Cortney Lollis 1 TWS 6 Lesson 1: Social Studies/Land forms

2.5

1.5 Pre Post

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Students 1 2 High 3 4 5 Middle 6 7 8 9 10 Low 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pre 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1

Post 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 2 2

Gain/Loss + + 0 + + + + 0 X + + + + X + + + 0 + +

Gain/ loss key: -: showed a loss of information from preto post- assessments +: showed a gain of information from the pre- to post-assessments 0: Showed neither a gain nor loss of information from pre- to postassessment X: Showed 0s in all assessments

Green: low student Blue: middle student Red: high student

Cortney Lollis 2

Whole group/Individuals In the table above for lesson one, 71% of my students showed a gain of information from the pre to the post assessment. .05% students showed a loss of information. 14 % of students stayed at the same level during the lesson, and .10% of students had zeroes all the way across. The results showed me that the majority, over half, of the students gained information during the lesson. During the lesson I informally assessed students, they all received a mark that they were on task. The ELL student showed progression during the lesson. This student did receive more attention during the lesson and was paired up with a very helpful student in the class. This student also received verbal directions for the project in class. The students with an IEP also showed an increase in information during the lesson. For this lesson I was also sure to group them with students who were helpful. For the first lesson the low performing student showed a zero in pre and post assessment. This student did not gain any information during the lesson. This student was given the same pre and post worksheet as the rest of the class. This student stayed on task during the lesson and seemed to enjoy the activities during the lesson. However, this student still ranked at the bottom of the class in information gained. The middle student performed as I expected. They showed little knowledge at the beginning of the lesson and received a 1. During the lesson the student was informally assessed and was on task. The student showed a gain of information from the pre to the post assessment and received a 2. This student was paired with and IEP student during partner work and stepped up to be the leader in the group. The high student in the class showed a little information at the beginning of the lesson and received a 1 on the pre assessment. This student was on task during the lesson and did show a gain of information. This student received a 2 on the post assessment. The student knew every landform

Cortney Lollis 3

at the end of the lesson. I am very satisfied by the students performance and hope to see a progression in upcoming lessons. Lesson 2: Math/factions
2.5

1.5 Pre 1 Post

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Student 1 2 High 3 4 5 middle 6 7 8 9 10 low 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Pre 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Not 2 2 0 0 Not 2 0

Post 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 In 2 2 2 1 In 2 1

Gain/loss 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class 0 0 + + Class 0 +

Cortney Lollis 4

18 19 20 21

Not 0 Not 2

In 2 In 2

class + class 0

Whole group/Individual During lesson two there were four students who not in the room. This group of students consists of three extended resource students and 1 ELL student. The analysis of the lesson show that 24% of the students showed a gain of information. 18% of students showed a loss of information. 59% of students stayed the same from the pre to post assessment, and 0% received all zeroes. The low preforming student was not in the classroom for this lesson. This student is taken out of the room during math for resource. While in resource this student is learning math, and at times the same lesson as the class, with extra help from the resource teacher. I have no qualitative or quantitative data on this student for lesson two. For lesson two the middle student preformed average but did showed a loss of information. The student had their homework turned in with correct answers so the student received a 2 for the pre assessment. This student struggled with the new concept taught in class and only received a 1 for the post assessment. The high preforming student received 2s in both pre and post assessment. They did not show a gain or loss of information, but showed that they stayed the same throughout the lesson. This student is previously known to do well with math concepts, so it was not surprise when this student excelled in the lesson I taught on fractions.

Cortney Lollis 5

Lesson 3: Social Studies/ Government

2.5

1.5 Pre 1 Post

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Student 1 2 High 3 4 5 middle 6 7 8 9 10 low 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pre 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2

Post 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2

Gain/loss 0 + 0 0 + + 0 0 + + 0 + X + 0 + + 0 X 0

Cortney Lollis 6

Whole Class/Individual During this lesson all 21 students were in the room. According to the lesson analysis 38% of students showed a gain of information from pre to post assessment. There were only .05% of students who showed a loss of information. .10% of students scored a zero for both pre and post assessment, and 48% of students show neither a gain nor a loss during the lesson. The low preforming student was part of the percentage that showed a gain of information during the lesson. This student was on task during the lesson and seemed really engaged. The students had a 0 in the pre assessment and a 1 in the post assessment. The middle student did not perform as well as I expected, but did show a gain of information from pre to post. The middle student did not seem to be interested or engaged in this lesson. This student was off task during this lesson. The student received a 0 in the pre assessment and a 1 in the post assessment. The high student showed a gain of information. This student could have tried harder on the pre assessment to receive a 2 instead of a 1. The student then received a 2 on the post assessment resulting in a gain of information.

Cortney Lollis 7

Lesson 4: Adjective/ELA

2.5

1.5 Pre 1 Post

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Student 1 2 High 3 4 5 middle 6 7 8 9 10 low 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pre 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 Not 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 Not 2 Not 2

Post 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 In 2 2 1 0 1 2 2 In 1 In 2

Gain/loss 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 Class + 0 0 X + 0 0 Class Class 0

Cortney Lollis 8

Whole group/Individual During lesson four there were three students who were in extended resource during the time of my lesson. These three students are receiving more individual help in ELA lessons. There were only 18 students present during this lesson. According to the lesson analysis, there were .17% of students showed a gain of information during the lesson. .06% of the students showed a loss of information. 72% of students remained the same from the beginning of the lesson to the end, and .06% of the students received zeroes for the pre and post assessment. The low preforming student was not in the class during this time. This student was receiving individual help from the extended resource teacher. I was unable to get any qualitative or quantitative data from this student during lesson four. The middle student performed well during the lesson on government. This student received a 2 in the pre and the post assessment. This student was on task during the lesson and was very engaged. The high performing student also performed well during this lesson. This student received a 2 for pre and post assessment. This student was very engaged during the lesson and showed a positive attitude throughout the whole lesson.

Cortney Lollis 9

Lesson 5: Science/Oobleck

2.5

1.5 Pre 1 Post

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Student 1 2 High 3 4 5 middle 6 7 8 9 10 low 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pre Not Not Not 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Not 1 Not Not Not Not Not 1 Not 2

Post In In In 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 In 2 In In In In In 2 In 2

Gain/loss Class Class Class 0 0 0 + 0 + + Class + Class Class Class Class Class + Class 0

Cortney Lollis 10

Whole group/individual There were 10 students who were not in the class during this lesson. Six of the 21 students were in GATAS and the remaining of the four students was in extended resource. This was not a great time for this lesson considering the number of students who were in the class which was 11. According to the lesson analysis, there were 36% of students who showed a gain of information from pre to post assessment. 45% of students showed not gain or loss of information, and .09% showed a loss of information during the lesson. There were no students who scored a zero on both pre and post assessments. The low preforming student really enjoyed this lesson. It was a hand on lesson and you could tell the student was trying hard to learn and gain information through this activity. This student received a 1 on the pre assessment and a 2 on the post assessment. The middle performing student received a 2 on the pre and post assessment. For this lesson, this student was one of the top performing students because of the 6 GATAS students absent. This student did very well during this activity and was very engaged throughout the lesson. The high performing student was in GATAS at the time of this lesson. I was unable to receive qualitative or quantitative data on this student.