347.627.2 ; 173.1 ; 347.447.8:347.626.

.
,
. - ( ). - (
- , rebus
sic stantibus, , , . - ,

). - ( ; , . ; ,
).
: . . .
Rebus sic stantibus. .
.

1.
,
.1 ,

,
panov@ius.bg.ac.rs.
1

2012.
, , .
, ... ,
.
, , ... -

107

 , LX, 1/2012

, ,
(- ). - , () / , ,
,2 , , , ,
, , , , ,3 . ,
, , /,
, .
, - ( , )
. , -
- , -, ,
- .

2. -
().
() : o , /
.
4 (, . , , . , Terra nostra terra incognita
, 2010, 7.
2
. : , . .
/ :
, a 1945. , . ,
(14921992), 2011, 192. / , ,
,
3
, j
, , ,
, I, 1/2010, 6.
4
, ,

108

 . (. 107136)

5).
. ,

. ,6
, .
-

: ( 7 /
/ ); , ,
( / ). ,

.
. ,
() / .
,
/, .8
,
, ,
public good, . Jonathan Herring, Family Law, Exeter College Oxford University,
2004, 89.
5
,
. () (. ). / /
/, /
, . , , 2009,
444450, 477.
6
,
. (
() ) ( ). ,
, . , , 2006, 7790. , . ,
, 18502000, 2007, 283288.
7
, , . . , (2009), 194.
8
. , XIXXI , 2008,
199.

109

 , LX, 1/2012

/, . , Harry Willekens, , /
, , .9
.
,
. , ,
.
, , , /
(
).
: , , , , , ...
, ,
.
.
, , ,
. , () , ,
, /
. , ,
( ,
, , ). ,
.
, ,
. ,
, 9

. Harry Willekens, Is Contemporary Western Family Law Historically

Unique?, Journal of Family History, 28, 1/2003, 70, .
, , , ,
2011, 67.

110

 . (. 107136)

,
. ( ) , ,
10/, , ... , , , .
.
, ,11
,
,12 /

.
/ , . ,
.13

.14 ,
()
.15
, , ,16
10
2 (
2) , () .
: ,
/ ,
, , /
. , , , . .
11
, , , : . ( )
: .
. ,
, . (2010), 10,
, . (2009), 140.
12
,
, , . . (2008), 71.
13
. . , . , . , (2011),
6773.
14
. , I, 1981, 8.
15
. , , 1964, 107, 309.
16
,
( ), (

111

 , LX, 1/2012

. , in rerum natura, .
,
.
,
,
, , . .
, .17 ,
.
. ( ), ,
.
-, .18
( , ). , , , , .
,
.19 ,
,
. , , , , ? ,
. ,
. .
: . ,

)
, . ,
, 2009, 455.
17
. , , , , , 2000, 251, .
, , 2010, 48.
18
. , , 1998, 12.
, ,
. ,
( )
(
,
).
19
, ,
, .
18. 19. , , . , ,
(.
, ), 2005, 7.

112

 . (. 107136)

.
, .
, , / ,
:
. , , , ,
, , , .
.
, .
.
,
, .20 , , .
, . ,
,
.21 . ,
. , : .
:
: ...
,
.

.22
,
.
, . :
.23

2429. 2008. 20
,
, ,
, (. ). ,
.
. .
, ,
. (. ), , 2009,
1117.
21
, ,
(. ), , 2009,63
71.
22
. , , 2002, 83, 5859.
23
. , , 2009, 7778.

113

 , LX, 1/2012

, 24 . .
( , . ).
, ,

,
.25

prima facie: ,
/ .
:
. ,
.26 ,
. .
. 27 , ,
.28 . ,
. .

, (,
24
,
. .
. .
25
.
. ( ,
), , ,
, .
, ,
(. ), 2009, 1133.
26
, ; ,
, (1. . 6, 12, 10, 23).
, , , . ,
, 2005, 81.
27
. , , , .
, , , , 2006,
211. : ,
, . , ,
1992, 111.
28
, , : Ignota nulla
curatio morbid .
( , . ..) ,
, . . ,
, 2011, 28.

114

 . (. 107136)

).
, ,
. , ()
.29 , ,
, . , , , ... ,
.30
. ,
.31 ,
.32 , :
/, , .33
: .
, , .34
, ,
( ,35
29
. . , (2009), 99, 229, 233, 234, 239, 243, 158.

, ,
, , . , , 2003, 45.
30
. ,
, ,
(. ,
), 2006, 79, 28.
31
: 1714. (10 ) 18401856. (76 ): 317 .
/ , Brenda Hale, David Pearl, Elizabeth
Cooke, Daniel Monk, The Family, Law&Society, Oxford University Press, New York
2009, 146, 159.
32
,
, Lord Ashbourne
, , . J. Herring (2004), 23.
33
. , , 2009, 21, 23, 24, 27.
34
, ,
. ,
. , ,
, 2006, 238248, 252, 267 .
35
, .
, . 50% ,
. , . . , (2009), 202. O
: ... ... ...
, , .
, . ,

115

 , LX, 1/2012

, . )
/ : , . .
.
, . ,36
. .37
, . 38
.39

.
().40
,
,
, , , , /. , ,
.41
(2007), 73, 72.
, , .
.
, ,
, . . , (2006), 9395.
:
, , . .
(1992), 117.
, . . , (2011), 455.
36
, , , , .
, , , 2004, 32.
37


, . . (2007), 629.
38
. , /,
.
39
. , . ,
, , . . , (2007), 78.
40
. , , .
e,
(. . , ), 2010, 245.
41
,
, (.
), , 2006, 7.

116

 . (. 107136)

: .
. ,
,
, , .
, , .

/ .
, , .
Eurostat-, 2003. 42 ()()
(28% ).42 , . :
() 1960. 170 ,
2006. , :
.43 ,
(Alain
Touraine), ( ,
, ),
,
.44
(
/ ) / (

, E. Badinter).45 42

. , , , .
, , , 2005, 185.
43
, 2002. 250 ,
148 , 150
, . J. Herring (2004), 79.
44
, ,
. , . ,
, ,
, (
36, 21. ).
,
(
, , , , , .
). , ,
. , , ,
, ... (),
, (, )
. , , , , , . . , (1992), 25 , 55, 61, 67, 97, 105, 107, 122.
45
. . , . , . (2011), 5962.

117

 , LX, 1/2012

() .
. /
,
( , /
pour le meilleur et sans pire). ,
(Singley).
.
, , , .
/
. , ,
. (social exchange theory),
,
. , (,
, .) .
, .
, .
, , , .
/ ,
.46 . , , ,47 ,
.48
(
) .49
- : (115
46

:
: ,
, . , , , 1987, 5.
: , . ,
; ,
... ,
, , .
(. ), 2010, 147.
47
:
, -, .
, . , (2007), 48.
(
), .
, (2006), 107.
48
. . (2008), 248257.
49
. . (1992), 139.

118

 . (. 107136)

50)
(
26. 2004. , ,
, ,
51).
:
.52 ,

. / ,
.53 : . .
, , (eudaimonia) .
, . / , .
(, , )
. , ,
/ : ... .
. ,
- .
-, : . .
.54
(, , )
? ,
,
,
.
, .
50
(Abneigung) E. N. M,
Neodoljiva mrnja kao brakorazvodni uzrok prema Austrijskom graanskom zakoniku,
Zadar 1902, 3 66.
51
. . (2009), 456.
52
. ,
, . . , (1992), 115. ,
, , .
. (2004), 19.
53
. , , , , 2000, 329.
54
(.
, ), 2007, 37 .

119

 , LX, 1/2012

( )
, , , ,
,
,
( ) ,
. , /
/ . ,
( ) //, .
: , , .55 .
/ .
. Primum philosophare,
deinde vivere. () (
) . , : , ...
.56 / . .57
, .
.
, //,58 .

/ . ,59
55

. . (1992), 16.
. (2007), 262, 279. . .
, (2009) 91.
57
. . (2009), 15.
58
, :
, . , (2004), 14.
.
: ,
, . , , , 2000, 118.
59
... , (., 6,33). , ,
, , , .
, , , 2005, 559.
56

120

 . (. 107136)

. , -, :
, . . , :
/ , , ,
: .60 ,
/
, , , , ( ),
()() .
.61
/, .62
,
/ , , .63 , , ,
,
.
,
60

. , , .
, . ,
, . . (2009) 13.
61
, .
, (2010), 7.
62
- ,
, , ,
. , / .
.
/ /,
. .
, , , . , .
,
. 27. , 10.
, . , (1964), 124. . . ,
, 10/2011, 527.
63
2005. , unreasonable
behaviour, , ,
, (desertion) .
: ;
, the real meals, . B. Hale, D. Pearl, E. Cooke,
D. Monk, (2009), 153, 167. , ,
, / .

121

 , LX, 1/2012

.64
65 (, -
, .).
: , .66

3. -
in rerum natura , , , , , ,
. . -
, ,
,
.

.67 ,
.
/ . , , 68 sui
generis.
, .


(. 124 ),
rebus sic stantibus (. 133
),
64

. . (2011), 248268
, . . . (2011), 265. . , , , .
, (
).
66
. . . , . , . . , , 2011, 3.
67
.

, , , , . ,
, 13/1998, , 60.
68
, . . , (1964), 109.
65

122

 . (. 107136)

(. 149 )
. , : ,
, , .69

, .
, /

(. 201, . 1 ).
70 ,
71 .
,
. : -, ,
/ . , , : ex tunc72 ex nunc.
69

(,
); ( , , , )
( culpa in eligendo culpa in vigilando).
:
( ) ? ,
, , .

, . . , (2009), 92, 93. :

, ,
. , , 1986, 84.
70
. . . (2011), 25.
71
. 62 , . ,
.
, , ,
, . , , , 1999, 294
. ,
, . . . , ,
, 2007,156. . M. Alini, D. Hrabar, D. Jakovac Lozi, A.
Kora, Obiteljsko pravo, Zagreb 2006, 79.
72
ex
tunc, . . (2009), 430 .

123

 , LX, 1/2012

.
,
, , , , .
,
. :
,
, , :73 74 ( ) ,
/ (
). , , .
, ,
. , ,
().

. (forma
dat esse rei) . lex commissoria
.

,
, ,
.75
.
. 124 , ,
73
je
, . , ,
200/2012, 17.
74
, . . 40 . 2 ,
() .
.
(
:
).
75
:
, / , . .
, (2009), 435.

124

 . (. 107136)

() .76
,
? ,
.77
(
, ,
, .), ,
, . , , ,
,
( , ) .
,
, , .
, . , compensatio
delicti. , . , . , : .78
() . ,
,
.
.79 / . :
(. 125
126)
(. 131). 76

.
, , 1981, 203 .
77
() , , .
.
78
,
. ,

. , , .
79
. , , 2005, 161; .
(2009), 113; , , , 2009, 186. : ,

,
.

125

 , LX, 1/2012

/ :
, .
, /:
, : .80
: . 130 ,
.
. ,

( ,
) . /
/?81

82
rebus sic stantibus ( ).83 :
(, ). (
/ ) 80

. ,
, ,
, ? ? :
. ,
. .
,
. , . 2005. :
; ( ,
) .

, , . . , (2009), 188191. ,
,
.
81
() (
x lege) / :
(. , , , 2000, 172 )

. 190 .
82
( ,
) , .
83
, , ,
, . . (2009), 414 .

126

 . (. 107136)

. , . 133
, .
(
, . 32 ). /
.
. ,
/ ,
.
:
.

.
, .84
, : ( /
, ;
,
,85 /; ex ante)
.
,
.86
() .87
( ) ()
84
()
().
85
rebus sic stantibus, , /,
.
86
. 1
:
, ( 2), ,
.
87
,
, ,
, . . (1964), 110 .

127

 , LX, 1/2012

( /),
(
/).
/ ,

( ), . ,
(/
) , / ,
.

.88
, .
,
.
, , ,
. ,
.89 ,
.
, , . , , :
. , , .90
, ;
( ?)
, ;
,
. , . , ,
, .
,
. ,

88

. . (2009), 362. :
;
.
89
, ibid., 241 .
90
. . (2008), 29.

128

 . (. 107136)

, de facto .
;
,
, ,91 , ...92
,

( )
( ).93
.
, .
94
animus donandi:
. ,
.
, /
: , , , , (
, ).
- : , .

:
( ) ().
91
of nonfault grounds for divorce 1969. //, . B. Hale, D. Pearl, E. Cooke,
D. Monk, (2009), 156.
92
, , , .
. (2010), 123.
93
, ,
.
, , .
. (2009), 182. , ,
.
94
: , , . . , , 10/2005, 854.

129

 , LX, 1/2012

.
, ,
/ . ,
( . 32 ). , in rerum
natura, , , . /
.
:
(, ,
, ). ,
:
, ,
/. (, , ).95
96
,
.

4. -
, , ,97
/ . /
. , , , . ,
in abstract in concreto .
( ) . , .
95

. . , , 2010, 360

.
96

, ;
; , .
97
. , versus ,
10/2010.

130

 . (. 107136)

. , ,
. ,
.98 ( ) ,
() . , ,
, , .
. 6, . 1 , ,
, .99 , , ,

/
. , ,
, .
.
100
.
. , ,
: ( . 84,
. 4 101
)
, .
98

, , 2011, 32.
, ,
, .
( , ). , , ,
(. 2
). ,
(. 11 ), . . . , (2011), 11, 25
. . ,
,
2/2011, 235262.
100
, Law Commission Report 192
(1990), it is confusing and misleading; it is
discriminatory and unjust; it distorts the parties bargaining positions; it provokes unnecessary hostility and bitterness; it does nothing to save the marriag; it can make things
worse for the children, . . Herring (2004), 9396.
101
, ()
.
, . . , ,
, .
99

131

 , LX, 1/2012

( . 84, . 2 ,

, ). , ,102 .103
, . ,
.

,
. , .
.

:
. ,
( ): ,
, , . ,

. , ,
, . ,
.
, ,
. , , , , ,
, .

. 102

.
,
. ,
, ,
, , , . .
(2004), 192 . ,
, .
103
.
, . . -, , 2005, 151. , /
, . . . (2011), 172.

132

 . (. 107136)

(
), .104
, .105
,
,
106 .
.
, , ,
. , , : .
, ,
. ,
( ), o107
.
(
) .
, ,
104
, , : , ,
, . 90% .
(,

), . Irena Majstorovi, Brani ugovor, Zagreb
2005, 62.
105
, ,

. , ? ,
, ? ?
?
: /
. , , , ,
? /
. ,
. 351 in fine.
106
, . M. Alini, et.
al., (2006), 85. . K. Zupani, B. Novak, V. nidari Skubic,
M. Konina Peternel, Reforma Druinskega prava, Ljubljana 2005, 31 .
107
, . , , 1880, 188, 193.

133

 , LX, 1/2012

.108 ,

? , ,
,
, ,
. ( ), ,
, .109

? ,
( ) ,
( , /
) .110 111 ,
, :
/ , /

.
.
,112 , ,
, ,
, . /
, .
( ,113 ),
108

,
, , .
, , ,

() (, , , , ).
109
. . , , 2007, 148151.
110
,
II. , , (,
. ..), .
111
, De
utilitate ex adversis capienda . ,
,
, . . (1987), 8.
112
. . (2009), 188192.
113
,
: /

134

 . (. 107136)

/ 114 . , ,
,

( ).
. , ,
.
. ,
, .115
,
?
, , , ?
. .
.
?

Dr. Slobodan I. Panov

Associate Professor
University of Belgrade Faculty of Law

GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE IN SECULAR LAW

Summary
The author made a detailed analysis of the grounds for divorce in
the secular and, in the expected article, in the ecclesiastical law. In meth , . ,
/ (
, ).
, , ,
, . . (1992), 168, 171.
114

. ,
/,
, (,
, )
.
115
. (2006), 8385.

135

 , LX, 1/2012

odology compatible to polymorphous marriage substance, basis of secular

marriage divorce is analyzed from three aspects. The first aspect is the one
of legal policy (in the amplitude of the conservative and liberal axiology).
The second is about the civil law background (records of similarities and
differences with the obligation and legal institutions of termination for
default; rebus sic stantibus, causes, usury contracts, etc. and hereditarylegal institutions, primarily the case of termination of life-long support
due to bad relationships of parties). The third comprehends family law
aspects (expulsion of love from the marriage vocabulary in the law; irrelevance of some causes, i.e. spouses guilt; concept of divorce by previous
Serbian Law on Marriage and Family Relations, current Law on Family
and future Civil Code).
Key words: Divorce. Conservatism. Liberalism. Contract termination. Rebus sic stantibus. Causa. Life support contract.

136