OF LESSON/ACTIVITY Sergio Rushing: Day Four/ Tug of War Relationships FEATURED STANDARD (Include sufficient detail based on the standards youre using. If youre using the CO standards, include the Standard, Prepared Graduate Statement, Concepts & Skills Students Master, and Evidence Outcomes. If you are using the CCSS, include the anchor standard and the appropriate grade-level band. Anchor Standard Reading: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. 11th Grade Corresponding Standard: Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
PURPOSE OF ACTIVITY (Think of this as your mini-rationale: What are you trying to accomplish through this lesson/activity? In your overall sequence, why does it make sense here? This is also the place to indicate briefly: 1) the principle of Connected Learning you are emphasizing and 2) how this lesson will provide extra support and/or challenge for the needs of individual learners, especially ELLs.) Young adults are faced with aspects of life that are both troubling and exciting. As these students move towards becoming adults they will gain and lose relationships. I want them to see the importance and the detriments of having relationships. What can we gain from them and how can they become something that changes aspects of their identities?
I believe students to be humans and being a human constitutes having connections with others. With their novels messages and some of my own experience, I want students to gain an understanding of how identity and relationships effect their daily lives and what inferences can be made about their characters relationships within their novels. In order to grasp the validity and negatives of relationships early on we will have students defend why they are or aren't important.
Connected Learning focuses both on a shared purpose for students and also production centered learning. My activity achieves shared purpose by allowing students to gain (as a community) a deeper understanding of relationships within the realm of their own identity. They will work in groups to achieve this. The production centered aspect of it applies to creating something visually as a group to come to a better understanding of their novels and the theme of relationships.
Auditory and visual pieces are very important to both ELLs and students with disabilities. Students who need more assistance with reading the novels are given the extra support by finding novels that suit their individual needs including books in Spanish, brail, and audio books. The activity is structured so every student has an opinion and will be challenged to participate in the activity.
MATERIALS (Include texts, handouts, special equipment or materials) Paper, White Boards, Markers, Large Sticky Notes Labtop/Videos: https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Kg_CTJP6w and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hfRHoSstJA
Dont forget to follow each lesson plan with any handouts youll distribute to students as you teach this particular lesson. If youre distributing a lengthy article like a short story or referring them to a specific website, you can just list the title or the URL. Please include brief pieces like poems, however. Also, please place assignment sheets and scoring guides for FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS in a separate section of your unit plan even though youll introduce them on a particular day.
PROCEDURES (Include a play-by-play account of what students will do from the minute they arrive to the minute they leave your classroom. Indicate the length of each segment of the lesson. List an estimate of actual minutes each step will takes.) 1: Students will be given 15 minutes to read their novels as part of the reading and writing Do Nows that are designated during this unit. 2: Students and Instructor will discuss relationships as an opened ended class after watching a Frodo and Sam LOTR video on bad and good relationships. 10 mins 3: Quick Write: What do relationships mean to my character? 5 mins. 4:Instruction on Tug-of-War activity. Four groups total. Two White boards with a line across the middle. Two groups will defend why we need relationships while the other two defend why we don't need them. Using textual evidence and personal belief. This will be done with sticky notes and their own thinking. 5 mins. 5: Tug-of-War Activity. 40 mins 6: Reflect as a class. Highlights. 10 mins. 7: Additional writing to original prompt: What do relationships mean to me? 5 mins. 8: Bring up writing response on the forums and housekeeping stuff.
ONGOING ASSESSMENT (Describe what youll do to determine whether or not students achieved the purpose described above.) The students will be putting in their comments and arguments as the activity is going on. I will be spectating and challenging ideas. I want my student to answer the question What does relationships mean to my character at the begin gin of class what do relationships mean to me at the end of the activity. This will be collected at the end but the prompt will be given in the beginning. They will also be having an online discussion regarding relationships and identity which is student lead.
REFERENCES (Include a brief citation if youve adapted an activity/ materials from another source.) My only reference is Making Thinking Visible by Ron Ritchart, Mark Church, and Karin Morrison. 199-207 Sample Lesson Plan for In-Class Activity: Silent Discussion
DAY OF UNIT & NAME OF LESSON/ ACTIVITY DAY 7: Silent Discussion CCSS ANCHOR STANDARDS AND GRADE-LEVEL BAND Speaking and Listening Anchor Standard #1: Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
11 th -12 th grade-level band: discussions (one- on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 1112 topics, texts, and issues, building on others ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
a. Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well- reasoned exchange of ideas. b. Work with peers to promote civil, democratic discussions and decision-making, set clear goals and deadlines, and establish individual roles as needed. c. Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives. d. Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or complete the task. PURPOSE OF ACTIVITY This activity will help students engage more actively with a text through written responses in the silent discussion and verbal participation in the whole-class share. This will be the first experience with a literacy routine we will revisit in the remainder of the unit and throughout the year. The activity emphasizes a shared purpose for learning by giving students the opportunity to address key questions and ideas in the assigned texts. It should also prepare ELL students to participate verbally in English by allowing them to first rehearse their ideas in writing on the large sheet of paper and their sticky notes. They should use as much English as possible, but can incorporate some native language as well if they dont know the English vocabulary necessary to complete their thought. MATERIALS Large sheets of paper with prompts in the center, tape, markers, sticky notes
PROCEDURES 1. Before class, arrange desks and chairs into small groups before class and put a put a large piece of butcher paper in the center of the group. Each group will be responding to a different prompt. (See attached.) 2. Welcome students to class, ask them to sit at one of the small groups, then go over the Daily Log. Review the protocol for the Silent Discussion and take any questions students might have. (10 mins.) 3. Ask students to review the text (which they should have read the night before for homework) and to respond silently to the prompt on the big sheet of paper at the center of their table. Using the provided markers, students can write comments or questions, make connections, etc. Model this first on the doc camera, if necessary, using one of the prompts you have provided on one of the big sheets of paper. (20 mins.) 4. After all students at the table have had a chance to respond to the prompt at their table, instruct them to post their sheets of paper on the walls around the room. (5 mins.) 5. Give each student a few sticky notes and explain that they will be taking a Gallery Walk. At each poster, they should read the groups comments and then write a comment of their own on their sticky note and post it near a related idea. Model first, if necessary. (15 mins.) 6. After students have used all their sticky notes, ask them to return to their original groups to read what others have written on their posters. They should discuss the comments and decide on a question or comment that pushed their thinking to share out with the whole class. What did they learn about the topic that they didnt know before? (10 mins.) 7. Share out one table at a time, asking students to carry the discussion as much as possible. (20 mins.) 8. If time permits after all groups have shared, ask students to complete a ticket out the door, describing how the silent discussion process influenced their thinking about the prompt at their table. (5 mins.) ONGOING ASSESSMENT Students will submit their tickets out the door for completion points. Students will not be formally graded on their contributions, but I will observe their discussions and keep track of participation. REFERENCES Adapted from Facing History and Ourselves website: http://bit.ly/1hhp7DN TABLE TOPICS
Table #1 Meeno Rami recommends that in order to thrive, teachers should try to make their classrooms joyful places where students and teachers can engage in vulnerable learning.
What questions, reactions, or feelings, does this recommendation raise for you? How will you follow Meenoos advice when you have your own classroom?
Table #2 Meeno Rami recommends that in order to thrive, teachers should try to make their classrooms joyful places where students and teachers can engage in vulnerable learning.
Do you think our classroom feels like this kind of space? Why or why not? Over the next few weeks, how can we make our classroom a joyful place where vulnerable learning can occur?
Table #3 Meenoo Rami recommends that in order to thrive, teachers should connect with a few hopeful people and engage in solution-oriented conversations.
How will you find mentors and professional networks that will help you do that? How will you surround yourself with others who will help you elevate your practice?
Table #4 Some us like the autonomy that comes with our classroom life; we can choose to close the door and live in our little corner of the world. However, when we do this, we take away the chance for us to learn from others near and far from us. Plus, if we want our students to be collaborative problem-solvers that our increasingly complex world requires, we must model this mode of learning for them (Thrive, p. 40).
What questions, reactions, or feelings, does this recommendation raise for you?
Table #5 Meenoo recommends that you find mentors who will help you:
1. see whats possible in your practice 2. fine-tune your instruction 3. dare you into new work 4. find community 5. see whats possible in your writing life 6. share your work publicly 7. stay balanced in your life
What questions, reactions, or feelings, does this recommendation raise for you?
Erika Kuijpers (Ed.), Judith Pollman (Ed.), Johannes Müller (Ed.), Jasper Van Der Steen (Ed.) - Memory Before Modernity - Practices of Memory in Early