Leadership Challenge Presentation

Leadership Challenge
Narrowing the Gap
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
360
The 360 competence review highlighted various
aspects that needed to be addressed.
Information seeking Partnership working Developing others Future focus Holding others to account
Investigation Map
Phase 1
Initial Enquiry (Under-achieving boys) Student & teacher observation Identied common factors Sketchbook Sample
Phase 2
Data analysis
Phase 3
Establish Focus group Implement strategies for support Online Learning Differentiation strategies ExtraCurricular provision Student voice
Year 7 data
Year 8 data
Student voice
Comparison Identied common factors
Investigation re-focus (All under-achievers)
Data Comparison
Investigation Map
Phase 4
Conclusions
Actions
Further Implementation
Phase1
Identifying the Problem

Initial research suggested that boys with
SEN were struggling to attain their TML. achievement was not reserved just for SEN boys: there was a large disparity between CG & TML for both boys and girls regardless of ability.
Further investigation revealed that under-
Phase 1
Objectives
Identify why students are failing to reach
their target minimum grade raising attainment raise attainment
Identify appropriate methodology for Provide staff with relevant strategies to
Phase 1
Methodology
Lesson observations Sketchbook samples Student voice Questionnaires Comparative studies Data analysis
Phase 2
Data Collection
Data has been collected through SIMs Utilised progress update information and
collated into spreadsheets for statistical analysis. source and how to handle data.
Discussed with data manager where to
Year 7 Data
50.00 37.50 25.00 12.50 0
On TG Exceeding TG Under TG G&T of which are under TG on TG exceeding TG
Phase 2
48.9% On TML 17.7% Exceeding TML 33.3% Under TML 10.2% G&T 5.9% Under TML 5.3% On TML
66% of cohort are on target or exceeding their TML. 34% are underachieving.
60.00 45.00 30.00 15.00 0

on TG
Year 8 Data
Phase 2
Exceeding TG
Under TG
G&T
under TG
on TG
Exceeding TG
52.8% on TML 13.55% exceeding TML 33.7% under TML

8.8% G&T 5.2% under TML 2% on TML
66% of cohort are on target or exceeding their TML. 34% are underachieving.
Phase 2
Summary of Data
Statistically, G&T students are not where
they should be
1/3 of cohort is underachieving regardless

of ability grouping
Near identical gures year on year

Phase 2 Summary
Data proven to highlight that
experience underachievement is occurring in all ability groups
Students are happy with their learning Assessment methodology differs across
department leading to inconsistency
Focus Group
Phase 3
11 students from KS3 Different ability groups Specically selected Appropriate for study in response to data
analysis
Strategies Implemented
Online learning Student voice Tracking sheet 1:1 teaching &
learning
Phase 3
Extra-curricular
provision (by invitation)
Impact of Intervention
Prior to Intervention
7 5.833 4.667 3.5 2.333 1.167 0
Phase 3
TMG
PU1
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Student 5
Student 6
Student 7
Student 8
Student 9
Student 10
Student 11
Impact of Intervention
Prior to Intervention
TMG
7 5.833 4.667 3.5 2.333 1.167 0
Phase 3
PU1
PU2
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Student 5
Student 6
Student 7
Student 8
Student 9
Student 10
Student 11
Phase 3
Data comparison
Students that have joined Art Club show a
markup in their attainment.
Lower ability students with SEN make Students able to maintain an already
exceeded TML
considerable progress towards meeting their TML.
Why are Students Failing to Attain their TMG? Narrowing the Gap
Phase 4
Interpretation of the National Curriculum

levels FFT data is based on English, Maths, Science and therefore is not representative of Art. Inconsistency in assessment methods Class size TMLs set too high
Phase 4
Narrowing the Gap

Introduced skills based worksheets via
online database
Invited underachieving students to extracurricular provision
Investigated how data is used to inform the

assessment of student ability.
Improvement in attainment
Phase 4
Conclusions and Actions

Visual representation of the NC levels Standardisation Invitation to extra-curricular provision FFT data does not show an accurate
benchmark assessment.
representation of student abilities in Art.
Action: Implementation of departmental

Phase 4
Further Implementation
The data collected could be used to form a
staff handbook.
Development of online learning Seminars discussing the use of data Advising teachers of current up-to-date
assessment strategies
Explaining the implications of data

Phase 4
Challenge Summary
360 considered throughout Has the gap been narrowed? Objectives attained through clear positive
data comparison
Complex learning

Leadership Challenge Presentation

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Leadership Challenge Presentation

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Leadership Challenge

Narrowing the Gap

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Comparison Identied common factors

Investigation re-focus (All under-achievers)

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Identifying the Problem

Further investigation revealed that under-

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Identify appropriate methodology for Provide staff with relevant strategies to

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Discussed with data manager where to

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

60.00 45.00 30.00 15.00 0

52.8% on TML 13.55% exceeding TML 33.7% under TML

8.8% G&T 5.2% under TML 2% on TML

1/3 of cohort is underachieving regardless

Near identical gures year on year

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

considerable progress towards meeting their TML.

Interpretation of the National Curriculum

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Narrowing the Gap

Invited underachieving students to extracurricular provision

Investigated how data is used to inform the

Conclusions and Actions

representation of student abilities in Art.

Action: Implementation of departmental

Explaining the implications of data

Anda mungkin juga menyukai