Final Project-based Learning Rubric

Score Levels Advanced

Provides substantial evidence to support analysis. Analysis is relevant and substantial. Shows insightful understanding of sources message. Effectively integrates and cites credible sources. Analysis is meaningful and is relevant to cited evidence.

Names: ___________________________
Proficient
Sufficiently provides evidence from sources to support analysis. Analysis is clear and logical. Shows competent understanding of the sources message.

Needs Revision
Ineffectively provides evidence from sources. Unclear how evidence supports analysis. Analysis is incorrect or confusing. Unsure of the sources message.

Novice
Provides inaccurate evidence from sources. Evidence does not support analysis. Analysis is not logical. Shows no understanding of sources message. Fails to integrate and cite credible sources. Analysis is not provided and/or source is not provided.

CCSS Science and Technical Standard Reading 1: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources. CCSS Science and Technical Standard Writing 9: Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis reflection, and research. CCSS ELA Speaking and Listening 1a: Come to discussion prepared, having read or researched material under study, and draw on that prep during discussion. CCSS ELA Speaking and Listening 1c: Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond to others questions and comment with relevant observations and ideas that bring the discussion back on topic as needed. NETS-S 3b: Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media.

Competently integrates and cites credible sources. Analysis is relevant to cited evidence.

Incorrectly integrates and/or does not cite credible sources. Analysis is not relevant to cited evidence.

Insightfully participates in discussion having studied the material. Provides persuasive reasoning and insightful understanding during discussion, based on materials and prior research. Questions are observant and developed to topic. Responses are proficient and integrates materials flawlessly. Stays on topic.

Consistently participates in discussion having studied the material. Provides valid reasoning and understanding during discussion based on materials and prior research. Questions are developed and relevant to topic. Responses are cohesive and integrate materials appropriately. Stays on topic.

Superficially participates in discussion having studied without understanding and/or did not study material. Provides incorrect reasoning, or doesnt understand discussion, based on materials. May not have done prior research. Questions are minimal and/or irrelevant to topic. Responses are hard to follow and/or do not integrate materials correctly. Needs help staying on topic.

Does not participate in discussion. Did not study materials prior to discussion.

Does not ask questions or are not related to topic. Does not respond or does not integrate material. Does not stay on topic.

Sources are from a variety of media. Sources are cited correctly. Substantially demonstrates their relevance to topic.

Sources are from a variety of media. Sources are cited correctly and demonstrates their relevance to topic.

Sources are from limited media. Sources are not cited correctly and/or does not prove relevance to topic.

No sources or are from one medium. Sources are not cited and/or not relevant to topic.

Final result: _____________________________________