BILLY
THE
KID
Erlinda Gonzales-Berry Oregon State University Laura Gutirrez-Witt University of Texas at Austin Mara Herrera-Sobek University of California at Santa Barbara Luis Leal University of California at Santa Barbara Clara Lomas The Colorado College
b The Real c
BILLY
THE
KID
This volume is made possible through grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Endowment for the Arts (a federal agency), the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and the Meadows Foundation.
Recovering the past, creating the future Arte Pblico Press University of Houston Houston, Texas 77204-2090
Otero, Miguel Antonio. The real Billy the Kid / by Miguel Antonio Otero, Jr. p. cm. (Recovering the U.S. Hispanic literary heritage) ISBN 1-55885-234-4 (trade paper : alk. paper) 1. Billy, the Kid. 2. OutlawsSouthwest, NewBiography. 3. Southwest, NewHistory1848- 4. Lincoln County (N.M.) History. I. Title. II. Series: Recovering the U.S. Hispanic Literary Heritage Project publication. F786.B54084 1998 364.1'552'092dc21 98-3220 CIP
The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Introduction 1998 by John-Michael Rivera Printed in the United States of America
8901234567
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
Introduction by John-Michael Rivera The Real Billy the Kid Foreword I First Years of Billy the Kid II Fights with the Apaches III The Lincoln County War of 1878 IV The Murder of Tunstall V A Lull and Then the Deluge VI The Kid at Fort Sumner VII Enter Sheriff Pat Garrett VIII Echoes of the Lincoln County War IX Lincoln Remembers The Kid X More Memories of The Kid XI A Visit to Fort Sumner XII An Old Friend of The Kid Speaks XIII When the Author Met The Kid XIV And Now the End XV Postscript 5 7 17 25 37 45 59 71 85 95 110 114 121 130 135 143 xi
Illus tr ations
William H. BonneyBilly the Kid Alexander A. McSween Mrs. A. A. McSween John A. Tunstall Patrick F. Garrett, Slayer of Billy the Kid Lincoln County Court House and Jail Patron House and Saloon, Lincoln, New Mexico Deluvina Maxwell Mrs. A. A. McSween in her later years Mr. and Mrs. Frank A. Coe Hijinio Salazar Main Street, Lincoln, New Mexico Mr. and Mrs. George Coe Grave of Billy the Kid Jesus Silva Maxwell House, Fort Sumner, New Mexico xlvi 26 26 38 72 81 81 89 89 89 89 100 100 117 117 141
Introduction
hat the first Hispanic territorial governor of New Mexico, Miguel Antonio Otero, would write a biography of the legendary gunfighter Billy the Kid is in itself peculiar. For that same work to begin with an epigraph of a romantic poem by Robert Cameron Rogers continues to problematize the creation of such a literary work. The poem stands alone, without any reference or footnote of authorial intent as to its placement in this historical Southwestern biography of the notorious desperado. And yet, the romantic poem implicitly voices and thereby represents the authors own political life as New Mexicos first Hispanic territorial governor (18971907). Like to a Ship, then, is a carefully positioned literary device to characterize Oteros own political life for the reader: a life that was conditioned by the neocolonial winds that madly mingle, and therefore he found himself having to trim [his] sails to favor all during the transition period when the New Mexico territory was pursuing statehood. Similar to the implicit representation of the poetic epigraph, this historical biography of Billy the Kid continues to use both implicit and explicit literary tropes and motifs. These literary devices structure this biography into a history that redefines the image of Billy the Kid and the history of the territorial war in Lincoln County. Moreover, what The Real Billy the Kid displays throughout is an emplotted history that recounts and subversively questions U.S. colonialism as it swept through New Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848. Much as the poem begins to reveal, Oteros recreation of the life and history of Billy the Kid not only reexamines and exposes the colonial past of New Mexico, it also deflates and undermines the dominant Anglo-American Western narratives about Billy the Kid that helped shape the popular imagination of America as being only Anglo-American in culture and history.
xi
b Introduction c
b Introduction c
native Nuevomexicanos from the geographic areas that involved the war in Lincoln County. Despite Otero attesting to the factual representations of his sources2 and his personally transcribed interview with Billy the Kid, Pat Garrett and the other individuals who knew Billy the Kid, historians who have studied this period of the frontier have ignored Oteros documentation and primarily concentrated on the Anglo historical version of the life of the infamous outlaw.3 As the numerous editions demonstrate, most historians have focused their research on Pat Garrett and Ash Upsons narrative The Authentic Life of Billy the Kid: The Noted Desperado of the Southwest, Whose Deeds of Daring and Blood Made His Name a Terror in New Mexico, Arizona and Northern Mexico, first published in 1882. Although criticized by some revisionist historiographers, the Garrett/Upson historical narrative of Billy the Kid has remained the most read and the most authentic in Southwestern history.4 Otero himself noted in the introduction to his narrative that with the exception of Garretts work, all the other works on Billy the Kids life were pure fiction. Despite this acknowledgment of authenticity of Garretts narrative, however, the historical image of Billy the Kid presented in Oteros narrative contests the one created by Garrett and Upson. As the reader will appreciate, these narratives are two competing and conflicting histories of the same period and the same man. Indeed, these two competing texts represent the two most dominant oppositional historical views of New Mexican history: the Anglo-American version and the Hispanic version. They should, therefore, be considered as separate cultural histories that are essentially interlocking cultural artifacts that
1 There are, however, autobiographical works written in English before the publication of Oteros biography of Billy the Kid. Juan Seguns Memoirs were published in 1858, and Mariano Guadalupe Vallejos Ranch and Mission Days, published in 18901891. 2 Otero, Miguel Antonio. The Real Billy the Kid with New Light on the Lincoln County War. Rumford Press, 1936. pg. xi. 3 This, however, is not true of historian and writer Jon Tuska. His well researched book Billy the Kid: His Life and Legend does acknowledge an Hispanic past, as well as Oteros book. 4 Despite the criticism and the inconsistencies that historians have found in the narrative, or have claimed to have found, the Garret/Upson biography of Billy the Kid has been proclaimed as the closest to the life of Billy the Kid. The book was first published only eleven months after the death of Billy the Kid in 1882. The version that this essay will be using is considered to be the most authentic and the best-edited version of the seven published since the first publication in 1882 (Tuska).
xiii
b Introduction c
together render a more complete (re)vision of New Mexicos colonial past. The contrast of these two narrative historieswritten by three individuals who knew Billy the Kids waking moments demonstrates that historical non-fiction narratives are constructed; that is, as Hayden White argues, narratives are emplotted according to what the particular narrators believe to be the true story. In Content of the Form, White argues that divergent historical narratives written about one particular episode in history occur because there is [a] need or impulse to rank events with respect to their significance for the culture or group [or individual] that is writing its own history that makes a narrative representation of real events possible.5 Under Whites theories, the two divergent histories related in these two authentic and real biographies become verbal structures in the forms of subjective, narrative prose discourses, rather than objective historical forms that render an authentic or real account of this mythologized person and period.6 In such an emplotted narrative representation, however, the narrator will not produce or reproduce the events he describes, but rather he will tell the reader how to think about the events and what the events represent in a particular individuals life (White 13).7 The narrator of a particular historical narrative is trying to find and identify for the reader the stories that lie buried in a particular episode in time. The narrator, then, with the information that he uncovers, will implicitly and explicitly emplot a story for the reader that will in content and form have similar motifs and literary characteristics as fictional representations of reality. The historical
5 White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987, 10. 6 The introduction will deal primarily with Whites theories of emplotment, not his theories of tropes. Examining these two narratives in such a Post-Structuralist theoretical framework, I argue that historical narratives are structured, emplotted forms similar to any other literary narrative. However, I differ with White as to the reasons why these emplotted structures exist in historical texts. Although White does argue that there is a moralizing aspect in the presentation of reality posing as history, I argue that it is more sociopolitical; that is, in these two narratives the emplotments occur due to the historical contingencies manifested by colonialism in New Mexico during the nineteenth century. Much like Edward Said in The World, the Text, and the Critic, then, I argue that words and texts are so much a part of the world that one cannot separate the two. 7 However, as one will see in the narratives of Billy the Kid, and as Simon Schama argues about other individuals in history, there is a tendency for the narrator to make assumptions about a particular individuals motivations that lends to the imaginative (Lingua Franca:36).
xiv
b Introduction c
narrator will construct a story out of the real event that will in many instances have a hero or protagonist, as well as a formal beginning, middle and end. According to White this conception of the historians task, however, obscures the extent to which invention also plays a part in the historians operations (13). Therefore, the narrator of a particular historical narrative will arrange, include or leave out certain real events (either written or oral) as needed for the emplotted form in which he perceives or needs to perceive the events. Thus, the emplotted historical narrative the narrator constructs, the events he describes or does not describe, and the fashion in which he narrates will lend themselves to romance, tragedy, comedy or satire. The modes of emplotment or archetypal story form depend on how the narrator views the events, or on how he believes the events should be viewed by the reader. The narrator will then seek out facts that fulfill the emplotment he has choseneither consciously or unconsciouslyto portray as the true story of a particular event or of an individual in history. White would contend that this is why we have so many varying accounts about a particular event or person in history, despite the various narrators having lived during the same period. These emplotted historiesthe incidents that are included, excluded or narrated in a particular fashion to adhere to the emplotted form they have constructedare motivated by the narrators own political, economic, social and cultural ideologies. In these archetypal narratives, however, the ideological system of a given writer is informed by the culturally constructed morals manifested by the colonial atmosphere that dominated New Mexico at the turn of the twentieth century. In this way, historical narratives that are emplotted are not entirely dependent on an epistemological presupposition informed by a type of linguistic determinism. They are also informed by a continuous interaction between ideology and the material forces of history, a space where a field of mutually if also unevenly determining forces defines a given cultures narratives (Williams 6586). I thus will compare the Garrett/Upson and Otero texts to establish that the historical image of Billy the Kid in Oteros narrative has been constructed as a response to and as a condition of the
xv
b Introduction c
Euroamerican colonizing of the Southwestern territories after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Oteros narrative has been written to contest the dehistoricization of Nuevomexicano cultures and traditions of the Southwest, which, as will be argued, was undertaken by Euroamerican historians and chroniclers such as Garrett and Upson. In this way, what one will see in the Garrett/Upson version of Billy the Kids life is an emplotment constructed to maintain the colonial status quo in the New Mexico territory after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo by rendering a historical account that devoices Nuevomexicano participation in Billy the Kids history. Historically, therefore, Garrett became the textual authority and minor hero in popular American culture because his construction of Billy the Kid answered an Anglo-American, as well as personal, need to imagine the heroism of the Western narrative, thereby helping invent an American frontier that was monolithically Euroamerican in culture and history. What should be considered when reading The Real Billy Kid, then, is that the Garrett/Upson work, viewed as the closest to the historical truth of the Kids life, is the emplotment of a romance. As defined by White, a romance is fundamentally a dualistic drama of the triumph of good over evil or virtue over vice (Metahistory 68;150157). Under such an emplotted form, Garrett/Upsons narrative characterizes Billy the Kid as a villain who has wronged society and therefore must be stopped for law to be restored and, more specifically, so that the United States can continue its colonial power in the New Mexico territory. Counter to this emplotted form, Oteros historical biography is emplotted as a tragedy. In Oteros tragedy Billy the Kid is characterized as a hero who is slain by a lawless regime that perpetuated the colonial relationships in New Mexico intent on destroying the land and traditions that Otero once knew as Hispanic Nuevo Mxico. In this emplotted form, Oteros narrative fundamentally follows most of the classical conceptions of a tragic hero: first, the history is emplotted as a serious drama whose main protagonist is tragically killed in the conclusion; second, Otero creates a protagonist who is flawed by an external force; third, this flaw
xvi
b Introduction c
eventually leads to his tragic death; fourth, through his death, Billy evokes both sympathy and pity (McCollom 3465). Thus, what the two narratives reveal is that Billy the Kid is created as a hero or villain to promulgate an image that the dominant colonial regime or the opposing Nuevomexicano culture requires to be the historical truth. Truth becomes a relative force used by individuals or entire cultures to empower themselves, as well as to disenfranchise opposing individuals or cultures. Billy the Kids biography, then, was used by Otero as a subversive framework to set the record straight and counter the historical truth that the dominant regime used to perpetuate colonial policies that existed in New Mexico prior to statehood in 1912. What is ultimately seen through The Real Billy the Kid, then, is a distinctive contestation narrative written from the perspective of an elite Hispanic in New Mexico, one that attempts to reinscribe the cultural history of Nuevomexicanos through historical biography. Otero thus challenged the image of Billy the Kid and the history of the Hispanic Southwest as rendered by historians representing the Euroamerican colonial power structure. It is no wonder, then, that Oteros text was not as popular as Garretts or any other Anglo-American representation of Billy the Kids life and that it has taken over eighty-five years to introduce his voice to the public.
Between Politics and Liter ature: The Inters titial Pers ona of Miguel Antonio Otero
For generations the Oteros had been important political and economic figures in the Southwest. The first Otero to serve in public office was Don Vicente of Valencia, Miguel Antonio Otero, Jr.s grandfather. He served as a judge under the Spanish and Mexican governments before New Mexico became a U.S. territory in 1850. His son Miguel Antonio Otero I (Don Miguel) was a famous professor of Latin and Greek at Pingree College, Fishkill on the Hudson, for two years (1847-1849). Like his father Don Vicente,
xvii
b Introduction c
he would serve in public office; he was appointed three times as a delegate of the New Mexico territory to the United States Congress (1855, 1857, 1859). President Lincoln offered him an appointment as a minister to Spain; however, Don Miguel refused because he wanted to retire from public life and dedicate himself to the banking firm of Whiting and Otero (Leal 45-65). While working as a banker, Don Miguel decided to take a lesser official job and serve as the secretary of the New Mexico Territory. In 1857, Don Miguel married Mary Josephine Blackwood, a southern woman raised in Charleston, South Carolina. The couple raised two boys and two girls; the eldest son, Page Blackwood, was born on January 4, 1858; Miguel Antonio, Jr., on October 17, 1859; Gertrude Vicente in 1865; and Mamie Josephine in 1867. Miguel Antonio, Jr.s first years would be spent traveling with his family throughout the Southwestern and Western frontier. In 1866 Miguel and Page were sent to a boarding school in Topeka, Kansas. As his memoirs attest, this was one of the most unpleasant periods in his life: The school proved to be a detestable place and its horrors are still fresh in my memory, though nearly seventy years have passed since then. I can only compare my experiences at the frontier boarding school with those which Dickens relates in Oliver Twist (Otero 23). After his years at the boarding school and his return to the family home in New Mexico, Otero would leave again to attend college at St. Louis University, where he received a B.A. Thereafter, he received a masters degree in Classics from Notre Dame. After graduating in 1880, Otero returned to New Mexico and worked as a bookkeeper for his fathers company, Otero and Sellar. In 1883, Otero began his long career as a politician in the New Mexico Territory; he served as City Treasurer of Las Vegas from 1883 to 1884, and from 1889 to 1890 he was Probate Clerk of San Miguel County, New Mexico. In 1892 and 1893, he served as the Republican delegate to the U.S. Congress for New Mexico and received much attention and power as a young political leader for the territory.8
xviii
b Introduction c
In May of 1897, Otero traveled to Washington, D.C., thinking that he was to be appointed marshall of the territory; however, President William McKinley unexpectedly appointed him Governor of New Mexico Territory. Otero would spend his years as governor (June 18971906) during New Mexicos transition from territory to statehood. As defined by historian Gerald Nash, The Otero Era was a period when
New Mexico entered the twentieth century in more ways than one. These years saw a blending of the old and the new, a merging of peoples and time periods. The blending of peoples was important, of Native Americans, Hispanics, and the increasing flow of Americans. The Otero era also witnessed a confluence of the old agrarian economy of the nineteenth century with the beginnings of industry and service industries more characteristic of the years after 1900. These years also were a time of amalgamation for political institutions and stylesof the traditional patron system and legal institutions of the Spanish and Mexican periods with those the Americans brought. Presiding over this complex interaction of diverse cultures was Miguel Antonio Otero, the genial territorial governor of New Mexico and long-time political arbiter in the state. In his own person, part Hispanic, part American, he personified the sweeping changes that were affecting New Mexico in the twentieth century. More than most other individuals, he symbolized the old New Mexico with the new (Nash 4).
Unlike Nashs characterization of Otero, many Chicano historians have characterized Oteros life and career as one that symbolized more of the new New Mexico. Because Oteros works do not overtly resist colonization by Euroamericans, his work and his character have been marginalized as assimilationist by literary and historical scholars who argue from a specific resistance theory paradigm.9 Although these scholars have brought up useful arguments needed
8 Although Otero was a Republican delegate at this time, his family had long been Democrats prior to this convention. As will be addressed later in the paper, this switching of the parties from Democrat to Republican was a pivotal aspect of Oteros life. However, partisan politics were not defined in the New Mexico Territory during the early and late nineteenth centuries. The Oteros themselves had changed parties throughout their political life; at various times in New Mexicos history they were Whigs, Democrats and Republicans. As Gmez-Quiones argues in Roots of Chicano Politics 16001940, changing political parties was not so much of an ideological act as one based on economics (235239).
xix
b Introduction c
to create and maintain a voice in American society, the writings produced by Otero after his political career had ended, when New Mexico had become part of the United States in 1912, does problematize this assimilationist argumentan argument that constructs Hispanics in history, such as Otero, as either pro- or anti-Anglo. If one were to theorize Oteros life and writings according to Homi Bhabas cultural theory, for example, Oteros political and narrative space should not be located in any static binary (pro- or anti-Anglo), but rather in the in between, an interstitial space that allows for contestatory movement during this neocolonial period in New Mexican history (Bhabha 143).10 And as critic GonzalesBerry has argued, Nuevomexicano work reveals, in one case overtly and in the other more subtly, an ambivalent double-edged discourse of resistance and assimilation from which we can glean some insight into the process of inscribing colonial subjectivity (148). In this way, Oteros literary works cast a different light on his past political actions and persona.11 That is, the literature produced after his political career had ended, especially The Real Billy the Kid, reveals a Nuevomexicano persona that Gonzales-Berry alludes to in her study of New Mexican narratives. Oteros literary persona was created out of a text that reveals encoded, and at times explicit, literary signifiers that demonstrate contestation to the U.S. government as it existed during his lifetime. Genaro Padillas lucid study of nineteenth century MexicanAmerican autobiography, convincingly argues that unless we wish to think of Mexicans as either blind or stupid, I believe we must recontextualize our reading of their narratives to understand their social and discursive situations. We must recognize that colonized Mexicans were often speaking out of both sides of their mouths
9 See Chvez, John R. The Lost Land: The Chicano Image of the Southwest, pg. 6061, and Montoya, Mara The Dual World of Governor Miguel A. Otero: Myth and Reality in the Turnof-the-Century New Mexico New Mexico Historical Review, Vol 67. Margaret Garcia-Davidson also has some interesting insight into this argument in her essay Borders, Frontiers and Mountains. (See citations for complete listing.) 10 Emma Perez similarly argues this theoretical position in her book Sexing the Colonial Imaginary: Chicana Feminists, History, Theory and Consciousness; refer to chapter II, Feminism-in-Nationalism: Third Space Feminism in Yucatns Socialist Revolutions, Forthcoming publication by Indiana University. 11 However, perhaps his political persona was also as complex and ambivalently double-edged as his works of literature.
xx
b Introduction c
with visionary social purposes(34). Like Otero, political elites such as Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo (Recuerdos Histricos) from California and Juan Nepumuceno Segun (Personal Narratives) from Texas also had controversial pro-American political personas. And much like Otero, these writers also wrote and developed double-edged discourses.12 However, these cultural performances were not necessarily created to construct a static racial consciousness that included all of el pueblo. For the Oteros and many of the nineteenth century Hispanic elites, their Mexican ethnicity was not a static construction in their expressions of self, for, as Gonzales-Berry contends, race and ethnicity was a universal ploy of the ethnic middle class to consolidate power within boundaries of dominant sociopolitical networks (195). More important to them was maintaining the economic and social power base that they had developed before the treaty of 1848. Thus, their political actions were based on sociopolitical survival in a newly colonized New Mexico. In these texts, then, it is class and the maintenance of this Nuevomexicano class and tradition that is central in the motivation of plot, theme and narratization. The Real Billy the Kid is in fact a contestation narrative that tries to (re)construct a distinctive perspective of the New Mexican past. However, this work is very different from the protest texts that were created in the modern Chicano period. And although, like Chicano
12 These literary personae are problematic for Chicano historians and literary critics who characterize the writings and lives of such nineteenth-century Hispanics as either overtly resistant to the colonial United States or as assimilationist to the new American government and society. These scholars base their arguments on resistance and assimilation models conceptualized during and after the Chicano Nationalist Movement in the 1960s and 1970s. The protest writings and scholarship that came out of this period were useful in modern literary history. Many of the writers of the Chicano Movement were arguing from a specific racial and nationalist point of view to define self during the civil rights movement. As the works of nineteenth century Hispanics slowly begin to emerge out of the stacks of libraries and archives, Hispanic literary history and scholarship is broadening. Explicit 1960s ideological conceptions of resistance, protest, assimilation, race, etc. begin to break down when examining these works in a different historical space. When considering these writers, then, one must not try to fit their works into an exclusivist reading of resistance created during the Chicano Movement or any other theoretical presupposition that creates a binary reading of literature. (This type of criticism in fact perpetuates the otherness created by hegemonic European theories used to exclude individual voices from the canon.) Indeed, as Genaro Padilla argues in My History, Not Yours, because their lives refuse to conform to some of the images we have created for ourselves, especially in recent years when we have radicalized that self-image, their autobiographies do force us to recognize variations of the Chicano self (35).
xxi
b Introduction c
narratives, this contestation narrative is created within a space of social displacement, what is heard in this work is a specific contestatory voice, a voice of an elite Nuevomexicano who lost most of his lands and power structure after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed.
Em plotting a Tr agedy
According to the frontispiece of Oteros The Real Billy the Kid, the work was published by R.R. Wilson in 1936 and printed by the Rumford Press in Hartford, Connecticut. The papers that document the activity of Rumford Pressheld at Harvard Universityunfortunately do not mention the Otero book, nor any relationship of Otero with the publisher. R.R. Wilson published two other works in 1936: a book on fur-trading in the Southwest, and a small collection of Walt Whitmans poetry. Both were published in limited number. According to various on-line catalogs and the Otero family papers held in New Mexico. The Real Billy the Kid, too, was printed in a limited edition, and at present there are only 118 extant copies held in libraries and special collection repositories throughout the world.13 The Real Billy the Kid is divided into three sections. The first narrative is written in the first person by Otero, the second consists of various ethnographic oral accounts that Otero collected and transcribed, and the third is an autobiographical narrative of his meetings with Billy the Kid in 1880. The first section is very close in content to the narrative that Garrett and Upson present in The Authentic Life of Billy the Kid. There is, however, a sharp contrast between the two narratives concerning the events used to portray
13 This information was attained through the two largest databases in the world, OCLC and RLIN. I also reviewed the Library of Congress holdings, as well as various on-line and printed catalogs (Books in Print and the Yale Special Collections Database) that documented the cataloging information in the MARC format. Furthermore, of these 115 extant copies, a collation was conducted with 25 books. The books were borrowed from various libraries throughout the country. I used the Hinman collation method and found that there was only one edition and one copy made of the book, printed in 1936.
xxii
b Introduction c
Billy as a villain and the number of men Billy actually killed in his lifetime. The first discrepancy in the two books occurs in their descriptions of how and when Tunstall was murdered and how the Lincoln County War subsequently escalated. According to Garretts narrative, after the killing of Tunstalla close friend of Billy in both narrativesBilly went on a hunt to murder the killers. Garrett recounts in his narrative that a fur trader named Roberts was one of the men involved in the killing of Tunstall and that Billy hunted and caught Roberts at South Fork:
As the party approached the building from the east, Roberts came galloping up from the west. The kid espied him, and bringing his Winchester to rest on his thigh, he spurred directly towards him as Bruer demanded a surrender. Roberts only reply was to the kids movements. Like lighting his Winchester was at his shoulder and a ball sang past the kids ear. Quick as his foe, the kids aim was more accurate, and the ball went through crashing Roberts body, inflicting a mortal wound. Hurt to the death this brave fellow was not conquered, but lived to wreak deadly vengeance on the hunters.14
In Garretts lengthy narrative, the hunted Roberts is depicted as a brave fellow and, despite Roberts quick hand, Billy wounds him. The wound, however, did not kill Roberts before he was able to kill many more of the members of the posse in which the Kid rode. Here one begins to see Garretts narrative characterization of the heroic actions of Roberts and the villainous attributes of the Kid. Note that, although the Kid did wound Roberts, he was still able to wreak deadly vengeance upon the posse, a posse interestingly depicted as hunters. Through Garretts narrative description, Roberts becomes the object of pity, a brave character who despite a mortal wound was able to fight back and defend himself against the ensuing posse. On the other hand, in Oteros narrativecollected from a oral sourcethere is no mention of Roberts as the actual gunman
14 Garrett, Pat F. The Authentic Life of Billy the Kid: The Noted Desperado of the Southwest, Whose Deeds of Daring and Blood Made His Name A Terror in The New Mexico, Arizona and Northern New Mexico. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1954. 5458.
xxiii
b Introduction c
involved in the killing of Tunstall. Rather, Otero states that his source noted the only reason Billy went after Roberts was because Roberts ambushed Charlie Bowdre and him after the killing of Tunstall. After Billy lodged a complaint about the ambush with a local official in Lincoln County, Billy was named to Deputy Brewers official posse and accompanied him to arrest Roberts. When Brewer and Billy entered Southfork, they split up the posse to look for Roberts. According to Oteros narrative, it was Brewers half of the posse, not the Kids, that first met up with Roberts and killed him:
Then some of the posse appeared, led by Charlie Bowdre. On seeing Roberts, Bowdre threw down on him with his pistol, barking: Throw up your hands. Roberts answered, Not much, Mary Ann. Both men fired almost simultaneously. Roberts was shot through the breast. The bullet went right through him dealing him his death wound (51).
According to Oteros narrative, when Billy arrived at the scene, Roberts was already suffering from a mortal wound (52). Oteros characterization is particularly interesting because in his narrative Roberts is depicted as a cowardly villain. Roberts death does not evoke sympathy, but is seen as justified revenge of the cowardly act of ambushing the hero of the emplotted narrative: Billy the Kid. Furthermore, Oteros narrative historicizes lawman Deputy Brewernot the Kidwho takes revenge for the unlawful and cowardly assassination attempt of the Kid. By Otero recounting the incident in such a manner, Billy becomes symbolically linked to the law of the land and is not seen as a lone desperado who kills unjustifiably. Realizing that many people may not believe this account, Otero includes a footnote: This account of the old skirmish is attested to Frank Coe, who with his cousin George Coe, is the sole survivor of the Lincoln County War. Both Pat Garrett and Charlie Siringo attribute the killing of Roberts to Billy the Kid, but the Coe statement is unquestionably the true version (53). The discrepancy surrounding Billys image as a ruthless killer in the two narratives occurs again in a description of one of Billys gunfights and the subsequent death of Jimmy Carlyle, a member of
xxiv
b Introduction c
Garretts posse sent to hunt down Billy. This incident occurred later in Billys life, after the Lincoln County War was over and Billy was a fugitive from the law of New Mexico. The Garrett/Upson narrative notes that the posse had found Billy and surrounded the house until reinforcements came. Thereafter, Jimmy Carlyle was sent in unarmed to negotiate Billys unconditional surrender. According to Garrett/Upson:
About two oclock, P. M., those on the outside were startled by a crash from the housea window was shatteredCarlyle appeared at the openingleaped out and made a rush for the barricadesa sharp rattle of firearms from within, and Carlyle fell dead within ten feet of the window. One word to the memory of poor Jimmy. He was a young blacksmith who had been in the territory a little more than a year, but in that short time had made hundreds of friends, and not one enemy. He was honest, generous, merry-hearted, quick-witted, and many who had viewed the career of the Kid with some degree of charity now held him with unqualified exratation [sic] as a murderer of an exceptionally good man and useful citizen (9596).
In Oteros short narrative there is no mention of Billy being the absolute killer nor is there a moralizing opinion regarding Jimmy, as in Garretts narrative. To Garrett, Jimmy was the innocent man without a single enemy. Out of such a defining historical characterization, Billy becomes the villain who unjustifiably killed an innocent young man. White argues that the moralizing of an event in history is common when a narrator has a vested interest in the event he is describing moralistically (Content of the Form 1131). Throughout Oteros narrative, however, as well as in the other oral narratives that document this event, Otero demonstrates that
xxv
b Introduction c
there is more uncertainty than certainty about this episode in Billys life. In one of Oteros collected oral accounts about the death of Carlyle, he documents that Frank Coe truthfully stated that Billy lamented, There is much more about that killing than I care to go into or to have people know, but if I were to tell the story in full, public opinion would justify me (148). Interestingly, Otero states in his book that Pat Garrett confirmed in an interview that the Kid did state what Frank Coe noted about the death of Jimmy Carlyle. There is no mention of this in the Garrett/Upson narrative, however. Throughout his book, Otero presents the incidents surrounding the death of Jimmy rather ambiguously. According to eyewitnesses and the personal statements in Oteros biography, the reader is led to believe that, although Billy may have killed Jimmy Carlyle, there is a story behind the incident that would justify the killing. In essence, Otero tells the reader that there is an unknown story behind the event; neither Otero nor Garrett know the whole truth. By suggesting through these narratives that there is a story behind such events, Otero presents the Kids life as complicated and not so definitively villainous. By representing such events as shrouded in uncertainty and doubt, Otero draws a complex picture of an enigmatic historical figure. By extension, this narrative strategy colors all of the Kids alleged killings and villainy: There is a story that would explain them. These narrative discrepancies regarding murders committed by Billy are but examples of the divergence of the Garrett/Upson and Otero narratives. Throughout Oteros narrative, he presents factual and truthful oral narratives that dispute the murderous man that Garrett and Upson emplot in their book. Narrative account after narrative account, Otero meticulously refutes Garretts claims as to the historicity of Billy as a ruthless killer. Otero concludes, as do numerous individuals he quotes, that Billy killed only a few men, and those were all in self-defense or justified. Within Oteros narrative, the oral accounts of Hijinio Salazar, Frank Coe, George Coe and Martin Chavez all depict Billys actions during the Lincoln County War as honorable and heroic. In essence, by disputing the image of Billy as a murdering desperado, Otero is setting him up as
xxvi
b Introduction c
a hero rather than the villain that Garrett and Upson create. In Oteros narrative, then, we have a man whose actions were justifiable, not homicidal. Although Otero acknowledges a few of Billys killings, his narrative is moralizing and ameliorates Billys transgressions: Billy was a man who was sinned against, more than sinned (168). The actions against Billy become the sin and Billy becomes a tragic figure.
b Introduction c
And yet, despite the promises of equal rights under the treaty for individuals who remained, most found that the transfer of sovereignty drastically changed their sociopolitical and traditional heritage. Similar to the patterns established under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and the Wisconsin Organic Act of 1836, the socioeconomic power that had once been autonomously controlled by Nuevomexicanos would no longer exist in New Mexico. During this period in New Mexicos history, New Mexico became a colony ruled by a foreign empire rather than a state of the United States. Using Edward Saids theoretical model of western colonialism, New Mexico and its native inhabitants were politically, socially and economically subordinate to a distant, ruling metropolitan center (Washington, D.C.) after that same center had by forcedefined in American history as Manifest Destinyconquered and incorporated the region into its growing empire.15 And despite some economic and political growth within the Nuevomexicano community after the treaty, it was overwhelmingly a period when Anglo-American structures of power subordinated Mexican culture and threatened the older way of life in the Southwest (Melndez 11). One such family that did have a strong political and economic regime in northern New Mexico and Colorado before as well as shortly after the treaty was the Otero family. When Anglos came from the East to establish their own economic regimes, however, the Oteros socioeconomic and political power was no longer an autonomous power based on Nuevomexicano customs and traditions. In a sense, both the Anglos from the East and the elite Nuevomexicano families engaged in similaralthough conflicting economic enterprises: One was trying to maintain a power elite way of life in New Mexico despite the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and the other was engaged in creating and expanding an empire in a foreign land under the doctrine of Manifest Destiny. What perhaps demonstrates and, in fact, epitomizes these two conflicting economic enterprises is the territorial war in Lincoln County.
15 Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books. 1993, pg. 9. Although Said defines his terms in more of a European Post-Colonial theoretical framework, he does argue that the United States has dominated other cultures and lands through imperialism and, thereby, created an empire.
xxviii
b Introduction c
Lincoln County was a small community 150 miles south of Albuquerque in the New Mexican territory annexed through the Gadsden Purchase of 1853. Its main reason for existence and development was as a site for trade and barter for the entire territory. Although sparsely populated, Lincoln County was a microcosm of New Mexico: There was a large population of poor Indo-Hispanic farmers and small ranchers who had lived there for generations or had recently migrated south to northern New Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.16 There was also a small number of elite Anglo and Mexican-American landholders who owned the vast majority of the lands. Since the Gadsden Treaty of 1853, Anglo settlers in the county had begun to purchase and steal lands throughout the region from the Indo-Hispanic ranchers, farmers and elite Mexican-Americans (Gmez-Quiones 241279). Like many other counties in New Mexico during the 1870s, Lincoln County was politically and economically controlled by the new Anglo settlers from the East. These settlers created and challenged the economic livelihoods of the old Nuevomexicano families who had also maintained rings of political and economic control in Lincoln County as well as in northern New Mexico. However, because the new Anglos created regimes were backed by powerful Anglo business leaders from the East, as well as the United States government, these Anglo rings ended up taking and controlling most of the lands in New Mexico. The old Nuevomexicano families, despite their political and economic strongholds in the beginning years of U.S. domination in New Mexico, became economic rivals of the new settlers from the East. And despite creating a sociopolitical space in New Mexico after the treaty, in time, many of the Nuevomexicano landholders, such as the Otero family, lost most if not all of their lands in Lincoln County and other counties of northern New Mexico to the newly created political and economic regimes from the East (Gmez-Quiones 241279). By 1878, Lincoln County was economically and politically controlled by the Murphy, Dolan and Riley familiesthe owners of the
16 Mares, E.A. The Wraggle-Taggle Outlaws: Vicente Silva and Billy the Kid Seen in Two Nineteenth Century Documents. Pas por Aqu: Critical Essays on the New Mexican Literary Tradition 15421988. Ed. Erlinda Gonzales-Berry. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1988. Pg. 244248.
xxix
b Introduction c
Murphy-Dolan store. These families and the power that they achieved was facilitated by the Santa Fe Ring, a political constituency affiliated with the Republican Party in Washington, D.C. The ring had dominated northern New Mexican territories since 1864. The Dolan-Murphy faction was, in effect, made up of Santa Fe Ring territorial delegates who assisted in acquiring lands in the region that surrounded Lincoln County.
Mainly, they (Santa Fe Ring) concentrated on amassing huge land holdings through the manipulation of Spanish land grants and the laws regulating the public domain. But wherever money was to be made, especially where facilitated by governmental action, people suspected ring involvement. Cattle railroads, mining, and army and Indian contracts all captured the attention of the ring members (Mares 3435).
Before the Santa Fe Ring entered the New Mexico territory and Lincoln County, the Otero family constituted the major economic and political power base in northern New Mexico. To the Oteros, as well as to many other Nuevomexicanos of the region, the Santa Fe Ring and the political leaders associated with it were political and economic adversaries.17 As Otero notes in The Real Billy the Kid:
The all-powerful Santa F Ring, political power-house of New Mexico and the most lawless machine in that territorys history, became actively interested in the Lincoln County slaughter, lining up solidly behind the Murphy-Dolan-Riley faction. Headed by Attorney Thomas B. Catron, ruthless overlord of all the Southwest racket interests, the Santa F Ring numbered among its more notorious members, Samuel B. Axwell, Territorial Governor; and J.B.(Billy) Mathews, Clerk of the District Court. The allegiance of the Santa F Ring gave to the Murphy clan a semblance of legality and lawfulness that only the cold facts belied (54).
In essence, the Santa Fe Ring was a cartel which maintained the colonial power structure that had been created after the treaty.
17 It is important to note that some Hispano elites sided with the Santa Fe Ring. However, the ring itself was mostly controlled by Anglo elites who used these Hispano elites to gain the Mexican natives sympathies during this time of empire building. Despite the fact that these Hispanics sided with the ring, like Otero, they were also pawns to the American government. (Mount, Graeme. Nuevo Mexicanos and the War of 1898. New Mexico Historical Review, Vol. 58, No 4, 1983.)
xxx
b Introduction c
When John H. Tunstall moved to Lincoln from the East and formed an opposing business and a subsequent economic and political power base in the county, the Oteros sided with him politically and economically in hopes of countering the stronghold that the Dolan-Murphy clan and the Santa Fe Ring political leaders had on northern New Mexico. The Oteros were familiar with Tunstall and had done business with him years before at the firm of Otero (Miguel Antonio Oteros father) & Sellar and Company in Colorado. Miguel Antonio Otero, Sr., had introduced Tunstall to a rich landholder and merchant who had befriended the Oteros some years earlier: Alexander McSween (My Life on the Frontier 41). This meeting eventually led to a partnership between McSween and Tunstall, and their business became an opposing force to the Murphy-Dolan faction. By siding with the McSween-Tunstall faction, the Oteros hoped to defeat the Santa Fe Ring and maintain their political and economic position in northern New Mexico. Out of this rivalry, the Lincoln County War began in the late part of 1878. The Dolan-Murphy faction, with the support of the Santa Fe Ring, employed numerous hired guns from throughout the United States to help enforce its regime (Mares 26). The Tunstall-McSween faction also formed its own extra-legal force, primarily composed of Indo-Hispanic farmers and small ranchers who had lost their lands to the Santa Fe Ring. This Anglo vs. Hispanic aspect of the territorial war is alluded to in Oteros recounting of the famous McSween Ranch battle:
The disturbance was caused by McSween entering the town from his ranch, Rio del Ruidoso, with thirty-five men lead by Don Martin Chavez of Picacho, who had insisted on coming to Lincoln to protect his friends against the Murphy-Dolan-Riley gang. Peppin and all his deputies ran to cover in side the Murphy store and the hotel, where they entrenched themselves against possible attack. Under cover of night, McSween, Francisco Zamora, Ignacio Gonzales, Vicente Romero, Hijinio Salazar and Jose Chavez y Chavez quietly entered the McSween residence without being fired upon by the enemy (66).
xxxi
b Introduction c
As Otero recalls, the war was divided between the old Nuevomexicano elites, such as Chavez and himself, against the Murphy-Dolan regime and the Santa Fe Ring. The Garrett/Upson narrative does not mention this aspect of the war, nor provide a substantial account of the Lincoln County War. Among this band that the Tunstall-McSween faction formed was Billy the Kid, or Los Bilitos, as the other Indo-Hispanic farmers had named Billy and his small gang. Fighting on the side of the Tunstall-McSween faction and alongside other Nuevomexicanos, Billy the Kid became a hero to the Hispanics throughout the territory. He became a symbol of resistance and freedom for the Hispanic population in the territories. To the Nuevomexicanos, Billy was on their side, fighting the Anglo regime that had taken their lands and impoverished their lives since the end of the Mexican War in 1848 (Mares 40). Because of Billys courage, he became a weapon that could help in their fight against the Santa Fe Ring. With the help of Billy, the Oteros hoped to win the war and regain the political and economic control that they had lost to the ring. The war continued throughout the 1870s, with both factions losing numerous men. However, because Territorial Governor Samuel B. Axtell and District Court Clerk J. B. Matthews financed the Dolan-Murphy faction, the ring was able to defeat the McSween-Tunstall faction. This shift in power subsequently led to the murder of Tunstall and McSween by ring gunmen, and the Murphy-Dolan faction and the Santa Fe Ring were able to maintain their power in Lincoln County and northern New Mexico. As Otero notes in his account of the war, the war was lost because the United States government had taken sides with Murphy-Dolan and the Santa Fe Ring (Otero 68). Realizing that they had lost the war, Miguel Antonio Otero Sr. and Oteros uncle, Don Manuel Otero, ran on the Independent Democratic ticket in hopes of gaining political control of the territory. Control of Democratic votes of the territory would possibly give them the power to dismantle the Republicans and the partys economic base: the Santa Fe Ring. However, this would not be an easy task, since most of the Democrats of the region had converted to Republicanism after the Civil War, when the Democratic ticket
xxxii
b Introduction c
began to be associated with the Southern pro-slavery stance.18 With the advent of more and more Anglo settlers who were Republicans, the entire Otero family had been losing its power within the territorial government since the early 1870s.19 To regain the political power that they had once achieved, the Oteros campaigned against the ring by trying to convince the people of old Nuevo Mxico that voting for the Republicans was the same as voting for the people who had taken the lands of the Nuevomexicanos. In a campaign speech recounted and translated in a local New Mexican newspaper, titled Thirty Four (1880), an anonymous reporter notes that:
Mr. Otero professed that he had nothing against the Republican party. He only fought the damnable ring which was led by men who fought against the Union; men who had done all they could to destroy the Union; and, failing in that, they had banded together to rob the Union and oppress the people (Thirty Four 1).
Despite the efforts by the Oteros to convert the Anglo Republicans and elite Hispanics to the Democratic ticket, Tranquilo Luna, a Republican and supporter of the Santa Fe Ring, won a seat in Congress (New Mexico Blue Book, 18561888: 2739). After this political setback, the Oteros lost most of their political power in the region, and the Santa Fe Ring and the Republican Party were significantly stronger than before the Lincoln County War. Having almost unlimited power, the Dolan-Murphy faction, with the support of the Santa Fe Ring, began to go after all of the supporters of the McSween faction. During the campaigns for the 1882 election, Dolan campaigned for and economically supported the election of Sheriff Pat Garrett with the unwritten agenda that he would hunt down and capture or kill Billy the Kid (Tuska 71). The loss of these elections also meant that the Oteros lost most of their political ties to Washington, D.C. and subsequently lost various land holdings to the Santa Fe Ring. Miguel Antonio Otero, Jr., meticulously recounts in My Life on the Frontier that in the years
18 La Opinion, 1878. This is demonstrated throughout the papers editorials in the months of July and August. 19 New Mexico Blue Book, 18561888. Compiled by R.G. Ritch, Secretary of the Territory of New Mexico in 1882.
xxxiii
b Introduction c
that followed the war his family lost two silver mines and various land holdings during the Santa Fe Rings regime. During a battle for one of the mines (Nuestra Seora de los Dolores), Miguel Oteros uncle, Don Manuelthe same individual who ran for public office in hopes of dismantling the ringwas murdered by a ring gunman; his father soon died after (My Life on the Frontier 82115). The traumatic years surrounding the Lincoln County War changed the Oteros forever. During the regime of the Santa Fe Ring, Miguel Antonio Otero witnessed the loss of most of the family lands, of political and economic power, and of some family members. The years that the Oteros battled with the Santa Fe Ring and the Lincoln County War were pivotal in the Otero family history. They marked a period of transition and loss of family heritage and power to the more powerful economic regimes that came from the East. Although Otero did become territorial governor and succeeded in partially dismantling the Santa Fe Ring during his governorship, the old Nuevomexicano way of life came to an end. The Lincoln County War symbolized not only the passing of the Old West, but more importantly for the Oteros the passing of the prominence of Hispanic culture in New Mexico. And although Otero did gain power as governor, his family had to rely on Eastern Anglo-American leaders for their political power. No longer were the Oteros a powerful, autonomous Nuevomexicano family in the region; they too had become political pawns in the creation of an empire for the Anglos from the East (Melndez 21; Graeme 381396). Under such an historical conception, the anomalous opening epigraph of the book becomes much clearer to the reader of the narrative. One begins to see how the poem, Like to a Ship reveals a feeling of traditional and cultural loss and political uncertainty, which characterized Oteros life as a politician during this unmoored period of colonialism in New Mexico. Perhaps these particular losses and the need to reconcile the past events, according to what Otero believed happened during Billys life, led Otero to emplot the historical narrative of Billy the Kid as the story of a tragic hero. By creating a hero who lives a
xxxiv
b Introduction c
tragic life, Otero is able not only to explain his familys recent history, but to set the record straight as to what really happened to the Hispanics on the frontier after the advent of the AngloAmerican. Otero published his biography only seven years before his death. He wrote it during a period when New Mexico had become a part of the Union.20 Otero had become a colonized Nuevomexicano who had lost much of his familys wealth, traditional power and culture. The Real Billy the Kid allows Otero to resolve the contradictions of his personal and family history, their fragmentation and thereby create a unique narrative space, a space created to contest his loss of land and heritage. This is why Otero collected the specific oral narratives that refuted Garretts rendition of Billy as a murdering villain. For emplotted tragedy, it was essential for Otero to transcribe oral narratives that would corroborate the storyline of his book: Billy the Kid was a tragic hero unjustly characterized as a villain by a ruthless regime, the Santa Fe Ring. That is why Otero transcribed narratives from the native Nuevomexicanos who idealized Billy the Kid. An example of this is the testimony of native Nuevomexicano Martin Chavez:
All of the wrongs have been charged to Billy, yet we who really knew him know that he was good and had fine qualities. We have not put our impressions of him into print and our silence has been the cause of great injustice to The Kid (160).
For Chavez as well as the other Native Nuevomexicanos of the region, Billy the Kid was a hero who symbolized resistance to the United States after the treaty. To the native Nuevomexicanos, he was Bilito; he was a mythic hero. At one narrative level, the orality in Oteros text allows him to take part in the fetishizing of folkness that began in the 1930s,
20 When I refer to the Neo-Colonial period, I am defining them in two distinct stages of New Mexican History. The Colonial is the period from 1848 to 1912. The Neo-Colonial is the period that the territory lives under now, a period that is marked with the lingering effects of colonial oppression that existed after statehood was achieved. Although this can be seen as an economic model that Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin argue in The Empire Writes Back, for this essay and specifically for the Southwestern territories, it is mostly a psychological period that is created out of this fragmentation.
xxxv
b Introduction c
seen in other Nuevomexicano cultural narratives and in the New Mexico Federal Writers Project ethnographic project (Melendz 204205). These transcribed interviews can be seen as an attempt by Otero to write the Nuevomexicano oral history in a public, authoritative voice. At another narrative level, however, for Otero (a man of the elite class), Billy the Kids oral history would also serve in the construction of his own historical emplotment. Through their appropriation, these oral stories from primarily poor natives of New Mexico become something entirely different in Oteros narrative. They no longer are the stories of el pueblo; they are now a literary devicein Englishto maintain the emplotted narrative of an elite Hispanic of New Mexico. They should therefore be scrutinized for their accuracy, but not dismissed. One cannot say that he made up the oral histories. (It should be noted, however, that there are no extant notes of these oral transcriptions in the Otero papers, held at the University of New Mexico.) Nonetheless, one should approach them with the understanding that in his transcriptions of these narrativeswhich were probably told him in Spanishhe did have a vision of what was needed to maintain his tragic narrative. In Oteros emplotment, then, if Billy the Kid were to be viewed as a murdering villain, then Oteros sidethe McSween-Tunstall faction Billy was hired to defend and supportwould look just as bad as (if not worse than) the murderer. And the Santa Fe Ring would become the justifiable winners of the Lincoln County War as well as the moral victors through imperialism. Otero thus had to create a protagonist from oral and textual sources who fought for the defensive side in the Lincoln County War and was therefore a man of the people. Through Oteros appropriation of these oral tales, Billy becomes a likable man of heroic dimensions. Throughout his book, Otero claims that Billy was a kind and just man, a gentleman to all the natives in New Mexico. When he does acknowledge the killings that Garretts narrative documents, Otero finds individuals who at least claim that Billys actions were justified. The more Otero emplots Billy as a man who had justifiably killed a few men, and the more gentlemanly characteristics that Otero documents as Billys true
xxxvi
b Introduction c
character, the more his side (the opposition to the Santa Fe Ring) appears to be just. Under such an emplotted form, the Oteros become synonymous with morality. Consequently, all of the actions against the Oteros become acts of unjustifiable aggression by a lawless regime, the Santa Fe Ring. Garrett and Upson were similarly motivated in their emplotment of a villainous, murdering villain. Both Garrett and Upson were heavily involved in the Santa Fe Ring, Garrett as a delegate and Upson (as he declares in the introduction to the narrative) as a supporter of the Dolan-Murphy faction in the Lincoln County War. In addition, Upson was elected postmaster of Lincoln County with the support of the Murphy-Dolan faction. Through their characterization of Billy as a murderous villain, Garrett and Upson further the interests of their employers and political benefactors. With Billy as a killer and a villain, the Santa Fe Ring could show that the McSween-Tunstall faction was just as corrupt as the killer they hired for their cause. The Santa Fe Ring, then, according to this image of Billy, becomes the just cause, and winning the war represents the restoration of social order and the taming of the West. Under such a conception, it is not surprising then that the death of Billy is documented much differently in the Garrett/Upson and Otero narratives. According to Garrett, he and Billy were in a fierce gun battle, which Garrett won heroically (Garrett 134135). Otero, on the other hand, notes that his reliable oral source provided a much different history of the events:
Since that time, and during a visit to Fort Summer, the author was reliably informed that Billy the kid had no gun with him that night; that he was in his stockinfeet [sic] and only carried a butchers knife, with which he was going to cut off a steak from the yearling Jesus Valdez had killed for Pete Maxwell that same day. An old Navajo women who went into the room after the kid had been killed verified this statement. Actually, Garrett was in no danger (137).
According to Oteros narrativecollected from an unnamed Navajo womanBilly was shot down in cold blood, unarmed. There was no fierce battle between Billy and Garrett, no villainous gunslinger. Otero sees Billys death as the unfortunate product of
xxxvii
b Introduction c
the Santa Fe Rings politics (137). Otero evokes both sympathy and pity for the tragic killing of the unarmed hero, as well as disdain for the lawman who killed him and would later cover up his cowardly deed. Oteros emplotment of the tragic hero unjustly slain by the dominant regime is metaphorically the story of the Nuevomexicanos. Billys death is tragically symptomatic of AngloAmerican colonization and the laws created to maintain the rhetoric of Manifest Destiny, as is the loss of Nuevomexicano traditions and customs. The Santa Fe Ring was Billys fatal flaw in Oteros narrative. As the political force behind the sociopolitical ruptures in New Mexican territory, they maintained a hegemonic atmosphere in the territory of New Mexico and thereby were able to contrive Billy as a murderer and hire Garrett to kill him. Garrett and Upson have everything to gain in their emplotted narrative account of the death of the villainous Billy the Kid; they need to create a murderous villain for the heroic Garrett to oppose and kill. Thus, Garrett becomes a hero of the territory for ridding New Mexican society of a barbarous villain. The killing of Billy symbolizes the taming of the West and, politically, the preparation of the New Mexico territory for entering the Union, which is the society of civilized states. This, too, is fitting, since the barbary of the West is represented in popular Anglo culture as the Mexican and Indian past. The two divergent images of Billy the Kid in the emplotted narratives of Garrett/Upson and Otero demonstrate that non-fiction, whether biographical or historical, is created and constructed according to the ideologies of the narrator. To conceive of narrative discourse in this way permits us to account for its universality as a cultural fact and for the interest that social groups have in controlling what will pass for the authoritative mythssuch as that of Billy the Kidof a given culture formation (White X). Miguel Antonio Oteros The Real Billy the Kid is the first biography of its kind to voice the relationship that the mythic figure Billy the Kid had with Nuevomexicanos, thereby contesting AngloAmerican control over the myth by emplotting this period in New
21 It is interesting to note that sixty years after Otero created this narrative about the relationship Billy the Kid had with the Nuevomexicanos, Rudolfo Anaya wrote a bilingual play that theatrically represents this relationship, directed in 1997 by Cecilia Aragon.
xxxviii
b Introduction c
Mexicos history as Nuevomexicano.21 Oteros historical biography, however, is but one representation of the hundreds of Nuevomexicano writers who created literature and history to write against the dehistoricizing practices undertaken by Euroamerican historians to promote Manifest Destiny and nationalism in the United States.22 In these narratives, Nuevomexicano writers used both multiple voices and emplotting strategies to protest. And through such narrative strategies, they were able to construct a voice that will continue to problematize how history and literature of this period is conceptualized in the United States.
22 Please see Melndezs exceptional work on Nuevomexicano history, newspapers and literature, So All Is Not Lost: The Poetics of Print in Nuevomexicano Communities, 18341958. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, 1997.
xxxix
b Introduction c
Work s Cited
Adler, Alfred. Billy the Kid: A Case in Epic Origins. Western Folklore. April 1954. 4568. Alstyne, R. W. Van. The Rising American Empire. New York: Quadrangle Books, 1960. Bhabha, Homi. DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation. Nation and Narration. Ed. Homi Bhabha. New York: Routledge, 1990. 220245. . The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994. Branch, Luis Leon. Los Bilitos: The Story of Billy the Kid and His Gang. New York: Carlton Press, 1980. Castillo, Richard Griswold del. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: A Legacy of Conflict. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1990. Chavez, John R. The Lost Land: The Chicano Image of the Southwest. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1984. Cohen, Ralph. Generating Literary Histories. New Historical Literary Study: Essays on Reproducing Texts, Representing History. Ed. Jeffrey N. Cox and Larry J. Reynolds. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University, 1993. 3954. Gallagher, Catherine. Marxism and the New Historicism. The New Historicism. Ed. H. Aram Veeser. New York: Routledge, 1989. 3749. Garcia-Davidson, Margaret. Borders, Frontiers, and Mountains: Mapping the History of U.S. Hispanic Literature. Reading the West: New Essays on the Literature of the American West. Ed. Michael Kowalewski. London: Cambridge Press, 1996. 177199.
xl
b Introduction c
Garrett, Pat F. The Authentic Life of Billy the Kid: The Noted Desperado of the Southwest, Whose Deeds of Daring And Blood Made His Name A Terror In New Mexico, Arizona and Northern Mexico. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1954. Gmez-Quiones, Juan. Roots of Chicano Politics, 16001940. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1994. Gonzales-Berry, Erlinda. Two Texts for a New Canon: Vicente Bernals Las Primicias and Felipe Maximiliano Chacns Poesa y Prosa. Recovering the U.S. Hispanic Literary Heritage. Ed. Ramn Gutirrez and Genaro Padilla. Houston: Arte Publico Press, 1993. 129153. Greetham, D.C. Textual Scholarship: An Introduction. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992. Kaldec, Robert F. They Knew Billy the Kid: Interviews with OldTime New Mexicans. Santa Fe, N.M.: Ancient City Press, 1987. Kowalewski, Michael, ed. Reading the West: New Essays on the Literature of the American West. London: Cambridge Press, 1996. Larson, Robert W. New Mexicos Quest for Statehood: 18461912. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1968. Leal, Luis. Pre-Chicano Literature: Process and Meaning (15391959). Handbook of Hispanic Cultures in the United States: Literature and Art. Ed. Francisco Lomel. Houston: Arte Pblico Press, 1993. 6285.
xli
b Introduction c
Limn, Jos. Dancing with the Devil: Society and Cultural Poetics in Mexican-American South Texas. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1994. Mares, E. A. The Wraggle-Taggle Outlaws: Vincente Silva and Billy the Kid Seen in Two Nineteenth Century Documents. Pas por Aqu: Critical Essays on the New Mexican Literary Tradition 15421988. Ed. Erlinda Gonzalez-Berry. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1988. 167185. Martin, Wallace. Recent Theories of Narrative. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986. McCollom, William G. Tragedy. New York: Macmillan, 1957. Melndez, A. Gabriel. So All is Not Lost: The Poetics of Print in Nuevomexicano Communities, 18341958. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1997. Mitchell, W. J. T. On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. Montoya, Mara E. The Dual World of Governor Miguel A. Otero: Myth and Reality in Turn-of-the-Century New Mexico. New Mexico Historical Review. Vol. 67, No 1 (January 1992), 1333. Mount, Graeme S. Nuevo Mexicanos and the War of 1898. New Mexico Historical Review, Vol. 58, No. 4 (1983). 184198. Murgua, Edward. Assimilation, Colonialism and the Mexican American People. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1975. Nash, Gerald D. New Mexico in the Otero Era: Some Historical Perspectives. New Mexico Historical Review. Vol. 67, No. 1, 113.
xlii
b Introduction c
Nolan, Frederick. The Lincoln County War: A Documentary History. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1992. Otero, Miguel Antonio. My Life on the Frontier. New York: Press of the Pioneers, 1936, 1939. . The Real Billy the Kid: With New Light On the Lincoln County War. New York: Rufus Rockwell Wilson, 1936. Padilla, Genaro M. My History Not Yours: The Formation of Mexican American Autobiography. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993. Paredes, Amrico. Folklore and Culture on the Texas-Mexican Border. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. Ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffins and Helen Tiffin. New York: Routledge, 1995. Recovering the U.S. Hispanic Literary Heritage. Ed. Ramn Gutirrez and Genaro Padilla. Houston: Arte Pblico Press, 1993. Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books, 1993. . The World, the Text, and the Critic. New York: Vintage Press, 1990. Samuels, David. The Call for Stories: A Guide to the Motives and Methods of the New Narrative Historians. Lingua Franca 5.4 (1995) 3544. Sanchez, Lynda. They Loved Billy the Kid: To Them He Was Bilito. True West 31.1 (1984) 1217.
xliii
b Introduction c
Slotkin, Richard. Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialization, 18001890. New York: Harper Perennial, 1994. Sunseri, Alvin R. Seeds of Discord: New Mexico in the Aftermath of the American Conquest, 18461861. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1979. Stratton, Porter A. The Territorial Press of New Mexico: 18341912. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1969. Tatum, Stephen. Inventing Billy the Kid: Visions of the Outlaw in America, 18811981. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1982. Thirty Four. October 6, 1880. Vol. IV, No. 15. Las Cruces, New Mexico. Tuska, Jon. Billy the Kid: His Life and Legend. Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1983. Veeser, H. Aram. The New Historicism. The New Historicism Reader. Ed. H. Aram Veeser. New York: Routledge, 1994. Weddle, Jerry. Antrim is My Stepfathers Name: The Boyhood of Billy the Kid. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1996. Weigle, Marta. Two Guadalupes: Hispanic Legends and Magic Tales From Northern New Mexico. Santa Fe, N. M.: Ancient City Press, 1987. Welsh, Cynthia Secor. A Star Will Be Added: Miguel Antonio Otero and the Struggle for Statehood. New Mexico Historical Review. Vol. 67, No 1. 3353.
xliv
b Introduction c
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. . Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in NineteenthCentury Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973. Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
xlv
DEDICATED TO MAURICE GARLAND FULTON AND MARSHALL BOND FOR THEIR KIND AND GENEROUS ASSISTANCE
Like to a Ship
Like to a ship upon a shoreless ocean, Manned by an ever-growing crew of years, My life slips onward, and with vain devotion My soul stands silent at the helm and steers. If one strong wind would blow direct and single, Then would I turn wherever it might call, But many winds there are, that madly mingle, And I must trim my sails to favour all. So whether I be drifting or be sailing I know not, and alas shall never know: My life is one desire, unavailing, That some strong settled single wind would blow. Robert Cameron Rogers
FOREWORD
BILLY THE KID was declared an outlaw almost from the cradle: First, when he killed the man who insulted his mother and who was about to brain his benefactor, had he not come to the rescue. Second, when he was accused of killing both William S. Morton and Frank Baker (two of the murderers of his friend and employer, John H. Tunstall) at Agua Negra (Black Water), on March 9, 1878. Third, when he was blamed for the killing of Sheriff William Brady and Deputy Sheriff George Hindman, on April 1, 1878, during the Lincoln County War. Fourth, when he emerged from the burning McSween home and killed Bob Beckwith, who was in the act of declaring that he had won the reward offered for the killing of McSween and wanted a pot shot at The Kid too. The author had many talks with the late Pat Garrett about Billy the Kid. Garrett always spoke of him pleasantly. I have many times regretted that I had to kill him, he would say. I would much have preferred taking Billy alive and allowing the Court to deal with him. But the night I met him face to face in Pete Maxwells bedroom, it was simply a case of who got in the first shot. I happened to be the lucky one. And, he would add, if I had not shot when I did, I would not be here to tell the tale. Since that time, and during a visit to Fort Sumner, the author was reliably informed that Billy the Kid had no gun with him that night; that he was in his stockinged feet and only carried a butchers knife, with which he was going to cut off a steak from the yearling Jesus Valdez had killed for Pete Maxwell that same day. The old Navajo woman who went into the room after The Kid had been killed verified this statement. Actually, Garrett was in no danger of being killed. However, he did not know that The Kid was unarmed, and he cannot be blamed for shooting when he did. Garrett presented the writer with an autographed copy of his book, The Authentic Life of Billy the Kid. When he did so, he said: Much of it was gathered from hearsay and made out of whole cloth. This book, written by Garrett in 1882, is nevertheless
b Foreword c
unquestionably the most authentic account of the life and adventures of Billy the Kid ever issued. The booklet written by Charles A. Siringo is largely copied from Garretts book. The same may be said of the other stories: the one by Harvey Fergusson in the June, 1925, American Mercury, and the other by Walter Noble Burns in the December, 1925, Frontier, and later published in book form under title of The Saga of Billy the Kid. Each author of these, however, add many tales originating solely in their rather vivid imaginations. They are pure fiction, wholly devoid of fact. But they make interesting reading; hence their popularity with the general reading public. The authors aim in this book is to write a story, without embellishment, based entirely on actual fact. Most of the material incorporated in this work was gathered at first hand by the author, both as a youth and later as an official of the State of New Mexico. M. A. (Ash) Upson, a close friend of Billy the Kid from early youth till the time of his death, supplied many significant and little-known facts, as did Pat Garrett, Mrs. Susan E. Barber (formerly Mrs. Alexander A. McSween), George Coe, Frank Coe and Don Martin Chavez. The printed account of the killing of Billy the Kid, written by E. A. Brininstool, has also been of valuable assistance in checking the Garrett and Coe statements. MIGUEL ANTONIO OTERO.
CHAPTER I
Firs t Years of Billy the Kid
William H. Bonney, Jr., was an Irishman. He was born on New Yorks East Side on November 23, 1859. A brother, Edward, followed Billy in 1861. During the summer of 1862, when Billy was almost three and his brother one, their parents removed to the West, settling at Coffeyville, Kansas, on the Verdigris River, a short distance north of the Indian Territory. Soon after their arrival in Kansas, the father, William H. Bonney, Sr., died, leaving his young widow and two baby boys with but a scant outfit and little ready cash. The widow disposed of all the property, with the exception of a wagon and team of horses, and joined a large party of emigrants heading for Pueblo, Colorado. There she married a man named Antrim, and moved to Santa F, where they opened a restaurant and boarding house during the summer of 1863. One of their first boarders was Ash Upson, who at that time was working for The Daily New Mexican. Billy was still under five years of age. When he was eight years old Billy acquired the habit of dealing monte. He had no use for toys, never played ball or marbles, and consequently his hands were as trim, nimble and shapely as those of a girl. His only toy was a pack of Mexican cards. He soon became as skillful at dealing as any of the older gamblers in and around Santa F. This led him to saloons and tendijons, where games of cards were played at all hours of the day and night. Here he watched every turn of the cards and the manner of shuffling and dealing, and soon became one of the most proficient dealers in the community. After five years in Santa F, Antrim decided to move to Silver City, New Mexico, at that time a lively mining town. Ash Upson was responsible for this change. It was he who put the idea into Antrims head and clinched it by his avowed intention of going with them to the booming mining camp. The Antrims sold their business in Santa F and opened a restaurant and boarding house in Silver City. Billy was then nine years old. Antrim was a miner. He
7
16
CHAPTER II
Fights with the Apaches
At times the Mescalero Apache Indians from Fort Stanton made raids into Old Mexico, often attacking immigrants along the Rio Grande. On one occasion a party from Texas (three men and their families) on their way to Arizona, came upon The Kid and Evans near the Rio Miembres. They invited the boys to have dinner with them then asked them to join the party, claiming that it was dangerous for two youths to be riding alone through Indian country. However, The Kid and Evans declined with thanks. After dinner they continued their journey. Later in the afternoon they discovered a band of fourteen Indians moving along the foothills in an easterly direction. Convinced that the Indians were planning to attack their friends, they wheeled their horses and raced for the foothills to head off the redmen. They succeeded, but their horses were tired and Evans called: Do you think we will make it? Will our horses hold out? The Kid yelled back: Its not a case will we, but how soon! Its a groundhog caseweve got to get there. Think of those white-headed kids, Jesse, and whoop her up. When my horses four legs let up, Ive got two of my own. At dusk they rounded a point in the road and came in full view of the immigrant camp. They were just in time, for at that moment the war-cry of the Apaches broke upon their ears. The Indians charged the camp from a pass on the south. The Kid and Evans threw themselves out of the saddle, and Winchesters in hand, started on a run toward the marauders, yelling as they went. The Indians were astonished, terrified. One after another, they went down under the unerring aim of the two rifles. Evans stumbled and fell into a narrow arroyo, overgrown with grass and weeds. Raising himself to his knees, he found that his fall was a stroke of luck, for it afforded him a wonderful intrenchment. He called The Kid to join him, while he kept up a constant fire with his Winchester. The Kid bounded into the arroyo but just as he dropped to his knees, a
17
24
CHAPTER III
The Lincoln County War of 1878
New Mexicos notorious Lincoln County War of 1878 was caused by the rivalry of two groups of business men whose activities centered in the small county-seat town of Lincoln. Ranged on one side were Lawrence G. Murphy, James J. Dolan and John H. Rileythe Murphy-Dolan Store Company, dealers in general merchandise, cattle and horses; on the other were John H. Tunstall, a young English investor; Attorney-at-law Alexander A. McSween, a newly established Lincoln resident; and honest, successful Cattleman John Chisum, generally known as The Cattle King of America. Others including The Kid were gradually drawn into the feud, but the foregoing six were at all times the ringleaders and instigators. Therefore, a brief note concerning their antecedents will not be amiss here. John H. Tunstall arrived in Lincoln in the spring of 1877 and shortly afterward formed a partnership with Alexander A. McSween in the mercantile and the banking business. This brought them into direct conflict with the Murphy-Dolan Store Company. Tunstall put up the bulk of the capital for the Tunstall-McSween store which made it possible for the new partners to become, from the very start, formidable competitors of the older firm. At this time Tunstall did business with the firm of Otero, Sellar & Company, at El Moro, Colorado, where the author was then employed as bookkeeper. Tunstall, a splendid young man and a British subject, was greatly admired by all who knew him. He had come West to go into the cattle business and had finally decided to operate in Lincoln County. He bought from Otero, Sellar & Company, mules, horses, harnesses, saddles, bridles, and all other paraphernalia needed on a cattle ranch. Besides the above he bought household effects and provisions enough to start a small hotel or grocery store. One point about Tunstall must be stated emphatically: Tunstall, unlike so many other Englishmen who came to the West, was not prompted by any desire to dissipate his inherited wealth. He was
25
Alexander A. McSween
Mrs. A. A. McSween 26
36
CHAPTER IV
The Murder of Tuns tall
The firm of Tunstall & McSween was making large inroads into the business of the Murphy-Dolan Store Company, and was bidding fair to close it out. In fact, the whole Murphy racket was nearing an end. The rustlers were frightened, and were not stealing as boldly as in an earlier time. Consequently, cattle were becoming harder to procure and Government contracts more difficult of fulfilment. Furthermore, the rustlers made demands on the Murphy-Dolan Store Company for money and credits during a slump sure to continue as long as McSween and Tunstall supported the cause of law and order. Murphy and his partners made a survey of the situation; they saw bankruptcy staring them in the face. Their desperate situation demanded that a remedy be quickly found. Their competitors must be destroyed. Since Tunstall had the capital, he was slated for death. On February 18, 1878, Murphy summoned Sheriff William Brady, his hireling. A claim was manufactured against Tunstall. The fact that he had never owed either Murphy or Dolan or Riley a single dollar made no difference. A writ of attachment for a herd of horses was given Brady, who deputized twenty of Murphys cowpunchers and rustlers to serve the papers on Tunstall at his Rio Felice ranch. Then secret orders were whispered to Sheriff Brady, who in turned passed them on to Billy Morton and Frank Baker. Never a hero, Brady decided that discretion was the better part of valor and elected to remain at home. Murphy proceeded systematically to get the posse drunk, knowing that liquor can make a brave man of a coward. Thoroughly inflamed with whisky, the posse reached the Rio Felice Ranch only to find the houses barricaded with sand bags.* Observing some eight or ten men occupied in placing more fortifications, Billy Morton called out: Who told you to do that?
* This version, undoubtedly authentic, was obtained from Don Martin Chavez of Santa F, N. M., in 1926.
37
JOHN H. TUNSTALL
It was the assassination of Tunstall, employer and friend of Billy the Kid, that brought on the Lincoln County War and caused The Kid to resume his murderous career. 38
* This account of the old skirmish is attested to by Frank Coe, who with his cousin, George Coe, is the sole survivor of the Lincoln County War. Both Pat Garrett and Charlie Siringo attribute the killing of Roberts to Billy the Kid, but the Coe statement is unquestionably the true version.
44
CHAPTER V
A Lull and Then the Deluge
There followed one of those brief lulls that occur in every stormone of those short respites when the blood-stained gladiators return to their respective corners to bind up their wounds, draw a few deep breaths, and prepare for the even gorier butchery that is to follow. Meanwhile, the all-powerful Santa F Ring, political powerhouse of New Mexico and the most lawless machine in that territorys history, became actively interested in the Lincoln County slaughter, lining up solidly behind the Murphy-Dolan-Riley faction. Headed by Attorney Thomas B. Catron, ruthless overlord of all the Southwest racket interests, the Santa F Ring numbered among its more notorious members, Samuel B. Axtell, Territorial Governor; and J. B. (Billy) Matthews, Clerk of the District Court. The allegiance of the Santa F Ring gave to the Murphy clan a semblance of legality and lawfulness that only the cold facts belied. The McSween-Chisum party were, as a logical outcome, declared the desperadoes and law-breakers. Sheriff William Brady, who never once had held a warrant for the arrest of Tunstalls murderers, was hot on the trail of the killers of Morton, Baker and Roberts, three of the known assassins of Tunstall. With the connivance of the Santa F Ring he succeeded in branding The Kid a mad dog, outlaw and murderer, who was wanted dead or alivebut preferably dead. In the same category, but to a lesser degree, fell McSween, Chisum and their followers. The lull in the storm was almost over. Dark clouds were again gathering. Soon the lightning would crackle. Soon the bloody deluge would begin again. On April 1st Brady, Billy Matthews, Deputy George Hindman and G. W. (Dad) Peppin started from the Murphy-Dolan-Riley store for the Court House, for the purpose of opening and closing the regular term of Court, which the judge had decided to postpone until a later day, as conditions in Lincoln County were too
45
* Ike Stockton was a terror throughout the whole Southwest especially in Rio Arriba County. He was afterward killed at Durango, Colorado. At the time of the above-narrated events he was the owner of a saloon in Lincoln Plaza and reputedly a secret ally of Billy the Kid.
46
47
48
49
55
58
CHAPTER VI
The Kid at Fort Sum ner
After the burning of McSweens residence, Charlie Bowdre, Hendry Brown and George Coe, who had been guarding the McSween store, made their getaway and took to the hills. The Kid and his followers fled to the mountains, where they rested, undisturbed by Peppin and his deputies. On August 5th, The Kid, Tom OFolliard, Doc Scurlock, Charlie Bowdre, Fred Wayte, John Middleton and Hendry Brown made a raid on some ponies belonging to Indians on the Mescalero Reservation. The Reservation bookkeeper, Joe Bernstein, formerly in the employ of Murphy, Dolan and Riley, rode out and commanded the men to leave. One of the robbers fired at Bernstein, killing him instantly. Naturally, it was charged to The Kid although it was later proved that another fired the shot. In the middle of August, The Kid, Tom OFolliard, Fred Wayte, John Middleton and Hendry Brown moved to Fort Sumner, where they made their new headquarters. Charlie Bowdre and Doc Scurlock were both married to native women living in Lincoln County. They remained with their families but avoided publicity. On September 10th of the same year, The Kid, Tom OFolliard, Fred Wayte and Hendry Brown left Fort Sumner for Lincoln County to make a raid on the ranch of Charles Fritz, on the Rio Bonita, eight miles east of Lincoln. Fritz was a close friend of Murphy, Dolan and Riley, and The Kid and his band, of course, had no use for him. They succeeded in stealing from him about twenty head of horses and, returning to Fort Sumner with their booty, they hid it in one of their favorite spots in that locality. On The Kids return to Fort Sumner he met John Long, an old buffalo hunter, who was six feet tall, and was noted for being a fine shot. When drinking, he often became boisterous and offensive, constantly bullying smaller men. He wanted it generally understood that he was a bad man.
59
70
CHAPTER VII
Enter Sher iff Pat Gar rett
Pat F. Garrett was elected sheriff of Lincoln County, at the November, 1880, election. He at once started an active campaign to get The Kid, dead or alive. Garrett had arrived in New Mexico early in February, 1878, and had herded cattle for Pete Maxwell, at Fort Sumner. Then Maxwell had discovered something which had caused him to discharge Garrett. The latter, who had saved some money during the few months he had worked for Maxwell, then opened a small restaurant, which he operated for a short time, finally buying an equal interest in Beaver Smiths store and saloon. He had married twice, first to Juanita Martinez, who died shortly after their marriage; and second to Apolinaria Gutierrez, who is still living with some of her children at Las Cruces, New Mexico. For nearly two whole years Pat Garrett was a personal friend of Billy the Kid. They were on the most intimate terms, and around Fort Sumner were generally known as Big Casino and Little Casino. The Kid made his headquarters in the Garrett saloon; they drank and gambled together. If Pat won he staked The Kid; when The Kid won he staked Garrett. It was rumored that Pat and The Kid were partners. Pete Maxwell often said: They are carrying on the same line of business. But Pat was more cunning than The Kid. He saw an opportunity to make a big haul, so he quietly negotiated with Captain J. C. Lea, John S. Chisum, and several large cattlemen on the Rio Pecos for his election to the office of sheriff, with the distinct understanding that he was to get rid of The Kid. As heartless as this deal may appear, Garrett always spoke of The Kid as a great fellow, and has told the writer many times: Billy the Kid was one of the nicest little gentlemen I ever knewkind and considerate, true and loyal to his friends, afraid of nothing on earth that walked on two legs or four. All his deviltry was wished on him by much worse men than he ever dared to be. When the reader reaches the exact statements
71
PATRICK F. GARRETT Sheriff of Lincoln County and slayer of Billy the Kid 72
Upper: LINCOLN COURT HOUSE AND JAIL, where The Kid was confined when he killed his two guards and escaped. Lower: PATRON HOUSE AND SALOON, where The Kid lived wheni n Lincoln. Mrs. Patron stands inthe doorway. The men, from left to right, are Miguel Luna, Marshall Bond, Jr., Mr. Patterson, and Governor Miguel A. Otero. 81
84
CHAPTER VIII
Echoes of the Lincoln County War
Such conflicting impressions and divergent opinions have been given in recent books about Billy the Kid and his part in the Lincoln County War that I am moved to publish some first-hand information gathered a few years ago from survivors of that time. The publication of Walter Noble Burns The Saga of Billy the Kid had given renewed impetus to the romancing that has always enveloped The Kid and his exploits, and there was a revival of the legend that The Kid was not actually killed by Pat Garrett at Fort Sumner on the night of July 14, 1881. The legend was receiving embellishments at the hands of various persons as to how the fake killing was managed, how The Kid escaped to Old Mexico, and how he was still alive in some remote hiding place. Just when I felt inclined to try to find evidence that would settle the matter once and for all, my good friend, Marshall Bond of Santa Barbara, California, and his son, Marshall Bond Jr., came to Santa F on a motor trip. When he learned of my interest in Billy the Kid he proposed that Mrs. Otero and I join them on a motor trip to the former haunts of The Kid. We readily accepted, realizing that we would be able to talk to a number of people in the vicinity of Lincoln and Fort Sumner who had been personally acquainted with The Kid and who were conversant with the events in which he figured. I shall now undertake to give an account of this trip and present in verbatim form, from the notes I made at the time, the information I was able to gather about The Kid and the Lincoln County War. Our party left Santa F on the morning of Monday, July 5th, and as the roads were in excellent condition, we reached the town of Carrizozo (which we proposed to make the gateway of our journey into Billy the Kids country) in the remarkably fast time of about six hours, although the distance was 176 miles. We spent the night at Carrizozo, and this gave us an opportunity to talk to George L. Barber, who, although well up in years, was still a prac85
Upper left: Deluvina Maxwell, an old Navajo woman that loved The Kid. Upper right: Mrs. A. A. McSween, in her later years. Lower left: Mr. and Mrs. Frank A. Coe. The Kid and Frank Coe were intimate friends and lived together for several years. Lower right: Hijinio Salazar. Severely wounded when the McSween home was burned; by pretending to be dead he escaped with his life. 89
94
CHAPTER IX
Lincoln Rem em bers The Kid
The town of Lincoln has fallen into decay since the county seat was moved to Carrizozo, yet many of the old landmarks are still standing. At the west end of the town is the old Murphy and Dolan store, which immediately after the Lincoln County War was bought by the county and used for many years as a courthouse. In recent years it has been remodelled and converted to the use of school classes, but in most respects it is the same as it was half a century ago. Scattered along the winding road that runs through Lincoln are many adobe structures, the majority of which were built a decade or two after the Lincoln County War. The store building of Tunstall and McSween is still standing and is practically unchanged on the exterior. Between the two stores was the McSween residence which was burned. Hardly a trace of it is discoverable now. About a half a mile farther east is the Ellis house and store. On the way out to the Ellis house, the visitor to Lincoln will pass the old Montaa store, now used as a dwelling house, which bears on the door the inscription, Kid, cut in by knife. There is also standing the old torreon, or tower, built for protection in Indian times but used for sharpshooting in the Lincoln County War by the Murphy forces because of its position with reference to the Tunstall store and the McSween residence. We spent the night at the Bonito Inn, just across the street from the Tunstall store. This house was built by James J. Dolan after the subsidence of the troubles, and used by him for several years as a dwelling house. It was ultimately converted into a hotel. Early the next morning, I visited the places that had seen so much bloodshed. Meeting a small boy, I asked him to direct me to the home of Miguel Luna. I sought him because I had learned that he was the best person to act as a guide in seeing Lincoln and finding some of the persons who were acquainted with the war. Miguel Luna himself was not a participant. He came to Lincoln as a small
95
Upper: MAIN STREET, LINCOLN, NEW MEXICO. At the right is what was once was the Tunstall & McSween store. Directly across the street, hidden by the clump of trees, is the J. J. Dolan residence, now a hotel. Lower: MR. AND MRS. GEORGE COE. This couple, now living in Glencoe, N. M., were close friends of The Kid. A McSween adherent, George Coe fought in several of the battles of the Lincoln County War. 100
109
CHAPTER X
More Mem or ies of The Kid
Although George Coes impressions of The Kid were detailed to our perfect satisfaction, we decided to visit his cousin, Frank Coe, for even further elaboration. We received a cordial welcome, and Frank Coe, in his enthusiasm at the mere mention of The Kid, proceeded to tell us of his memorable friendship: I first met Billy the Kid in the year 1877. He had just arrived in the Pecos Valley, coming from Las Cruces; he was only a boy of eighteen. Though I was not much more than a boy myself, I was twenty-five. An intimate friendship began between us at once. I found Billy different from most boys of his age. He had been thrown on his own resources from early boyhood. From his own statement to me, he hadnt known what it meant to be a boy; at the age of twelve he was associated with men of twenty-five and older. Billy was eager to learn everything and had a most active and fertile mind. He was small and of frail physique; his hands and feet were more like a womans than a mans. He was not the type who could perform heavy labor. Billy had been brought up in a mining town, Silver City, New Mexico, hence developing a spirit which made him desirous of making money quicklywithout regard for the manner in which it was made. In the old mining camps there were many saloons and gambling tables, giving Billy the opportunity to deal monte, the popular gambling game in that section. Like everything else he undertook, he became an expert, the wonder of the gambling fraternity. Billy explained to me how he became proficient in the use of fire-arms. He said that his age and frail physique were handicaps in his personal encounters, so he decided to become a good shot with both rifle and six-shooter as a means of protection against bodily harmharm which might have come at any time in the quarrels incident to the rough and tumble life of a mining settlement. As in
110
CHAPTER XI
A Vis it to Fort Sum ner
The second part of our journey into the haunts of Billy the Kid took us to Fort Sumner. Our route thither led through Roswell, which in The Kids time had a population of twelve people. Billy sought refuge there after the fatal Brady battle. Now it is an attractive and thriving town of seven or eight thousand. It is indisputably the metropolis of southeastern New Mexico and has played a great part in bringing law and order into what was a sorely distracted section in the seventies and early eighties of the last century. Upon arriving at Fort Sumner, we secured Ollie B. Earickson, a resident and old friend of mine, to take us to see people identified with The Kid. We called on Mrs. Jose Jaramillo, the daughter of Lucien B. Maxwell, former owner of the Maxwell Land Grant. Lucien B. Maxwell, after selling his interests in the land grant, bought from the Government in 1870 the remains of the Bosque Redondo, an experiment directed toward making agriculturists out of the Navajo and Apache Indians. Fort Sumner had been established as a garrison for the soldiers who had to be on hand to keep the Indians under control. When the project was given up, the land and buildings had been offered for sale and were purchased by Lucien B. Maxwell. Inasmuch as The Kid frequented Fort Sumner and had been friendly with the Maxwells, I was eager to talk with Mrs. Jaramillo, ne Paulita Maxwell. When she knew The Kid she was an attractive young woman in her teens. Since Billy found the Maxwells to be warm friends, he frequented their home, and he and Paulita were naturally thrown into contact. Despite the fact that Mrs. Jaramillo was suffering from rheumatism, she evinced a lively interest in the object of my visit and consented to drive with us to the old military cemetery in which Billy the Kid is buried. Irrigation has done much for the country around Fort Sumner. Our road lay between orchards and truck gardens which were marvelous in their productiveness.
114
JESUS SILVA The Kid was staying at Silvas home the night he was slain. Silva made The Kids coffin and buried him in the old cemetery at Fort Sumner.
GRAVE OF BILLY THE KID Here beside him are the graves of two of his pals, Charlie Bowdre and Tom OFolliard. The Kid was buried here on July 15, 1881. 117
120
CHAPTER XII
An Old Fr iend of The Kid Speak s
Though our visit to Fort Sumner definitely settled the authenticity of The Kids death, we stopped at Santa F to see Martin Chavez. He had been an active participant in the Lincoln County War and we were keen to hear his memories. Mr. Chavez began by commenting on some of the accounts he had read: Most of the accounts of the Lincoln County War are far from true. The stories I have read were written by Pat Garrett, Charlie Siringo, Harvey Fergusson and Walter Noble Burns. I have also read the account of the killing of The Kid, published by E. A. Brininstool, which is correct. It was written by John W. Poe, who was with Garrett. All the other accounts are filled with inaccuracies and discrepancies, and do no justice to The Kid. All the wrongs have been charged to Billy, yet we who really knew him know that he was good and had fine qualities. We have not put our impressions of him into print and our silence has been the cause of great injustice to The Kid. In the killing of Sheriff Brady and his deputy, George Hindman, for which The Kid was tried and convicted, it would be hard to determine whether or not he was directly the guilty one. When they were shot, these two, together with Billy Matthews and Dad Peppin were in the middle of the street, going from the Murphy, Dolan and Riley store to the courthouse. They were all heavily armed. A group of McSween men had concealed themselves behind some adobe jacales, and they all opened fire as soon as the Murphy men reached the point where they could be seen by everybody behind the wall. Among the McSween men were Billy the Kid, Jim French, Charlie Bowdre, Tom OFolliard, Frank McNab, Fred Wayte, Harvey Morris, Hendry Brown, Doc Scurlock, Sam Smith, John Middleton and Stephen Stevens, and all were firing. Brady fell with about nine bullet holes through him. It is possible that a bullet from Billys gun struck him, but it is just as possible that the fatal shot emanated from any of the other guns. George
121
About two hours later, Billy Burts horse returned to Lincoln. The bridle was off but to the horn of the saddle was tied a silk handkerchief in which there was a note addressed to Billy Burt. It read: I am returning your horse because I know you love him so much. You would probably not sleep tonight. Horses never worry me; I can find them anywhere. W. H. Bonney. This consideration for Billy Burt was another evidence that Billy the Kid was a perfect gentleman and a man with a noble heart. In all his career, he never killed a native citizen of New Mexico, which was one of the reasons we were all so fond of him. I felt grateful to Martin Chavez for his recollections of Billy the Kid and the Lincoln County War. He had fought side by side with The Kid in the days when Lincoln County was a by-word for lawlessness. My purpose from the beginning has been to seek the recollections and impressions of these events from personal contact with the participants. Occasionally their accounts may conflict but that is due to difference of opinion and to the lapsing of over fifty years. That, however, will not lessen the value of the knowledge. Some later comer may try to collect this material, and from it there may merge a corrected and connected account of one of the most remarkable outbreaks of lawlessness the United States has ever witnessed.
129
CHAPTER XIII
When the Author Met The Kid
My own meeting with Billy the Kid was coincidental. On the morning of December 23, 1880, Pat Garrett, Frank Stewart, Lon Chambers, Lee Hall, Louis Bozeman, alias The Animal, James East, Barney Mason, Tom Emory, alias Poker Tom and Bob Williams killed Charlie Bowdre and captured Billy the Kid, Dave Rudabaugh, Billy Wilson and Tom Pickett. Shortly after The Kid and his companions had taken refuge in a little rock house, Pat Garrett closed around them. The posse besieged the little house all night, and when Charlie Bowdre appeared at the door early next morning, Garrett, giving unmistakable indication of the nature of his quest, shot and killed Bowdre. It may be true, as Garrett claimed, that he mistook Bowdre for The Kid because of the hat he was wearinga hat which supposedly resembled The Kids. However, the act was a manifestation of the Garrett spirit. The Kid and the remaining three of his company proposed terms of surrender with promise of protection of their lives until they could be tried, to which Garrett agreed. In seeking a jail secure enough to hold the four outlaws, Garrett turned toward Santa F. Since the nearest railroad station was East Las Vegas, he carried his prisoners thither, heavily shackled, and with an escort of mounted deputies. The news that the noted desperadoes were coming through Las Vegas brought together large numbers of people curious to see them. Albert E. Hyde was in Las Vegas at the time, a guest at the Grand View Hotel, where I also happened to be stopping. Years later, Hyde wrote a magazine article giving a graphic account of the entry of Garretts party into Las Vegas: It was a beautiful afternoon, the elevation of the hotel affording a wide vision across the plains. As the hours passed waiting for their arrival, the crowds became impatient and skeptical when, from our point of vantage, we suddenly discerned a cloud of dust in the southwest. When it advanced closely enough and the people saw a
130
134
Chapter XIV
And Now the End
When Pat Garrett arrived in Santa F with his prisoners, he turned them over to Charles M. Conklin, Deputy United States Marshal and Sheriff of Santa F County, on December 27, 1880. The prisoners were placed in the Santa F County Jail to await the orders of the District Court. They made an effort to escape by digging a hole through the adobe walls, concealing the dirt under their bedding, but their attempt was frustrated by vigilant guards. My last talk with The Kid was just before he was taken to Mesilla, Doa Ana County, to be tried by the District Court there for the murder of Buckskin Roberts. Judge Warren Bristol, the presiding judge, appointed Ira E. Leonard of Lincoln County to defend The Kid. He was acquitted. He was tried again at the same term of court for the murder of Sheriff Brady the outcome of the second trial being a conviction. Judge Bristol sentenced The Kid to be hanged on the 13th day of May, 1881, at Lincoln. He was brought from Mesilla to Lincoln County by Robert Ollinger and David Woods and turned over to Pat Garrett, Sheriff of Lincoln County, at Fort Stanton, the county seat. Shortly before the capture of The Kid at Stinking Springs, Brazil, a partner of E. J. Wilcox, came into Fort Sumner to see Pat Garrett, saying Billys band of outlaws had sent him. He described the condition of the crestfallen desperadoes, telling Garrett they had sent him to gather news for them. Garrett instructed him to return and to tell them, as a ruse, that he was in Fort Sumner with Mason and three Mexicans, wanting to return to Roswell but afraid to leave the plaza. He told Brazil to return to the ranch where they were hiding, to remain with them if they were still there, but to return to Fort Sumner if they had departed. The understanding was that if Brazil did not return by two oclock in the morning, Garrett would start for the ranch. However, Brazil returned by midnight. But let Garrett tell his own story:
135
139
141
It was in a bedroom on the ground floor of this building that Sheriff Pat Garrett slew The Kid on the night of July 14, 1881.
142
Chapter XV
Pos ts cr ipt
I cheerfully comply with my publishers suggestion that I add a few paragraphs about the later years of the surviving principals in the Lincoln County War. Lawrence G. Murphy, who posed as the chief representative of the Santa F Ring in Lincoln County, made frequent visits to Santa F to consult with his superiors and to slake an ever-present thirst for liquor. About 1885, on his last trip to Santa F, and in the course of one of his customary drinking bouts with boon companions, he contracted a whisky cold and was taken to St. Vincents Sanitarium. There he developed a severe case of pneumonia which a few days later caused his death. Murphy was a member of the Order of Odd Fellows, and a local lodge cared for him day and night until his death. He rests now in an unmarked grave in the Odd Fellows cemetery at Santa F. John A. Riley, one of Murphys partners, was a lobbyist in his last years, and each session of the Territorial Legislature found him in Santa F working in the interests of the large corporations. At the first session after I became governor in 1899 he arrived in Santa F, as was his custom, the afternoon before the convening of the Legislature. I chanced to see him as he passed my office, riding in a hack from the station to a hotel. I at once by telephone requested my good friend, Judge Henry L. Waldo, to send Riley away from Santa F as his presence at the Legislature would be most distasteful to me. Judge Waldo sent for Riley, and the latter returned that same night to Colorado Springs, where he was then living with his family. He never appeared at a session of the Legislature while I was governor. His death from pneumonia occurred in a Colorado Springs hospital on February 10, 1916, and his grave is in a Catholic cemetery at Denver. James J. Dolan was a good business man and a splendid accountant. Like his partners, Murphy and Riley, he was also a
143
144