TPE 1: Pedagogical Skills Observer Commentary Elementary Core Practices Opening move Questioning and responding Secondary Core Practices Engaging students in rigorous content High Level Tasks, Concept Maps Engaging students in discourse Learning Cycle ?s, Think-Pair-Share Providing Equitable Access to Content Form. Assessment, Word Bank/Wall Developing a positive classroom ecology Opening/Closing Rout, Comm Circle
TPE 2: Monitoring Student Learning Checking for understanding Asking & answering relevant questions Other TPE 3: Use of Assessments Use of criteria/rubric Taking formal assessment Completing projects Student presentations Other TPE 4: Making Content Accessible Accessing prior knowledge Referencing lived experiences Scaffolding Other TPE 5: Student Engagement Student participation Culturally relevant materials Other TPE 6: Developmentally Appropriate Differentiation Use of media & technology Other TPE 7: Teaching English Learners SDAIE methodology Academic vocabulary Other TPE 8: Learning About Students Community building activities Other TPE 9: Instructional Planning Lesson plans Agenda communicated to students Other TPE 10: Instructional Time Starting and ending class Transitions Other TPE 11: Social Environment Inviting and clean; safe Student work displayed Caring environment Other TPE 12: Professional, Legal, & Ethical Classroom management Teacher speech: clear, pace, warm, tone
TPE 13: Professional Growth TEP portfolio Daily reflections
Observation Focus:
Sarah Patterson March 4, 2014
Irene Villanueva Rowan Elem., Ms. Carrillo 5 th grade
Students entered the room after recess. Sarah went to the front of the room to illustrate table groups, roles for each member of the group in accordance with their seating arrangements. She reviewed the roles: paraphraser, squeezer, questioner, writer, verifier.
She informed the group she would read a story aloud to the group, Jumanji, and informed students to take out their reading text, and open the book to page 470. She mentioned that they would read a different story than her Read Aloud, and informed the group that she saw similarities between the two stories, and they would compare the two stories today.
A couple of students mentioned that they were familiar with the story through a movie and video game. Sarah acknowledged that they may have seen a different version of the story as movies are sometimes different from the original. She remained standing to read the story, showing illustrations on each page to the group as she read. She walked through the room to pass by various table groups, holding the book open for students to see the illustrations as they listened quietly to her reading. The majority of students were attentive and appeared interested in the text, just a couple of students turned away or appeared uninterested. Sarah read.
After the Read Aloud, Sarah briefly reviewed the story. She wrote on the board polarity, and asked students if they know the definition of the term. A student called out poles. Sarah mentioned the magnetic poles, and advised students that in this case, it means pull together and she wrote the definition on the board. She asked if anybody knows what a gyroscope is. No one answered, Sarah asked has anybody ever used a gyroscope? No one, why not? She wrote on the board, equipment that maintains direction. She wrote, malfunction and not working. Asked if a student who speaks Spanish sees another word in the word malfunction. A student volunteered mal. Sarah asked what does it mean? The student responded, bad. Sarah prompted the students, Can you think of as bad functioning? She also asked if the story is science fictions, why, and can you make an argument why Jumani, story might be science fiction? A student volunteered, it doesnt have anything to do with technology, or future.
Sarah noted that students were going to create a conclusion chart, drawing conclusions, and citing evidence. She called for an individual student to read aloud. She asked comprehension questions about the reading, and asked if students thought they saw
Questions/Suggestions
TPE 9 Lesson plan
TPE 1 Opening
TPE 4 student experience outside of school
TPE 6 developmentally appropriate
TPE 4 scaffolding
TPE 7 academic language
TPE 5 culturally relevant connection
TPE 7 English Learners
TPE 4 prior knowledge
TPE 2 monitoring student learning
Observations/Commentary/Scripting
relations to their own experience, suggesting their relations with brothers or sisters. Students acknowledged, yeah. Sarah called for another student to read aloud. She asked comprehension questions and inference questions, i.e., how do you know?
She advised students that they would read silently 10 minutes. After they read silently, Sarah directed students to begin their small group work. Students talked about the various roles and who had not taken the various roles. Sarah called for students attention and reminded them they only needed the paraphraser and squeezer. In one group, a student realized her role, oh I need to summarize, and she began reviewing the text with her group. Another student mentioned, Im the squeezer. In that group, the Questioner, asked What did the gravity belt..? Sarah called for students attention to remind students they could talk in quiet voices because volume was becoming too loud.
Sarah monitored the class, talking with small groups, reminding or prompting them of the next task, illustrating the story. She gave each group strips of paper on which to illustrate a scene from the story. She wrote on the board, Storyboard, sequencing, scenes. In their small groups, students talked about the various events from the story, and who would draw which scene. Sarah talked with the table groups to remind them they had only a minute left and keep them on task.
She called for students attention, asking the whole group what are they [characters] going to do? and prompted students to make prediction how do you think theyre going to finish the game? She drew attention to polarity of gravity in the text, and referred to science fiction elements, such as future and space. Sarah led the discussion, continuing to prompt students to compare the two stories.
She advised the group to put their texts away, informing them they will continue their story board illustrations tomorrow. She encouraged students to keep thinking about the comparison for tomorrows discussion. She noted that she was rewarding students with marbles for their collaborative work and for reading silently.
Debrief: I want to say that Sarah has a very nice demeanor with the students, she appears comfortable and confident with the students. She has a good Teacher voice, speaks clearly and has a natural tone when she speaks with the students. Students in turn, respond appropriately and actively engage in the lesson/activity.
In our debrief Sarah commented on her lesson, working out the various participant roles in the activity, i.e, the squeezer. She noted that because the room configuration had changed, students were somewhat confused about which role they would have for the activity since they were assigned by their seating arrangements at their table groups. Sarah also noted that ideally, she would have started the activity two weeks earlier in order for students to have an opportunity to experience each role. She commented that in the future, she would like to provide opportunity for students to illustrate their work, and spend more time and variation in the activities.
We also talked about the fact that she tried something different and would like to develop the literature circles in the future. Sarah noted that she investigated various resources to provide a variety of effective reading strategies for the students. I encourage and compliment her efforts.
Sarah is developing very well in her student teaching placement. She attempts diverse and engaging participant structures, and encourages students to interact with their peers and the text. I look forward to seeing Sarah grow.