360 degree -Depth analysis of global data

The presentation covers some depth

analysis of the recent 360 degree
appraisal.
This purpose is to give the
organisational behaviour analysis
And also plan our future change
management startegies wherever
required

9/5/09 Saama Confidential

 360 degree appraisal

1-closer analysis of data distribution

2- > 4 by self and others
3-Self and others' rating alignment
4- no or insignificant gap cases

2
2

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 2Page 2

 Scores > 4 by self and others

The rating scale was 1 to 5-- 1 is low 5 is high

Over all > 4— Senior mgt—2

Others-- nil

Self score > 4-- Senior mgt-3

Others—7

RM score > 4 -- Senior mgt-1

Others-- 2
Peer score > 4-- Senior mgt—1
Others—3

Subordinates score >4 Senior mgt—3

Others--6

9/5/09 Saama-Confidential
Saama Confidential 3Page 3
 Self VS others' rating alignment

The gap between self and others’ rating

being less than 0.5 taken as nil gap
●
Self -Overall —1
●
Self –RM— 1
●
Self- Peer— 2
●
Self- Subordinates--5

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 4Page 4

 No gaps or insignificant gap
on most parameters.

Senior mgt— 2
Others-- 4

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 5Page 5

 implication
s

Tendency to rate self --high > 4 is very rampant- 90% of

ratings were >3.5

This may be due to lack of understanding of the purpose of this

exercise- assessment of competency than job performance
Confusion with on the job performance .

Corrective action: try to be modest /realistic in self rating

Tendency of subordinates also to rate high- 80% rating were

above 3.5

Corective action; educate subordinates to be realistic.

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 6Page 6

 tendency of subordinates also to rate high- 80% rating were above
3.5

Corective action: educate subordinates to be realistic.

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 7Page 7

 Rating Trends – Implications
Tendency to Self Rate high. (90% 3.5 to 4 or more)

Tendency from Subordinates to rate liberally.(80% between

Tendency of RM's to rate Stricter(64% in 2.5 to 3.5 )

Tendency of Peers to Play Safe.(64% 3.0 and 4.0)

Need to talk to all significant groups to educate them ab

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 8Page 8

 Action Steps – Apraisee scoring < 3

2 people have scored less than 3 in the Individual Mean S

There have been strong comments on them from few app

Their Reporting Manager, should decide the further cours

9/5/09 Saama Confidential 9Page 9

 end

Thank you

9/5/09 Saama Confidential