HADDINGTON ROAD NS Planning Application Report November 2013 Job Ref: 1895Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Executive Summary Site Report Proposed Scheme ‘Community Consultations Civil Engineering Report - Downes Associates Services Engineering Report - NJ O'Gorman & Associates APPENDICES A. Site Photographs 8. Tree Survey & Condition Report C. Archaeological Impact Assessment D. _Ecological Desktop Study & Screening For Appropriate Assessment E. —_ Bat Survey F Traffic Impact Assessment & Travel Plan prepared by Kieran Boyle Consulting G. Planting Plan and Schedule prepared by Mitchell & Associates Landscaping Consultants H. Conservation Report prepared by Robin Mandel Architects 1 Minutes of Pre-planning meetings with Dublin City Council 7 ‘Schedule of Planning Drawings Drawings of the Proposed Scheme (A3 Reductions)Section 1 Introduction and Executive Summary1.0 wa dad 12 124 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Introduction This report together with the drawings and documents listed in 1.4 below comprises of the application for Planning Permission for the demolition/removal of all existing structures of the former St Mary's Secondary School at Haddington Road, Dublin 4, and the construction of a new part three-storey and part two-storey primary school in its place. The proposed school provides twenty-four classrooms and associated ancillary accommodation, including the provision of external play, 4 no. parking spaces, 72 no. cycle spaces and all associated site and landscaping works. ‘The application is made on behalf of the Department of Education & Skills. The applicant wishes to claim exemption from fee under Part 12, Section 157 (1) (a) of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001. A separate letter has been issued to the Registry of Decision in this regard. Project Outline The site for the new primary school project is at Haddington Road Dublin 4. As noted above, the Department of Education and Skills brief seeks to provide a 24 classroom primary school building with ancillary accommodation including 390m? of General Purpose area. ‘The new school is proposed to facilitate two existing primary schools (St Brigid's Girls Primary ‘School and St Mary's Boys Primary School) located at the rear of the adjacent St Mary's church (see figure 1 below). The site location is adjacent to these existing schools. ‘The new school will serve the expanding local need for primary school places, and in particular the expanding need of the existing schools. The existing schoo! buildings no longer meet the needs of the primary schools, particularly in relation to classroom area, special education and tuition requirements and general purpose and assembly. There is limited external play available to the existing school. The enrolment ‘numbers for both schools is rising and currently exceeds the available space in the existing buildings. ‘The additional and improved facilities included in this application will, when provided, address capacity issues and provide improved and increased teaching spaces, specialist accommodation and improved external facilities such as amenity areas and play space. The total area of the new school is 3850 m21.2.2 1.2.3 1.24 1.25 1.2.6 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Figure 1: Aerial Photo Haddington Road, Haddington Place (Major) and Haddington Place (Minor) form the site boundaries to the north, east and south respectively. The existing school buildings form the existing site boundary along these three public streets. Adjoining residential properties form the boundary to the west. The residential units along Haddington Road to the east are Protected Structures. The properties along St Mary's Lane to the east are single storey mews housing. Development Plan The site is zoned ‘215’ to provide for institutional, educational, recreational, community, green infrastructure & health use. The redevelopment of the site as a primary school is in keeping with the development plan zoning, and retains the existing educational land use. ‘The proposal reuses the site of a vacant former school building, contributing positively to the urban fabric and community. The project provides improved accommodation & facilities for the existing primary schools, which have outgrown their schoo! buildings. ‘The new school is proposed on the footprint of the existing buildings on the site, along the ‘eastern site boundary. The new building completes the corner site at the junction of Haddington Road and Haddington Place (Major), and the street edge along Haddington Place (Minor). The main entrance Is maintained on Haddington Road. The new building encloses the ground floor external play area, reflecting the existing condition. 4 no. dedicated staff parking spaces are provided to the south, accessed off Haddington Place (Minor), Ecological Desktop Study and Screening for Appropriate Assessment ‘An Ecological Desktop Study and Screening for Appropriate Assessment has been completed. A copy of this study is included in Appendix D of this report. The report concludes the development would not be likely to give rise to significant adverse effects on the conservation objectives of any Natura 2000 site. An Appropriate Assessment is not required.13 1.3.1 13.2 14 144 15 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Consultations Consultations with Local Authority There have been a number of meetings with Dublin City Council Planning Department and Roads & Traffic Department throughout the design process. + 11 October 2012 Meeting with Mary Conway, Edel Kelly and Elaine Power, Dublin City Council Planning Department + 07 December 213 Meeting with Mary Conway, Dublin City Council Planning Department + 14 February 2013 Meeting with Mary Conway, Edel Kelly and Elaine Power, Dublin City Council Planning Department = 18 July 2013, Meeting with Mary Conway, Dublin City Council Planning Department Consultations with Local Residents Residents on either side of the development and directly opposite on Haddington Road, the mews residents to Haddington Place Minor and residents adjoining Haddington Place Major were consulted on a number of occasions. The concerns raised by each informed the design of the project and amendments were made where possible to address the issues raised The issues raised in these consultations have informed the building design, to provide a balanced design solution, responding to the site context and school requirements, and mitigating adverse effects on the surrounding residential amenity. The building design approach Is described in Section 3 and specific concerns raised in ‘community consultations and mitigation measures taken are explained in detail in Section 4 Planning Documents ‘The following documents are lodged in support of this application for Planning Permission: « Site Notice 1 copy ‘+ Newspaper Notice ‘The Irish Times dated 21 November 2013 + Completed Planning Application Form Dublin City Council - 1 copy ‘+ Schedule of Planning Drawings 1 copy * Planning Drawings 6 copies «This Planning Report 6 copies Executive Summary + Planning Permission is sought for the demolition/removal of all existing structures of the former St Mary’s Secondary School at Haddington Road, Dublin 4, and theCoady Partnership ARCHITECTS construction of a new part three-storey and part two storey, 24 classroom primary school with associated ancillary accommodation. ‘The site for the new primary school project is located at Haddington Road, Dublin 4. ‘The new schoo! is proposed to facilitate two existing primary schools (St Brigid’s Girls Primary School and St Mary's Boys Primary School) located at the rear of the adjacent St Mary's church, who have outgrown their existing facilities. The site is zoned 'Z15' to provide for institutional, educational, recreational, community, green infrastructure & health use. ‘The land is currently in the ownership of the applicant, the Department of Education & Skills. ‘The proposal meets the increasing need for primary schools in the locality. ‘The proposal reuses the site of a vacant former school building, contributing positively to the urban fabric and community. The new school provides improved accommodation & facilities from the existing primary schools, which have outgrown their school buildings. The new schoo! will provide a safe, comfortable and delightful environment for students and teachers alike. The proposed building is part three storey and part two storey and includes 4 no. dedicated staff car parking spaces, 72 no. cycle spaces, new external play, including 1 no. basketball courts. The building form provides a robust secure perimeter with good passive supervision of all areas within the school boundary. The proposal includes the construction of a new boundary railing along Haddington Road with pedestrian and vehicular entrance gates. Elevation materials are selected to compliment the surrounding context and form a robust facade at street level.Section 2 Site ReportCoady Partnership ARCHITECTS 2.0 Site Report 2a 214 21.2 Site Context Location The site for the new primary school project (Haddington Road NS) is the site of the former St Mary's Secondary Schoo! at Haddington Road, Dublin 4. Figure 2:05 Map Size The existing school site is 3015m? in size. Site Characteristics Refer to site photos in Appendix A. The site is currently occupied by the two storey and part three storey former St Mary's Secondary School, which is 2470m? in area. Haddington Road, Haddington Place (Major) and Haddington Place (Minor) are located to the north, east and south of the site. The existing buildings form the site boundary along these three public streets. The western site boundary is formed by existing residential properties. A low railing and front garden space is located to the north of the existing building, in keeping with the adjacent residential properties along Haddington Road. ‘The existing schoo! playground is located at the centre of the site between the existing school and the housing to the west. The existing parking and play area is surfaced in tarmac. The site is generally flat, with a total fall of approx. 1m from north to south. A three-storey residential convent building is located immediately to the south of the site.2.2 2.2.4 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS +The residential properties to the east along Haddington Road are Protected Structures + There are some young and mature trees along the northern boundary in the garden space at the front of the building. A modest tree and religious grotto is located in the centre of the existing playground area + The occupant of an adjoining property has notified the school of their respiratory health issues, which have been considered. Dust suppression measures will be incorporated into the demolitions and construction waste management plan and will be in place for the duration of the works. Existing Schoo! Site The new primary schoo! is proposed to facilitate two existing primary schools (St Brigid's Girls Primary School and St Mary’s Boys Primary School) located at the rear of the adjacent St Mary's church (see aerial photo below), who have outgrown their existing facilities. The site location is adjacent to these exiting schools. Figure 3: Site Location showing location of existing schools The adjacent structures along Haddington Road, both to the east and to the west are three storey buildings. A three-storey residential convent building has recently been constructed immediately to the south of the site. The housing along St Mary's Lane to the east is single storey mews housing ‘The existing schools at St Brigid’s and St Mary's form an integral part of the Haddington Road neighbourhood. The schools have an ethos of serving the local community, and intend to retain and build on this ethos in the new school The classrooms and the community hall in the existing school building on the site are presently used by St Mary's and St Brigid’s for PE classes and after hours education, including23 2.3.1 2.3.2 23.3 23.4 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS adult education classes. The existing community hall is used by the wider neighbourhood for community arts and drama events. Planning History & Development Policy Planning History A Planning Application was submitted to Dublin City Council in August 2008 (Ref: 4244/08) for the full demolition of all existing school buildings on the applicant site, and the redevelopment of the applicant site and the adjacent convent site to the south at St Mary’s Road, as residential ‘accommodation and landscaped park area. ‘An Bord Pleanala granted permission for this development, including the demolitions of the existing buildings, in April 2010. A further application was made for alterations to the previously approved permission in November 2010 (Ref: 3883/10). The development of the convent site immediately to the south, including a new three storey residential building, is now completed. Planning Context ‘The site has been reviewed in the context of Dublin City Council's Development Plan 2011 - 2017, and through consultation and discussion with Dublin City Council > Figure 4: Extract from DCC Development Plan 2011-2017 The site is zoned 'Z15’ to provide for institutional, educational, recreational, community, green infrastructure & health use. The redevelopment of the site as a primary school is in keeping with the zoning for the site.2.4 241 242 243 2.4.4 24.5 2.4.6 247 2.4.8 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Existing Buildings ‘The existing buildings on the site are the former St Mary’s Secondary School buildings. The existing buildings were extensively reviewed during the design process to investigate the feasibility of their retention and reuse as a primary school. Detailed analysis of the condition of the existing buildings was undertaken involving independent surveys of the building structure, services, ground conditions, masonry and roofing condition. ‘The detailed analysis shows that many parts of the existing building are in a very poor condition, and would require significant intervention, including major structural stabilisation, if retained. The presence of asbestos containing materials was also identified. The existing drainage system within the site is a combined system. A CCTV Survey of the existing drainage and sewers identified it being in a very poor condition. The existing mechanical and electrical services in the building are no longer fit for purpose, and would require complete replacement. In summary, significant refurbishment works would be required to the building to repair existing defects and comply with building regulations and modern codes and standards. In addition to these works, significant structural intervention would be required for reuse of the existing building in a safe manner, including removal of internal floors and walls to insert new fire egress and accessible stairs, lift core, toilets and wider internal doors to comply with Part B and M of the Building Regulations. ‘A number of layouts for the new school building, with full retention or part retention of the existing buildings on the site, were examined in detail. In order to provide the required ‘accommodation for the existing schools in a 24 classroom building with 390m2 General Purpose Room, significant extensions to the existing building were required in each case, increasing the building footprint, reducing the available external play area and reducing the separation distance to the adjacent residential properties. These options proved to not be economically viable, provided a substandard educational environment and would impact more significantly on the adjoining residential amenity. ‘As noted above, the demolition of the existing buildings on this site formed part of previous planning application for development (Ref: 4244/08). This application was granted, subject to conditions, by An Bord Pleanala in 2010, including the proposed demolitions. We submit that the proposals in this application offer the optimum solution to provide the project brief on this site, with the full demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of a new purpose-built primary schoo! building on the site. This will meet the school’s educational needs, maximise external play, and minimise the impact on the adjacent residential area and housing, Due to the proximity of the protected structures to the east of the site along Haddington Road and the adjacent Conservation Area, a Conservation Report on the existing buildings and the impact of the proposed development, prepared by Robin Mandel Architects, is included in25 2.5.1 2.5.2 25.3 254 255 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Appendix H of this Report. This report concludes that ‘the proposals respect the scale and general use of the surrounding buildings’ and that the overall impact is ‘moderate, positive and long-term’. Site Surveys ‘As part of the design development a number of site surveys and desktop studies were undertaken. Commentary on these surveys are included below with complete documentation of selected surveys included in the Appendices of this report. Topographical A topographical survey has been completed. The existing site is relatively flat. The existing levels at the boundaries will be retained, with the building level set at footpath level to provide access close to the road junction. Tree Survey ‘The completed tree survey and condition report gives a description of the existing landscape character, the relative importance of each tree and recommendations for their retention, removal or future maintenance. A copy of the report is included in Appendix B of this report, Details of the landscaping proposals for the site are set out in Section 3.2.4 of this report. Archaeology Impact Assessment [A desktop study of the site was undertaken to evaluate any potential archaeological interest. ‘The completed survey, carried out in October 2012, Is included in Appendix C. The study concludes that there is no requirement for further archaeological surveys or implications for the proposed development. Ecological Desktop Study and Screening for Appropriate Assessment ‘An Ecological Desktop Study and Screening for Appropriate Assessment has been completed. A copy of this study Is included in Appendix D of this report. The report concludes that the proposed school would not have an imperceptible impact on the local ecology. An Appropriate Assessment is not required. ‘The study makes the following recommendations + Abat survey be undertaken. + A Construction Environmental Management Plan be prepared prior to construction for implementation during the works The report confirms that the development would not be likely to give rise to significant adverse effects on the conservation objectives of any Natura 2000 site.25.6 25.7 2.6 26.1 2.6.2 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Figure 5: Extract map from the National Parks and Wildlife Services Bat Survey A bat survey was undertaken in late June 2013, a copy Is include in Appendix E of this Report. The study reports that no bat roosts were identified by the surveyors, and recommends mitigation measures to be implemented during the demolition of the existing buildings. Traffic Impact Assessment & Travel Plan A Transport Assessment and Travel Plan prepared by Kieran Boyle Consulting is included in ‘Appendix F of this Report. The objectives of the Transport Assesment is to review the transport implications associated with the proposed new school The Travel Plan includes a survey of the existing transport patterns to the school and outlines the aims of the schoo! to reduce car travel to the school and encourage walking and cycling. ‘The recommendations and targets of the Travel Plan are set out in section 3.2.2 of this report. Details of the proposed parking provision and traffic management are included in the Civil/Structural Engineer's Report in Section 5. Existing Services ‘The availability, location and adequacy of water supply, surface water and foul drains, are addressed in the Civil/Structural Engineer's Report in Section 5. The availability, location and adequacy of gas power and telecommunications supply, are addressed in the Services Engineer's Report in Section 6.Proposed Scheme Section 3 M080 O00 COCOCOOOCOC OOS OOEEE®e3.0 3a B41 B12 3.2 3.2.4 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Proposed Scheme jeneral Overall Concept The new building is located along the eastern edge of the site, completing the comer at the Junction of Haddington Road and Haddington Place (Major), and the street edge along Haddington Place (Minor). The new development is located within the footprint of the existing school building and reinstates the existing street edges on the site. External play is located to the west and 4 parking spaces are provided to the south of the play area, accessed off Haddington Place (Minor). Figure 6: Proposed Site Plan Demotitions Al of the existing structures on the site will be demolished as part of the works, Site Plan General Access The main building entrance is located at Haddington Road, close to the corner junction, Under the overhang formed by the first floor Staff Room and adjacent Multi-Purpose Room 2. Administration offices and a Multi-Purpose Room are adjacent to the main entrance and foyer. A secondary entrance is provided from Haddington Place (Major), at the south-east of the site. It is envisaged that this will be the main pupil entrance to the school, where direct access to the rear playground is provided The boards of management also envisage the proposed school will contribute to the3.2.2 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS community and facilities such as the General Purpose Area will be made available for community use outside of school hours. The entrance from Haddington Place (Major), allows independent use without opening the whole building, and allows the school to manage access outside of normal school hours. Figure 7: Front Axo of Proposed New School Parking & Vehicular Access The Development plan sets the maximum car parking numbers for zone 2 to be one parking space per classroom. However the site is on the edge of zone 1 which requires no on site parking for school in urban areas. To maximise external play on the site and to promote more sustainable travel to work, four on-site staff parking spaces are provided, including fone accessible parking space, accessed from Haddington Place (Minor), which we believe is appropriate for this urban location. The parking provision within the site is designated as staff parking only. There are a number of existing on-street parking spaces available on the adjacent public streets, which will facilitate set down and visitor parking, which is the norm for schools in a similar urban context. This arrangement is a continuance of the status-quo for the existing schools. 72 no. on-site cycle spaces are proposed as part of the development. Secure cycle parking Is, provided in the open area along Haddington Road, and to the rear of the site adjacent to the vehicular parking spaces. While the development plan sets out the cycle requirements of 1 per 6 pupils, the submitted number of on-site cycle parking is proposed to maximise the area of external play available to the school. In addition, storage for scooters is also available under the stairs to the rear of the building A Travel Plan was commissioned by the Board of Management in May 2013, and prepared byCoady Partnership ARCHITECTS Kieran Boyle Consulting. A copy of this plan is included in Appendix F of this report, The main targets and actions arising from the Travel Plan are as follows: The schoo! will operate the Green Boot Initiative, promoting sustainable travel to and from school. The schoo! will actively promote cycling. Cycling initiatives will be available and the schoo! will partake in Bike Week in conjunction with DCC. Walking will be encouraged through walking groups, the ‘Walking on Wednesday’ Initiative and through incorporating fun and interest walks into the school day. The use of public transport will be more actively encouraged Information on car sharing will be posted in the school to encourage staff to participate. 3.2.3. External Play The building, set over three levels, provides a compact footprint and maximises the available external play in this constrained urban site. The double height volume of the General Purpose Area offers the opportunity for additional external play area to serve the second floor classrooms. This area will be used as an amenity area only, ball games will not be allowed here. ‘The external rooftop play area will be surrounded by a fritted glazed screen to provide acoustic separation and privacy to the adjacent housing to the south and east of the site along St Mary's Lane and St Mary's Road, set back from the building edge to it’s visual, impact Floodlighting for the school is not proposed. Figure 8: Rear Axo of Proposed New Schoo!3.2.4 3.3 33.1 332 2322! 3.4 34.1 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Landscape Treatment There are two existing mature cherry trees and an early western red ceder located at the front of the existing building, along Haddington Road. It is proposed to remove one of the cherry trees and the western red ceder to form the new entrance to the school. These trees will be replaced with 4.5m high feature trees as part of the proposed works. The second cherry tree, closer to adjoining residences, will be retained, and protected during the construction works. The existing trees located in the external play area, to the rear of No.’s 77 and 78 Haddington Road, will be retained. A reading garden is proposed around this feature. The soft landscaping will be reinforced along the western boundary, with low level seating located around the site boundaries. A Planting plan and schedule, prepared by Mitchell & Associates Landscaping Consultants, is included in Appendix G of this report. Boundary Treatment 1.6m high railings over a brick plinth with brick piers are proposed along the northern boundary, to Haddington road, in keeping with the existing boundary railings along this street. This treatment is returned along Haddington Place (Major) up to the line of the new building. A small plaza forms the new entrance at Haddington Road, with sliding gates to close down the site at night. A new feature tree and seat are proposed at the corner of this semi-civic space. ‘As noted above, the new school building forms the site boundary along the remainder of Haddington Place (Major) and the majority of Haddington Place (Minor), to match the existing boundary conditions. The south boundary is completed by a series of metal gates and services shutters, set within brick framing to secure the parking spaces and courtyard access. These will be visually permeable to avoid solid treatments. The existing boundary walls to the housing on the west, within the external play area, will be retained, and the boundary to the north will be raised by 600mm. Additional planting is proposed to provide a green edge to the play area. Building Design Entrance and Administration Areas ‘Administration rooms are arranged around the Main Entrance, with the Admin Offices, Principal's Office and Multi-Purpose Room forming the foyer space inside the lobby. An3.4.2 343 344 35 35.1 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS accommodation stairs and lift are located adjacent to the entrance area and egress to the playground is provided at the base of this stairs. ‘The General Purpose Area is located at the southern end of the building. As noted above, the secondary entrance allows the use of this space as a community facility without opening the whole schoo! building. ‘The Staff Room is located on first floor level at the north-east corner, over the main entrance area, and the Library is located immediately above this. The location of these rooms at this prominent corner, and with the overhand at the entrance, provides an appropriate civic presence for the school building. Classrooms Classrooms and Special Education & Tuition (SET) Rooms are arranged along a double- loaded corridor. The classrooms have been clustered into groups of three classrooms and one associated SET Room, to reflect the 8 no, classroom year-streams. Six classrooms are located on ground floor level for junior and senior infants, and nine classrooms are provided on both first and second floors for first class to sixth class, General Rooms Accessible WC’s are located in the centre of the building, adjacent to the lift and ambulant disabled stairs, with one Accessible WC provided on each floor. Two other stairs are located at both ends of the central corridor. Stairs are designed as ambulant disabled stairs in line with best principles of accessibility. The low, deep steps are particularly useful for primary schoo! buildings and younger children. All stairs serve as accommodation and fire escape stairs. Safe Assembly and Egress ‘The new building forms a new urban street edge on three sides. The secondary entrance to the east of the building provides direct access to the rear playground, thereby allows all Pupils assemble safely before the school building opens in the morning. All fire egress stairs exit into the playground to allow safe assembly in the case of emergency. Egress from the external play area Is located at the south west corner of the site, adjacent to the staff parking. Materials & Finishes External Envelope ‘The proposed elevations are designed to give a robust yet welcoming exterior to the school. ‘The Local Authority noted in pre planning discussions that the building should be constructed in brickwork due to the proximity of the adjacent Protected Structures along Haddington Road, and the adjoining Conservation Area. Brickwork and stone cladding is proposed to the street elevation on the main block along the north and east facades, and is repeated as a plinth to the front railings.Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Moving further into the site, self-coloured render will become the predominant material, and will provide a brighter material to the rear play area of the building. The General Purpose Room also has self coloured render as an external wall finish. Aluminium, thermally-broken, double glazed windows are proposed throughout. Figures 9,10 and 11: Material Context 3.5.2 Roof35.4 3.5.5 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS A flat roof with centrally collected syphonic drainage system is proposed for all roofs. ‘The proposed syphonic drainage system also allows for the easy collected of rainwater at the rainwater recovery tank with minimal internal downpipes inside the building. A parapet is formed along the street elevations to provide the appropriate urban street detail on these facades, and complement the existing adjacent civic buildings in the area. Gutters and downpipes are not provided on the street facade to avoid potential damage and climbing by intruders. Structure ‘The building will be constructed of fair faced load bearing blockwork with concrete beams ‘spanning large window opes. The first floor will be constructed of 250mm precast floor slabs spanning between classroom walls, with a 75mm screed, and insitu concrete in the locations identified by the Structural Engineer. The classrooms are vertically aligned over both floors to ensure speedy and economic construction. Staff Room/library structure: The cantilevered corner of the staff room and library requires construction of a 325mm concrete floor slab and insitu concrete walls to the staff room. GP Area Structure: An in-situ concrete roof on metal decking forms the roof structure of the General Purpose Area, supported by 975mm deep castellated steel beams on SHS stee! columns within the internal leaf of the external walls. The structure provides the loading requirements for the external play area above. Building Mass ‘The parapet height of the proposed building along Haddington Road is increased , however it is similar to the height of the roof ridge of the existing two storey building. The building mass reduces from north to south, to minimise overshadowing on the adjacent residential Properties, falling to two storey at the southern end, where rooftop play is provided to augment the external play provision for the new school. Sustainability & SUDS: Sustainability is central to the design of the proposed building. Building materials and u- values are designed to exceed current building regulations & standards. The flat roof provides for ease of retrofitting of solar panels or similar sustainable technologies in the future. Rainwater will be collected from the roof into a below ground storage tank. From this point the water will be pumped to a high level day (feeder) tank located in the tank room of the new school. This tank is raised as high as possible within the school to work by gravity so that the system continues to operate in the event of a power failure. The rainwater will be used for flushing WCs throughout the new school. In addition, the rainwater supply serves a tap mounted in the boiler room for external wash down and / or watering purposes.3.5.6 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS ‘The day tank is sized to the Department of Education and Skills guidelines to provide 10 litres per day per pupil and therefore has a capacity of 7.2m?. The underground storage tank will have 30m? of volume The system will provide up to five days of storage, in accordance to the Department of Education and Skills guidelines. Due to the constrained site area, and the limited green space available, surface water is attenuation in a below ground tank. This is described in detail in the Civil Engineering report in Section 5. Impact on the Amenities in the Area ‘The building has been carefully designed to minimise it’s impact on the amenities of the surrounding area, including in particular it’s impact on the adjoining residential properties. ‘Throughout the design process the design team continually assessed the impact of the proposed development on adjacent properties particularly in terms of light, proximity, impact of existing residential amenities and overshadowing. To ensure adequate separation distances to the adjoining residences, the new building has been designed as a compact building with an efficient footprint, broadly in line with the footprint of the existing buildings on the site. This maximises separation distances to the existing dwellings to the west of the site. ‘The acoustic quality of the new building will be far superior to the existing buildings on the site, so that the new building will perform to a much higher standard in terms of noise abatement. The ground floor external play area of the school is located within the centre of the site, matching the playground of the existing St Mary's Secondary school. The external rooftop play area will be surrounded by a fritted glazed screen to provide acoustic separation and privacy to the adjacent housing to the south and east of the site along St Mary's Lane and St Mary’s Road. Classroom windows on the east elevation facing onto Haddington Place (Major) will provide passive supervision to this public lane. The parapet height and massing of the proposed new building has been designed to minimise the impact and overshadowing on the adjoining properties. As can be seen from Figures 12-17 below, there will be adverse overshadowing on adjoining properties from the proposed new building due to careful location and scale of the development. Larger images of the shadowing analysis studies below are included on Planning drawings 0508 and 0509, which accompany this report.3.6 3.6.1 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Figure 16 ~ Existing Shadows (3pm March 21") Figure 17 - Proposed Shadows (3pm March 21%) Statutory Requirements Fire Safety The building and site layout have been designed in compliance with TGD-B of the Building Regulations. A Fire Safety Certificate application is currently being prepared for submission to Dublin City Council for consideration.3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Universal Accessibility ‘The development has been designed in compliance with TGD M 2010. A Disability Access Certificate application is being progressed and will be submitted to Dublin City Council in due course. Building Regulations ‘The Design Team have developed the design in compliance with Technical Guidance Documents of the Building Regulations. Health, Safety & Construction ‘The Design Team have adopted the General Principles of Prevention through the course of the design of the project. Designers Assessment of Safety have been completed and circulated to the PSDP in compliance with Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006. The building design has developed to minimise the impact on the adjacent properties and neighbours. Dust suppression measures will be put in place at the site perimeter to the rear of House No.’s 77 and 78 Haddington Road. The construction of the development will be operated in accordance with a construction & demolitions management plan. This will include restricted hours of works and best practice in relation to noise management, off-site disposal of construction/ demolitions waste, safe management of deliveries and interface with the public roads, measures to be put in place to ensure the public roadways in the vicinity of the construction site entrance will be kept clear from debris and waste.Section 4 ‘Community Consultations4.0 41 414. 41.2 41.3 4.2 424 4.22 43 43.1 Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Community Consulta! The community were engaged in consultations to identify issues affecting particular residents and to explore potential solutions to eliminate or mitigate the impacts of concern. Residents adjacent and opposite the site on each side were consulted on a number of occasions. The concerns raised by each informed the design of the project and amendments made where possible to address the issues raised. ‘A number of residents had made contact directly with the Department of Education and Skills, were also met as part of these consultations. Each resident was encouraged to make any of their concerns known to the Planning Authority by an observation submission during the planning process. A leaflet drop was made to the wider neighbourhood, to announce the development and Invite contact for further information. Issues Arising All residents were generally supportive of the development and welcomed the educational reuse of the site. ‘The issues raised by the residents were: ‘= scale of the building over three storeys, and the provision of adequate play area for the school ‘= height of the new school and its shadow cast on residents opposite the site on Haddington road, and the mews residents to the east adjacent Haddington Place Major + articulation of the main facade to Haddington Road and its junction to the adjoining period houses + landscape treatment to the public edges of the site * noise from the playground affecting residents to the north ‘+ noise from the rooftop play area ‘+ increase in traffic generated by the school and its management, and retention of, existing on street parking spaces ‘+ construction access and impacts of construction activities ‘+ dust, noise and vibration nuisance of the demolition works Mitigation Measures The scale of building and provision of play areas have been optimised by: ‘+ the new building repeats the building line of the existing building, pro appropriate street edge, with a compact form mostly over three floors, has a lesser footprint of the old St Mary's School, increasing the available external play area jing anCoady Partnership ARCHITECTS the roof area of the double height general purpose hall provides an additional play/social area, directly accessed from the second floor the proposed building is no higher than the overall height of the existing building and is an appropriate scale and mass for this urban site 4.3.2 The height of building and shadow cast on neighbours has been minimised by: stepping the form down towards the south similar to the existing building a flat roof construction throughout with a minimal parapet height. A safety barrier rail is set inside the parapet, inclined inwards to ensure it is not visible from low level ‘The parapet is higher at the corner of Haddington Road and Haddington Place Minor, to annunciate the corner and school entrance, where its shadow falls on the blank gable of the opposite houses, with no consequence to the residential amenity. The shadow analysis in section 3.5.6 illustrates ther no impact on the residents on Haddington Road and there is some additional impact on the mews residents opposite the ‘school on Haddington Place Minor. This impact has been discussed with the resident most affected, where their courtyard is currently shaded by their party wall with their neighbour, the proposed building shadow falls further up the courtyard wall to approximate mid height. 4.3.3. The articulation of the main facade onto Haddington Road has been enhanced by: providing a canopy to the main entrance with a stone surround, with stone extended vertically to annunciate the entrance and the raised brick box to the corner adding a stone trim at the junction to the adjoining period house changing the toilet windows to a vertical aspect brick piers have been added to the new enclosing metal railings, similar to the existing condition retention of one of the cherry trees to the front garden area, closest to the adjoining residents 4.3.4 Further landscaping has been included in the scheme by: 4.3.5. Noise from play areas is moderated by: providing a planter flush to the pavement, where the general purpose hall is set back from the line of the public pavement to accommodate a climber plant to this elevation including a planter surrounding the roof play area to screen the glass screen and play area from view raising of the boundary wall by 600mm to the two neighbours north of the playground was agreed to provide additional screening and mitigate noise from the playground the existing trees in the existing playground area are retained, with additional planting to the boundary wall, agreed with the neighbours affected the roof top play area is enclosed by a glass screen to provide an acoustic barrierCoady Partnership ARCHITECTS 4.3.6 A Traffic Impact Assessment is included in this report. Measures to further mitigate the traffic impacts discussed with neighbours were: changing the traffic flow on Haddington Place Major from two-way to one-way, travelling from St Mary's Road to Haddington Road, to allow cars to pull into the left to setdown in the current designated school setdown area addition of raised table crossings, to provide save pedestrian crossing and reduce vehicle speed These changes would involve work in the public road and changes in the traffic flows, which are outside the scope of this application and the school is committed to progressing these issues separately with the neighbours, to the appropriate Department within the Council 4.3.7 Construction access control measures to be employed include: site activities to be limited to normal working hours construction access to be managed in a one-way flow along Haddington Place Major wheel washing of construction vehicles and regular road cleaning 4.3.8 Demolition control measures to be employed include: continuous dampening down of the demolition works and rubble heaps noise and vibration monitoring on site separation of the existing building from the adjoining period house with likely support shoring, prior to its major demolition misting screen barrier to boundary of adjoining house to the west to prevent dust and airborne particles, were the resident has a compromised immune system wheel washing of construction vehicles and regular road cleaning 4.3.9 Construction liaison arrangements will include: ‘A requirement for the contractor to provide a point of contact with neighbouring properties to facilitate reporting and mitigation of construction-related nuisances, if they arise.Section 5 Civil Engineering Report Downes Associatesowas associates @ 12167 e Haddington Road School, Dublin 4. Planning Submission Report for o Dublin City Council. o September 2013 e Prepared for e Coady Partnership Architects e Revlon Regi 6 Revision | Description "| Prepared By [eer om [1 J oianal Revision NF i TEI 2 [Fee Pring — RF Te OTS | e Evcrveers Downes acts i Regiteed TRAN 5385 eatsContents: 4. Infroduetion 2. Existing Site Services 3. Foul Water Drainage Design 4, Surface Water Drainage Design 5. Surface Water Source Control Measures 8. Watermain Design 7. Schedule of Drawings 8 Appendices ‘Surface Water Attenuation Calculations. ‘Attenuation Device Details Dublin City Council Records Sheet Soakaway test results pompHaccington Road School, Dubin & Planning Suomasion Report fr Dubin City Counc 4. INTRODUCTION The proposed new schoo! is located on an existing schoo! site at junction of Haddington Road ‘and Haddington Place Major. The existing school is to be demolished and replaced with a new three storey school. The purpose of this report is to highlight and discuss the civil ‘engineering issues relating to the project and to ensure a thorough pre-planning analysis has been carried out ‘The building comprises twenty four classrooms (8No. Set rooms, 2No. Multipurpose rooms and a GP Hall) and associated ancillary works. This report should be read in conjunction with drawings referred to in section 7 of this report. 2. EXISTING SITE SERVICES Details of the existing site services in the vicinity of the site were obtained from Dublin City Council. Please refer to drawing 121671101 for the location ofall existing drainage on the site. ‘See appendix C for the record sheets received from Dublin City Council, Watermain ‘90mm diameter HPPE watermain pipes exist on Haddington Road, Haddington Place (Major) ‘and Haddington Place (Minor). The existing school appears to have two connections, one from Haddington Road and the other from Haddington Place (Minor). It is not proposed to re- Use any of these existing connections in the new development. Foul & Storm There is no separate foul or storm water system in the vicinity of the site. The existing schoo! has @ combined foul and storm system which flows to the public combined system at three separate locations around the site. It is not intended to use any of the existing system within the site or the existing connections to public system, 3. FOUL WATER DRAINAGE DESIGN The foul water drainage system for the proposed development will be separate to the surface water drainage system up to the final manhole within the site where it becomes combined. This manhole will be constructed with interceptor trap. The combined system will then discharge by gravity flow to the existing 225 dia. combined sewer line at Haddington Place (Minor) by way of saddle connection, Foul pipework within the site will be designed to carry a maximum peak flow rate of 6 DWF (Gry weather flow). Dry weather flow is calculated based on the recommendation of 60 \meadiday for the population equivalent, as per EPA Wastewater Treatment Manual. A roughness co-efficient, ks, of 1.6mm is used for foul sewers, which are designed to achieve a ‘minimum self cleansing velocity of 0.8m/s when flowing half fulHaasington Road School, Dubin 4 Panning Sutmission Report fr Dubin City Counc ‘Proposed Development. Based on a total population equivalent of 760, the average outflow based on 60 Vhead/day is: ‘801x760 x8 =32 Usec (24x60x60) 150mm diameter sewer at a gradient of approximately 1:80 Hydraulic performance with ks = 1.5, Discharge capacity 16.950Vs (>3.2Vs) Velocity {86 mis (> 0.8 mis and < 4 mis) 4, SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE DESIGN The surface water drainage system for the proposed development will be separate to the foul water drainage system up to the final outfall manhole where it becomes combined. The surface water will discharge by gravity flow via AJs and manholes to the existing 225mm diameter combined sewer system at Haddington Place (Minor) by way of saddle connection. Pipes carying surface water shall be sized to cater for a rainfall intensity of SOmm per hour applied to all external impermeable areas and roofs. Surface water runoff from impermeable areas is calculated using the Modified Rational Method as follows: 78C,CiA (where Q is in Us, iis in mm/h and A is in Ha) C= 0.75 and C,= 1.3 = Q=278iA A roughness coefficient, k, of 0.6mm is used for surface water drains. Pipe size and gradient for each run are determined using the Wallingford hydraulic design tables. Total impermeable area of development (roof and non-permeable pavements) = 260m" ‘Therefore, peak unattenuated surface water discharge from development; © Q=2.78x 60x 2800 x 104= 38.9 Us 300mm diameter sewer at a gradient of approximately 1:100 Hydraulic performance with ks = 0.6 Discharge capacity = 121 Us (> 38.9 Us) Velocity = 1.55 mis (> 0.8 m/s and < 4s)Haddington Road Schod, Duin 4 Planning Submission Repot for Dubin Cty Counc 6. SURFACE WATER SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES, ‘With regard to surface water disposal, the Technical Guidance Documents for the “Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Regional Drainage Policies" (GDSDS) is to be complied with for the proposed development. Regarding the application of the drainage criteria this site has been considered ‘high density small infil site. We have therefore applied crteria's 1.1, 3 & 43. Criteria 4.1: Interception storage: ‘Systems considered Soakaways: A soakaway test was carried out in November 2012 by Site investigation Ltd to assess the sol infitration vaiue on the site. The water infitrtion was noted in report as being too low to calculate the soil infiltration value. The site has therefore been deemed unsuitable for soakaway. Test results can be found in Appendix D. Infiltration trenches: As above the soil in deemed unsuitable for such. Pervious paving: As above the soil in deemied unsuitable for such Rainwater Harvesting: With a large roof area the use of rain water harvesting has been incorporated into the new School design. With the exception of the roof play area which would contain contaminated water, the remainder of the roof runoff will be collected into sealed rain water pipes and stored in an underground tank for use as grey water. ‘Criteria 3: Level of service flooding for the site OPW flooding maps do not show previous flooding on this site. The site can therefore be classed to be in Zone C. Flooding in 1 in 100 year storm event has been design for within the site by use of linear drainage channels to drain all impervious surfaces and use of green spaces where available. All drainage channels drain by gravity to an underground separate storm system, Criteria 43: Maximum discharge rate: A iow contol resticting device (hydrobrake) is proposed to be installed at final storm ‘manhole within the site. This wl esrict the flow to 2.08. A sutable sized attenuation tank for 1 in a 100 year storm events proposed to prevent flooding to site, The tanks proposed to be instaled of ne of main drainage runs to prevent siting wiin the tank. Calculations ofthe attenuation volume are included in Appendix A. Flow control device details are inctuded in Appendix B. ‘Summary of Attenuation Volume. 11in 100 Year storm volume required = 131.9m* Climate change allowance = 10% Total volume required = 145.1m* ‘Attenuation Type: Polypipe PolyStorm system with 95% voids and 40tonnes/m* load bearing capacity.Hadcington Road Schodl, Dubin 4. Planning Submigson Repo for Dubin Cy Cour 6. WATERMAIN DESIGN With reference to the drawings enclosed, water services to the proposed development will be by way of the existing 90mm-diameter HPPE watermain at the Haddington Place (Minor). It is [proposed to tap a 100mm diameter watermain from the existing main. 7. SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS The following drawings are enclosed with the report: 121671101 12167/100 12167/102 121871103, 12167/104 121671105 Existing site services showing site survey and existing drainage, Proposed site services layout. Typical manhole details. Typical pipe bedding details, Typical gully details, Typical water main details.Haddington Road School, Dubin 4. Planning Submission Report for Dublin City Coun APPENDIX A SURFACE WATER ATTENUATION CALCULATIONSDownes Associates Se ——~T Page + 79 South Circular Rd 12167 5 Portobello Haddington Road fee eet Eee Date June 2013. Designed By NF File hadaington SRC Checked 8y roe age: ENCAD Storage Design W7-5 (@)1082:2001 Micro Drainage | ‘Summary of Results for 100 year Return Period Storm Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum | Duration Control Outflow Water Level Depth Volume Status (mins) (m3/s)_— (3/8) (a 0D) @) (3) 15 0.0019 0.0019 6.7655 0.1655 46.4 OK 30 0.0020 0.0020 6.8325 0.2325 65.0 OK 60 0.0020 0.0020 6.8995 0.2995 83.9 OK 120 0.0020 0.0020 6.9765 0.3765 105.4 OK 180 0.0020 0.0020 7.0225 0.4225 «(118.3 «OK 240 0.0020 0.0020 7.0345 (0.4345 «121.6 OK 360 0.0020 0.0020 7.0575 0.4575 «128.2 OK 480 0.0020 0.0020 0.4665 130.7 OK 600 0.0020 0.0020 0.4705 131.7 OK 720 0.0020 0.0020 0.4715 132.2 OK 1440 0.0020 0.0020 7.0605 0.4605 128.8 OK 2160 0.0019 0.0019 7.0345 (0.4345 121.6 OK 2880 0.0020 0.0020 7.0045 0.4045 113.3 OK 4320 0.0020 0.0020 6.9435 0.3435 96.1 OK 5760 0.0020 0.0020 6.8835 0.2835 (79.3 OK 7200 0.0019 0.0019 6.8295 0.2295 64.4 OK 8640 0.0019 0.0019 6.7905 0.1905 53.3 OK 10080 0.0019 0.0019 6.7605 0.1605 45.0 OK Dencen Rain Time-Peak (ane) (VBE) (mins) 15 76.66 30 53.19 60 34.38 3120 21.82 180 16.65 240 © 12.72 360 © 9.51 48000 7.73 600 66.58 720 5.76 1440 3.48 2160 2.59 2880 © 2.10 43200 1.56 5760 1.26 7200 1.07 8640 0.93, 10080 © 0.83,Hadsington Road School, Dubin 4 Planning Svémiasion Report for Dubin Cty Couns APPENDIX B ATTENUATION DEVICE DETAILSHRD TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Design Layout with Approximate Dimensions of a 97 SXH Hydro-Brake® 1; Project information (ur Reterence "07-8210 | Cert” Downes Associates | Ste: stMichaels Special Needs School Raheny sar & 180mm iD OUTLET DW _ mat IK — Coram | | i= : | 390mm SECTION AA SECTION BB IMPORTANT: pact wm aN TORI BZN ene FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY ord Toot Wyardone Pee “Tel : (01) 4888 440 Fax : (01) 4588 442 BeeNew! Hydro D> turing voter around Hydro-Brake® Chamber Intérnational | Ie No Benching, No Coring, No Fuss! Pre-formed Chamber with Integral Hydro-Brake® Flow Control Product Profile Hydro Intemational, n 8 jnt venture with CPM Group. has introduced a seres of #38y 19 5 Reintorced concrete chamber wit Insta pre-formed Hycto-Brake* Crambers The Hydro-Brake® Flow Contol, manufactured pre-formed benching and bby Hydro Intemational. e incorporated into either 8 1200 mm or 8 1800 mm diameter De eacwalt ‘cast einorced concrete chamber with pre-formed benching and neadwall manufactured bY 5 retited Hydro-Brake® Flow (CPM Group Lis ou ‘© Configurable to most flow contro! ‘The one-piece chamber reduces the need for concrete suvcund The sem-crcular stations benching aiows easy access to the Sump area fr Sediment rerroval and s designed Suc” Chamber design allows up to that up to four inlets can be incorporated into the chamber - additonal smaller Szed inlets 4 No precored inlets to sut can also be included to suit customer specications. The Hyoro-B'a Flow Cont customer specication {ited into the chamber ensunng that 18 always instaied correctly The chamber cao marae ‘supplies win or wimout double steps. + Reduced instalation tine + Reduces captal costs on overa project | \ 1 Ay +1200 mm Diameter Chamber + 125m overall depth 1+ 2150 kg maximum weight (with wash 1500 mm Diameter Chamber E iapeeelereabeotabe +175 m overage were woure ‘Scin. #3970 kg maxmum went (win no stuos) «+ Eltner 150 mm er.225 mm ouset. © MBXimum inlet clameter 600 mm. 1 21No, double ste presnstaieg ° Oui Sze 150:mm up 10 450 mm tegen + 4'No. double stops preunstalieg f required Hydro international Shearwater House + Clevedon Hall Estate Vicona Road « Clevedon « 8S21 7RD nee Tel 01275 87837" = Fax 01278 874970» www hydro-nternational B2 :@ © OC 6 6 O86 666666 Seeeeee @ New! Hydro turning water around Hydro-Brake® Chamber _ Intemational a = No Benching, No Coring, No Fuss! Pre-formed Chamber with Integral Hydro-Brake® Flow Control Product Profile Hyer iterations, na joint venture wits CPM Group. nas invoduced a seres of easy 19 4 Reinforced concrete chamber with inaat pre-formed Hyro-Brake® Chambers. The Hyoro-Brake® Faw Contol, manufactured pyetrmed benching and by Hyg ltoratonal, incorporated into ether a 1200.mm or a 1500 mm dame r= gadwal cast reinforced concrete chamber win prerned benchag and headwai manuiecu'ed 5y 4 Presited Hydro-Brake* Flow CPM Group Lis a + Configurable to mest ow con! ‘The one-piece chamber reduces the need for concrete surround The semi-crcular tuations benching slows easy access o the sumo area for sediment removal andis signed Su" 4 Chamber design allows upto ‘hat up to four nets can be incorporated int the chamber -adtonal salir sized inlets 4 No, pre-cored ints to Sut can also be incuded to sut customer specifications. The Hysro-Grake" Flow Contclis Pre- —_customer specication {ed into the chamber ensuring hat tis always nstabed corey The chamber can be 4 No concrete surround requred ‘supplied wth of wthout double steps © Recured tan ee + Reauoes capital costs on overat project 1200 mm Diameter Chamber + 1:25 overall depth ‘+2180 kg maxenur weignt (with 41600 mm Diameter Chamber ‘no stubs). , ee ee, +175 m overali depm, ater aur menace 3970 hg maximum weight (with no stubs). Maxinum inlet diameter 600 mm, Outlet size 180 mm up to 450 ram. 4.No. double steps pre-installed required ‘+ Either 190 mm oF 228 mm outet. ‘+ 2 No. double steps pre-installed i required Hydro International ‘Shearwater House « Clevecon Hall Estate « Victora Roae “Tel 01275 87637! = Fax 01275 874979 - wow hyd Clevedon + 8521 7RO international 62Hydro-Brake® Flow HRD Control Technologies Lid sl Technical Data Sheet How it Works Product Profile ‘+ Nomoving pats The design is simple, consisting ofan intake, a volute and an outet Flow is drectec . nae eiediacent tangertaly into a volute o form a vortex. High perpneal velocites induce an a-led + Seehinlng teteet core with a resulting back pressure that reduces cischarge. wea turning water around + Outet 3-6 times arger than conventional contois + Highest pectorming passive fow contr + Can reduce storage requirements by up to 20% compared to an orice plate + BBA applied for + Requees mamai maintenance + Over 10,000 instaiations worlwide Performance Applications + Stomwater management ‘The Hyaro-Brake! Fiow Control out. pertorms conventional flow contol dewces Is Source Control ‘nique S-shaped headiaischarge cuve, which has been devised fro™ extensive 00 -inatip systematic modeling and feld testing, comprises two distnct phases As the heas «New dilegeatie ‘creases. 2 transiton takes place trom tree ow (lower pomton ofthe curve) 1 vortex + Storage locos controled flow (upper porton of the curve) ‘© Treatment pants. ‘+ Flow balancing, stenuation ans The Hydro-Brahe® Flow Contvoltherety acheves maxmum sesign discharge rates at wniciben ‘ower heads than conventional contols AS 2 result. storage requements are recuces « tandilpllags by up 0 30% (as shown below) sinicanty reduoing project costs + eloety conto! eaaHydro-Brake® Flow Control HRD | I se Design Procedure turing water around (On receipt of We provide free of charge Head - Depth trom invert to top Unt specttcaton water lve! upstream ‘6 HeaaiDischarge Characterstcs # Flow - Required discharge ‘+ Typical installation drawing Type of appication «we. fou! ‘combined oF stormwater ‘+ Quotation forthe supply ofthe fow contra ‘© Detais of the proposed application ‘manhole detais or consol chamber On receipt of order: Example of 80400 We fabricate and deiver the equpmen ‘ypicaty witin 3-4 weeks Our Most Popular Types of Hydro-Brake” Flow Controls, ‘Type SH, SMH, SKH and SMXH CGeneraly used to control stormwater low In adsibon to stormwater control these unts an be used as inlet contois and for regulating the outfow from balancing tanks and sacl pan: ramp ofan 8V 08 Flow Range: Typically 2-700 vs ‘Type SV, SMV and SKV ‘Simi tothe Type SH but wih a vertical outlet Can be used in foul and combed sewer ‘ow conto! applications Flow Range Typically 2-300 Vs oe Wee _ Provides sutable cantrl fr stormwater, foul and combines sewer flows The Type Chas 18 pronounced S-shaped headidicharge curve, alowng dry weather flow to pass without ‘capes resticton and reducing overall storage requirements. Generally used for high flow ‘appicatons. Applicaton incude control of watercourses Flow Range Surface Water Typically 90 Us upwards Foul Water: Typicaly 240 Vs upwards Type CH and Cx ‘Serdar to the Type C, the Boxintake ofthe Type CH provides a larger opening for reducing the nsk of blockage during low flows Applications include CSO's storage tanks, niet works and flow balancing Flow Range Surface Water Typicaly 4 U's upwares anaes Foul Water Typecally 18 V's upwards [NOTE OTHER TYPES OF HYDRO-BRAKE* FLOW CONTROLS ARE AVAILABLE]S©CeSeSSSSOKRSaHRSDGOHOGOOSOOE Hydro-Brake® Flow Control il Options Technologies Utd HRD offers a variety of patented features designed to enhance performance inthe most dificult and chaienging situations. Our profession ngiering team can agvse on how the Hydro-Brake® Flow Control can be customised te provide a soltion to your ‘arbclar problem Pivoting By-pass Door Recammendes fo al conto’ the doce ataches tothe | back pat of the corto! unt to allow ( Adjustable intake Gate ‘Alows for mosifcaion ofthe units ow rate Vortex Suppressor/Vent Pipe Innis vortex mation by introducing water into the ai core thereby increasing fow by up to 50% with a very smal Increase in nea Flexible Installation Conrols can be supped wih ciferent types of mounting Including curved mounting plates, push-At spigts, side mounted and attached to penstocks Rodding Pipe Enables pipe blockages downstream of he contol o be rodded tom he surtace Pressure Applications Flanged connectons are available HIRO Technologies Lis Tootennll House « Rathcoole = Co Oubin = irelang Tol +983 (0) 4013964 + Fax. +353 (0}1 | 3078 + ww bree or tuming water around Since their introduction in 1980 over 10,000 Hydro-Brake® Flow Controls have been installed in: United Kingdom Ireland United Arab Emirates South East Asia United States of America Canada + Australia ° France ®¥Haddington Road School, Dubin 4 Pranning Submission Report fr Duin Cty Counc APPENDIX C DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL RECORD SHEETSScale: 1: 1000 Date: 6 Sep 2012 DESIGN DIVISION, ORANASE DESIGN, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BLOCK 1, FLOOR 2, CIVIL OFFICES, WOODGUAY, DUBLIN Phot 6786111 FaxO1 6790800 Dublin City Bale Ata chato/ EON SES ss ZR : U/ 4 SEES SOD WEE RR IRQ LF | mx ‘ | idvat) 1 J zoe a eS OY fouHadeington Road School, Dubin 4. Planning Submission Report for Dubin Cty Couns APPENDIX D SOAKAWAY TEAT RESULTS.Soakaway Test to BRE Digest 365 TP ‘The Trial pit was filled with water to 0.67mBGL and the drop in water level with time was recorded below. ‘Trial Pit Dimensions: 1.5 x 0.3 x 1.8 (Lx Wx D) Elapsed Time Water Level Minutes mBGL a. 0 0.67 Hole filled to 0.67m bal 1 0.67 2 0.67 3 0.68 5 0.69 10 0.70 15 0.70 20 0.70 30 0.66 Partial collapse of pit wall ists ‘causes water level to rise 40 0.66 30 0.66 60 0.67 75 0.68 30 0.69 120 0.70 150, : 180 5 210 O73 240 5 270 074 300 0.74 330 0.75 360. 0.76 Test Complete Ground Investigations Ireland LtdSection 6 Services Engineering Report NJ 0 Gorman AssociatesI I 0G PLANNING REPORT for the MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL BUILDING SERVICES INSTALLATIONS at HADDINGTON ROAD NATIONAL SCHOOLRef: Project: 12052 Date: 2 : 2013-10-15 Document: Planning report (M&E Building Services) Haddington Road National Department of Education School and Skills, NJ. OGORMAN & ASSOCIATES. General Mains, Cold & Hot water supply Rainwater Harvesting Natural Ventilation Central Heating Electrical Engineering Services: Electrical Installation - General Mains & Sub Mains Distri Emergency Lighting Extemal Lighting Data & Telecommunications: cctvz z 12052 Date: 2013-10-15 Document: Planning report (M&E Building Services) Haddington Road National lien Department of Education School and Skills Nu. OGORMAN & ASSOCIATES, 10 Li. i, 13. 14, Ls. Mechanical Inst ‘The services will be installed throughout the building in accordance to the Building Regulations, relevant standards and good industry practice. M , Cold and Hot Water Services ‘The mains water shall be supplied to the building via a new service pipe. The proposed service pipe shall enter the building in the boiler room. Mains water shall be distributed throughout the building, feeding drinking water points (fountains and sink taps) and shall also be supplied to cold water storage tank and rainwater header tank (for backup), both located at roof level. Cold water shall be stored in a Format 30 tank located in the tank room at the roof level. From this thank cold water shall be distributed throughout the building, supplying taps and showers, A separate feed shall be installed to supply cold water to the boiler room for production of domestic hot water. Rainwater Harvesting Rainwater will be collected from the roof into a below ground storage tank. From this point the water will be pumped to a high level day (feeder) tank located in the tank room of the new school. This tank is raised as high as possible within the school to work by gravity so that the system continues to operate in the event of a power failure. The rainwater will be used for flushing WCs throughout the new school. In addition, the rainwater supply serves a tap mounted in the boiler room for external wash down and / or watering purposes. ‘The day tank is sized to the Department of Education and Skills guidelines to provide 10 litres per day per pupil and therefore has a capacity of 7.2m3. ‘The underground storage tank will have 30m3 of volume. The system will provide up to five days of storage, in accordance to the Department of Education and Skills guidelines. Natural Ventilation ‘The building shall be ventilated by means of natural ventilation. The opening sections of windows have been designed to provide an adequate air flow rate to prevent rooms from excessive overheating, Central Heat The school shall be provided with a hydronic central heating system comprising LTHW (low temperature hot water) pipework, radiators and radiant emitters installed throughout the building. The system shall be provided with weather compensation, 7-day programmer and individual room temperature control. The heating system shall be zoned to facilitate out-of- hours use of certain sections of the building. ‘The heat shall be provided by gas fired condensing boilers installed in a dedicated boiler room at the back of the building. A new natural gas connection shall be provided to replace the existing gas connection and heating oil storage.Ref: 12052 Date: 2013-10-15 Document: Planning (MB&E Building Services) Project: Haddington Road National Client: Department of Education Schoo! and Skills To Seca theese 2.0 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES: Electrical Installation - General ‘The buildings will be supplied with electricity from a new ESB Networks wall recessed mini- pillar located on the new school boundary wall ‘The electrical installation associated with the project will comply with T.G.D. (b) paragraph 1.4.10 and National Rules of Electrical Installations as published by the Electro Technical Council of Ireland. Protected circuits which are required to continue to function in fire condit sounder circuits) will meet the requirements for classification of C.W.Z BS 6387:1983. ns (i.e. fire alarm accordance with Mains Distribution ‘The new main incoming distribution board & ESB metering will be positioned in a fire rated electrical cupboard within the entrance lobby. Emergency Lighting ‘An emergency lighting system will be installed to provide adequate artificial lighting to all escape routes to comply with the Building Regulations and IS 3217:2008 “Code of Practice for Emergency Lighting”. The installation will include a central test unit located within the main distribution board. Emergency lighting shall be by invertor/battery packs fitted to general luminaries, with dedicated, self contained, maintained units for exit signs & and non-maintained LED emergency lights. Emergency luminaries shall be provided at every emergency escape door as required by IS 3217:2008 Exit signs and markings will be provided in accordance with SI No. 132 of 1995 “Safety Health and Welfare at Work (signs) Regulations 1995. External ting to Building: External lighting will be provided via wall mounted IP 65 rated LED light fittings, controlled by a time switch and solar cell arrangement to a co-ordinated scheme to illuminate external areas to current CIBSE external lighting standards. External lighting will also be connected to the security alarm system which will activate in the event of a security breach, It is not proposed to provide any lamp standard external lighting within the site boundary. All external lighting is to be building mounted. ‘The existing ESB Place & St. Mar istribution pole and public lighting located near the comer of Haddington 's Lane is to be removed.Ref: Project: 12052 Date: 2013-10-15 Document: Planning report (M&E Building Services) Haddington Road National Client: Department of Education School and Skills, ue." Data & Telecommunications: Facilities vertical and horizontal cableways will be provided on each floor for data and telecommunications cabling, . Voice/Data Installations New UPC & Eircom phone, TV & internet lines are to be provided to the Communications cabinet in the Data Communications Centre New ducting will be provided from Haddington Place for same. External CCTV: The perimeter of the building and all entrances and exists will be covered by a CCTV system for security purposes.Site Photographs APPENDIX ACoady Partnership ARCHITECTS Site Photographs Project: Haddington Road NS Job ref: 1895 Date: 6 June 2013 Fig. 2 View from Haddington Road looking SouthFig. 4 View from Haddington Place Minor looking East VaniFig. 6 Existing CourtyardAPPENDIX B Tree Survey & Condition Report‘wey -09 outoquna oom suo jesnyinoisoqay SSV + HTTLANOD°W Wf Z40z 48q0390 »yunqng ‘peoy uoj6ulppey ‘yooyag Asepuosasg s,Asew 3S seuu04 eyL ye BUS 8y} UO $90 04) ssesse | (Aeauns 9044) jueussessy jeinynovOqiy‘@mwueyneuog eanynouogay | saxepossy + 9AUODIAN WE S961} POWWAIS-1)NUL JO} B1Dy JOO! YY ‘@A0qD PUD [eA9| PUNO’B eAogo saijaW ¢'| JO PAINSDO SO ‘Se,OLUIHLL LI LOIS Se} BY} JO.J9jOWIOID aly 0} sia}! (HEC) JeFOWIOIP Wa!S + ‘POINSDOW 'SS4JOW U! UMOID OY} JO YIPIM 94} 0} $19J91; PDBISUMOID + "SojoUU Ul 904 94) 0 JUBIOY IJ} a4 0} siojou: GION * DOOM PEEP @AISUO}X9 40 BUyD9| 2510S 1]010A0 — 100d ‘BOOM POEP JO[OLU Pa{0I051 10 POOM PEEP JOUML! '48AOD JOB] PEONPE! AYUBIIS — HO ssayouDIg PaBOUIOP 10 passexddns ewos Bulpnput Assod ing AdouD> Ayi|OSy 005 SD PaqUoseP a}OUM 0 SO 224, BU JO UOMIPUDD |ODIBOIOISKUC OU} 0 S19}91: UOMIPUCD wrBojojsAud + “Peuidxe 941 |]0404 JO Pury, UO Oo} dn YIM ‘BUYUDIA jUBD9J ‘BUND A - A “P2ACXS 24y][O}O} JO SPs OMY O} PuNY}-OUO ‘euN}OWY AUOZ- WA ']U8WE.0U [ONUUD JOU AJUO yyy ‘UMOIE Any “@INYOW — W {u92S8URs PUD eUIDP UI ‘eI JEU JO PUB ayy BUI4DDE! seal ‘eINIOW 1800 - WO peuie2u09 saDeds 84} JO} @6UD) 260 |ODIAA} 344, PUOAAG BUIAIAINS S}ONPIIPU O} BASN|O* JOU }Nq ‘JO DSHO}DOIOYD 210 {OYJ NIDA DYBUYISED 40 JOINYIND “JOOI]GOIOIA Jo SeINYOR) BUMMOYS ‘OUD}UD Pez[sBOIe! AQ UDIYM ‘SBOM} ‘UOIOIOA -A, ‘SD Paquosep 26, eu jo 26D ey Jo UONDWIIS UW: eby + "201} 244 0} UOAB OLUOU OyyUEIDs PUD LOWOD ey 0} Si9j1: sajoeds + ‘2814 0 0} payDWJ0 BD} UOYDSYYLEP! 44 0} S18J91: “ON BAL © “ZLOZ_ 1940120 € UO jN0 PalLuod som KOAINS OYI5 SUL “94/5 84} LO UOYDoYKdD Burwuo|d 0 40) uoKssnugns © Jo 440d s0 1 odes ey 40) 29u919/01 Jo WHO} SUL “PAUYEP 51 A10B9{09 YODE OUP 0} PEsn UOUE|UD oul ‘e}oudoiddo @ieym "pud se1g0; HOde! 229i) 24) UIUIIM PAsN UBBG @ADY SA1OGE{D9 BuMO|IO} OL “UOYIPUOD 1194) INO 195 » UNANG ‘PoOY UOGUIPPOH ‘yoouas Awwpuodas s,AIOW ‘I$ JOUL0J OU} {D ‘1D BIS a4) UO Seay JO UOKDedSU! a4; BUMO}D} SGLIPUY OU 4NO 495 O} S| YOCAL si4} JO esocLNd UL ‘TOySApOT ANAWSSaSS¥ TwanLINDIWORY t ‘ ungna ‘peoy uexsuippey joouas Auepuonas s ANEW I$ | uoday AaRINS 2311emwueynsuog jeamnayoqiy | 21890559 + aNUODON WE “snoyyuerpo oq ‘kw £94} 40 SPN {UOUOP WO ADM Sy} UI WHO} ADUL SJOOYS ‘SLIBIS ADOOM BINJOW UO PA}OIIU! 24 YOIYM $}001 10 SJOOUS 0} BuIIOUEd : DpuMOD!Ag '260)5 Ul BussesBoid ueyjo pud jUlod JO}SP © Woy BuILO|s AyONsN yUDId © 40 HOM jo Woop oul 2}20q010 “yUaWUONAUD S41 Of PaliNsUN AJOOIUDYDeLU 884} SY S9YOW YDIYN 40 ‘ssa4}s [ODIUDYDBUL JO UOYNAYISIP WOJIUN OY} LOY S}D0EP YOIYA By} D JO 21n}09) Auy |29}9q ‘049}90q 10/pUD !Guny Aq poom jo Uo¥DPO:Beq :Ao29q PoyoD}o ADOM UOY fewoIp Jone JOSu Jo SeyoUDIG 10 su04s juDUIMOP-0> {281 D J S@\yUOIG puD seAo9) auy :(AdouD2) UMOID (9509 944 wo} BuyDuoWe 9504) 210 s}00Us |os0q) ‘puNoI6 ey} 0} 250)9 26H, 84) Jo @50q OUI Y>RDE PORN SUB JO AOD WLS | Mojaq J8JaWO!P Wa|s © YM seaq Bunod 40 “paysIgD|se 8q PINOD BuyUOIA Mau NUN UIOWE! 0} UOYIPUO BjONbePoUI AyUELIND En|OA PUD AYJ]OND Mo} O Jo $891} B04, -D + ‘YOHNYIUOD {UODYIUBS D BDU O} 21q0 2q 0} SD UOYIPUOD B YON Ul OnJOA PUD Ajonb e}O!POW D JO SEO1} B50UL-B 'UO|NAU|UOD |OYUDISANS © SFO O} 814 aq 0} SO UOYIPUDD D UNE Ul BnIOA PUD AyJONb UBIY O JO Sea @SOUL-y UOWUEBOUOU JOINYINOOGIO UNOS Jo SuOsDAI 10) PeAOWAs £9 "}K@jUOD JOEUOD OU} UI OG PINOYS YOIYM PUD SIOEAD| UIMIIM 450] 2q PINON OnIOA BuYsKE AUD OU UOYIPUOD B YONS UI see esouI- epnig A180 + “suoyopuswiwose) juswe6oUDW AULUIIOId pnioUl AOU PUD SBOUANYU |OWIB}xS JO JUBLIUOAALO 5}! ‘S81} BU} JO (JOIN}ONYs) WO} 40 (JO2IBO|OSAYA) YIIO9Y SU) NOD s\UBLULIOD eAYduOSEg ‘YIDWEY 07 UDY} B10WN “+02 “+01 ‘OL LOY) $59] sO passeich :(D¥3) S194 U UOYNquIuOD Bu}YJOWD: PoUIysy + z ‘vungna ‘peoy uoiBuippeH Yoo4s Kuepuosas s ANEW 2S | wodas Aanans 3944,@swueynsuen jeumynapogay | so1epossy + 3I§AUODN WI “sng snoy4UBAPO Jo UOUDIo4HOd ssOW OY) WO PEALE @s04) AJOIDEdSe ‘seoUDJEqNIOXd {DOOM -ng 39019 0} POOM asNBD 'sND90 ADU SesseuIs JOWNE|UI BUOYS YOIYM UI JOd penIND AjpuoMdn Uy -quUIN pUOZOH PUNOM © PUNOID anssy BuIPr}D20 S44 10 PUNOM © Jo AYIUIDIA UY U PAULO} 'SO1N}D9 |ODLUO}OUD JODIGAYO YIM POOM ;POOM PUNO ‘ino 0} 21404 S8eu| PUB PUD Poom eu BPO‘GEP YOIYM ‘sUOIDB/U! J]OUE|DDq 10/ PUD |OBUNY :suaBOYIDE ‘260110} jo Uoyonpoid ou) UI UOYOUN} 1p @Aoy J86u0} OU YoUDIG emo} 4) PUD PEpUE;XS {YBIBy UME!D BY} SO PAIP YOIYM ‘si9J1UOD UI PoompDad ;PoOMpDEp passeiddns [DINJON Punou6 84} 0} AUOSU 40 Punoub ey} 0} sPUE)XE YOIYM “AdoUDD nog ‘YOUDg 40 Wun B Jo @2}INS eu UO seunful ;puNoM ‘@B0WOP \WHO}s 10 Bulunid snoinaid JY 49] UBEq ‘OADY ADL YDIYN 'YOUDIG B JO UOYDIS HOUS y :Bed/qnis. {youid 10 We4s UIOW ety UO PNG sNOYYUAAPD JO {UOUHOP © WO PEAYEP OOUS y JOOUS “YIAOY YMOIB jUELINDEP B YIM 904} D JO UMOID OY JO HOMOLUOY UIOW OY} WHO) YOIYM ‘S@4oUOIG OUL :SqUUN PIODIS JOOIWEA BY) WOM} AUN B44 JO @iNYOded ;uD—eT “uotun APOOM b JO 420} Bus OF ENP S$BUADEM S1 21044 OUL 95 4904402 €90}-0}-890} UI s1 YOIUM "(S@{Ny 150g 40 seyDUDIG Pe|6UD Aj{NDO ‘5410 Ul Aj}ONSN) 864, © Jo sod JUeDOIPD Jo 20g :woIUA Pephjouy © ‘yungna ‘peey vorsuIppeH joou>s Auepuoses SLEW IS | uodas ABRuns 331,‘@squeynsuon yeamrayoqiy | s2i2D055Y + ]IMUODPIN WE Tso Sty 0; JOO! SIO SBI] © soy 41 “BuUTUd J9y0 AdouD> Uado AqoUOsos 1 soy 41 “UNO Buunid a4) 4O sjoous Sauos!do osm Pedojenep soy 4! ;Buping 4 woy AMO pourud osa jones snunig seq soy AdouDd 41 ‘spjoyOIS ejdyinu Ym oes Auey> Buyemoy § UMOID D UNO} 0} SE}DOINYIG WEIS OW $,994 ML +01 WD OSN 9 oF ‘sounder — S66 poompoep Pesseiddns —Ayounyou Jou pud _18n09 stm ouuger, 260I10} POE Yj UMOID PEDUD|OG ‘PaULIO} om, za 031d onus © S04 41 "so}0W £7 J0 {UBIEY D 0} da yo pound ozs wpe) 2. SeYOUDIG Jomo] POY SOY 41 s9}UOD ]O}JUEWOWO UY +01 WI 4D OfN ez 06 perwiesom — 766 “syujod Buurud oy) 40 sjooys o1oo\de soy pud jsod ey UI peurud AyuBy U2eq sDY 41 “S18FINS 4OOI SOY 4 8SDQ SY! HY ‘POOMPDEP PA9}JO95 JOULL PUD sjO4s JMODIda orm SOY 41 "SeyoUDIq BuIggny PUD BuUIssO:D YM 09a yO /UeS spunig ‘aunjonyjs YUDI BsUEP D SOY 41 “UMOID sy] BULWO) ovs ‘uo Buyomoy @_spjoyOds eidyinw PUO WsOJs EIU © SOU ee SL +01 Wd Se ssouodor £66 (4) OP (w) “ou 2po1d SpOWSY Dua 26y uoypuca —_poeids —wais —j4BIOH sajpeds eau ‘FUNSOY ASAINS ‘820A UOSMD] HOMP PUD ‘8JOWID2AS BuIPe@s 0 “AA BSUBP O50 s} B19 SBB1} PAINPAYDS 24} 0} UOYIPPO UI °0}1038 UOUDW UMO.619A0 UD YIM PIDK D 51 BIS BU} JO IDB) BUY IY “sOYSNG YO9Eq Pedi; omy PUD WUNUING!A “WNdUOdAH "5950 1H 'OISYONY ‘sseAA> UOSMO) ‘SNLUALION BUIPNIOU! 'SQNUUS BLUOS PUD MojOq 5204 PEINPAYOS OU} YIIM UMD} JO sjOUDd OM| $9sUCLIOD 4] Pe}92/68U UBEq SOY YOI\Y DID UEPIDB JOWO, [Wes D s} POY UO{BUPPEH BuOIO “yuoY eu} 04 “SBUIPHNG |OOUDs PasNsip 40 Xe|GUIOD 0 1 O45 GUL TORSUSISC SS ’ fy uygna ‘peoy worBuyppey Joo4ps kepuos.s sue 1s | Hodou KaRINS 9913sweynsuea jeanym>yogsy | 521°P055Y + aIMUOPN WE liv “yuowssoss0 514) Buunp pejou Ue9q oADY JO BU Bu} 40 AIGSIA S1INOJ 0} AO 4De/qNs ous Ayuanbasuo> pun soipoq Buyny jOUosDes onpoid AjUO sueBOYjOd WIOHED “UC PUNY Ul BWOg @q PINCUS 41 PUD AlUO Jane PUNO WOH Odes IONsIA © UO PEsoq e10 sBUIPUHY “uoyDedsu) oy) Jo OU Ou 40 SIO}! S04) JO LOYIPUOD OY} 5199491 PUD PAULUOKE a18% {DUI SUO}! @S04 AYO SIBAOD HOEK SIU} U! PEUIC|UD LOYOULO|U| "\sYOINYINQuOCUY Peyl|ONb © PeUBSIEpUN au} jo eQUEUEdXe PUD eBPEynOUY OLY UO PAsg eID sUOHOPUELULLO: PUD SUOJOAIESGO sOUpUY IID ;Pasn Z1aM SANbILYDe UOYON|OAS @AI}ONWISEP 40 OASDAUI OU ‘PUNDIB 244 WON} jNO PaLIOD som ABAINS 62 SIYL a a a Toxo) DuUIIUOW ) {yBRG INds jo YOKDeIUI PasHODOI © SOU osm {I PooMPDAP PAI9}409s ewUOS "4909 Ip diy JOUR ova sjouunyno, UA UMOID {UBLNDEP OPH D SOY 4] ‘SWOIS CU Oss Oey yeuuans snunig 2 UOJen02 An! BsUEP AIBA YIM 894 POUWOIS UY —+0L = WOE OSN fz OL AUOUD PAG esoy 666 SIM “yon09 An! @,0,0POU SOY 4144S] 10} Buys gia DuDLOSMo| uoyoje6en Buwiolpo 0} enp 26010) 40am sis suodéoe0w0uD 2 soy Adouds samo} sj} ‘uawIDeds yyBudn IO} Y +40Z WF Os SIN Orr Of Ss@1dAD UOSMD] — 866 ‘R09 ozm An. 1UBIS SOY 41 “(0X0 OILMUOW ) YB ads YY ova .syouwnyno, P2}D9jUl $1 PUD 490g ep UMOID SOY 4] 'LOHDJeBIA ozs yeyuans snunig 2 Bumolpo ey Aq passexddns uewioeds yous y Ol> = WA 100d OZN O*L 0B AueydPAqesoy 466 O1M "Ways Sj! U0 48/09 AA! BIDI@POW oa soy 41 ‘see Buluioipo ey) hq possosddns si ois sy04jsn0 auiAp10D 2 PUD UMOID YBIY D YIM WO}s ojBUIS © soyooH SK +01 WO OLN 002 OsLL _eeHeBoqaD> 966 Tuy DP wy vou p01 SpoWoy ‘Dua e6y uoWpuCD —_poaids was _1NBICH sojpeds eon s ‘yungna ‘peou vorsuippen ‘joouss Arepuosas s AveW 6 | woda4 Aanuns 304),@sweynsues jesmynauogiy | saieD0s5Y + BIAUOIWN AT 7102 840120 SaVIDOSSW + TIANOD2W Wr NID Wi0giV's ‘THW "2518 SIIALODOW Ydesor ‘seBuoyo jojuewuosAUS PUD [OaIBojoKAYA ss9550 0} SIDOA OMY AJOAs 944 10) Auod pa waWiss@ssD9) 0} jO9laNs @q PINoYs Hod! sly} UI PeUOYUELW 599: ‘Aub 0} PapUEIxE 5} Ajtig|SUOdse1 OU PUD PESSEIPPD 1 4! WOUM 0} SeIUOd Bul JO WeUEG eu 40} AjoIOs PapUaIUI st Ode! SIU “@PDUW 10 s{UaWeBUOUD JONJDy4UOD jUENbasqns ssojUN jOde1 S144 Jo SUOSDAL Aq sjueB0 oy} 40 JOUMOPUD| OY} Aq U9x0} SUCK AUD 40} AyNIq|SUOdSE! OU $940} JOYIND Sy} :UOYODYddo BuIUUD|d 0 10) Pesodesd som Odes SIUL ‘@ayny @4y UI @suD jou ADL LOYseNb UI See) 244 JO SeDUEDDYEP 10 sWAIGOLA JOY} “PalCUL! 40 Passeldxe “89 UOIONB JO AJUDUIOM OU S| SIU. "Ud S14} O} YODHO Nr Aji UI BS|MIBUJO JO BIOIYBA |DDIUDYDeW AUD 10 pIs@ 0, eBOWP Busnoo ee Su 0} PUD WEY} es0UBDIP 0} PoyyONb UOsIed © 0} pejiode: eq Pinoys PUD s}9e}eP Jo sUBIS 40} ssDq J0/NBe1 © UO Paloj1uoW! eq PINOUs sey ’ ‘Punjgna ‘peoy uowduippey oou>s Arepuo3es sAreWN Is | uoday ABAINS 9944ALvIOOSsv + WANOOOW WPAPPENDIX C Archaeological Impact AssessmentFormer St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Archaeological Impact Assessment Client: Department of Education and Skills (DoES) clo Coady Partnership Architects Mountpleasant Business Centre Mountpleasant Avenue Dublin 6 Licence No: nla Archaeologists: Rob O'Hara & Aidan O'Connell Author: 0’ Hara & O'Connell Report Date: 1st October 2012 Our Ret 2012.27 CPA Ref: 1895 (Nrcher Heritage PlanningFormer St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 SITE NAME CLIENT INVESTIGATION TYPE LICENCE NO PLANNING REF TOWNLAND IRISH TRANSVERSE MERCATOR RMP NO RPS NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT ARCHAEOLOGIST DATE OF ISSUE JOB REF, CPA REF. St. Marys Secondary School, Haddington Road Department of Education and Skils, ‘Archaeological impact Assessment a a Baggotrath East 717200, 733076 na wa ‘Archer Heritage Panning Lid Rob O'Hara & Aidan O'Connell ‘st October 2012 2012.27 1895Archer Heritage Planning Lid Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 1.1 PaOPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION... ‘9, METHOD STATEMENT.. 4.1 GENERAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND. 4.2 RECoRO OF MONUMENTS & PLACES 4.3 ToPosRAPHICAL FILES. ‘44 CamTocrapiie SOURCES. 4.5 AERiaL PHOTOGRAPHS, 4.6 Recoro oF ProTecTeD STRUCTURES. 4.7 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS, 4.8 Torowmus. 4.9 Sir Vis. 5. IMPACTS, 6, RECOMMENDATIONS.. A 7.1 Bruiogaaphy. 10 7.207HER souRcES: — 10 7. We® REFERENCES 10 List of Tables Table 1: Archaeological sites adjacent tothe proposed development Table 2: Catographic sources relating tothe ste Table 3: Aerial photograph sources relating tothe site Table 4: Previous archaeological excavations adjacent to the siteArcher Hertage Panning Lid Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Site in relation to surrounding RMP sites Figure 3: Rooque's Map of Dublin (1756) Figure 4: tst edition Ordnance Survey map (1844) List of Plates Plate 1: Haddington Road and Haddington Place facade Plate 2: Schoolyard with Marian Shrine on left Plate 3: Shelters with St. Mary's chapel in background Prate 4: Marian shrineArcher Heritage Planning Lid Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddingion Road Archaeological Impact Assessment ‘SUMMARY ‘A desk-based study and field survey was carried out atthe site of a proposed school at Haddington Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 (ITM 717200, 739076). The site covers an approximate area of 29 hectares on a site currently occupied by the former St. Mary's Secondary school but in 1910 and closed in 2006. This Archaeological Impact Assessment report, for the Department of Education and Skils (D0ES), sought to identity and describe known and potential archaeological constraints within and immediately acjacent tothe ste. ‘There are no recorded monuments within the proposed site and there were no surface expressions of Potential archaeological features noted in the field survey. The desk based survey also traced the development ofthe site through cartographical sources and aerial photographs from the mid-eighteenth century tothe present day. No archaeological features were recorded in these archival sources at the site. No further archaeological works are required in relation to the above scheme. There is always a possibilty however that archaeologically enriched sols, features or deposits indicating the presence of destroyed or buried sites will be revealed during construction, even in areas in which no impact is predicted. In such an event, attention is drawn to the National Monuments Legislation (1930-2004), which states in the event of the discovery of archaeological finds or remains, the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht and the National Museum of Ireland should be notified immediately. ‘OConnell (Archer) | OHara(Archer) | © ve Guinness seworancraco.ocet | seNoR ARoHNEOLOIST 1 Dratt | Oct 2012Archer Hertage Planning Lid Former St Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road ‘Archaeological Impact Assessment 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by Archer Hertage Planning Lid for Coady Partnership Architects, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Dublin 6 on behalf of Dept. of Education and Skils. The desk based study and field survey for this Archaeological Impact Assessment was undertaken in September 2012 by Rob O'Hara ‘and Aidan O'Connell of Archer Heritage Planning Ltd. 1.1 Proposed Development 'No detailed plans at tis point 2, SITE DESCRIPTION ‘The proposed works are located at the comer of Haddington Place and Haddington Road, south of the Grand Canal in Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 (Dublin City South; Dubin Barony; St. Peter's Parish; OS sheet Dublin Sheet 18; ITM 717200, 783076 Figure 1). The site is curently occupied by a series of inter- linked two and three storey buildings dating from the 1900's (see Plates 1-4). ‘The sit is not covered by any specific statute; however it may be covered by provisions ofthe National Monuments Acts 1980-2004 should previously unrecorded archaeological material be uncovered during the project.Archer Heritage Planning Ltd Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddingion Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 3, METHOD STATEMENT This deskbased assessment and wakover survey aims to establish the archaeological potential of the Proposed development area, to determine the potential impact of the proposed development and if necessary design a suitable mitigation strategy. The folowing sources were consulted in the preparation of this report: Record of Monuments and Places (RMP)* Record of Protected Structures (Dubin City Development Plan 2011-2017) ‘Topographical Fies ofthe National Museum of Ireland ‘Aerial photography (various collections including National Museum of Ireland, Geological Survey o Ireland andlor Ordnance Survey Ireland) Historical maps (including early edition Ordnance Survey (OS) maps and pre-Ordnance Survey held at Trinity College Map Library). ‘© Relerence material (journals, papers, books etc) held by the National Library of Ireland, local Ibraties andlor on-line search faciltiesicollections (e.g. JSTOR etc) ‘© Relevant onine databases (e.g. Excavation Bulletin; NRA Archaeological Database). 0000 ° 4. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 4.1 General Archaeological Background ‘Dublin is one of the oldest European Capitals outside the areas that were once part of the Roman Empire (Simms, 2001, 15). twas known in Irish as both Dubh Linn (Black Pool) and Ath Cath (the ford of the hurdework). Edwards (1990, 180) specuiates that these lish place names suggest pre-Viking setlement, possibly near the ford on the southern bank of the Life. A second possible pre-Viking setlement in the form of an ecclesiastical enclosure was located on the east bank of the River Poddle and south of Dubin Castle. This enclosure is parialy preserved in the modern day street pattem (see ‘Simms, 2001, fig. 15). Wallace (1981, 138-9) has speculated that the initial Viking settlement at Dublin consisted ofa fortress with an adjacent undefended trading settlement. The fortress was established in ‘841 as a longphort near the mouth of the River Lifley (Edwards, 1990, 179). Although the exact location of the Jongphort is unclear, Simms (2001, 29) suggests the site of Dublin Castle based on topographical criteria. Wallace (1988, 127) has speculated that the ongphort was in fact closer to the extensive Viking cemetery at Islandbridge. The early Dubin Vikings were defeated in 902 by a native force and moved across to northern Britain where they came into contact with the concept of urbanisation in towns like ‘York and Chester. They later established the town of Dublin in the period 915-17 on their retum to Ireland (Wallace, 1968, 127-8). The locaton of the initial Viking town was on the southern bank of the River Lifey and west ofthe confluence with the River Podde, wes surrounded by an earthen bank and extended northwards from Dublin Castile and Ship Street to Essex Street West, encompassing + Archive Unit National Monuments Service, Department of Ats, Heritage and the Gaeltact, Floor 2, Block 6, Irish ite CentreArcher Heritage Planning Lid Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment Christchurch Place, Werburgh Street, Fishamble Street, Castle Street and Lord Edward Street. A second phase of growth at Dublin can be recognised from circa 980 to 1170 when the town lost its poltical independence and became incorporated into the Irish poltical scene. This period is known as the Hiberno-Norse phase and witnessed a significant westward growth of the formal town precincts The extended hibero-norse town was surrounded by a stone wall from the eary-twelfth century onwards (Simms, 2001, 22) Wallace (1988, 149-153) states that the growth ofthe Viking and hibemo-norse town was organic rather than planned with streets and plots laid out aocording to natural contours. The plots were situated on elther side of a main street and separated from each other by low post and watle fences. The individual buildings (did, 195-148) were grouped into five main categories. The majority of the buikings were, however, similar in plan. They were generally square or rectangular with a thatched root supported by intemal posts. Walls were constructed of wattle and daub and were comparatively low at circa 1.25m high. The interiors were divided longitudinally into three parts with a central living area and benches/sleeping areas to the sides. The next phase of town growth occurred in the medieval period ater the Anglo-Norman conquest. Dublin was captured in 1171 and the new colonists set about introducing a municipal infrastructure and a strong ecclesiastical presence. The Normans also instigated major land reclamation from the southem bank of the Lifey, extending the walled town northwards as far as Merchants Quay, Wood Quay and Essex Quay (Simms, 2001, 39-40). The municipal centre of the Anglo-Norman town was Dublin Caste, built in 1204 (ibid, 46) and possibly occupying the ste of the ‘original Viking longohort (see above). There was also a change in this period from post and wattle houses to more substantial oak timber framed structures. ‘The subject site is located within the townland Baggotrath, which derives its name from the Anglo- Norman Bagot family, although the suffix ‘rath’ indicates some form of early medieval settlement in the ppre-Norman period. After the Anglo-Norman conquest in the 1170's, the area was known as the rath ‘near Donnybrook’ and came into the ownership of Sir Robert Bagod, frst Chief Justice ofthe Bench in Ireland, in 1280 (Ball 1903, 43). Bagod, who was a founder of St. Mary's Priory, Dubin in 1274 (Murphy ‘and Potterton 2010, 255), built @ castle near the modem junction of Upper Baggot Street and Eastmoreland Place. His manor comprised of a castle, a mill, a grain store, brewing vessels and ‘abundant resources of livestock and crops (ibid 423, 431 & fig. 6.1; Ball ibid). ‘The manor at Baggotrath passed into the ownership of the Fitzwilliam family (Ears of Pembroke) inthe early fiteenth century (Ball 1903, 2). The orignal castle was in a ruinous condition by 1489, but following a restoration was regarded as one of the strongest fortresses near Dublin by the 1640's, andArcher Hertage Planning Lio Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment was the focus of an attack by Parlamentary forces during the Battle of Baggotrath and Rathmines in the course of the Cromwelian invasions (ibid, 45-8). The Fitzwiliam estate stretched from St. Stephens Green to Ringsend and southwards as far as Bray, and the development ofthe estate in the mid-late eighteenth century winessed the planning and construction of new streets and public squares in tandem with the construction of townhouses forthe gentry ofthe period (Sheridan 2001, 100-12). The ‘nineteenth century saw the creation of new suburbs, such as Ballsbridge beyond the Grand Canal, and consequently outside of the remit of Dublin Corporation (Prunty 2001, 167-8). The name Balsbridge erives from an eighteenth century setlement that developed around @ bridge built over the River Dodder in 17512, 42 Record of Monuments & Places The Record of Monuments and Places (RMP) is a statutory inventory of archaeological sites protected under the National Monuments Acts 1930-2004 (Section 12, 1994 Act). tis compiled and maintained by ‘the Archaeological Survey of Ireland (AS!) and comprises descriptive lists and maps of all sites, monuments and zones of archaeological potential, recorded to date in the country. The inventory concentrates on pre-1700 AD sites and is based on a previous inventory known as the Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) which does not have legal protection or status. A current initiative of the NMS has been the estabishment of publicly accessible website (www.archaeology.le) containing details of the recorded holdings of the Archaeological Survey of Ireland (ASI). It includes recently discovered sites recorded in the course of developmentied archaeological assessments and ‘excavations as well as the on-going work of the ASI. Newly added sites on this ‘emerging’ lst do not have the same statutory protection as those in the published RMP. The site is beyond the Zone of Archaeological Potential placed around the core of the medieval setlement of Dublin as defined by the medieval town walls (ASI). There are no recorded archaeological sites within the subject site, or within 100m of the subject site (see Table 1 below; Figure 3). The nearest RMP site is the presumed location of Baggotsrath Caste on Baggot St. Upper. DU018-055 | Castle-tower house | Dublin City South | 717070, 732862 Sie presumably that referred to as Baggotsrath Caste’ on Rocque’s Map of 1756 which is ven as the junction of Eastmoreland Place and Baggot St. Upper. Table 1: Archaeologica sites within the vicinity of the proposed development nttou/ www Jogainm ie/Viewer.asox7text=balsbridge&streets=vesArcher Heritage Planning Lid Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road ‘Archaeological Impact Assessment 4.3 Topographical Files ‘The National Museum of Ireland Topographical Files is the national archive of all known antiquities recorded by the National Museum listed by county and townland! street. These files relate primarily to artefacts but also include references to monuments and contain a unique archive of records of previous ‘archaeological excavations. The Museum files present an accurate catalogue of objects reported to that institution from 1928. There are no recorded entries for Baggotsrath (North or East), Haddington Road or Haddington Place listed in the Topographical Files. 44 Cartographic Sources ‘Analysis of historic mapping can show human impact on landscape over a prolonged period. Large collections of historical maps (pre- and earty Ordnance Survey maps as well as estate or private maps) are held at the Glucksman Map Library, Trinity College and other sources (UCD Library, Ordnance ‘Survey Ireland, local libraries, online sources and published material). The following historical maps were consulted in the compilation of this assessment: ‘The general area is shown as farmiand off Gallows Road (Bagoot ’ Si) A short lane runs off Gallows Road which may be the start of eae 1786 | Haddington Road. castle is depicted to the east on Gallows Fad (east side of Baggot St Upper, See Figure 3) ‘Area shown as Baggot Rath wih the area noted as part of Cottage Duncan's Map 1821 | Terrace along Haddington Road. The lane (curently Haddington Pace) i shown leading tothe rear of Cotage Terrace. Haaddingion Road shown outside City wals with ribbon development Larcom's Map 1897 | on the subject site. A lane is shown between De Grey Terace and the site (Haddington Pace) ‘The subject site is shown to contain one bulding along Haddington Pace with a yard or garden to the front along Hadkngton Road. The ee 1844 | westom part f the site is shown as divided into yards or lts. St ‘Savoy Map, ‘Mary's RC Church is depicted wih a number of houses between the church andthe schoo steal froning orto Haddington Road. ‘ed Eaton Ordnance 7o0e9 | The bulling inthe SE comer is shown wih no building along Survey Map_ Haddingion Road. Table 2: Cartographic sources relating to the site No archaeological features were identified within the subject site during the cartographic research,Archer Hertage Planning Lio Former St. Mary's Secondary Schoc!, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 45 Aerial Photographs Aerial photography (or other forms of remote sensing) may reveal certain archaeological features or sites (earthworks, cropmarks, sol marks) that for many reasons may not be appreciated at ground level There are a number of available collections including the National Monuments Section, Geological Society of Ireland (1970-73), Ordnance Survey of Ireland (1995, 2000, 2006), National Museum of Ireland (St Joseph CUCAP Collection) and Air Corps (1950's-1970's) os! aa call Ne petal ees of artaesocal tet ae Table 3: Aerial photograph sources relating tothe ste 'No archaeological features were recorded in the aerial photographs ot the site; however there are ‘numberof factors which may determine whether archaeological remains, buildings and stuctures are detectable using this method, including natural conditions of soils, topography, vegetation, moisture conditions and the scale and timing ofthe image capture. 4.6 Record of Protected Structures Local Authorities have a statutory responsibilty to safeguard architectural heritage in accordance with Part IV of the Planning and Development Act 2000. Under $.51 (1), a County Council must compile a Record of Protected Structures (RPS), which lists all structures which are of special architectural, historical, archaeological, anistc, cultural, scientific, socal or technical interest. The protection, unless ‘otherwise stated, includes the exterior and interior of the structure, lands lying within its curtlage (boundary), other structures and their interiors within the curtilage, plus all fixtures and fitings which {orm part of the interior or exterior of any ofthese structures, Bulings can be added to, or deleted from the RPS at any time, though generally this occurs when the county development plan is being reviewed. ‘The Dublin City Record of Protected Structures 2011-2017 was consulted fo see if any Protected ‘Structures would be impacted by development at this location. There are no protected structures located within the subject site. St. Mary's Church and the houses in De Grey Terrace are listed buildings.Archer Heritage Pianning Lid Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 4.7 Previous Archaeological Excavations ‘The Excavation Bulletin is a database of summary accounts of archaeological excavations in Ireland and Northern Ireland from 1970 to 2008. Summaries relating o archaeological excavations undertaken by the National Roads Authority are also available on-line and were consulted for any adjacent sites. Reports on licensed archaeological works are also held by the Archive Unit ofthe National Monuments Section. Several archaeological investigations have been undertaken around Ballsbridge in the past and have tevealed limited archaeological data mainly relating industrial activity along the River Dodder. 95E009 | - 0179824 Ballsbridge | 1995:060 Margaret Gowen Excavations af the Johnston, Mooney and O’ Brien site revealed evidence for industrial activity. At the westem corner of the site, large stone walls represented a phase of activity eartier than the bakery. ‘The presence of red brick in the foundations indicated that these walls were the foundations of post- ‘medieval buildings. These were associated with the culvert, rather than with Balls Mansion, and may represent portions of mil buildings. They were too fragmentary to establish a ground-plan or layout 976363 | - 0282318 Balsbridge | 1997:078 —_| Christiaan Corfett Test trenching on the ste of the RDS Complex revealed no archaeological features. 980016 | - ores922 Ballsbridge | 980016 Malachy Conway ‘Assessment and montoring atthe site of the Four Courts Hotel revealed post-medieval deposits. 040969 | - 317880, 282430 | Ballsbridge | 20040486 | Stuart Haliday ‘Six trenches excavated on a site on Shelbourne Rd revealed no archaeological features. 06E0018 | - 318268, 282026 | Ballsbridge | 2006:559 | Bernice Molloy ‘Monitoring of works at RDS Simmonscourt revealed no archaeological features. ‘Table 4: Previous archaeological excavations adjacent to the site‘Archer Herttage Planning Lio Former St. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 4.8 Toponyms Research into a site or areas place name (or toponym) can provide information relating to an areas heritage or previous land use. Many townland names were anglised by the time the Ordnance Survey (0S) began in the 1880s and when townland names were standardised in the Townland Index (1851). The name Balsbridge derives from a Bridge built over the River Dodder at this location in 17519 Haddington Place and Haddington Road were named for the Earl of Haddington, Lord Lieutenant in 1834-35 and were previously known as Cottage Terrace (Clerkin, p84). 439 Site Visit ‘The location of the proposed works was visited by Archer Heritage Planning Lid on 24th September 202 in overcast, wet conditions (Plates 1-4). The site is currently occupied by the former St. Mary's ‘Secondary School comprising several two storey buildings fronting onto Haddington Road (to the north) and Haddington Piace (to east and south). The tarmacamed yard tothe west ofthe site is being used as, ‘car park with school shelters in the NW comer and a high boundary wall with the neighbouring property and school entrance onto Haddington Place. In the centre of the yard is a Marian Shrine ‘composed of @ halt-sized statue and a rough shrine of granite stone. The street frontage along Haddington Road (No 77) is a Georgian two-storey over basement residence and the schoo itself which is of more recent origin (1950's) constructed of redbrick with steel framed windows. There is a small garden to the front of the school along Haddington Road. No obvious areas of archaeological potential were noted in the course of the site visit and no potential archaeological features were noted.Archer Heritage Planing Lig Former Si. Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 5. IMPACTS There are no recorded monuments within or adjacent to the proposed site and there were no surface expressions of potential archaeological features noted in the field survey. The desk based survey traced the development of the site through cartographical sources from the mid-eighteenth century to the present day. No archaeological features were recorded in these historical maps and no stray finds recorded in the NMI topographical files can be attributed to the subjec-ste. Archaeological excavations in the general area have been largely unremarkable. Based on the above impact assessment itis unlikely that archaeological features will be impacted by the development. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS No further archaeological works are required in relation to the above scheme. There is always a possibilty however that archaeological enriched soils, features or deposits indicating the presence of destroyed or buried sites will be revealed during construction, even in areas in which no impact is predicted. In such an event, attention is drawn to the National Monuments Legislation (1930-2004), which states in the event ofthe discovery of archaeological finds or remains, the Department of Ars, Heritage and the Gaetacht and the National Museum of Ireland should be notified immediately, NOTE: All conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are subject to the approval of The Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (DAHG) and the relevant local authorities, AS the statutory body responsible for the protection of Ireland's archaeological and cultural heritage resource, the DAHG may issue alternative or adftional recommendations.Archer Heritage Planing Lid Former St Mary's Secondary School, Haddington Road Archaeological Impact Assessment 7. REFERENCES 7.1 Bibliography. Ball F E 1903 A history of county Dublin: the people, parishes and antiquities from the earliest times to the close ofthe eighteenth century. Volume 2. A Thom & Co., Dublin Clerkin, P. 2001 Dublin Street Names, p84 Gill and Macmillan, Dublin Edwards, N. (1990) The Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland, London, Murphy, M. and Potterton, N., 2010. The Dublin Region in the Midle Ages. Four Courts Press and Om Om Omox O* Oram Ose O mower Oe Oommen Ou Oow2.4 Existing Cycle Network 24.1 The subject site is well located in terms of access to the Dublin City cycle network. The location of the key cycle network routes is shown in Figure 2-4 below. The closest route to the subject site is the Ballsbridge to City Route and the East-West link along the Grand Canal. The street network to the ‘south of the school operates as a mixed street provision with relatively low traffic volumes and25 25.1 Public Transport ‘The area is well served by public transport links, there are a number of bus routes within close proximity of the site. The bus routes that service the site are shown in Figure 2-5 below, the routes F Mountjoy Sq | Dalkey per thr 15mins | 1 per 1 hr 15 mins y Dalkey MountjoySa | iperihris | tperhour mins i Harrstown Monkstown T every 15 mins | Levery 15 mins ” Monkstown Warristown Tevery 15 mins | Levery 15 mins a ‘MountjoySa | Cheerywood? | Levery 15mins | 1 every 15 mins Loughlinstown 5 Cheerywood7 | MountyjoySq | Tevery15 mins | Tevery 10 mins Loughlinstown Fa Palmerstown | Sandymount Tevery 25 mins | Levery 15 mins a Sandymount Palmerstown | Tevery25 mins | Tevery15mins | Ballsbridge ‘ashtown ‘services during | WA 120(b) PM peak “Ashtown Ballsbridge 3 services during | 20 mins 1200) rid an ng ue Lucan 2 services during | N/A oe PM peak a Tucan ue 3 services during s AM peak "Tale 2 Dublin Bus Services in Local Area252 253 ‘These bus services provide good connection from the subject site to the City Centre, Phibsboro, Blackrock, Ballymun, Monkstown, Palmerstown, Drimnagh, Rathmines, Sandymount, Dalkey, Dun Laoghaire and Loughlinstown/Cherrywood. ‘The subject site is approximately 900m away from the Grand Canal Dock DART station, which is approximately 10 minutes walking distance.2.6 261 27 27a 272 Vehicle Access and Parking ‘At present teachers of the school park on the grounds of St Mary’s Church in the 12 parking spaces in front of the Boys’ school. This carpark is accessed from a vehicular entrance on St Marys Road. Local Street Network ‘The key elements of the local street network are as follows: © Haddington Road ~ This road runs in an east-west direction from Upper Baggot Street to Shelbourne Road. It is a single carriageway road with on street parking along both sides. The street carries a reasonable volume of traffic and is busy during the peak hours. ‘© St Mary's Road ~ This street runs parallel! to Haddington Road. It is quiet residential street with low traffic volumes and low traffic speeds. The street is a single carriageway with on street parking on both sides. © Haddington Place ~ This is a narrow street that runs from Haddington Road to St Mary's Street. Ithas very low traffic volumes and low traffic speeds. It has a row of on-street parking along the ‘west side and remaining carriageway width is approximately 3m. All of the streets in the area have Pay and Display and Permit parking in operation and all the streets have a 50 kph speed limit in operation.3 EXISTING SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS ai Baa 342 343 32 32a 3.2.2 3.23 3.3 331 33.2 333 Staff and Student Numbers ‘The new schoo! will be home for the two existing schools, St Mary's Boys school and St Brigid’s Girls ‘school. St Brigid’s school has mixed junior classes and giris only classes from 1" to 6" class. The St Marys Boys schoo! has boys from 1" class to 6” class. ‘St Mary's currently has 170 pupils and 13 staff members. St Brigid's has 290 pupils and 24 staff ‘members. Classes begin at 9.00 AM., the junior cycle finish at 1:30 PM and the senior cyde finish at 2:30 PM. Pupils attending the homework club or doing after school activities finish at 3:30 PM. ‘The schools have a diverse catchment with some students coming a significant distance to attend the school. Most of these pupils travelling these long distances are with parents who are working in the areas such as Grand Canal Docks. Green Schools Programme and Active Travel Initiatives Both the schools are currently engaged in the Green School programme. St Mary's schoo! is currently Con their sith flag, whilst St Brigids is on their second flag. St Brigids will be starting the transport flag next year, St Mary's have already completed the transport flag a few years ago. Both the schools actively promote children to walk/cycle to the school and both the schools take part in Dublin City Counci’s cycle training schemes. They also engage with the Road Safety Authority on regular basis and participated in some of their safety promotion schemes. The schools also regularly bring the children on walks to places like The Ark in Temple Bar. Both the schools currently have websites that are regularly updated and they regularly send newsletters and information to parents. Morning Drop — Off At present access to St Marys Boys school is from the rear on Haddington Place and St Brigid's schoo! is accessed from the grounds of St Marys Church. People walking to the school are primarily coming from the northeast or southwest. The pupils coming from the northeast are predominately using the school warden to cross Haddington Road, although some cross diagonally at the Haddington Road / Northumberland Road junction. ‘The crossing point for the school warden is close to the junction of Haddington Road/Haddington Place. The school warden operates from between a row of parked cars and itis difficult for oncoming, rivers to see the school warden. A warning sign has been erected to help improve the visibility of the school warden, please refer to Figure 3-1. 103.3.4 The visibility to the school warden should be improved, this could be achieved by providing a kerb 335 336 3.4 341 342 build-out. This would also operate as an informal crossing point. This would remove approximately 1 on-street parking space from the each side of Haddington Road. Figure 3-1: School Warden Crossing Point (note: Warning Sign in background) Based on on-street observations, St Marys Road is the main location for parents who park and then ‘walk their children to the school. Drop and go primarily takes place on Haddington Place and on Haddington Road. During the AM drop-off period, there were limited spare parking provision along Haddington Road ‘and Haddington Place, however there were a significant spare spaces along St Marys Road. Afternoon Pick-up For a primary school the afternoon pick-up period is when the biggest demand for parking, The ‘busiest afternoon pick-up is the 14:30 when the 1" to 6" classes from both schools finish. A survey of the parking demand on the streets in the vicinity of the school , before, during and after this pick-up period was carried out. The results of this survey are shown on Figure 3-2 and indicated the following: ‘© Inthe immediate area there were 92 free spaces after pick-up and 49 free spaces at pick-up. Based (on this it is estimated that the spaces occupied for 14:30 is approximately 42. ‘St Mary’ s Road and Haddington Place are the main areas that people park for the pick-up ‘Along St Mary's Road (from Upper Baggot Street to Northumberland Road) there were a total of 54 free spaces after the pick-up and 29 free spaces at 14:30. + Allof the spaces on Haddington Place are occupied at 14:30, uFigure 3.2: Spare Parking Spaces Before/ During/ After 14:30 Pick-up 24 TRAVEL SURVEY RESULTS 4.1 Travel Survey 1.1 A travel survey of the pupils within the school was undertaken. Approximately 170 surveys were completed with the results analysed as part of this report. A travel survey was also carried out by the staff within the schools with 30 responses in total A full copy of the results from both surveys is contained within Appendix A. 4.2. Geographical Spread of Students 4.2.1 The existing geographical spread of pupils to the school is shown in Figure 4.1 below, The majority of students are coming from four zones as follows: ‘* The first zone is the area immediately surrounding the subject site; pupils living within this zone are all within 1km of the school. ‘+ The second zone isthe area to the north and northeast, this area includes Pearse Street, Grand Canal Dock and the Irishtown areas. Pupils living within this zone are between 600m and 1.5km. from the site. ‘+ The third zone is the areas to the south of the school; this includes the areas of Donnybrook and Sandymount. ‘© The fourth zone is for students from outside of the other three zones. 4.22 The split in the numbers of pupils coming from the different zones is shown in Table 4-1 below. 1 21% 7 2 38% 175 3 14% 6a 4 27% 124 Table #1 Percentage and Location of Existing Pupils B4.3 Current Modal Split of Students 4.3.1 The current model spit for students to the school is shown in Figure 4-2. The results from the travel survey indicate that close to 44% of the pupils walk, 39% arrive by car, 12% by bus and 5% cycle to school, How do your children mostly travel to the school (8)? are sox mice as mm Oe mm Pic Boe Ten nay ose Figure 4-2: Modal Spit of Existing Pupits 43.2 Based on Census 2011, the typical modal spit for a primary school in Dublin City and suburbs is 44% walking, 55% arrive by car, 6.5% by bus/DART/LUAS and 3% cycle. 43.3 When compared to the average for Dublin City and suburbs the two schools have a similar modal split for walking and slightly lower modal split for car. The numbers arriving by public transport and the percentage cycling is higher than the average. 4.3.4 The results from the different zones have been reviewed to identify modal splits for pupils from the various zones. The results of this are given within Table 4.2 below: * Based on Census 2011 Profile 10 Door to Door ~ Commuting In ireland 151 7 71% 24% 5% 0% 2 175 60% 34% 0% 9% 3 64 6% 44% 38% 22% 4 124 20% 67% 1% 1% ‘Table #2: Modal Split of Pupils based on Location 4.3.5 The results from people who drive their children to school were reviewed to identify the average ‘group size, a summary of this is shown in Figure 4-3 below. Approximately 33% of parents are driving ‘one child to school, 42% are driving two children, 22% are driving 3 children and 2% driving 4 or more to the school. This means that the average group size of people driving to the school is approximately 1 children per a car. How many children travel to the schools with you? 22%) 00% ‘mochildren michia ‘m2 Children 3 Children m4 Children Figure 43 : Number of Pupils pera Cor 16436 437 There were a number of specific issues that were identified by people completing the survey, these are as follows: ‘+ Lack of pedestrian crossing facilities at Bath Avenue/ Shelbourne Road junction ‘+ Cyclists going through the pedestrian crossing phase at Mount Street Bridge ‘© Vehicles and cyclists going through the red light at Nortumberland Road /Haddington Road junction ‘The current modal split for staff to the school is shown in Figure 4.4 below, the majority of staff drive to school, but a notable portion walk/cycle and close to 15% use public transport. The majority of the staff live over Skm from the school, however 30% live less than 2km from the school and another 10% live within the 2-5km from the school. The modal split is broadly comparable to the distance, i.e. 60% live greater than Skm and 57% drive. How do you mostly travel to the school? 3.0% | =Car Driver mar Passenger aWalk mcycle Public Bus strain 0.0% Figure 4-4: Current Modal Spit -Staft v75 PROPOSED SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT 5.1 5a. 512 513 5.14 515 Proposed School Development The layout of the school redevelopment is shown on the Architects drawings. The proposed development is for a new schoo! building and the two existing schools, St Mary's and St Brigid’s will be relocated into this new building and become one school. The new school building will allow the pupil population to be increased from its current level of 460 to a future level of 720. The number of staff at the new schoo! will also increase from 37 to 40. The new schoo! will have 24 classrooms, which will allow it to have 3 classes per year. As such there will be 180 pupils in the infant classes and 540 pupils in 1" to 6" class. In transport terms there are a number of items to note on the site layout, these are as follows: ‘© Three car parking spaces and 1 disabled parking space are being provided. This represents reduction in the existing car parking provision. As there is no free parking in the area, this reduction in parking will result in a number of staff having to change their mode of transport. * There are a total of 72 cycle parking spaces provided. ‘+ The main pedestrian entrance to the schoo! will be on Haddington Place. {A Travel Plan has been prepared for the new school, this document accompanies this planning application. 186 61 61a 612 6.2 624 622 623 IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT Existing Trip Generation ‘At present the existing pupil trip generation is summarised in the Table 6-1 below and the corresponding trip generation by staff members is given within Table 6-2 below. Total Number | Walk “Toyae Bus car 460 202 23 55 180 ‘Table 61 Current Tips by Eating Pups Total Number | wak Cycle Bus /DART Car Driver 37 8 © 6 2 Table 62 Carrent Tips by fisting Stal The current group size for the car drivers to the school is 1.5 per a car,as such the 180 pupils that are driven to the school result in 120 car journeys to/from the school in the AM peak and less at the 1:30, 2:30 and 3:30 pick-up times. Future Trip Generation The future school population will increase to from 460 to 720 pupils. This will mean an increase of 260 pupils, based on the current modal split these 260 pupils will result in the following additional trips. Total Number | Walk cyde Bus car ‘Car Journeys (based ‘on group size of 1.5) 260 114 3 31 302 68 Table 63: Number of Trips by Additional Pupis ‘The future school is estimated at having 40 staff members, this is a very small increase in the number Of staff and in a worst case scenario would result in an additional 3 car driver trips. However as the level of parking is being reduced this will force some of the staff members to change their means of getting to work and the actual number of car trips by staff members will be reduced. Assuming that the car group size remains the same, i.e. 1.5 children per a car, this will result in an additional 5 car trips in the AM peak and an additional 44 car trips during the 14:30 pick up 196.3 63.1 63.2 633 634 635 64 641 6.4.2 643 Potential Impact on the Local Transport Network ‘The additional public transport trips can be easily accommodated on the existing Dublin Bus services in the area. The main demand will be during the AM peak period from 08:30 ~ 09:00. During this period approximately 14 buses service the area, the additional demand created by the extension of school will result in 3 -4 bus passengers per a service. These can easily be accommodated on the ‘existing bus services to/from the area, ‘The additional pupils walking to schoo! will primarily be coming from zones 1 and 2. These additional, ‘walking trips and the accompanying parent can be easily accommodated on the existing footpath network, without any notable decrease in the footpath level of service. ‘The additional 68 car journeys will result in an addtional 136 vehicle movements during the AM peak period. Based on the geographical spread of pupils and the existing modal splits itis estimated that these new car trips will be split as follows: 10% willbe to/from Zone 1 , i. 14 movements '50% will be to/from Zone 2, .e. 68 movements 10% will be to/from Zone 3, i.e. 14 movements 30% will be to/from Zone 4, .e. 40 movements The largest increase in traffic movements will be from Zone 2, these vehicles are likely to use Mount Street and Haddington Road to access the site. In the AM peak period, these vehicle trips to/from this zone is estimated to result in an increase of 68 movements at the junction of Haddington Road/ Northumberland Road. These movements will be spread over a period from approximately 08:30 to 10 and will result in approximately 1 additional movement at this junction every minute. The current two way vehicle flow on the Mount Street bridge” is close to 1,200 during this period, and these additional flows are less than 6% of this existing flow. Given the low volume of movements these additional movements should have minimal impact on the existing operation of ths junction. Car Parking for Drop-Off / Pick-Up Demand The existing demand for drop-off and pick-up car parking was observed on-site. This demand has been increased on a pro-rata basis to allow for the increase in pupil numbers. The biggest increase will be at the 14:30 pick-up. From the on-site surveys the current demand for parking at the 14:30 pick-up period is estimated at being 42 spaces. If this number is increased by the same portion as the increase in student numbers then the future demand would be increased by another 24 spaces. ‘There are sufficient free parking spaces along St Marys Road and Haddington Road to accommodate this increase in parking demand. * Based on DCC Canal Cordon Counts 2012 (source Dublinked.ie) 206.5 Pedestrian Assessment 65.1 As agreed with the Roads and Traffic Planning division of Dublin City Council an assessment of the pedestrian network on Haddington Place and its ability to cater for the potential pedestrian movements was undertaken. This assessment has been undertaken using a Fruin analysis. 6.5.2 The busiest pedestrian demand period will be around the 14:30 pick-up, when 1” to 6" class finish. All the pupils from the schoo! will exit from the main entrance/exit on Haddington Place. 65.3 There will be approximately 540 pupils in 1" to 6 classes, on a normal day approximately 20% of these will be doing after school activities, homework club or be absent, this leaves us with 432 pupils exiting at 14:30. 6.5.4 For the purpose of this analysis itis assumed that 90% of the remaining pupils exit in the 5 minute period from 14:30 ~ 14:35. The remaining 10% exit the school either just before or after this period. ‘As such we have approximately 390 pupils exiting in the 5 minute period 14:30- 14:35, 65.5 There will also be parent pedestrian movement during this period, a conservative estimate would be ‘to assume that the parent movement are 50% of the pupil numbers. Some of the older pupils will not bbe accompanied by an adult and some parents will be picking up more than 1 pupil. tis therefore assumed that there are 195 parent pedestrian movements during the 14:30 ~ 14:35. 65.6 Intotal itis assumed that there will be 585 pedestrian movements in the 5 minute period from 14:30- 14:35. It has been assumed that these movements will be split 50:50, with 50% going towards. Haddington Road and the other 50% going towards St Marys Road. 6.5.7 The footpath width on the section between the school exit and Haddington Road is 1.9m and the footpath width on the section of the school exit to St Marys Road is 1.7m. The results of the analysis ‘are shown in Figures 6-1 and 6-2 below. The analysis has been undertaken with a contingency of 15% included. a be area Figure 6-1: Fruin Analysis of Footpath between Ext and Haddington Road 24Figure 6-2: Fruin Analysis of Footpath between Exit a St Marys Road 65.8 The results of the analysis indicate that there will be LOS D on the footpath section between the exit, and Haddington Road and a LOS 0 on the footpath section between the exit and St Marys Road. The description of these LOS are detailed below. 65.9 LoS Don the two sections may lead to problems for pedestrians when exiting the school. Fruin LoS D Flow rate 49 to 66 people per metre per minute corresponding to densities between 0.72 and-1.08 people/m?. Walking speeds are restricted and reduced. Passing is rarely possible without conflict. Crossing and reverse movements are severely restricted with multiple conflicts. Some probability of intermittent flow stoppages when critical densities are reached.7 Summary / CONCLUSION 71a 71.2 713 716 77 718 719 ‘The existing schools are located in an area with good pedestrian linkages and public transport Provisions. ‘The majority of the existing pupils live within 2km of the school, with the largest portion of pupils ‘coming from the northeast. A travel survey was undertaken at the school, the results of this survey indicate that 44% of pupils walk to school, 12% use public transport, 5% cycle and 39% are driven to school by car. The level of car usage is lower than the average for travel to primary schools within Dublin City and suburbs, the level of walking is similar to the average, whilst public transport and cycling is higher than the average The schools already promote sustainable travel to the schools. Both of the schools are in the Green Schools programme, St Mary's have already achieved the transport flag and St Brigid’ will be undertaking the transport flag next year. As part of this planning application a Travel Plan has been prepared for the new school. {A Travel Plan has been prepared for the new school that will promote travel by non-car modes and further increase the levels of walking/cycling and public transport usage. ‘The proposed new school development will resuit in additional trips in the AM peak hour and at the afternoon pick-up periods. Its estimated that the new development will result in an additional 136, ‘vehicular movements in the AM peak period. The maximum impact of these car movements will be Con the Haddington Road / Northumberland Road junction, where the new development will result in an additional 68 vehicle movernents at this junction, or approximately 1 additional movement per minute. This will have minimal impact on the operation ofthis existing junction. ‘The proposed new development will result in additional public transport trips; however the existing bus services will have sufficient capacity to accommodate this demand. ‘There are sufficient parking spaces in the vicinity of the proposed school to accommodate the increase in parking demand during the morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up periods. The reduction in parking spaces for staff will result in a transfer of trips from car to other modes; this will result in a reduction in car trips by staff members and offset some of the additional car trips created by the additional pupils 2324 Appendix A - Summary of Travel Surveyspas ‘St. Mary's & St. Brigid's National Schools H i | Li au Hi .jee oee Saas routes‘St. Mary's & St. Brigid's National Schools Staff SurveyInformation routes % Teuratowor, 120%aanarnaesSt. Mary’s & St. Brigid’s TRAVEL PLAN G - Go Walking Walking R - Reach your Targets E - Exercise Public Transport E - Earn that Golden Boot Car Sharing N — Now is the time to go GREEN (ss Kieran Boyle Consutting Transport Planning EngyneeringQM ssuarevision Issue Tssue2 Issue 3 Remarks Oret Issued tor Panning | Revised Cycle Parking Date 27” May 2013) 10% June 2013 03 Oct 2013 Propered by ‘Jane Hennaghan Jane Hennaghan| Matt Foy ‘Signature ‘Checked by Matt Foy Matt Foy Matt Foy ‘Signature ‘Authorised by eran Boyle Kieran Boyle Kieran Boyle Signature File roteence 2073008 2013°006 2013P006_TRAVEL PLAN Contact Details: Kieran Boyle Consulting 12 Camden Row Dublin 8 Phone: +353(0)14790570 Mobile: +353(0)87797772 2 www.kieranboyleconsulting.ie Registered in Ireland 453860Contents 1 Travel Pian 4.1 Introduction 1.2 ManagementStructure of the Travel Plan 1.3 Existing Scenario 1.4 Actions to Support Sustainable Travel 1.5 Monitoring and Targets 1.6 Review Process Appendix A ‘Appendix B1 Travel Plan 4.4 INTRODUCTION ‘The aim ofthis Travel Plan is to encourage pupils and staff to travel using modes of transport other than car by Providing them with information, support and promotion. It is hoped that by introducing this plan into the ‘school, pupils will be motivated and encouraged to use more environmentally friendly ways of getting to school such as walking, cycling and public transport. Consequently, it is envisaged that pupils will continue to mal these conscious decisions on an everyday basis, utilising the skills and knowledge they have learnt. 4.2. MANAGEMENT/STRUCTURE OF THE TRAVEL PLAN This Travel Pian (TP) has been prepared on behalf of St Mary's and St Brigid's National Schools, Haddington Road, Dublin and accompanies a planning application for the construction of a new schoo! in close proximity to their present locations. The planning application will see the two schools combine into one school and this TP {is for this new school. The TP will be managed and delivered by @ Travel Plan Co ordinator (TPC). Both Principats of the schools have indicated their wilingness to take the role of Travel Plan Co ordinator on. The ‘TPC will have the support of the Board in the implementation of the TP. They will manage the plan and lead on the implementation of actions, promotion of the plan and the monitoring and review of the plan. The TP will form part of the agenda for the regular staff meetings and at the Board meetings. The two schools are already proud to be part of the Green Schools programme with St Mary's having already achieved their flag in transport. St Brigid's will be working towards their transport flag next year. The two schools are already committed in promoting and achieving sustainable travel to school and this Travel Pian will help to enhance and guide their progress. ‘The plan will be reviewed and updated annually. Parents willbe kept informed on the progression of the Travel Plan throughout the year and the parents of new pupils informed of the plan at inductiorvinformation evenings. 4.3. EXISTING SCENARIO ‘The current modal split for the two schools is shown in Figure 1 below. it can be seen that almost 44% of Pupils are walking to school, with 5% choosing to cycle, almost 12% using public transport and car use of 40%. (Overall, this modal spl is good, with almost 60% of the pupils from these schools already choosing sustainable modes to travel to school. A full copy ofthe results from the survey is contained within Appendix A. Figure 1: Current Modal Split for Pupils Attending St Mary's and St Brigid's Schools4.4. ACTIONS TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL Vac) ‘+ AWelkabilty Audit will be carried out by the school. This will be beneficial for highlighting potential hazards for walking and cycing inthe area surrounding the school. The results of these aucits will be submitted to Dublin City Council ‘+ The school will develop initiatives such as WOW (Welk on Wednesday). WOW is an initiative which ‘currently being used by many schools participating in the Green Schools programme. In more recent times, COW (Cycle on Wednesday) has been introduced to schools. Either initiative is very beneficial ‘and will encourage pupils to travel to school in a more sustainable manner whilst providing a fun activity at the same time, ‘= The schools currently run themed waiks, such as walking to The Ark in Temple Bar. These walks will be continued. ‘+ The schoo! will participate in the Green Schools National Walk to School week. ‘+ The overall initiatives that will be put in place to encourage pupils to walk to school are the Golden Boot award, the Green Tree and the Blinging Boot award. These initiatives are similar to each other ‘and have the same goals. One of these initiatives will be run either monthly or annually, alternating between the three each year. arom Te} + The schools have availed of the cycie training Programme in the past. This training will be continued on a reguiar basis. ‘+ Staff will be provided with information on the Cycle to Work Scheme. ‘+ ABike Doctor will be brought in to the school. Their role will be to hold a workshop for pupils and staff. ‘They will provide maintenance and fix any bicycles that are broken. ‘+ The schoo! will participate in Bike Week in conjunction with DCC. © A total of 72 cycle parking spaces are being provided in the new school grounds. This will further encourage pupils and staff to cycle to school. PUBLIC TRANSPORT ‘+ Information on public transport routes will be provided on the schools website for visitors to the schoo! with a link to the national joumey planner, www joumeyplanner.transportiorieland ie ‘© Staff will be made aware of the Travel Pass Scheme or Tax Saver Commuter Tickets. These are available forall teachers.CAR SHARING Car sharing is a great way to reduce the number of cars on the road and provides a more sustainable alternative to single car use, ‘© The Travel Plan Co ordinator will set up @ private group scheme on www.carsharing ie and inform parents of how to join the scheme. ‘+ Since 57% of staff use their car, this scheme would be beneficial in reducing the number of single car users coming to the school every day. A private group will also be set up for staff within the school on. the carshare website SCHOOL DROP OFF / PICK UP AAs part of the Travel Plan, we ask that parents that must drive to school park on either Haddington Road or St ‘Mary's Road and avoid using Haddington Place. There is plenty of on street parking on these streets and they are just a short walk away. PROMOTION AND LINK T ‘+ Anawareness campaign to promote walking and cycling will be run. The cycle to work scheme will be promoted amongst existing and new staff, ‘© New staff will be given information on the Travel Pian and on how to avail of the Taxsaver ticket and Cycle to Work scheme. ‘+ A’Green Travel’ section will be provided on the new school website. ‘+ Results ofthe travel surveys will be posted on the school website. + The school wil take part in events run by DCC, NTA ‘and RSA to promote walking and cycing. ‘+ The Travel Plan will be linked and incorporated into the everyday curriculum within each class. Examples taken from the NTA Toolkit are outlined in Appendix B. 4.5 MONITORING AND TARGETS Travel surveys will be introduced annually in order to determine if the modal spit has changed and improved. This survey willbe similar, if not the same, as the original travel survey conducted as part ofthis Travel Plan, Targets will be based on the current modal split. The overall target will be to reduce car use by 9%, ie, from 39.5% down to 30.5%. This 9% will then be distributed between the other more sustainable modes of travel. Staff targets will be to reduce the amount of single car users to the school. It is hoped that car sharing will be implemented successfully among the staff. With only three car parking spaces and one disabled parking space being provided at the new school location, other alternative modes of travel may be necessary. 34.6 REVIEW PROCESS Following on from the targets and monitoring results, the plan will be assessed and reviewed in order to determine ifany changes need to be made and the plan updated. The plan wil also be reviewed before the start of each school year. This gives the opportunity to make adjustments to the plan such as altemating some of the initiatives and schemes in order to keep pupils, interested and motivated with new activities.Appendix A &eae gee a8 i { : fal , j i Po bb ssess Z....woes BANS Rak routesSt. Mary's & St. Brigid's National Schools Staff SurveyAnswer Options ee este ‘More bus shelters 10.0% No bus serves our area. 5.0% Better information 5.0% CHEERS Tne maRRERUE SE.aanareoes JoeAppendix B (ss“In order to promote sustainable travel to school you will need a dedicated ‘champion’ who can give his/her time on a regular basis. Government Agencies and Policy www: nationatrensport ie wewmcdttasie womepale wmcenfoie worm healthpromationie woemirshspatiastrategyie worse Non-Government Agencies vwewwririshheartie www grianie International resources wow sustrans org.uk wor ivingstreets.org.uk www traiclub.co.uk worm bikeforall.net www honoloko.com www. mobiltyweek-europe org wwoneiwalktoschool.org Sample Curriculum Links The section below shows some examples of how thinking about the journey to school can be linked directly to the school curriculum. These examples are taken from the Green- Schools programme and some further ideas can be found on the Green-Schools website. In order to maximise the impact of travel plan actions, however, the full resources of the Green Schools programme would be required. Information Sheet 1 - Travel Curriculum Links This section gives you some practical ideas to link your Travel theme with the curriculum. In some cases, the activities are more suited to primary school. Geography (SESE) ‘+ The Natural Environment: Looking at maps (or aerial photographs plot or identify natural transport routes. along rivers. Why were these routes chosen? Children can identify features onthe maps, such as mountains, contour lines, rivers, forests, archaeological remains and 50 on. +The Bult Environment: Looking at maps or eral photographs plot or ientify man-made transport routes. tran lines, roads, paths and walkways. Again tr to identify why these routes an © Ges G2 ase‘Weather Watchers (links with SPHE & Maths) : Monitor the weather forecast over a set period of time, or foran event ie. for a WOW day. ‘Compare the weather forecast withthe actual ‘weather, and monitor how often the forecast was accurate. Children can be encouraged to dress appropriately for the weather predictions. * ‘The Schoo! Environment: Plot the catchment area ofthe school How far do pupils travel from home to schoo!" \What mode of transport do they take? oes this impact on the environment? ‘Are there alternative routes for pedestrians for cyclists that are shorter, or so that they can avoid cars? Study of humans and thelr impact on the environment: Pollution, Greenhouse Gases, Carbon Dioxide & Chmate Change, Building of : roads; Environmental impacts locally and globally = brainstorm to think of althe effects of travel fn the local environment (i.e. congestion, ale pollution, cars parked on cycle lanes, speeding traffic ee) and on the global environment (climate change, use of fossil fuels, energy consumption, transport of goods and food] food miles ete Waste: How does waste from transport impact fon the environment? What kinds of waste does transport produce? : Mathematics Traffic survey: conducted at the school gate where children monitor the number of cars, buses, pedestrians, bikes etc. going by. They can also monitor the number of people using each ‘mode if possible. Display the results on pie or bar charts & rate from 1o 5, with one being the best forthe environment. Link this activity toa dliscussion on car occupancy numbers. \Walk Watcher: Chiléren can stand near the school gate and count the number of pedestrians arriving atthe school gate. They can observe if the numbers increase or decrease on particular days orn inclement weather. ‘Speed Checking: Invite 2 local Garda to monitor the speed of trafic outside the school gates with a speed gun. Children can work out the speed cars are doing in the area, number of cars speeding, numberof cars under the speed limit, average speed ete. Bike Monitors: Children can count the number (of bikes in the bike shed on an on-going basis. ‘They can note bikes with working brakes, bells, fully pumped tyres, lights and so on. They can ‘work out the percentage increase in bkes or the percentage that are fully functional et. Green Trees: Monitor the number of children taking sustainable modes of transport with @ Green Tree, where a green leaf is awarded to children choosing sustainable modes, and 3 brown leafs displayed for children being driven to school. Count the number ofleaveson a regular basis and splay the results inple or bar charts. The class should be aiming for a completely green tree, atleast once every sooften, Distance calculation: Work out how many steps Cor kilometres you walk, cycle or are driven every day on the way to school. Add them al up and seeif the combined distance would reach Cork Europe / America etc. Is everyone taking the recommended number of steps (exercse) per day! How much fuel do you save by taking your Journeys by foot? Database Management: Any of these monitoring ‘activities can be used to compile 2 database, ‘which must be managed to see how your Action ©@8e8006Plan is progressing, as part of the Monitoring & Evaluation step. Carbon Foot printing: Students can work out how much carbon the average school ourney ses. For students in the Greater Dublin Area, use the journey planner on the National Transport ‘Authority's website (www.nationaltransport.ie) Drama (Arts Education) Exploration of topics such as ‘what f you met a dog or a bully on the way to schoo. Explore other cultures by imagining what traveling to them would be ike, Music ‘Travel Songs: Lear the lyrics for travel-related ‘songs, o pick a piece of music you lke and re writ asa rap or song that suits the school. Transport Sounds: Recreate the sounds of diferent transport modes or sounds associated with travel Le. traffic lights, horns, indicators, engines, wheels, puncture, bike bel etc. Identity which sounds are pleasant. Why are the other noises unpleasant? SPHE Road Safety: Explore the issue of road safety with guest speakers and activities Le. how to ross the road, how to use a traffic crossing, ‘obeying the instructions of those responsible for safety in the community, National Roads ‘Authority local community guard, traffic warden, professional cyclists, road safety officer. Display posters around the school with advice fon crossing roads etc Discuss the local area ‘from the point of view of hazards encountered by pedestrians or cyclists - write to the Local ‘Authority to request that some ofthese are fixed or changed. ‘+ MySchool Cornmunity: Discuss the rights and responsibilities of children and adults on the Journey to school ‘+ Media Education: Submit an article to the local press about an issue related to Travel which is of importance to the class. + Food & Nutrition ~ Link exercise withthe Importance of food for promoting growth, keeping healthy and providing energy. ‘+ National, European and Wider Communities: Explore what other Eco-Schoolsare doing to promote sustainable transport. Link this with ‘a discussion on global climate change. Personal Safety & Wellbeing + Discuss children’s safety on the school run — ‘what too Ff they have a problem, who can they speak to, emergency telephone numbers, how <0 they deal with a bully, what to dof they feel unsafe and so on. + Invite walkers, hikers and cyclist in to discuss their sport and why they enjoy it and are involved. How do interested children sample the sport? + Invite guest speakers to discuss isues such as how to behave on public transport. ‘+ Invite a local bike shop owner to carry out workshops on maintaining bikes in working ‘order, repairing punctures etc, s0 that chiléren hhave the skils they need to maintain a bike io An Taisce+ The school journey as an adventure - what have children discovered about their local area on the schoo! journey? Have they had any adventures? ‘Utter inthe local environment —is your journey pleasant or are there iter black spots? Can you do. clean up to make'it a more pleasant area? Languages + Schoo plays on road safety. + Write a Green-Code for Travel + Write poems about the school journey or the longest journey you've ever taken. ‘Discuss the impact of travel on the environment, locally ane globally. ‘+ Have a debate about schoo! travel, for example, Is driving to school every day a good idea? ‘+ Read, write or tell stories about the school Journey, adventures sights, good things, bad things + Unkwith other countries - discuss how children In other countries go to school. + Glossary of Transport in different languages eg, what i bicycle in irish or Spanish? Physical Education + Ge training during PE clases ~ inks with SPHE (evelopment of skis and fitness). + impact of Exercise ~on ngs /puse alertness =link with maths. + Wellbeing linking exercise with healthy eating ~ a caruses petrol desl for fel, what do humans need to run propery? ©8008 Visual Arts + Using the journey to school as inspiration, draw the following: + Something you like about your journey toschoo! + Something you distke + Something unusual you saw on yourjourney + Design a bus ticket. + Design a bike, or make models of diferent modes Le. planes, bikes, cars, + Doacolage of the local neighbourhood, and ‘get each chié to draw themselves on the way to.chool. Cut these out and stick them onto the neighbourhood scene to ilustrate everyone walking to school. ‘+ Design posters promoting an aspect of road safety for display around the school + Design & laminate a poster asking parents not to park infront ofthe school gates. ‘+ Design a poster fr the schools Travel Action Day. + Draw picture of how you travelled to school that day on a small square of paper. Use the squares to make abar chart showing how everyone travelled to schoo! that day. Science (SESE) Models: + Make magnetic cars out of matchboxes. + Design & make models of bikes and machines with wheels, gears, chains and belts. + Design and make an umbrella suitable or rainy days. How would it diferfor an umbre for sunny days? Link this with a discussion on theorigin of the umbrella. Experiment with diferent materials before choosing the best type i. ‘foam, fabric, plastic, cotton, wood and so on. + Design and make aland yacht (see Exemplar 45 Sclence Teachers Guidelines Primary School Curriculum). + Design & construct a sustainable town? \What would be so environmentally friendly about t? Think about the facilities your town would need + Link periodic table with gases given off by cars eg. Con. Experiments ‘+ Energy ~investigate the relationship between light and materials e.g. reflective materials ~ compare a dull bag witha bag with reflective strips by shining a torchylight on them - which is brighter. Conduct the same experiment with vist: vests vs. normal jacket & bike lights vs. no lights + Forces ~ exploring how to slow a moving object ‘or Investigating brakes ona bike. Explore how a stronger force (or push) affects an object such as. 2 toy car. What happens tothe car on a slope? + -AirPollution - compare the front.of school ‘environment with inside the school grounds by smearing Vaseline on some slides so that particles stick to the Vaseline. After one day / week / month, which is drier? Relate this to dirt ‘on buildings. ‘+ Materials explore what kind of materials make the best model boats, airplanes, shoes and so on. {Examine ability to withstand moisture or cold, {Fp on the ground, weight, ability to float et + study oes - where do they grow? De they ie polton? °e + Lung capacities & pulses - test children’s lung capacties and pulses. Explore the impact of exercise on your lungs and pulse + Observe the weather over a period of time & discuss the suitability of different clothes for “different weather conditions. + Explore how lights reflected (for example with torches and mirrors, or sunlight and the face of ‘2 watch) & link this with the role of the sun in heating the earth & climate change + Noise pollution - discuss various trafic noises ‘and other sounds heard on the schoo! journey. \Which are pleasant? Which are unpleasant? Explore how you can stop loud noises, for ‘example, by wrapping items in cifferent materials. Observe the effects a window has on noise Le. isthe noise louder inside or outside? Displays ‘+ Make posters to explain how burning fossil fuels Impacts on the environment. ‘+ Make posters with travel facts & figures to display around the school. ‘+ Human Life Processes ~ Design a display showing allthe different reasons why people travel, or why products they use have to be brought to them. This can introduce the concept of food miles’ or buying local produce. Children can draw themselves on their way to school, and these can be stuck onto a large display.History (SESE) + Christopher Columbus’ voyage to America Explore the journey itself & related issues, for example; Why did he do this journey? How did he travel? How long did he take to travel to the Americas? ‘Was ita sustainable form of transport? How would he have travelled today to speed up his Journey? is this suggested modern method 3 sustainable form of travel? ‘+The History of Transport: Children can explore the history of modes of transport we now take for granted. This can link in with a study (writing down the oral history) of how their parents or grandparents travelled to school. They could also study their ives (childhood, school, work, friends, hobbies et.) in general in the past. Children can query when were planes, cars & bikes invented? Who could afford to use them? What did they look ike? Were they strange looking? What were they made from? Were they comfortable f you were to design a bike / car I plane (or ticket), what would it look tke? f Possible, visita transport museum to learn more and see the vehicles in person, ‘Settlers in ireland: Children can explore the history of settles in reland. Asan istand, we hhave had many visitors to our shores. Who were the frst settlers in Ireland? How did they get hhere? How did they live? Why did many live close to water? How have things changed since then? Children can study different groups, for example ‘The Vikings; The Normans; The Ceks; Recent immigrants, for example, the Polish community, the Chinese community, returning irish emigrants - what is their impression of ireland? How did they travel here? How many different cultures are in your schoo!”APPENDIX G Planting Plan and ScheduleMiche & Associates Haddington Road Paring List Haddington Road Planting Schedule Trees vanrveors ‘No. | Botanical Name Common Name | Size Form 3 Sorbus Sheerwater | Rowan (fasgiate) | 18-20cm gith | rootbalied Seedling 0 Rhus typhina Laciviata’_| Sumach 2m rootbaled ‘Shrub planting Wo. | BotanicalName ‘Common Name | Pot | Height (cm) | Densityim2 Size ) 20 | Lonicera May Green 3c | 20306m | 5 60 Daphne bholua Daphne 3t__[30-40em [4 50 Ceratostigma Ceratostigma at | 20-30em | 5 wilmottianum 100___| Vinca balerica Perninkle at __| 15-20em [5 160 | Sarcococca h Digyna’ | Christmas Box | 3 | 15-20em | 4 Hedge planting No. | Botanical Name ‘Common Name | Pot Size (L) | Densityim2 250 | Fagus sylvatica Beech aL 6 Perennial planting ‘No. | Botanical Name ‘Common Name | Pot Size (L) | Densityim? 30 ‘Anemone ‘Honorine Jobert’ Japanese 2b 5 ‘Anemone 3 Dryopters felix mas Fer 2 a 15 Dryopters walichianum Fem 2 4 ‘Spring bulb planting To be planted in same species groups of min, spaced 30 plants. No lines; random pattern evenly 'No._| Botanical Name ‘Common Name | Densityim2 150 | Narcissus pseudonarcissus Datfodi 20 es ‘Street Climbing plants. ‘No. | Botanical Name ‘Common Name | Pot Size (L) | Densityim2 5 Hydrangea petiolaris Climbing SL wa bydrenges. Roofgarden containers ‘No. | Botanical Name ‘Common Name | Pot Size (L) | Densityima 105 | Fargesia ‘Red Panda’ ‘Umbrella bamboo | SL per in m 105 | Rubus ‘Betty Ashboumer” ‘Omamental 1 per lin m bramble All planting stock must adhere to the National Plant Specification and wherever possible be sourced locally.HADDINGTON PLACE (MINOR) (2) Platina Pian = Second Flor Exeral Pay MITCHELL + ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture Urban Design ArchitectureAPPENDIX H Conservation Report1464 CONSERVATION REPORT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AT SAINT MARY'S SECONDARY SCHOOL, HADDINGTON ROAD, DUBLIN 4 ‘Aerial view of St. Marys This report has been carried out at the request of the Coady Partnership Architects, on behalf of the Department of Education and Skills, It forms part of a submission for an application for a grant of Planning Permission to Dublin City Counc ‘made on behalf of the Department of Education and Skills, by the Coady Partnership Architects Its aim is to make a conservation assessment of the impact of the proposals on the existing buildings that comprise the Secondary School at St. Mary's, Haddington Road, Dublin 4St Mary's Road / Hadkington Road INTRODUCTION This report is set out as part of @ planning application to Dublin City Council. The planning application is prepared by the Coady Partnership Architects on behalf of the Deparment of Education and Skis of the properties, and is for the construction of a new school on the site of the existing secondary school, which is proposed to be ‘demoplished. This report is intended to assess the architectural value of the existing structure, which is not on the Record of Protected Structures, and to assess the impact of the proposals on the nearby Protected Structures. These Protected ighlighted with a red asterisk on ‘The proposed development consists of: 1. A new 3 storey high school building at Haddington Road and Haddington Place, and 2. The demolition of the existing schoo! building at Haddingion Road and Haddington Place. ‘This report should be read with the architects drawings and other documentation provided with the planning DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING Saint Mary's Secondary Schoolconsists of an amalgam of buildings constructed over a number ‘of years, commencing in c.1901. The main building that fronts onto Haddington Road is a two-storey, red-brick flat roofed, L-shaped structure, with steel framed casement windows. It has five bays, with a central entrance projecting bay, with a stone clad central panel. front elevation of the school, Haddington Road ‘side elevation, Haddington Place The fagade to Haddington Place has six bays of double-height, round-headed windows, with a ‘Bolton’ type gate to the front. Railings on a brick plinth form the front boundary.St May's Road Haddington Rosd vu tom te comer of Heeangton Attached to the rear of this building is a later, two- storey, five-bay, yellow brick, with red brick trims, pitched, slated roofed structure, ¢.1940. This is sot behind 'a red-brick high wall, that forms a yard area. This yard is closed by a later single-storey building of dashed render and @ pitched roof, €.1960. yellow brick building behind the original schoo! ‘The yellow brick building is itself L-shaped, and ‘extends out to the boundary line of the school at the southern side of Haddington Place, forming an ‘edge 10 a playground that is to the south west of the schoo! buildings. 1d and Place ‘south-western comer of the yellow rick building Positioned between the original red-brick schoo! ‘and the yellow brick extensions is a plastered, flat roofed building that contains tollets and additional classrooms. The window pattern on these is similar to that on the front building. The rear of the front building is also rendered in the plaster finish. ‘ear ofthe front building, with staircase windows: Blackrock. County Dubtype. A series of random internal views are attached below to ilustrate the interiors.The internal photographs above are included to lilustrate the internal layout of St. Mary's ‘Secondary School. They are not intended to be a comprehensive photographic record of the interiors. HISTORIC MAPS 1876 Ordnance SurveySt Marys Road /Haddaglon Road ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING BUILDING As stated earlier, the buildings that isthe subject of this planning application snot a Protected Structure, nor are the buildings immediately adjoining it Ris worth noting that the buildings across tho road ‘and 10 the East, on St. Mary's Road are protected structures, as are the buildings to the east on Haddington Road. Haddington Road Church is also a protected structure, ‘This building is a reasonable example of its type, from the architectural point of view. Its street elevation is confident and well detailed. Its juxtaposition with the adjoining building is not, in the author's opinion, particularly satisfactory. The interiors have litle of any particular interest. From the point of view of the NIAH, the author would assess the buildings that comprise the ‘Secondary school as being of ‘local’ interest only, ‘and would not merit inclusion in the record of protected structures. view from the comer of Haddington Road and Place Vw fon asain Pace Padang Road view along Haddington Place (Minor) DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSALS: ‘Thoy consist, in essence of the consiruction of a new three storey school and the demolition of the ‘existing school building. It is proposed to replace the existing secondary ‘school by a three-storey school on Haddington Road and Haddington Place, stepping down to a two-storey height at the rear, at Haddington Place (Minor) ‘On Haddington Road, the proposed school building takes the scale of the adjoining houses to the West. While these houses, which are not Protected Structures, are also three storey, the proposed new building is approximately one metre higher than them, The houses to the East of Haddington Place, while also three-storey, have a lesser floor-to-ceiling height, thus giving smaller scale to these buildings. These buildings are Protected Structures. The proposed scele, design and materials for the proposed new school are sensitively designed, 60 {as to add to the grain and texture of the area and to reflect ts location in an area with many Protected Structures, including Haddington Road Church, site layout plan of the proposed new schoo! The Meating Hal, 73 George's Avenue, Blackrock, County Dubin 1-01-2786 164, F-01-2836023, € rmagiectinghal ie. W eSt Marys Road / Haddington Rosd IMPACT OF THE PROPOSALS ‘The terminology used below to define the impacts of the works are taken from the Environmental Protection Agency's document “Guidelines for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Statements", ‘and their meanings are as defined in that document. The impact of the proposals on the buildings to be demolished is significant, neutral and permanent. ‘The impact of the proposed new schoo! on Haddington Road is moderate, neutral and long- term. The Impact of the proposed new school on the protected structure of Haddington Road Church is slight, imperceptible and long-term. Similarly, thelr Impact on the protected structures to the East of Haddington Place is slight, neutral and long-term. The impact of the proposed new school on Haddington Place (Major) is_significant, positivemnoutral and long-term. ‘The impact of the proposed new school on Haddington Place (Minor) is significant, positive ‘and long-term. The existing secondary school Is not a Protected Structure, and the proposals respect the scale and general use of the surrounding buildings on Haddington Road, Consideration may be given to recording the existing building photographically and by a ‘measured survey, prior to Its demolition. In summary, the author is of the opinion that the Coverall impact is moderate, positive and long-term, due to the proposed use, layout, scale, massing ‘and design of the proposals layout plan of the proposed new schoo! building Robin Mandal 10” June 2013 The Meeting Hall, 73 George's A T:04.2786 168, F'01-2696029, € no fa, Blacrock outtaAPPENDIX I Minutes of Pre-planning meetings with Dublin City CouncilCoady Partnership ARCHITECT: Minutes of Meeting with Local Authority No.1 Project: Scoil Mhuire & St Brigid's NS Haddington Rd Job ref: 1895 Date: 11 October 2012 Venue’ Dublin City Council Offices Present: Mary Conway Dublin City Councit pec Edel Kelly Dublin City Councit pec Elaine Power Dublin City Council bec Conor Skehan Client Representative oR Gavin McHugh Downes Associates DA William Gleeson Coady Partnership Architects CPA ‘Olwen Coady Coady Partnership Architects CPA Item Minute Action 1.0 Purpose of Meeting La ‘The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the project to DCC Planning Note ‘and Roads Departments, discuss the context of the project and present a umber of possible options for the new school. 2.0 Project Context and Location 2a ‘The DoES have proposed the amalgamation of two existing primary Note schools, Scoil Mhuire Boys National School and St Bridget's Girls National School currently located adjacent to the proposed site. ‘The amalgamated schoo! will be located at the corner of Haddington Road and Haddington Place on the site of the former St Mary's Secondary School. 2.2 The existing buildings on the site were previously under the ownership of |_ Note the Holy Faith Sisters Convent. The site has been purchased by the Department of Education and Skills, who wish to reinstate it as an educational facility. 23 CR stated the existing primary schools have begun accepting additional Note ‘students this year, above the capacity of their current buildings, on the direction of the DOES, in anticipation of the amalgamation and availability of additional accommodation in the new building. 24 The pupil numbers in the existing schools are approx 400 . The Note amalgamated school will be a 24 classroom primary schoo! with a total capacity of 672 pupils. 25 DCC noted they welcome the Departments intention to reinstate a school Note at this site. 3.0 Zoning and Development Plan 34 ‘The Site is zoned 215, institutional and community use. The location of Note the amalgamated primary school on this site will continue this use in line with the zoning 3.2 The site is not in a conservation area and the buildings are not protected Note structures. Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland. 1: 01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 E: admin@coady.le W: wnw.coady.le42 CPA noted that The Holy Faith Sisters had previously applied for planning permission for the redevelopment of the secondary school site into a three storey residential scheme. This included the full demolition of all existing buildings on the site. This Planning Application was granted by ‘An Bord Pleanala in Oct 2011. CPA tabled drawings and 3D images from this previous planning application. The key issues addressed by An Bord Pleanala which may alco relate to the amalgamated school site and possible scheme designs a ‘* full demolition of the existing buildings was granted by An Bord Pleanala. ‘* the scale and character of new buildings (3 storey height/brickwork) was granted by An Bord Pleanala. ‘* the new development would result in lite or no new ‘overshadowing of adjacent residents compared to the existing buildings. This was accepted by An Bord Pleanala, 5.0 Design Option 5a 52 53 5.4 55 56 57 58 CPA tabled plans of the existing school buildings on the site, indicating the different levels of existing building condition, from poor’ (probable demolition) to good (possible retention and renovation). CPA noted a condition survey is underway and will better inform the design team regarding feasibility and extent of retention . CPA tabled design options A to D outlining the pros and cons of each optior '* Option A - retention of the majority of existing building. © Option B - retention of existing structure at the north, up to the rear of the stage and dressing rooms. © Option C - retention of existing structure at the north, up to the rear of the GP Area only. ‘© Option D - New build. CPA noted that the layout of the existing buildings on the site are quite poor from a primary school management and function point of view. Options showing maximum retention of the existing building result in the requirement for additional building accommodation on the site, thereby pushing the building mass toward adjacent properties and reducing the availability of good quality play areas on the site. CR noted the schools are both level 2 DEIS schools and many of the pupils live in apartments. For many the playground is the only safe Outdoor area they have available to them. The provision of good quality play areas is essential for the success of the project. Options A,B C1 will all increase overshadowing, overtooking, proximity to neighbouring houses and gardens and will interfere with existing views. DCC outlined their concern with all options tabled showing the extension of the building up to the gable end of the residence of the Bulgarian Ambassador. Option C2 shows the building form further away from the residence of the Bulgarian Ambassador, however a fourth story is required to provide the accommodation in the new brief, increasing overlooking and overshadowing. A four storey primary school building is also very difficult to manage for the school authorities. CPA noted the demolition of existing building (Option D) and the provision of a full new schoo! building provides the optimum solution in terms of school planning, availability of play space, reducing the proximity of buildings to the adjacent neighbours and reduction in additional overshadowing. CPA noted a new school building will be no larger in scale than the existing buildings on the site. Mount Peasant Busines Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dubin 6, Ireland. T: 01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 E: edmin@coady le W: Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note5.10 6.0 Traffic, 61 62 63 65 6.6 67 68 6.9 6.10 DCC noted in reviewing a Planning Application for this site they would Note have particular regard to: '* overiooking to adjacent properties ‘© overshadowing and loss of light ‘© building massing ‘© building heights and relationship with existing structures DCC are in favour of a future proofed school building on this Note site, which will provide good quality teaching spaces long into the future. rking and Set-down CR set out the current parking and set-down arrangements for the staff Note and parents of the existing schools: © There is no set down available © There is limited on site staff parking ‘© The schools can be approached on three sides, Haddington Road, Haddington Place Minor and St Mary's Road, CPA noted onsite set-down spaces are not provided in any options for the Note ‘new school. On-site staff parking will be limited to six spaces for core staff members only. CR outlined the catchment areas for the existing schools. The traditional CR catchment areas are not Haddington Road and Ballsbridge, but Pearse Street, Ringsend and Irishtown. The schools have recently had a large Uptake from newer communities, including the non-national ‘communities, in North Wall, the IFSC and Barrow Street. There are 42 languages spoken in the schools. Public transport to Haddington Road from these areas is very poor. As a result a large volume of pupils travel to the school by car. CPA outlined the proposed access points to the school buildings Note as follows: * formal entrance from Haddington Road ‘* secondary (pupil) entrance from Haddington Place '* access to rear play ground areas from Haddington Place (Minor) DCC noted that as access to the yard area will be the main entry point for students in the morning, and therefore the main congestion area for ‘set down, this must be provided from Haddington Place. Haddington Place (minor) is not an appropriate location for set down as it is a cul-de~ sac. DCC suggested the following possible options for improving traffic to the Note site when the new school is opened: ‘© Privatisation of Haddington Place minor, with access only for residents and staff ‘Introduction of a one way system on Haddington Place (South to North), with the retention of pay and display parking, but with Certain time restrictions to allow drop off in the mornings '* Possible provision of road markings, such es ‘loading bay’. It was agreed that the issues above will not form part of a Planning ‘Application for the site, but once a preferred option is available, can be issued to DCC who will progress these suggestions further. DCC requested 2 traffic and pedestrian study be completed before the DA/CPA next meeting DCC noted current policy for urban school sites such as this Is not to Note encourage set-down. DCC noted walking and cycling to school should be prioritised. DCC however, acknowledge that the catchment areas are outside of walking distance. CR noted the existing pupils do not currently cycle to school fora number Note of reasons, but most particularly as there is no cycle parking available at home for their students. Cycle facilities will be provided for some students use and for staff use in particular ‘Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland. T: 01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 €: admin@coady.le ww coady.lean DA & CPA to provide a preferred option, following meeting with DoES, to allow DCC review all traffic issues in greater detail. DA to liaise directly with DCC to discuss further If required. 7.0 Other Issues 7A 72 73 74 Issue to: Mary Conway Edel Kelly Elaine Power Conor Skehan Gavin McHugh William Gleeson Olwen Coady CR noted that a large amount of discussion with neighbours and the local residents has taken place and is on-going. CR is actively managing this ‘and all concems will be taken on board by the design team as the project, progresses. DCC noted as Bord Pleanala have previously granted full demolition, this precedent has been set DCC noted that any new buildings as the site must be in brickwork. The site Is immediately adjacent to a Conservation Area and a terrace of protected structures along Haddington Road. This will be a condition of Planning. ‘A Desktop Ecology Survey and Screening for Appropriate Assessment will be required. This will be completed once a preferred option is agreed upon. DA/ CPA Note Note Note Dublin City Council mallto:mary.conway @dublincity.ie Dublin City Council mallto:Edel.kelly@dublincity.ie Dublin City Council elaine. power@dublincity.ie St. Brigid's Primary Schoo! pmclaffeysvd@yahoo.co.uk Downes Associates. gmchugh@downesassociates.le Coady Partnership Architects william@coady.ie Coady Partnership Architects ocoady@coady.ie ‘Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland. 1:01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 E: admin@coody. le W: www.coady.leCoady Partnership ARCHITECT! Minutes of Meeting with Local Authority No.2 Project: Scoll Mhuire & St Brigid's NS Haddington Ré Job ref: 1895 Date: 7 December 2012 Venue: Dublin City Council Offices Present: Mary Conway Dublin City Councit pec Conor Skehan Client Representative cr Tomas Sexton Coady Partnership Architects CPA William Gleeson Coady Partnership Architects CPA Item Minute ‘Action 1.0 Purpose of Meeting Aa ‘The purpose of the meeting was to present design options to the local Note ‘authority and review in terms of planning risk in advance of a meeting with the Department of Education and Skills. 2.0 General a5 CPA presented a number of options to DCC, including massing studies Note and shadow analysis for 21 March at 9am, 12pm and 3pm. The options were © C1/C3 - part retention of the existing building, with three storey, new build extension to the south-east of the site. © 01/02/03 - full demolition of the existing building and construction of a new part three storey school building. ze DCC noted that the key issues which the Local Authority will take into Note ‘consideration when assessing an application for any options are: '* Overshadowing - does the proposal create any additional ‘overshadowing at the adjacent residential properties? ‘© over looking - does the proposal create additional overlooking to ‘the adjacent residential properties? ‘© visual impact - what is the visual impact of the proposal? DCC noted proposals will be assessed against the existing building, and all new building proposals should seek to minimise the effect in relation to the above issues, 23 DCC noted that the impact on the residential amenity will be a key Note concern. The adjacent areas are all zoned Z2, are protected structures to the east and north, and the site is on the edge of a Special Area of Conservation. The priority of the Local Authority in an area of 22 Zoning is to protect the amenity of the existing residential properties. 24 DCC noted that while the previous permission has set some precedent In Note relation to an application for the site, a new application will be reviewed on its own merit, and issues outlined above will be key to any Planning decisions taken by the LA. 25 DCC noted that new proposals should not increase the site coverage on Note the site. Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland, ‘T: 01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 E: admin@coady.le W: www.coady le3.0 Next Meeting CPA noted they will revert to DCC following the meeting with the DoES CPA next week, to when the Local Authority of the direction of the project, and will seek formal pre-planning meeting once the three offered options. 3a Issue to: Mary Conway Conor Skehan Tomas Sexton William Gleeson is further developed. Dublin City Council Client Representative Coady Partnership Architects Coady Partnership Architects mailto:mary.conway@dublincity.te eis@eis.ie t.sexton@coady.ie william@coady.ie ‘Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Irelond. T:01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927, in@coady.ie W: www.coady.leCoady Partnership ARCHITECT: Minutes of Meeting with Local Authority No. 3 Scoil Mhuire & St Brigid's NS Haddington Rd 1895 14 February 2013 Venue: Dublin City Council Offices Present: Mary Conway Dublin City Council pec Edel Kelly Dublin City Council pec Elaine Power Dublin City Council pec ‘Conor Skehan Client Representative cR Nigel Fitzsimons Downes Associates DA William Gleeson Coady Partnership Architects CPA ‘Tomas Sexton Coady Partnership Architects CPA Item Minute Action 1.0 Purpose of Meeting a ‘The purpose of the meeting was to present the proposed new build Note design option to the Pianning and Roads Department of Dublin City Council and to clarify DCC’s specific requirements for the Planning Application Submission. 2.0 Scheme Design 24 CPA presented the current proposals for the full demolitions of the Note existing St Mary's Secondary School building on the site, and the construction of a new build, three storey, 24 classroom, primary school building, 2.2 CPA presented the proposed site plan, floor plans, elevations and 34 Note views of the scheme, 23 It Is proposed to build to the site boundaries along the east and south, Note ‘and to the building line along the north at Haddington Road, 24 External play is located to the west of the new buliding, with 4 no, car Note Parking spaces proposed to the south of the site, accessed off Haddington Place (Minor). CPA noted 70 cycle spaces are proposed, 60 to the north of the building at the front of the school along Haddington Road, and 10 to the rear adjacent to the car parking. 25 ‘The main, formal school entrance is from Haddington Road, with the Note ‘main pupil entrance through to the rear yard at Haddington Place (Major). 2.6 It Is proposed to retain the existing tree in the rear courtyard and one of Note the existing cherry trees along Haddington Road. 2.7 Rooftop play is proposed at second floor level to the south of the Note building, over the General Purpose Area. 28 CPA noted the building Is arranged as follows: '= Administration is located at the comer of Haddington Road and Haddington Place, adjacent to the formal entrance. Mount Pleasant Busines Centre, Mount Peasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland T:01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 E: sdmin@coady.te W: www.coadysie3.0 40 ‘Mount Pleasant Business Centre, 1:01 497 6 ‘= Classrooms are arranged in groups of three, grouped together based on class groupings, with associated Special Education & Tuition rooms and access to the play areas. Junior classes are located on the ground floor with Senior classes on the second floor '= Staff Room and Library are located at first and second floor levels respectively, to the north-east corner at the road junction. = The double height General Purpose Room is located to the south, adjacent to the pupil entrance. Planning Comments 3a DCC noted the following would be considered in the assessment of the proposals: ‘= loss of light, daylighting and sunlight to the existing adjacent residential properties. DCC noted full daylighting analysis will be required as part of the Planning Submission. ‘= overlooking to the adjacent residential properties. DCC noted while there is existing overlooking, the proposals should not exacerbate the situation, '= the appropriateness of the design in the context of an existing residential conservation area. An Architectural Design Statement will be required with the Planning Submission. = materiality. CPA noted the proposed material is brick. 3.2 DCC noted they would like to see the main entrance at Haddington Road used by the school and visitors. CPA noted that the pupil entrance from Haddington Place (Major) will be mainly used to bring students through to the rear yard in the morning. It may be possible that the schools allow some of the older pupils access though the entrance from Haddington Road, but that this entrance will be mostly used by teachers and visitors. This will be discussed in more detail with the schools. CR noted that there Is lots of activity around the schools during the day with the coming and going of staff, parents and visitors and it is most likely that this entrance will be frequently used in any case. 33 DCC noted that the Planning Submission should set out the envisaged use of the General Purpose Room outside of normal school hours, including a notional diary of activities, if available. CR confirmed that the hall will be used by the community and not for commercial activity. 34 DCC noted the demolition of the existing building will required detailed explanation and justification. 35 CPA to include a Heritage Report and Architectural Impact Statement with the Planning Submission. 36 DCC noted that a sufficient number of Site Notices should be erected; 2 on Haddington Road, 2 on Haddington Place (Major) and 1 on Haddington Place (Minor). 37 CPA noted that the current programme is for the submission of Planning in early April, as the project is on a fast track programme for occupation ‘as soon as possible, DCC offered to complete a Pre-Planning Validation process to ensure there are no difficulties at this Stage. CPA noted the team would very much welcome this process. ‘Traffic, Parking and Set-down 4a DCC noted the traffic proposals discussed at the previous meeting were discussed with DCC Traffic Management Dept. ‘= Privatisation of Haddington Place minor, with access only for residents and staff = Introduction of a one way system on Haddington Place (South to North), with the retention of pay and display parking, but with certain time restrictions to allow drop off in the mornings = Possible provision of road markings, such as ‘loading bay’. 42 jount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland. ‘01 497 0927 E: admin@coady.le W: www.coady le CPA CPA/CR cra, CPA, CPA Note Note Note43 44 45 46 47 49 4.10 DCC Traffic Management Dept have noted that recent analysis of the south of the city around the south circular and canal areas has been undertaken. There is a reluctance to commit to any amendments to the existing traffic flows in and around Haddington Road and Haddington Place to accommodate the new school. DCC noted their reluctance to provide a dedicated school drop off along Haddington Place (Major) as this may set a precedent for other urban ‘school projects. DCC also noted that the provision of set down here will not cater for the vehicle numbers at the new school, and the creation of a one way system may result in double drop off along this road, ‘causing further traffic issues. DCC suggested there is sufficient parking along Haddington Road to provide school drop off and that the introduction of a pedestrian crossing ‘along Haddington Road could be considered to provide safe crossing along this busy route. DCC noted that the a Traffic Impact Assessment and Mobility Management Plan will be required to make the case for any alterations to the existing traffic network, but that this will not form part of a Planning Application for the new school in any case. The TIA and MMP will be required as part of the Planning Submission. DCC noted a proactive strategy for travel to the school should be developed through the Mobility Management Plan and put in place to discourage the need for vehicular drop off. DCC noted there is no objection to the redevelopment of the school on this site from a traffic point of view, and welcome the redevelopment of the school at this location. CR noted, on behalf of the schools, his objection to the above strategy outlined by DCC. CR noted that the schools need a safe place to drop off young children close the school entrance, and provide ease of access to the playground area in the morning CPA noted that some of the children who attend the school travel from long distances, and vehicular drop off is unavoidable. CR noted there is {an existing traffic load at the school, which Is approximately 30% of the ‘school population at present. DA will meet with DCC Roads Dept, following completion of the TIA and MMP and to discuss the specific planning requirements in more detail, prior to the Planning Submission. 5.0 Other Issues Sa 5.2 53 Issue to: Mary Conway Edel Kelly Elaine Power Conor Skehan Nigel Fitzsimons DA to contact DCC Drainage regarding their specific requirements for the project (Gerry O'Doherty). CPA to contact Michael Noonan, DCC Parks division to investigate if there are any specific ecology requirements. CPA noted an Ecological Desk Study and Screening for Appropriate Assessment has been commissioned and will be included in the Planning Submission. DA to check auto-tracking on the staff parking at Haddington Place (Minor) Dublin City Council mary.conway@dublincity.te Dublin City Councit Edel.kelly@dublincity.ie Dublin City Councit elaine. power@dublincity.ie Client Representative els@eis.ie Note Note CPA/DA, Note Note Note Note DA DA DA Downes Associates nfitzsimons@downesassociates.ie ‘Mount Pleasant Business Centre, Mount Pleasant Avenue, Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland, T: 01 497 6766 F: 01 497 0927 €: admin@coady.ie ww.coady. leAPPENDIX J ‘Schedule of Planning Drawings Drawings of the Proposed Scheme (A3 Reductions)Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS Schedule of Planning Drawings Project: Haddington Road National School Job ref: 1895 Date November 2013 Architects Drawings : Coady Partnership Architects Dwg No.: Scale: Size: Drawing Title: 0501 As indicated Al _Site Location Map and Existing Site Plan 0502 1:200 ‘Al Existing Buildings - Demolitions 0503 1:200 Al Proposed Site Plan 0504 1:200 ‘AL Ground and First Floor Plans 0505 1:200 ‘AL Second Floor and Roof Plans 0506 1:200 AL Elevations 0507 4:200 AL Sections 0508 1:1000 AL Shadow Analysis 0510 1:200 AL Planting Plan osi1 NTS AL 30 Views os12 NTS AL 3D Views 0513 Asindicated Al —_ Boundary Details 0514 Al Existing Elevations 051s AL Existing Plans Landscape Architects Drawings: Mitchell & Associates LHAD-002 100 4:200 ‘Al Landscape Masterplan Civil /Structural Engineers Drawings: Downes Associates Dwg No.: Scale: Size: Drawing Title: 12167/101 ‘As shown Al Existing site services showing site survey and existing drainage 12167/100 ‘As shown Al Proposed site services layout 12167/102 ‘As shown Ai Typical manhole details 12167/103 ‘As Shown Ai Typical pipe bedding details 12167/104 As shown AL Typical gully details 12167/105 ‘As shown A1 Typical water main details Services Engineers Drawings: NJ O'Gorman & Associates Dwg No.: Scal Size: Drawing Title: PL-751 1:250 Al Proposed External CCTV & Lighting Services ARCHITECTURE BUILDING CONSERVATION. URBAN DESIGN ‘Mount Peasant Business Centre, Mount Peasant Avenue, Ovbin 6: 01 4576766, 01 4970527, Prepared by: CPA CPA CPA CPA cra CPA CPA CPA cpa ca CPA CPA CPA MA DA DA DA DA DA DA NOG © admindcontieDrawings Prepared by Wiliam Gleeson | Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS| =Drawings Prepared by Wiliam Gleeson| | | | | | | Drawings Prepared by Wtiam Gleeson Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS ott a = Pai Ged ad iste Pans sae prothae ee e © oO jot ol fj biel a be Drawings Prepared by Wiliam Gleeson fe Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS &® — ae ae a Hadar Rod atin Sceot Ss oe = = v= eons@ Neath ation le Mam-csh-o4 de a eee sate Drawings Prepared by Wiliam Gleeson —— a jae eer —— co Coady bartnessiip reticleeoeoee2e2e0e7ee0e00202020808808808088080 8 mn ; NT weraTeene HTTTTT ROB f i f B | | {|| seat | |} & © I gE | i E yy] | BE Swope persis @ ‘VOB LI Aa Peredaig SBUWNEGHADDINGTON PLACE (MINOR) MITCHELL + ASSOCIATES Landscape Arcitectite Urban Design Architecture Drawings Prepared by Willam Gleeson1. Existing View fom Haddington Road ingView from Haddington Pace Major Drawings Prepared by William Gleeson Coady Partnership ARCHITECTS “Dept of Een Sa gon oa hate She reg ew= an, - Ja 1. Existing View rom Haddington Ptae Minor 3. Existing School Courtyard 4. Proposed View fom Extemal Courtyard meenbs pce HADDINGTON ROAD Drawings Prepared by Wiliam Gleeson | — es = SS a a Goasy Partnership ARCHITECTSwoseer9 wey Aq poredeig s6uye10 SLOALIHOYY diyssauyeg Apeo> —warorsmsiee ©eeaera Poa oor | —_zolzi == ae aion stwis0 a0¥NvHS ‘PANOAYT ls G380d0ud ‘vou NoLoNIaavH nny ee on minga a fetes ee fetesa ii Bag gdda aad NOTES F [MINIMUM DIMENSIONS | MANHOLE [DIA. OF ‘DIA. OF 1 PRECAST MAMIOUES SAL WANE 130mm CONCRETE SURROUND = = Pe NOE CENoT | WOTH ATEN | [‘Twe- [ncer” | ono | Broo” | x SUSAR SRS Tom ToT x [o-oo] 1200 | 780 1080 Te | a2 | o-a00 | aa eee te oe | eeeceearaaa =a | 1300 [7a iota ° eoo-eeo] 23s | azo fat rong es 9 sea we 1 wren cum wo moue | * RRSRUCRERSN SEE ese | a : meiooo| 28 | STN aseruminrneswsses | SEES E00] —ta00 [720 sexo ——] [ree] saa 000 | 00 3. mas ovo nen ue pt Ce Serneeremes oar | 1390 [730 cso t eco-tco| 300 | 0 |< amis mo wamots wo 1 ousme ieasaremes. 204 — 100 {oo 180 st >se00 | 228_| 00 BER cuce 2 0 ven an one" [ 200 [900 Toso THEA | asso] 8 SS ERAS WaT SEES enon. fs —1a50 | ~tes0 m= ° so-aco| 0 | 0 ; et 1 : See cige eee HEBER cooer msn Ea a THER ao a 8 pe em a macs 6 oem Oe HO Em [o-9-| 1200 | 1300. 1200- 8 }7s0-1200| 300 | 450 von en co 50 [200 200 ° S20 |__| 20 ome a ia00 TER as eas Sotees wee lssof 1350 | “1350 isso ° so-aco| 78 | aan = 750 [o-a5: [1200 1350 4350 2 > 1200 300. 3 — se beers fe = a wars we re QaieTs eis Wo O€ [900 0-45" | 1350" 1500 1500. 8 1780-1500] 375 5 Smiaate Ss OF Ar ust 00 lisse —tst0—[1so0 ae ° Sisco | 37s_| 5 |» some roa o gus cx coeare memes wm 21 = TEA 0 0-750 “200 = _SANO/CEMENT MORTAR "poo. ee ae im © | 20 freon] 0 | 0 3800 [sso [oor] 00 [00 a0 2 puso | 5 | so as —Joxso"| tate [too ‘ao Soo Jose [tat tt a fs —oseo"| “1300 [sto 7300 Co 7 1200 1380] “1350 ise so] —ta00 | “1380 iso tes [a0 ‘a0 tat [ ase 0 tse [380 is Co a [ss 3s ‘sso [380 1s ca ‘aso | seo 0 ‘seo [300 1s co [sae ‘a0 100 [00 = ares Ta 0 3609" [tso——o-so"| 1300 [sto m= a = ‘a 300 fomso" ‘ato z ato i is is 00. a] 8] 8) 8 rine k BRIBE lelelelelg —} CaN | i FOR OMENSIONS ETC. TO MANHOLES] a nore + ame fee AB D SEE TABLE 2 ae DETAIL OF STEP RUNG Pee ea = 12167 102 ra maomuee anne Downes DETAIL OF ACCESS LADDER ‘TYPICAL DETAIL OF SAFETY CHAIN ersereletyLIMITATIONS ON DEPTH OF COVER. (ons UP 10 6m) PIPE DIAMETER. (mm) | soe | sso | 22 | xm | os | wo | sas | TRENCH MOTH (AX) (M) Taso | sce | r00 | mmo | roto | soso | vaco | sme ‘TRANSMON DEPTH (M) | es ean BEDOING CLASS PEERS 00 USS 30 +[]. cuss-u. 3 + [0 cuss-H + Las! Ss arr noise ot tomy Anca te mee | WHEN 8 IS LESS THAN rm a¥O/OR Dc CONCRETE FLL TO iveL oF FEMA SORE! 12167 103hal! ay ie iit Gi i He) i | : Hip Hi |ee TC ee an a i We soar i STIVIEG NIVEA WOILAL ‘Fibs #NOLvonGa 0 DaMULVESS 7 NTIENG TOOHOS -AsviNtd YOM NOLONOGVH =F zoe z I 5 pp an fe 1 : tot 5 it | op “et | i i i fl "maaan -4 i i 1 ' HH ti =r ONINNYa UOaSECURITY LIGHT EXTERNAL LUMINAIRE ‘coiieator acrenstn Serres ren = Deparment of Evcaton Haddington oad Haddington Road Saree ret Proposed External COTV & ghing Se oe PLANNING PL-751