Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • A Rose Has No Teeth

    Diunggah oleh

    Bradshaw Stanley
    173 tayangan1 halaman
    Conceptual artists in the 1960s-1970s were influenced by analytic philosophy and explored relationships between language, logic, and reality. For example, Bruce Nauman took Ludwig Wittgenstein's phrase "A rose has no teeth" and exhibited it nailed to a tree, reflecting Wittgenstein's view that its meaning was not clear. Joseph Kosuth argued that art has no content like logic, producing dictionary entries of philosophical words. The collective Art & Language asserted that making art and a type of art theory were often the same procedure.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Bruce Nauman text

    Judul Asli

    A ROSE HAS NO TEETH

    Hak Cipta

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Format Tersedia

    PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    Conceptual artists in the 1960s-1970s were influenced by analytic philosophy and explored relationships between language, logic, and reality. For example, Bruce Nauman took Ludwig Wittgenstein's phrase "A rose has no teeth" and exhibited it nailed to a tree, reflecting Wittgenstein's view that its meaning was not clear. Joseph Kosuth argued that art has no content like logic, producing dictionary entries of philosophical words. The collective Art & Language asserted that making art and a type of art theory were often the same procedure.

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    173 tayangan1 halaman

    A Rose Has No Teeth

    Diunggah oleh

    Bradshaw Stanley
    Conceptual artists in the 1960s-1970s were influenced by analytic philosophy and explored relationships between language, logic, and reality. For example, Bruce Nauman took Ludwig Wittgenstein's phrase "A rose has no teeth" and exhibited it nailed to a tree, reflecting Wittgenstein's view that its meaning was not clear. Joseph Kosuth argued that art has no content like logic, producing dictionary entries of philosophical words. The collective Art & Language asserted that making art and a type of art theory were often the same procedure.

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 1

    A ROSE HAS NO TEETH: CONCEPTUAL ART AND PHILOSOPHY

    Instructor: Bradshaw Stanley (bstanley@artic.edu) October 11, 2013


    A distinctive preoccupation of conceptual art between roughly 1966 and 1972 was with what is known as analytic philosophy, which is concerned with relations between linguistic meaning, logic, and reality. For example, Bruce Nauman took a striking phrase from Ludwig Wittgensteins Philosophical Investigations, A rose has no teeth, cast the phrase in lead, and exhibited it nailed to a tree in a garden. Wittgenstein offers the phrase as an example of a true statement (even obviously true!, Part II, xi), but the meaning of which is not clear. Naumans work is not an isolated phenomenon: Joseph Kosuth, drawing on arguments expounded in A. J. Ayers Language, Truth and Logic, argued that art, like logic, has no content, and produced photostats of dictionary entries of philosophically signicant words, like universal and meaning. And the British collective Art & Language argued, in the quasi-academic format of their journal Art-Language that the making of art and the making of a certain kind of art theory are often the same procedure. What is the signicance of Naumans appropriation of Wittgensteins obviously true sentence, Kosuths argument that art, like logic, is tautologous, and Art & Languages contention that art and a certain kind of theory are identical?

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai