0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
1K tayangan5 halaman
1. The document evaluates the truth and validity of three arguments using the step-by-step process outlined in the text.
2. The first argument that "nuclear power is a threat to world peace" is analyzed and found to contain a false premise that is revised.
3. The second argument about social security weakening causing poverty is also analyzed and found to make unsupported assumptions, so it is revised to add validity.
4. The third argument that "power must be evil because it can corrupt people" is examined and deemed to overgeneralize, so a revised statement is proposed, though validity issues still remain.
1. The document evaluates the truth and validity of three arguments using the step-by-step process outlined in the text.
2. The first argument that "nuclear power is a threat to world peace" is analyzed and found to contain a false premise that is revised.
3. The second argument about social security weakening causing poverty is also analyzed and found to make unsupported assumptions, so it is revised to add validity.
4. The third argument that "power must be evil because it can corrupt people" is examined and deemed to overgeneralize, so a revised statement is proposed, though validity issues still remain.
1. The document evaluates the truth and validity of three arguments using the step-by-step process outlined in the text.
2. The first argument that "nuclear power is a threat to world peace" is analyzed and found to contain a false premise that is revised.
3. The second argument about social security weakening causing poverty is also analyzed and found to make unsupported assumptions, so it is revised to add validity.
4. The third argument that "power must be evil because it can corrupt people" is examined and deemed to overgeneralize, so a revised statement is proposed, though validity issues still remain.
PHL/!" Thi# $a$er i# %a#ed &n the in'&r(ati&n $r&vided in li#t 'r&( A$$li)ati&n li#t 1*+*,a+y+- in .h+1* in The Art &' Thin/ing+ I have #ele)ted three #)enari� a# in#tru)ted0 t& evaluate ea)h EVALUATING TRUTH AND VALIDITY E1ER.I2E * argu(ent %y u#ing the #te$ $r&)e## a# it i# e3$lained in the te3t+ I #ele)ted the '&ll&4ing e3er)i#e#5 1- E3er)i#e N0 6Nu)lear $&4er i# a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+ Nu)lear energy #tati&n# generate nu)lear $&4er+ 2& nu)lear energy #tati&n# are a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+7 *- E3er)i#e R0 6I' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te( i# 'urther 4ea/ened0 the elderly 4ill have t& 'ear $&verty+ There'&re0 i' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te( i# n&t 'urther 4ea/ened0 the elderly 4ill n&t have t& 'ear $&verty+7 8- 6P&4er (u#t %e evil %e)au#e it )an )&rru$t $e&$le+7 Nuclear Power & World Peace 6Nu)lear $&4er i# a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+ Nu)lear energy #tati&n# generate nu)lear $&4er+ 2& nu)lear energy #tati&n# are a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+7 In thi# $arti)ular )a#e I #ear)hed '&r hidden $re(i#e# and t& en#ure that it 4a# #tated and 4a# )lear+ 9n)e that 4a# deter(ined the ne3t #te$ in the $r&)e## i# t& #ear)h '&r err&r# that (ay a''e)t the truth+ In the very 'ir#t #tate(ent0 6Nu)lear $&4er i# a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e70 thi# #tate(ent i# indeed 'al#e a# it i# )urrently 4ritten+ I' the #tate(ent 4a# re4ritten in a (anner #& it read0 6Nu)lear $&4er u#ed t& $r&du)e 4ea$&n# &' (a## de#tru)ti&n i# a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+70 then thi# #tate(ent 4&uld %e truth'ul+ There are (any di''erent u#e# &' nu)lear $&4er that d&e# n&t $&#e a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e at all #u)h a# Nu)lear and :&le)ular I(aging and a# an alternative energy #&ur)e+ The #e)&nd #tate(ent i# a truth'ul #tate(ent #& it 4&uld %e u#ed t& argue the $&int that nu)lear energy d&e# n&t $&#e a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+ N&4 4e are at a $&int 4here the argu(ent )an %e e3a(ined '&r err&r# in validity and lin/# the )&n)lu#i&n t& $re(i#e+ The $re(i#e i# that nu)lear $&4er i# a threat t& 4&rld $ea)e0 the deter(inati&n that the #tate(ent and h&4 it i# 4ritten i# 'al#e+ ;y in#erting the '&ll&4ing #tate(ent0 6u#ed t& $r&du)e 4ea$&n# &' (a## de#tru)ti&n70 thi# in)rea#e# the $&#iti&n '&r the #tate(ent t& %e de'ended+ 2& the )&n)lu#i&n that nu)lear energy #tati&n# t& threaten 4&rld $ea)e <u#t %y )reating nu)lear energy )ann&t %e EVALUATING TRUTH AND VALIDITY E1ER.I2E 8 de'ended a# the #tate(ent ha# %een revi#ed+ Unle## the#e $arti)ular nu)lear #tati&n# 4ere %eing u#ed t& $r&du)e nu)lear 4ea$&n#0 then they 4&uld n&t $&#e any threat t& 4&rld $ea)e+ A# #tated in #te$ '&ur &' the evaluati&n $r&)e##0 that i' the argu(ent i# 'la4ed t& the e3tin)t that the (&#t #uita%le a)ti&n di#regard the argu(ent all t&gether and ad&$t a ne4 argu(ent+ ;y revi#ing the 'ir#t #enten)e in the #tate(ent0 a ne4 argu(ent 4a# devel&$ed+ Social Security System In e3er)i#e r0 the argu(ent i# a%&ut the validity &' the #tate(ent that 6I' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te( i# 'urther 4ea/ened ( the elderly 4ill have t& 'ear $&verty+ There'&re0 i' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te( i# n&t 'urthered 4ea/ened0 the elderly 4ill n&t 'ear $&verty+7 Thi# argu(ent 4a# analy=ed '&r any hidden $re(i#e# and #tated )learly+ A'ter the deter(inati&n 4a# (ade that the #tate(ent (et the re>uire(ent#0 the ne3t #tage in the $r&)e## 4a# #tarted %y #ear)hing '&r any err&r# that 4&uld a''e)t the truth+ All elderly )iti=en# in the United 2tate# d& n&t re)eive any #&)ial #e)urity %ene'it# and the initial #tate(ent# re'er# t& 6all elderly7 (a/e# the #tate(ent n&t very truth'ul5 al#& the #e)&nd $art &' the #tate(ent i# untrue %e)au#e the #tate(ent in#inuate# that the )au#e &' $&verty i# a l&## &' in)&(e &r a )ut in 4age# $aid+ There are #everal di''erent i##ue# that )&(e int& $lay 4hen #$ea/ing &' 4hat )au#e $&verty )&nditi&n#+ The #tate(ent )an %e)&(e (&re truth'ul i' )hange# are (ade that 4&uld in)lude0 6I' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te( i# )&ntinu&u#ly 4ea/ened0 then the elderly 4h& de$end &n the 'inan)ial #u$$&rt &' thi# #y#te( (ay 'a)e $&verty )&nditi&n#+ Thi# #tate(ent add# validity t& the #tate(ent and eli(inate# the a##u($ti&n that $&verty i# )au#ed %y the 4ea/ening &' the 2&)ial 2e)urity #y#te(+ Power is Evil EVALUATING TRUTH AND VALIDITY E1ER.I2E In (y la#t argu(ent the #tate(ent that 6$&4er (u#t %e evil %e)au#e it )an )&rru$t $e&$le+7 Ha# t& %e analy=ed '&r hidden $re(i#e and that the #tate(ent i# #tated )learly+ Thi# #tate(ent 4a# )&($letely %een analy=ed and )&n#idered t& (eet the re>uire(ent#+ A# the ne3t #te$ in the $r&)e## )&n'ir(# that there are #&(e err&r# that a''e)t the truth &' the #tate(ent+ The $art &' the argu(ent that in#inuate# 6all $e&$le7 are )&rru$ted %y $&4er i# a 'al#e #tate(ent and )an %e #u$$&rted %y 'a)t that all $e&$le in $&4er are n&t )&rru$t+ A valid #tate(ent 4&uld #tate that 6$&4er ha# the $&tential t& %e evil %e)au#e it )an )&rru$t a $er#&n7+ A'ter the evaluati&n $r&)e## and #ear)hing '&r validity err&r#5 the #tate(ent )an %e revi#ed %ut even 4ith a revi#i&n the #tate(ent )an #till have validity i##ue#+ There are #till #&(e i##ue# that are in >ue#ti&n and (ay #till 'ail in )ertain area#+ The >ue#ti&n &' the u#e &' the 4&rd 6evil70 d&e# )&rru$t ne)e##arily (ean that a $er#&n i# evil+ There are (any $e&$le 4h&( have d&ne thing# that are )&n#idered )&rru$t %e that d&e# (ean that they are (ean #$irited &r evil+ A'ter )&ntinue# evaluati&n I have de)ided t& thr&4 the )urrent #tate(ent &ut %e)au#e &' the a(&unt &' 'la4# in thi# $arti)ular in#tan)e and )&n#tru)t a di''erent #tate(ent+ 6?hen $&4er '&r the u#e &' evil d&ing#0 it (ay )&rru$t the individual inv&lved+7 References EVALUATING TRUTH AND VALIDITY E1ER.I2E ! Ruggier&0 V+R+ ,*@1*-+ The art &' thin/ing+ A guide t& )riti)al and )reative th&ught ,1@th ed+-+ : Pear#&n Edu)ati&n+