SAMPLE SBM VALIDATION FORM Name of School: ____________________________________________________ Division: ___________________________________ Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)

Thematic Area
Access (45%)

Performance Indicators
Enrolment Increase SY 2009-10 SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase: % of Inc.

Rating & Equivalent Points

Computation

Results

1 Marginal: At least 3% increase 2 Average: At least 5% increase 3 High: At least 7% increase ________ x 0.45 =

Efficiency (25%)

Dropout Rate (DR): SY 2009-10 SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Decrease: Completion Rate (CR): SY 2009-10

% of Dec.

Baseline: 7.06 1 Marginal: At least 2% increase 2 Average: At least 4% increase 3 High: Has 0 DR

% of Inc.

Baseline: 75% 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase _________ x 0.25 =

SY 2010-11
SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): SY 2009-10 SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): Quality (30%) NAT MPS SY 2009-10 SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase: % of Inc. % of Inc.

2 Average: At least 7% increase

3 High: At least 10% increase

Baseline: 76% 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase

1 Marginal: 26 50% 2 Average: 51 75% 3 High: 76 100% __________ x 0.30 =

Sub -total

Interpretation

___________ ___________ ___________

Good Better Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Good Better Best

Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of Better can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%) Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle Computation ______ x 0.3 ______ x 0.3 ______ x 0.25 ______ x 0.15

SBM Principles Leadership Curriculum & Learning Accountability Resource Management Subtotal

Weight 30% 30% 25% 15% 100%

Results

Interpretation

___________ ___________ ___________

Good Better Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Good Better Best

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas A. Performance Improvement B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) TOTAL

Weight 60% 40% 100%

Computation 2.50x0.60 2.50%x0.40

Results 1.59 1.00 2.59

Interpretation :

___________ ___________ ___________

Developing Maturing Advanced

(Level I) (Level II) (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Developing Maturing Advanced