effortless to read. 6-9 points: The text-to background contrast could be sharper but the site is sufficiently readable to support learning. 0-5 points: The text-to-background contrast is insufficient to such an extent that it causes eyestrain an inhibits learning Font choice, size, and consistency 12 points 10-12 points: The font size is appropriate for the topic and age of the learner; consistent fonts are used throughout the site. 6-9 points: The font is adequate for readability though it may not be quite sized right for the learner; some font inconsistencies between pages 0-5 points: The font size is significantly too large or too small for readability (taking into account the age of the learner); hard to read decorative or script font; too many different fonts appear on the same page; the font is not consistent from one page of the site to another. Navigation 13 points 10-13 points: The navigation system is intuitive; learners are free to think about the content because they don't have to think about navigation. 6-9 points: The navigation is a bit tricky to figure out at first, but it is consistent so once learners catch on they won't by distracted by it.

EDTC 5153 Final Grading Rubric for Website

Your Score 12

13

12

13

0-5 points: The navigation is so confusing it will produce extraneous cognitive load and inhibit learning. Comments on Usability: Your site is very well organized, easy to read, easy to follow, and attractively arranged. Educational Value Clarity of writing 13 10-13 points: The writing is clear, elegant, and has a logical flow that makes it easy for the learner to understand. There are few if any grammatical errors, spelling errors, or typos. The reading level seems appropriate to the audience. 6-9 points: The writing is mostly clear, though there may be some awkwardness or a few confusing sentences. There are some grammatical errors, spelling errors, and typos that may distract the learner but are not so serious as to impair comprehension. 0-5 points: The writing quality is low, with confusing sentences and many grammatical errors, spelling errors and typos that distract the learner and impair comprehension. Amount of original content 13 10-13 points: There is just enough original content to provide value to the learner. The site provides background to help the learner get the most out of any supplemental material that might be provided. 6-9 points: The site may be light on original content but provides good links to external sources OR it may have too much duplication of the content of the linked sources but still contain enough original material to contribute value. 0-5 points: The site is nothing but hyperlinks, adding no value due to the lack of original content OR the original content duplicates the linked material too much so that the site itself has no value. Appropriateness of external resources 12 10-12 points: The site provides relevant additional sources of information (e.g., hyperlinks, embedded video from YouTube, etc.) that support learning and make the most of the web environment. 6-9 points: The site provides some links to other sources of information on the web though there may be few and they may not be completely relevant. 0-5 points: The site contains only text and does not make use of the web to provide connections to other sources of information. Use of graphics 12 10-12 points: The graphic elements on the site are of high quality and have a clear purpose to support learning. 6-9 points: The graphics are of reasonable quality and have

some connection to the topic, with few if any images that are extraneous to the topic. 0-5 points: The site is cluttered with decorative graphics, animated gifs, etc., that distract the learner because they have no clear connection to the content. Comments on Educational Value: Excellent job choosing external resources and integrating them seamlessly with your own original text! Interactive Element 1: Goal-setting worksheet wiki 45 40 - 50 points: appropriate to the topic of the website and clearly supports learning; provides clear instructions as to what the learner should do; contains few if any technical glitches. 21 - 39 points: mostly appropriate to the topic of the website; supports learning for the most part though the connection could be made clearer; instructions could be clearer but most learners will be able to figure out what they should do; contains technical glitches that may distract the learner but will not seriously impair learning. 0 - 20 points: not clearly appropriate to the topic of the website; not clear how it would support learning; missing or confusing instructions as to what the learner should do; contains technical glitches that significantly hamper its use. Interactive Element 2: Quiz 50 40 - 50 points: appropriate to the topic of the website and clearly supports learning; provides clear instructions as to what the learner should do; contains few if any technical glitches. 21 - 39 points: mostly appropriate to the topic of the website; supports learning for the most part though the connection could be made clearer; instructions could be clearer but most learners will be able to figure out what they should do; contains technical glitches that may distract the learner but will not seriously impair learning. 0 - 20 points: not clearly appropriate to the topic of the website; not clear how it would support learning; missing or confusing instructions as to what the learner should do; contains technical glitches that significantly hamper its use. Comments on Interactive Elements: I like the goal setting worksheet on your wiki but it's not clear to me how it would work if multiple people or groups actually started using it. Are they supposed to copy the worksheet to a new wiki page before they start to edit? Some instructions on the logistics of what you want them to do would be helpful. Total Score on website 195 A: >=180; B: 160-179; C: 140-159; D: 120-139; F: < 120

Anda mungkin juga menyukai