P r o c e e d i n g s o f t h e S y mp o s i u m s p o n s o r e d b y T h e Ge o l o g y Di v i s i o n o f Cl M, a n d h e l d i n Mo n t r e a l , Q u e b e c , Ma y 1 O - 1 1 , 1 9 8 6 Edi t ed by M. Dav i d, R. Fr oi dev aux , A. J . Si nc l ai r and M- Val l 6e THE CANADI AN I NSTI TUTE OF MI NI NG AND METALLURGY 135 A COTTPARATIVE STUDY OF GMSTATISTICAL AI{D COTil/ENTIONAI, HETHODS OF ESTTilATTNG RESER\IES AND QUhLrrr IN A THIN @AL SE,AT'T P. J. HANNON and Nova Scotia Elepartment of Mi nes and Erergy ABSTRACT Thi s paper gi ves the resul ts of a compari -son of three methods of esti - mat i ng coal r eser ves and qual i t y ( ash, sul phur and energy content) at the now mined out Novaco Poi.nt Aconj. opencast mi ne i n Cape Breton, Nova Scoti a. The accuracy i n predi cti ng the reserves and qual i t y of t he i n si t u coal r esour ces, as wel l as t he accur acy i n sel ect i ng economi cal l y mi neabl e coal is compared with the tonnage and qual i t y of coal act ual l y mi ned. The three esti mati on techni ques compared were: 1rc1-ygon; i nver se-di s tance- squared wei ghti ng; and kr i gi ng. The coal r eser ve was f i r st est i - mated usi ng di amond dri l l hol e data avai l abl e pri or to the commencement of mi ni ng. Thi s study found that al l esti mati ng techni ques overesti mated the tonnage; the polygon method bY 23* | the i nverse-di stance-squared by 26* and kri gi ng by onl y 12*. A second est i mat e usi ng al l avai l abl e dr i l l hol e dat a was made, and agai n the three methods overesti - nated the tonnage, thi s ti me bY 1 4t ' 1 1 t a n d 4 t . The accuracy i n sel ecti ng econom- i cal l y mi neabl e coal was st udi ed i n one area. The tonnage actual l y mi ned vtas computed f rom channe I sample s taken duri ng the mi ni ng cycl e. Thi s \'ras comlnred to the esti'rnated tonnage predi cted by the three methods, agai n usi ng dr i l l hol e dat a avai l abl e pr i or 1985 CI M Sl t mPosi um Or e r eser ve est i mat i - on: met hods, model s and r eal i t Y. H. G. SHERWOOD Techni cal - Uni versi ty of Nova Seoti a t o mi ni ng and t hen al l avai l abl e dr i l l hol e data. A11 three methods i ndi - cated a reasonabl y cl ose approxi mati on of the tota1 amount of coal avai l abl e however , t he i ndi vi dual bl ock est i - mates were superi or when predi cted by the i nverse-di stance-squared method and kr i gi ng. The importance of a sound geolog- i cal base i s emphasi zed. The coal i s found i n the Pennsyl vani an l tori en Group Sydney t' tain ( garbour ) Seam . At Poi nt Aconi , the SYdneY Mai n Seam i s actual l y two seams separated by a thi n mudstone parti ng. The top seam i s l ocal l y absent , ei t her because of er osi on or non dePosi t i on. The fai l ure to take the di sconti nuous nature of the top seam into account woul d l ead to a consi derabl e over- est i mat i on of t he coal r eser ve. RESU![E Ce papi er donne l es r6sul tats d I une comparai son de troi s rnethodes d t esti mati on des reserves de charbon et de l eur qual i t d ( cendr e, souf r e et contenu cal ori fi que ) a l a mi ne de Novaco a Poi nt Aconi a CaP Bretont Nouvel l e- Ecosse. Lr exact i t ude des pr edi ct i ons des r 6". t r r . s et l e qual i t d des r esour ces "i n si t u" de char bont aussi ql ue 1r exaeti tude a sel ecti onner le charbon qui est dconorniQU r sont compares avec l e tonnage et qual i td du charbon mi ne en rdal i t5, Les troi s techni ques comparees sont : la mdthode des lnlYgiones; l a mdthode des di stances 136 car r d i nver ses l a m6t hode geost at i st i que de kri geage , Les r eser ves de char bon ont 6t 6 premi drement estj -m6es avec l -es donnees de forage qui etai ent connues avant l _e commencement de mi nage. Cette dtude a / trouve que toutes l es methodes ont suresti me l e tonnaget l a methode des pol ygones par 23t r . l a met hode char gd des di st ances ""r r J" i nver ses par 262 | et l a *6thod" de kri geage par seul ement 12*" Une seconde est i mat i on, ut i l i sant toutes l es donnees de forage connues, / . / - a et d f ai t e o et l es t r oi s mdt hodes ont encore suresti mds l es r6"*rrre=, cette f oi s par 14* , 11* , et 4* . Les esti mati ons de qual i tJ du char bon ( cendr e, souf r e et cont enu cal ori fi que) i ndi quent un model e sem- bl abl e, quoi que l es val eur s est i mds et l es val eur s r eel s sont pl us pr es, avec 1r exceptj -on du contenu de eendre . Lr exact i t ude de l a s5l ect i on du charbon economi que a 6td etudi J dans un endroi t. L tonnage qui a 6td mi n6 a 6t6 eval ud avec l es donnees des echant i l l ons en voi esn pr i s en cour s de mi nage. Un comparai son entre ce resul tat et l es tonnages esti mds par l es t r oi s *6t hod. " a 6& f ai t e r n se ser vant des donnees de f or aEes ut i l i s- abl e avant l e mi nage, et de t out es l es donndes de f or age ut i l i sabl es. Les troi s mdthodes ont toutes i ndi qudes un approxi mati on rai sonnabl e pour l e t onnage, mai s l es est i mat i ons des bl ocs i ndi vi duel s sont r nei l l eur s avec l es *6thod*s des di stances carr6s i nverses et du kri geagre . Lr i mpor t ance dr un base gSol ogi que solide est appuyd. T-,e charbon se trouve dans l e groupe Mori en, de I' Age Pennsyl vani an, dans l a couche Sydney I r {ai n ( havr e) . A Poi nt Aconi , l a couche Sydney t{ai n est en fai t deux couches, ="p.r6s Par une mi nce couche argi l d . L6l couche en haut n I est pas cont i nue, a cause de 1t dr osi on ou parce que le charbon nr a pas 6t6 depose a cer t ai ns endr oi t s. A\ def aut de f ai r e at t ent i on a ce di sposi t i on di scont i nu de I a couche sup6r i eur e, un sures ti mati on consi der abLe INTRODUCTION The purpose of thi s paper i s to eval uate the coal reserve esti mati .on techni que used i n Nova Scoti a and to pr esent t he r esul t s of a det ai l ed com;rari son of esti mati on methods f,or the coal reserve of the Novaco Poi nt Aconi opencast coal mi ne " Novaco Poi nt Aconi mi ne i s near the western edge of the Sydney coal - f i el dr or Boul ar der i e I s1and, appr oxi - mat el y 18 km nor t hwest of Sydney, Nova Scot i a ( r i gur e 1 ) . The coal mi ned i s from the Sydney Mai n (Harbour) seam, one of the mi neabl e seams of the 2000 m thi ck r Pennsyl vani an age Mori en Group. Bet ween 1 9BO and ear l y 1 985, 875 578 tonnes of thermal coal were shipped from the mine to the Lingan generati ng stati on of the Nova Scoti a Power Corporati on, The wei ghted aver- age qual i ty of thi s coal over the fi ve year per i od was 24. 75 t al Bq ( 1O , 642 Bt u/ l b" ) , 4. ' 79* s ul l phur and 16. 11t as h. The ori gi nal tonnage and qual i tY esti mate for the rni ne was 925 300 t onnes of coal gr adi ng 27 . 45 MJ / kg , 5. 0t sul phur and 1 6. 4t ash. The cl ose agreement between the esti mate and the actual val ues i s sornewhat mi sl eadi ng ' The ori gi nal - overal l stri p rati o was esti mated to be 1' l . 4: 1 ( U3/ t onne coal ) ; however , t he act ual r at i o was cl oser t o 16: 1. The hi gher stri p rati o was requi red to make up for thinner than expected coal i n the ori gi nal Pl an drl o I n August of 1 983 a di scussi on paper on the appl i cabi l i ty of usi ng geostati sti cs to the Sydney coal fi el d was r el eased bY CAI {I ' i ET ( 1) . Thi s paper used data from the Novaco Point Aconi pi t to obtai n a kri Eed maP of the coal thi ckness, and suggested that the esti mati on techni que mi ght be use- ful as a rnapping aid fot the geoteeh- ni cal f eat ur es of t he coal f i el d. The Nova Scotia Department of l' lines and Energy and the Techni cal Uni versi ty of Nova Scotia ( tmqs ) undertook a com- parati ve study of reserve esti rnati ng methods usi ng the Novaco Poi nt Aconi dr i I l hol e dat a. r5*er. r"s de charbon resul t erai t . des 137 F i g u r e 1 . GEOLOGICAL FRAMEI{ORK The Novaco point Aconi reserve occurs i n the Sydney D.tai n Seam, near the western edge of the Sydney coal basi n. The Sydney Mai n Seam i s one of a dozen si gni fi cant coal seams i n the upper part of the pennsyl vani an Mori en Seri es of Westphal i an C and D age ( 2, 3) . Fi ve ki - l omet er s t o t he west , the Pennsyl vani an i s i n faul t contaet with the precambrian George River Series and the Cape Breton ltighlands ( 2) . ttre coal secti on di ps gentl y to the northeast under the Atlantie Ocean. ttre axis of ttre Boisdale anti- el i ne trends northeast aeross the western edge of the Novaco pi t, but i n general the structure of the property i s very si mpl e. fhe Mori en Group i s cover ed by 12 t o 1 5 m of sur f i ci al t i l l l n t he mi ne ar ea. Hacquebard and Donaldson ( 3 ) reported on the environment of coal del nsi ti on i n the Sl dney Basi n and eoneluded that the eoal aecumulated from forest-moor and reed-moor vegeta- ti on i n a f l ood pl -ai n envi ronment L E G E N D f r - I l ' , l o r i e n Se r r e s , Pt y c h o c o r p u s u n r t u s t o n e { An l h r o c o my o r d n e ) L l f l q r e y s c n d s i o n e o n d s h o l e , t h r n b e d s o f l r e s h w o t e r l r me s l o n e , I n l e r c o l o l e d r e d b e d s , w o r k o b l e c o o l s e o ms t , * - - l Mo r e n S e r i e s , L r n o p l e I s o b l r q u o z o n : g r e y o r k o s i c q r r t o n d s o n d s t o n e , s o me s h o l e o n c c o n g l o me r o l e , o f e w r e d b e d s , o l e w wo r k o b l e c o o l s s o ms T - l Z - l Mo r r e n S e r r e s , L o n c h o p l e r r s z o n e . g r e y c o o g l o me r o l e , o r k o s i c I ' * I g r r l o n d s h o l e , o l e w r e d b 0 d s , l h r n c o o l s e o ms charaeteri zed by rapi d subsi dence and earl y buri al of peat beds. There rdere two maj or ri vers traversi ng t-hi s f l ood pl ai n, al ong wi th numerous snaLl -er streams now preserved as sandstone channel s. The coal s r est on a cl ay bed which contain the pl-ant root syst ems" The occasi onal coal f i el d tree i s sti l l standi ng upri ght i n the coal bed " Condi ti ons were not uni form across the Basi n duri ngr the growth of t he veget at i on ( 3) ; par t s of t he Basi n were thri vi ng whi l e other areas mi ght be covered with mud. The higher ground was Located in the western part of t he Basi n ( poi nt Aconi ar ea) , and a eommon characteri sti e here i s that the seams spl i t or subdi vi de and event- ual l y pi nch out. At Point Aconi the SydneY t' tain Sean i s actual l y two se;rns seSnrated by a thin mudstone trnrting. lrhe deposi t was eut by a ri ver duri ng peat deposi ti on as evi deneed by the sand- stone channel near the eastern edge of the mi ned area ( Fi gure 2l . Fi gure 3 i s a cross-seeti on throuEh the deposi t . Cr oss- bedded sands ar e evi - \9 \' r ? ! r \ i \ , \ ^ t i l , ? l 6 IE \ - o \< 'r$e^ )-l{? !:? *i r M I N E S Po i n t Ae o n i l o c a t i o n r n a p e h o wi n g t h e g e n e r a l g e o l o g y , N o v a c o o p e n c a s t mi n e a n d a d j a c e n t c o a l r n i n e o p e r a t i o n s o dent thror.l gh much of the secti on, i ndi -cati ng a del tai c envi ronment. lftre bottorn coal horizon at Point Aconi has an ari ttrrnetic average thick- ness of 0. 65 m as measur ed f r om dr i l l hol e sampl es. The top seam averages ( f r om dr i l l hol e sampl es) 0. 43 m i n t hi ckness but i s onl y l oeal l y pr esent , general l y i n the eastern part of the mi ne area. Where the parti ng i s pre- sent , t he par t i ng var i es f r om 0. 03 m t o 1. 23 r r r eyr i t e i s common at t he top of the coal seams and i n the part- ing " tlost of the sulphur comes f rom pyrite, although some couLd come from cal ci um sul phat e mi ner al s l qypsum) . At the Li ngan Mi ne, Agterberg and Chung (4) found that the top 25 em of 138 Fi g u r e 2 . ( We s t h a l f ) a 2.21 m secti on of the Harbour Searn ( Sydney iltain seam ) had 3 . 7 3* sulphur ' whi l e the remai nder of the secti on cont ai ned 2. 5*. Sul Phur i n t he t oP sect i on was der i ved f r om pyr i t e ( 71t ) ' organi cs (ZZ*) and gypsum ( 7t ) . The l oroer ' ! .96 m of the seam contai ned onl y pyr i t e ( Sgt of t ot al sul phur ) and or gani c sul phur ( 4t t ) . The ash content of the coal- at poi nt Aconi i s vari abl e r i ncreasi ng from the niddle of the mined area to the east and west. Ni l r the western edgre of the mined area the ash content approaehes 30t, as the top seam di s- appears through pi nch out or erosi -on. The coal- from the Sydney lltain Seam is a hi qh vol ati l e bi tumi nous eoal wj - th l-oj o o rl) a td o O o rf) UJ O o rf) rf lrJ o o o (f, LJ o o F ro 2 500 2000 N t 500 N L39 o o (I) l"* IJ o o rO f- LrJ o o o ft* IJ o O tO (o Ld o o o (o Ar eol ext ent of t op seom o 200 400 l t t t . _ l met r es F i g u r e 2 . hi qh ash and hi qh sul phur, accordi ng t o t he AST! { ( 5) cl assi f i cat i on of coaLs. I.{ININc Itre topsoil and till were removed using Caterpillar 627r_ tandem-powered wheel tractor scrapers, except near the edge of the pit rv?rere Cat D-10 dozers removed the overburden. l-tining began with a down dip box-cut at the eastern edge of the property, then mi ni ng progressed usi ng al ong-stri ke strips. fhe rock above ttre coal was l i qht l y bl ast ed t o wi t hi n 0. 25 m of the top of the coal , usi ng ANFO l oaded i nt o 250 mm di annet er hol es dr i l l ed on 2500 N 2000 N I 5 OO N a 5 m by 6.' l m trnttern. A Powder factor of approxi matel y O.2 kq AHrO/m3 was used. The rock was then removed using a Bueyrus-Eri e Model - 38O W wal ki ng drag- line . The dragline rernoved the rock to wi thi n about A"2 m of the toP of the coal . The remai ni ng rock was cl eared usi ng a smal l dozer " {the coal was then mi ned usi ng a Caterpi l l ar 235 excavator, )-oadi ng i nto 10 t tandem- wheeled dunp trucks. The eoal \tas taken to the on-site plant where it $ras crushed and stacked for transport to the Nova Scotia Power Corporation gener at i nq st at i on at Li nqan. POI NI T ACONI OPEN CAST COAL MI NE ( NOVACO LI M I T ED ) N T S I I . K - 8 Ap r i l 1 9 8 5 T h e o u t l i n e o f t h e r mi n e d o u t a r e a s o f t h e N o v a c o p i t , d r i 1 1 h o l e l o c a t i o n s a n d t o p o g r a p h i c a l f , e a t u r s . SCOTI A DEPARTMENT MI NES AND ENERGY F i g u r e 3 . 140 A g r i d s o u t h - n o r t h r t h r o u g h t h e e a s t e r n c r o s s s e c t i o n ( l o o k i n g w e s t ) p o r t i o n o f t h e No v a c o p i t " AVAILABLE DATA The or i gi nal r eser ve est i mat i on for Novaco used i nformati on from three set s of dr i l l - hol - e dat a. The Department of l l i nes dri l l ed a ser i es ( 5 hol es, D- Ser i es) of hol es i n the area duri .ng the 1 960' s . A second ser i es of hol es ( t S hol es, R- Ser i es) was dr i l l ed i n 197 4, and t he t hi r d ser i es of 15 hol es was dr i l l ed and q t est pi t s wer e dug i n 1979 and 1980. On1-y the hol es dri l l ed after 1979 r"ere geophysi eal l y 1-ogged. The average core recovery i n the coal secti on rdas i n the order of 80*. A further 28 di amond dri 11 hoLes were dri l l ed i -n 1 980 and 1 981 and, i n addi t i on, r ot ar y holes vrere dri lled through the coal pri or to each bl ast to test for the top of ttre coal hori zon. Tabl e 1 summari zes the dri l l hol e data avai l - abl e for ttre reserve esti mates. The data avai l abl e for the reserve esti - nate i .s certai nLy l -ess than i deal ; not an uncommon si tuati on i n the mi ni ng i ndustryt COAL RESERVE ESTII.{ATION PRESENTLY USED IN NOVA SCOTIA The Department of lt{ines and Energy presentl y uses the pol ygon method to esti -mate coal reserves r The maxi mum di stance between obeervati on poi nt s conf or ms t o t he Cl assj - f i cat i on for Coal - Resources and Reserves of Canada ( 6) . ttti s maxi rnum di stanee depends upon the eharacteri sti cs of the seam bei ng eval uated: the thj -ck- ness of the seun, the resource cate- gory, and whether or not the seam i s on shore. Por the Sydney Mai n Seam, thi s di stance i s a maxi mum of 800 m for the measured cateEoryo and 1 600 m for the i ndi eated category of resource cl assi f i cat i on. For the poi nt Aconi deposi e, the average dri l l - hol e spaei -ng at the ti me of the i ni ti al reserve cal cul -ati on was 117 m; however , t he r ange of di st ance between drill holes ltas f,ron 50 rn to over 600 rr o Even so r al l of the coal vras el assed i .n the measured category. COMPARJATIVE STUDY OF RESERVE ESTI},IATES the compari son studY esti rnated the eoal reserve and qual-ity in the area actmal Ly mi ned, usi ng ttre ori gi - nal di annond dri l l data for sul phur, ash, energy content and eoal thi ekness ( table 1 ) . ttre methods used \,tere the lnlygon method, the inverse distance squar ed met t r od ( r . D" s. ) , and t he kr i g- i ng rnethod of geostati sti es. Tabl e 2 summari zes the resul ts of the esti - mat es usi ng t he dr i l L hol e i nf or mat i on avai l abLe pri or to producti on, and the est i mat es usi ng al - 1 avai l abl - e dr i l - 1 [ FEl over bur den tr-:1 shol e " EC shot e ond sondst one hI l si rt srone IFJ ,onostone iff =-'*#' . . : . _. \ ---- +,':ii:Itn :: ji:ir, .,: j:L,.ti ji j j';.. iir':.i:#- I =' l ' t ooi r i ci i on : illr-...ji.--]fl' **..ti . .1.,:j j,t i: i ir,.. i ;i.it:.., r a..----TF 7. 2o/ o Ash 4 37o S 32 63 MJ, / k g r! 1: i . : : : . . : : : . : . : . r: : . : . j : 1i : I : -F. ! : 1: i : r: : : t 1 : i : i i : : : , : rrj i rr j r: j j i , j . : , : : : ; : i : . . . . : . . . . . , . : . : . ' r i r i . . . . . : . ' . . . . . . . . ' - No v o Sc o l i o De o o r l me n f o f Mi n e s o n d E I : i l : J j j . : ' ' . . r : . mel r es t oo No v o c o Po i n l Ac o n i Op e n c o s t C o o l Mi n e G E O L O G I C A L C R O S S - S E C T I O N P. Honnon L4L . r oo . o75 t r r nl . o50 .o2 . oo238 t rt n t o. o2 o. ol F i g u r e 4 . COAL THI CKNESS TOP SEAM FI RST HOL ES 294 44? h ( m ) COAL TH. I CKNESS TOP SEAM AL L HOL ES COAL THI CKNESS LOWER SEAM FI RST HOLES 274 4t O 347 684 h ( m ) COAL THI CKNESS LOWER SEAM ALL HOLES t 47 t 37 I ( h ) COAL ENERGY tr( 30. 20.oo h ) t 37 274 412 549 h ( m ) o.05 o.o4 o. o3 5. OO 4. OO 300 Tt n t 2.OO l . oo COAL SUL PHUR 189 284 379 471 l sr zt ' + qt c' h ( m ) h ( m ) Se mi v a r i o g r a m n o d e l s b a s e d o n t h e d r i l L h o l e d a t a a v a i l a b l e p r i o r t o t h e p r o d u e t i o n d e e i s i o n ( f i r s t h o l e s ) a n d o n a l l a v a i l a b l e d r i 1 1 h o l e d a t a . Th e s e mi v a r l o g r a n s f o r a s h , e n e r g y a n d s u l p h u r a r e b a s e d o n t h e f i r s t d r i l l h o l e s o n l y . T h e l a t e r h o l e s we r e n o t a s s a y e d f o r t h e e e v a r i a b l e s . h ( m ) r 37 274 412 549 686 h ( m ) r42 TABLE 1 ST'UI{ARY OF NOVACO POINT ACONI OPENCAST I'IINE DRILL }IOLf, SAHPLE DATA - - * No t p r e s e n t NA * i No t a s s a Y e d H o l e Nu n b e r S e a m r h i ? k n e s s ( m) . To p I Bo t t o m I A s h ( r ) s u l p h u r ( t ) E n e r g Y ( l . { J/ Ks ) D 2 3 D 2 4 D 2 5 D 2 6 D 2 7 R - 1 R - 1 8 R - 1 8 R - 1 C R - 2 R - 2 B R - 2 B R - 3 R - 3 R - 3 8 R - 4 R - 4 8 R - 4 8 R - 4 C R- 5 R- 5 R - 5 8 R - 5 8 R- 6 R- 7 R- 8 R- 9 F 1 - 7 9 ' t - 7 9 2 - 7 9 2 - " 1 9 3 - 7 9 4 - 7 9 4 - 7 9 5 - 7 9 6 - 7 9 7 - 7 9 7 - 7 9 B- ' t 9 9 - 7 9 1 0 - 7 9 5 - B 0 6 - 8 0 7 - 8 0 8 - 8 0 1 0 - 8 0 1 - 8 1 2 - 8 1 3 - 8 1 4 - 8 1 5 - 8 1 6 - 8 1 7 - 8 1 8 - 8 1 9 - 8 1 1 0 - 8 1 1 1 - 8 1 l 2 - 8 1 1 - 8 1 4 2 - 8 1 A 3 - 8 1 4 4 - 8 1 A 5 - 8 1 A 6 - 8 1 A g - 8 1 A 9 - 8 1 4 1 O- T A ' l t - TA 1 2 - T A 1 4 - T A 1 5 - T A 1 6 - T A 1 7 - T A _ _ r I 0 . 7 3 | 0 . 5 6 | 0 . 4 1 | 0 " 4 8 I o . z a o . 5 8 | o , s s o . 6 7 | I o . s s I o . 8 0 o . G 4 | o . r z o . G s I I o . e z o . s 2 I | 0 . 7 3 0 . 1 e I o . 2 4 | 0 . 7 e 0 . 8 6 | | 1 . 1 s o . 1 6 | 0 . 9 5 o . 2 7 I I o . 2 2 o . 3 4 | I 0 . 6 7 I o . e r I o . s s o . s 2 | o . : r | 0 . 4 3 o . 4 3 | I 0 . 5 4 0 . 2 8 | 0 " 3 6 o . a 2 0 . 5 8 I o . e t I o . r z I o . s s 0 . 6 1 | | 0 . 7 3 I o . z o o . 2 4 | o . 7 e | 0 . 7 0 | 1 . 2 6 o . s o I o . e a o . 4 s I o . e s o . 4 6 | O . 6 5 I r . z a o . 4 s I o . 6 0 o . 4 s I o . e o o . 5 0 | o . 6 s o . 4 0 | o . 5 0 o . 4 s I o . s z 0 . 3 s I 0 . 6 3 o . 4 8 I 0 . 6 0 | 0 . s e I o . s z I o . 7 o I o . z o I o . e z o . 4 o I o . 6 s o , 3 s I o . e s o . 3 1 | o . z s I o " z r I o . s 4 I o . z s | 0 . 6 2 I o . 8 1 I o. es I 0 . 6 2 I o - z s I o . z o I o . e r I o . o a I 0 . 5 9 9 . 4 2 9 . 1 4 9 . 5 8 1 0 . 5 9 . 8 2 1 5 . O ' | 1 . 2 0 8 . 9 0 6 . 4 0 7 . O O 1 5 . 9 8 . 4 0 1 8 . O 6 . 8 0 4 5 . 5 0 7 . . 2 2 0 . 4 8 . 5 0 r 3 . 1 9 1 0 . 8 2 1 . A 5 . 9 1 0 . 3 9 " 1 0 1 1 . 7 1 6 . 5 NA 1 4 . 3 7 " 6 0 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 4 9 . 1 0 9 . 4 0 4 . 1 0 NA 1 0 . 3 2 3 . 4 2 s . 2 1 5 . 9 NA NA NA NA N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 . 1 5 I N A * * 4 . s 8 I 2 2 . 0 8 7 . A A I 2 2 . 0 8 6 . 6 o I z z . o e 5 . 3 6 I 2 2 . 0 8 2 . 2 0 | 2 2 . 0 8 5 . 5 0 | 2 e . 1 s 3 . 8 0 | 2 2 . o o 3 , 7 o I r o " z s 3 . 6 0 | 3 1 . 4 4 6 . e o I z o " r r 3 . 5 0 | 2 9 . 1 9 5 . 4 0 | z t . t z 3 . 3 0 | a o . e z e . 3 0 | e . r r 4 . 3 0 | : z . e r 1 1 . 0 | z a . t e 4 . 4 0 | : r . o o 4 . 5 2 | z a . t s 5 . 3 0 | 3 0 . 2 e 4 . 4 0 | 2 6 . 5 ' 7 4 . 2 0 | 3 0 . 9 o 3 . e o I z a . z o s . 1 o I z s . s t 6 . 2 o I 2 e . 1 3 9 . 0 0 | 2 8 . . 2 1 N A I * o 7 . 6 7 I - - 4 . 1 8 | - - 7 . 9 0 | 2 e . 2 6 4 . 2 0 | 2 s . a 7 4 . 7 3 | 2 9 . 0 8 G. 3 8 | z a . z e 1 . 4 8 | 3 0 . 5 8 N A l " o 5 . 8 4 | 2 8 . 2 3 B . T B I 8 . 7 0 | 2 2 . e 6 6 . 8 6 | 2 7 . 3 1 N A I * o N A l " o N A I N A N A I * o N A I N A N A l " o N A I N A N A I * o N A l n n N A l n a N A I * o N A I N A N A l " o N A l n o N A I N A N A I N A N A l n o N A I N A N A I N A N A I N A N A I N n N A l x e N A l n o N A I N A N A I N A N A l n n N A l n o N A I N A N A I N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L43 T A B L E 2 COMP A RI S ON OF COA L E S T I MA T I ON ME T HODS NOV A CO P OI NT A CONI DE P OS I T l 4e t hod U s i n g t h e P o I y g o n s r . D . s . r r i g i n g A c t u a I Po I y g o n s I . D . S . x r i g i n g A c t u a I Po I y g o n s I . D . S . K r i g i n g P o I y g o n s r . D . s . Kr i g i n g 2 5 . 5 5 2 5 . 9 8 2 5 . 9 1 2 4 . 7 5 2 3 . 9 4 2 5 . 9 1 2 5 . 8 9 2 4 . 7 5 5 . 5 0 4 . 5 0 5 . 1 9 4 . 7 9 TABL E 3 STANDARD TZED DI FFERENCE ( E s t i n a t e d - A c t u a l x 1 0 0 ) w + + + + + 1 5 . 9 0 5 . 0 5 8 . 3 5 2 . 3 0 3 . 3 4 8 . 1 4 + 3 . 2 3 + 4 . 9 7 + 4 . 6 9 - 3 . 2 7 + 4 . 6 9 + 4 . 6 1 T o n n a g e ( t o n n e s ) F i r s t 3 5 H o l e s E n e r g y ( MJ / K q U s i n g A 1 1 H o l e s t ' l e t hod F i r s t H o l e s E n e r g Y ( MJ I K 9 ) A l t H o l e s 144 hol e dat a. l f hr e i n si t u coaL r eser ves and qual i ty were esti mated, then an est i mat ed di l ut i on of 5t was added. ( fhi s seems a reasonabl e amount of di l ut i on, al t hough t he possi bi l i t y exi sts that trecovery ri ras actual l y l -ess than 1 00t. There are no records of t he act ual di l ut i on. ) Si nce t he di l uti on contri butes to the sul phur and ash content, these were adj usted upward 5* . The di l-ution would sub- t r act f r om t he ener gy cont ent , so t hi s was adj usted dovrrward St. The areal extent of the di scon- tinuous top seam rras p1-otted on a plan i l &pr usi ng i nf or mat i on avai l abl e af t er the fi rst 35 hol es and then repl otted usi ng al l dr i l l hol e i nf or mat i on est i - mated. ' Itre southern boundary of the seam l s the trace of the subcrop, while the northern boundary is the toe of the hi ghwal l -. POLYGON }IETHOD Tonnage and coa I qua l ity \rere esti mated by wei ghti ng the central sample value by the area of a polyEon constructed around the central sarnpl e and extendi nE thi s hal f way to adj a- cent sampl e si tes " Onl y that porti on of the polygon coincident with the area actual l y mi ned hras used. The tonnage was esti mated fi rst and then the coaL qual i ty \,ras determi ned by weighting the sample value by the t onnage. Ar r S. G" of 1. 34 was used f or al l est i mat i on met hods" I}WERSE DISTANCE METHOD Bl ocks 1 OO m bY 1 0O m were used wi th thi s nethod, i n a manner si rni l ar to that descri bed by Ot Bri an and Wei ss ( ?) . Each val ue was esti mated for a bl ock by consi deri ng al -l - sampl es wi th- i n a 400 m radi us of the centre of the bl ock. KR.IGING For the kri gi -ng esti mati on, seni - vari ograms of ttre coal - thi ckness, ash, sul phur and energy were constructed usi ng the method of, angul "ar regul ari - zati on ( I ) and the method of nectang- ul - ar r egul - ar i - zat i ons ( 9) , The semj - - vari oEram data for the coal thi -ckness, ash, sul phur and energy content are tabul ated i n Tabl e 4. Due to the i rreEul ar sarnpl e data, the experi - ment al semi - vani ogr ams di spl - ay a ver l r er r at i c var i ance, The dat a base f or a good r eser ve est i mat i on i s cer t ai nl - y non- i deaI , and at f i r st g1- ance a geostati -sti cal study woul d seem to tre a f ut i l e exer ci se. Fi gure 4 i l l ust r at es t he exper i ment al and theoreti cal vari ogrl rns r The experi mental senni -vari -ograms for the seam thi -ckness, parti -cul arl -y the semi -va.ri ogrram of the top seam, f i r st hol eso suf f er s f r om a l aek of cl ose spaeed sampl es. One way to overcome thi s l ack of sampl e data mi ght be to assi gn val ues to the sampl e gri d baeed on a geo}ogi cal eval uati on of the l ocati -on. Hovtever, it was decided to make do with the actual sampLe i nformatj -on avaj -l abl e. The theoretical variogrrarn was found by CANI4AT program 227 5 ( 9 ) ' whi ch searches for the semi -vari ogram model whi ch has the best f,i t wi th the experi mental semi -vari ogramr by l i near r egr essi on anal - ysi s. The r el - at i ve error between the esti mated and observed val ues for the model s are tabul ated, wi th the best theoreti cal semi-variogrram curve having the best f i t wi t h t he exper i ment al dat a, The experi mental semi -vari -ograms for sul phur, ash and energy were construeted usi ng these vaLues rather than the value tirnes the seam thi ckness. Actual l y both nethods were tri ed and si nce ttre aecumul ati on di d not improve the quality of the output' the simple value was used " The kriging estirnation was com- p!.eted by subdi vi di ng the deposi t i nto seven areas, then esti mati ng the sel eeted vari .abl e i n each drE r Each area was in turn subdivided i nto 15 sub-areas; ttre rni dpoi nts of these sub-areas were used to cal -eul ate the covariance between the sample area bei ng eval uated " SFLECTTON OF MINEABLE COAL One ar ea, bounded bY east i ng 61 00 L45 T A B T E 4 T HE ORE T I CA L V A RI OGRA MS US E D F OR K RI GT NG F i r s t 3 5 H o l e s C o a l T h i c k n e s s , T o p S e a n , S p h e r i c a l Mo d e l v 0 ( h ) = 0 . 0 2 6 + 0 . 0 1 5 ( g z C o a l T h i c k n e s s , L o v r e r s e a mr S p h e r i c a l Mo d e l U t r t l = 0 . 0 3 6 + o . o 2 B ( 3 ( h ) . - 1 ( h ) 3 ) 2 2 6 2 2 2 6 2 however n most bl ocks had 7 or 8. The r esul t s of t hi s conpar i son ar e t abu- l at ed i n Tabl e 5. The top seam i s di sconti nuous over of the study area. Thi s $ras appar ent af t er t he f i r st 35 hol es and was taken i nto aeeount for the esti - mati on of the coal tonnagre. Bot h t he I nD. S. and kr i gi ng rnethods were an improvement over the pcl l ygon method of esti mati ng tonnage n The overal l resul ts of each method were fai rl y good, al though the pol ygon met hod di d ser i - ous1y over est i mat e t he tonnage of bl ock 2-8, 9 and 1 0 and seri ousl y underesti mate the tonnage i n bl ock 2r 6. The I . f ) . S. and kr i gi ng methods gave reasonabl e esti mates ttrroughout the mi ned area. DTSEUSSION OF RESTILTS l l he resul ts of the compari son study appear reasonabl e wi th the except i on of t he est i mat e of ash. Al l esti mati ng methods i ndi cated a l ower ash eoal , wi th a hi gher sul phur con- t ent . thi s may be due to the i nel usi on of par t i ng mat er i al as di l ut i on and the removal of some of the sulphur ri ch coal at the top of the seam. Bot h t he I . D. S. and kr i gi ng ar e an improvement over the polygon method, although the polygon method did give a cl ose approxi mati on of the actual tonnage and qual i ty v*ren al l dri l L hol es wer e consi der ed. The polygon method has the advantage of si mpl i ci ty; a reasonabl e bal l park esti mate can be produced i n an afternoon. The method has numerous di sadvantages, the most seri ous bei ng the faet that the entire polygon is esti mated by one eentral - sampl e, i gnori ng the rel ati onshi p between sampl es. The i nverse di stance squared- moving average method does take adj acent sampl es i nt o consi der at i on; the wei ghti ng can be adj usted by shri nki ng or exl nndi ng the radi us of t he ci r cl e used f or est i mat i on. The geol ogy and sampl e var i abi l i t y t r end may be taken i nto aecount by usi ng an el l i pt i cal sear ch ar ea, wi t h t he ( h - ) - 1 ( h ) 3 ) 2 7 8 2 2 7 A 3.ll-*[gl- C o a l T h i c k n e s s , T o p S e a m, - f I t t r l = 0 . 0 1 3 + 0 . 0 2 1 ( 3 ( h ) - 1 l 2 e z t C o a l T h i c k n e s s , L o \ , r e r S e a n , S p h e r i c a l Mo d e l S t n l = 0 " 0 2 8 + o . o o s ( 3 ( h ) - 1 2 4 7 4 2 S p h e r i c a l Mo d e l S u l p h u r , S p h e r i c a l l ' { o d e l I t r t l = o . o o o + 2 . 6 4 ( 3 ( 2 A s h , S P h e r i c a l Mo d e t f , n 1 = o . o o o + 1 G - 4 9 ( 3 2 E n e r g y , S p h e r i e a l Mo d e l ( h ) 3 ) 2 m ( h ) 3 ) 4 7 4 ( h ) - 1 ( h ) 3 ) 5 1 9 2 5 1 9 h ) 3 6 0 - 1 ( h ) 3 ) 2 3 6 0 J [ t r , l = 1 5 . 6 0 + 3 . 4 1 2 ( 3 ( h ) - 1 ( h ) 3 ) 2 5 1 . 2 2 5 ' 1 . 2 and 5700 and northi ng 1 8OO and 2O5O, was chosen to determi ne the accuraey wi th whi ch the esti mati on methods couLd sel ect mi neabl e coal . The area was subdi vi ded i nto 20 bl ocksr 350 m by 25 m ( f i gur e 5) . t he tonnage of coal i n each bl ock was est- imated by the three methods and then compared to the tonnage of each bLoek as determi ned from channel sampl es obt ai ned dur i ng t he mi ni ng cycl e. fn thi s ease, the pol ygon esti - mate was made by determi ni nq the Length of the rnid-trnint line in each bLock that clme under the inf luence of the dri l I pol ygons. The l ength of thi s l i ne was rnul ti pl i ed by the t hi ckness assi gned t o t he dr i l l pol ygon and then the bl ock was assi gn- ed the wei ghted average thi ekness. A t ot al of 172 channel samples were avai labl_e . The number per mi ni ng bl - ock var i ed f r om 4 t o 1 5, 146 TABL E A CCURA CY I N S E L E CT I ON MI NE A B L E COA L 5 OF l -onEest ray i n the di -rectj "on of great est cont i nui t y. The eomput er prograami nq i s fai rl y si rnpl e and the output i s strai Ehtforwarrl . The di s- advantage of the I " D* S * method i s that i t does not take the sai uPl e vari abi l i t y of t he dePosi t j -nt o account j -n any ri gorous wd1l r The Eeol ogi cal trerrc{s are smoothed over and ver y l - i t t l e i nf or mat i on i s Eai ned from the anal Ysi s of the outPut " Areas of non delrcsitiorr. atre gi-ven the average val-ue of the sampl-es within the search ci rel e. When there are cLust er s of samP1es, t he cLust er wei ght tends to domi nate the esti rnate wi t hi n t he sear ch ci - r cl e. The kri gi -ng method does gi ve the best l i near unbi ased esti mate of, a r eEi onat r i zed var i abl e ( 8) whene t her e i s no si gni f i cant t r end t o t he dat a" Uni versal kri gi ng can be used i f there i s a si gni f i eant t r end. The use of qeost at i st i es i s l i mi ted more by the ski l l of the user than by the method i tsel f* The sel ec- ti on of the theoreti cal semi vari ogram used to kri ge the vari abl e, boundary of t he deposi t , sear ch ar ea si - ze and sel ecti on of kri gi ng rnethod al l - requi re ski l "l s that are acqui red onl y through practi ce. The software systems no\c avai l -abl e are of, conei der- abl e hel p, but even these Prograns requi re a much hi gher degree of ski l l than does a si mpl e pol ygon esti mate. tdeal l y, there shoul d be a good gri d of sampl e data so that a vari ogram anal ysi s can be conPl eted and, of course, aecess to good software and reasonabl -e cornputi ng faci l i ti es i -s essent i al . The extra effort and hi gher degree of ski l -I requi red to do a Eeo- stati sti eal studY of a dePosi t are more than offset by the output gener- ated by such a study" The variograms generated by thi s parti cul ar study indieate the discontinuous nature of the coal in the top seam n and also indicate that a regular grid wi-th dri l t hol es spaced about 1 50 m apart would have been more appropriate than the haphazard dri Ll - spaei ng upon whi eh the i nvestment deci si on was xnade. The esti mate of the tonnage, ete. 7 show"n To n n e s E s t i n a t e d Fr o m t o n n e s ( f i r s t h o l e s ) t o n n e s ( a 1 1 h o l e s ) P a n e I Ch a n n e I S a mp l e t o n n e s Po I y g o n I . D . S . x r i g i n g 1 r 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 z o q 6 0 0 7 0 0 5 5 0 1 ' 2 4 1 0 0 3 9 0 0 3 6 5 0 4 5 5 0 4 6 5 0 5 3 0 0 aeSo 1 t 3 7 1 0 0 6 8 0 0 66oo 7 7 A A 7 4 0 0 8 4 0 0 7 5 0 0 1 r 4 9 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 666'o 8 8 0 0 8 4 o O 9 5 0 0 8 6 0 0 1 , 5 1 0 1 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 0 5 0 9 3 5 0 8 5 5 0 9 0 0 0 8 6 0 0 1 , 5 9 9 0 0 7 4 0 0 E6'6'o 9 2 5 0 8 3 5 0 8 3 0 0 8 3 5 0 1 r 7 8 0 5 0 _e4qo 8 5 0 0 8 4 5 0 7 4 5 0 7 400 6 B OO 1 t 8 7 5 5 0 e_?00 8 9 0 0 8 1 0 0 tToo 68oj 6 8 0 0 1 , 9 7 3 0 0 87oj l 7 3 0 0 7 4 5 0 6 8 0 0 64. 00 6 2 0 0 1 , 1 0 4 1 5 0 4 5 0 0 . 4 4 0 0 3 8 5 0 3 4 0 0 3 6 0 0 346'0 2 , 1 2 t 2 2 , 3 6 5 0 460 2 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 B OO 4 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 4 0 5 0 3 9 5 0 2 , 4 5 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 4 9 0 0 4 8 5 0 6 1 0 0 5 7 5 0 2 , 5 6 7 5 0 3 8 0 0 3 8 0 0 6 3 5 0 6 3 0 0 7259 6 9 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 r 5 1 3 4 0 0 6 9 0 0 6t6'6' 1 2 9 p 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 t 7 2 , I L t 6 8 0 0 9 2 0 0 7 4 0 0 6 7 0 0 6 1 0 0 6 2 5 0 6 3 0 0 7 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 q 9 0 0 0 8 0 5 0 7 1 0 0 6 9 5 0 6 7 5 0 6 9 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 7 9 0 0 8 3 0 0 7 1 0 0 7 0 5 0 . 7 1 5 0 2 , 1 O 5 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 - 6200 8 0 5 0 6t5o' 6 8 0 0 68oo TOTAL 1 2 6 4 5 0 1 2 9 6 6 0 1 1 3 9 0 0 1 2 4 9 0 0 1 2 o T 5 o L47 TABL E 5 A CCURA CY I N S E L E CT I ON OF MI NE A B I , E COA L T o n n e s E s t i r n a t e d F r o m t o n n e s ( f i r s t h o l e s ) Tf i ' i l ; ; ( al "t hol es ) P a n e I Ch a n n e I S a n p L e t o n n e s p o I y g o n I . D . s , x r i g i n g 1 r 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 7 q o 6 0 0 7 0 0 6 5 0 1 t 2 4 1 0 0 3 9 0 0 3 6 5 0 4 5 5 0 4 5 5 0 5 3 0 0 a5"5 0 1 , 3 7 1 0 0 5 8 0 0 6 6 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 4 0 0 8 4 0 0 7 6 0 0 1 ' 4 9 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 6' bso 8 8 0 0 8 4 0 0 9 5 0 0 8 6 0 0 1 , 5 1 0 1 0 0 _9600 9 0 5 0 9 3 5 0 8 5 5 0 9 0 0 0 8 5 0 0 l r 6 9 9 0 0 7 4 0 0 5' eoo 9 2 5 , 0 8 3 5 0 8 3 0 0 . 8 3 5 0 1 r 7 1 , I 8 0 5 0 9 4 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 4 s 0 T?so 7 400 6-8O O 7 5 5 0 e2q_0 8 9 0 0 8 1 0 0 7 1 0 0 5 8 0 0 6 8 0 0 1 1 9 7 3 0 0 87 0j 7 3 0 0 7 450. 6 8 0 0 6 4 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 r 1 o 4 1 5 0 4 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 3 8 5 0 3 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 2 t 1 2 t 2 6 5 0 260- 2 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 8 0 q 7 0 0 2 ' 3 4 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 t s oo 4 0 5 0 3 9 5 0 5 3 0 0 4 8 0 0 2 t 4 5 4 0 0 1_1oo 3 1 0 0 4 9 0 0 4 8 5 0 6 1 0 0 5 7 5 0 2 t 5 6 7 5 0 ? 8 0 0 3 8 0 0 6 3 5 0 6 3 0 0 7 250 6 9 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 3 oo5' 2 t 6 1 3 4 0 0 6 9 0 0 6 9 0 0 1 2 6 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 t 7 6 8 0 0 e 2o9 7 4 0 0 6 7 0 0 6 r O O 6250 6 3 0 0 2 , I 7 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 -T60o -s.q19 7 1 0 0 6 9 s O 6 7 5 0 2 t 9 5 9 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 7 9 0 0 8_300 7 1 0 0 705. O 7 1 5 0 2 t l O 6 4 0 0 1- 2ooo 6 2 0 0 8 0 5 0 6 ? 5 0 6 8 0 0 6 8 0 0 TOTAL I 2 6 { 5 0 1 2 9 5 6 0 t 1 3 9 0 0 1 27- 9, 00 1 1 7 5 0 0 1 2 4 9 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 0 Thi s i s a r epet i t i on of Tabl e 5. lrl o 9 @ 148 2200 N 2t oo N 2000 N t 900 N 1800 N t 700 N T h i s f i g u r e s h o ws t l r " a r e a o f t h e d e p o s i t u s e d t o d e t e r mi n e t h e a e c u r a c y wi t h wh i c h t h e e s t i ma t i o n me t h o d s mi g h t s e L e c t mi n e a b l e c o a l . T h e s h a d e d a r e a i n d i c a t e s t h e p r e s e n e e o f t h e t o p s e a m. tll o o @ lrj C) o (\I @ t! o t - (o lrj o (o (o trJ o o ro trl o o <r (o IJ o o tf) (o F i g u r e 5 . i n Tabl e Z are the most J- i keLy val ues. A mi ni ng company mi ght demand a hi gher confi dence l i ni t for these val ues pr i or t o i nvest i ng mi l l i ons of dol l ars i n the _ venture. For thi s particular study, the company could have been 97. 5t assur ed of at l east 593 000 t onnes af t er t he f i r st 35 hol es had been dr i l l ed. The importance of a good sample data base must be emphasi zed. Aecur- ate anal yses and measurements must be obtai ned whenever possi bl e. Ttri s i s parti eul arl y true of l ow grade, l ow tonnage deposi ts where the di fference of 1 0 or 20 cm i n thi ckness of the deposi t mi ght mean the di fference bet ween pr of i t and l oss. In order to do a proper reserve esti mate, the deposi t shoul d be sampl ed on a regul ar gri d. Th dri l l hol es i n the eoal hori zon must be geo- physi cal l y l ogged and al l er i t i eal anal yses compl et ed. Geol ogi cal i nt er - pretati on must be i ncorporated i nto al l t onnage est i mat es, i n par t i eul ar when computer based estimation tech- ni ques sueh as t he r . D. S. and kr i gi ng est i mat es ar e used. EONCLUSIONS The esti mate of coal quanti ty and quality at the Novaco Point Aconi deposi t has been cornpl eted usi ng the pol ygon met hod, t he I . D. S. movi ng average method and the kriging method of geost at i st i cs. Each met hod has certai n advantages and di sadvantages. The geostati stical rnethod gave the best esti nate of the overal l tonnage and r f ! [ ] r Bot h I . D. S. and t he kr i g- i ng methods gave a reasonabl e esti mate of mi neabl e coal i n sel eet ed bl ocks. It has been shown that each .method rel i es on a grood geol ogri cal data base. fhi s data base shoul d i ncl ude al l obtai nabl e data and shoul d r ds near as possi bl e, be on a r egul ar sampl i ng gr i d. I49 ACKNOWLEDG14ENTS The authors wish to thank the Department of hergy, Mi nes and Resources for fundi ng thi s proj ect under Research Agreement Number 222, and Novaco Ltd. for permi ssi on to publ i sh t he r esul - t s of t hi s st udy. REFERENCES 1 ASTON, T. R. C. , D. l l acNEr l , and C. WHI TE, 1983r The Appl i cat i on of Geost at i st i cs t o t he Sydney Coal f i el d: CANMET Di scussi on Paper , EMR, Ottawa 2 BELL 7 W. A. 7 1 983 , Br as d I Or Sheet , Cape Breton and Vi ctori a Counti es, Nova Scot i a: G. S. C. Map 359A 3 HACA- I ' EBARD, F. A. and J. R. DONALDSON, 1 969, Carboni ferous Coal Deposi ti on Associ ated wi th Fl ood Pl ai n and Li mni c Envi ronments i n Nova Scot i a! G. S. A. Speci al Paper 114 t Er r vi r onment s of Coal Deposi t i on r pp 1 43- 1 91 4 AGTERBERG, F. P. and C. F. CHUNG, 1973, Geomat hemat i eal Pr edi ct i on of Sul phur i n Coal r New Li ngan Mi ne Ar ea, Sydney Coal f i el d: CI t { Bul - l et i n , Oet . 1973 5 Ameri can Soci ety for Tresti ng and Mat er i al s, 1 978, Book of ASTM St andar ds, par t 26, Phi l adel phi a 5 BI ELENSTEI NT H' V' ; L' P' CHRI SMAS, B. A. TATOUR and T. E. TI BBETTS, ' | .979, Coal Resources and Reserves of Canada: CANMET, E!lR, ottawa 7 OTBRTAN2 D. T. AND A. WEr SS' 1968' Practi cal Aspects of Cornputer Methods i n Ore Reserve Anal ysi s: cI M Speci al r Vol 9t pp 109- 113 8 DAVI D, M. 1977, Geost at i st i cal - Or e Reser ve Est i mat i on: El sevi er , Am s terd am 9 SABOURTN, R.L. r 1982, CANMET System for l tl i neral Reserve Erraluation: CANI,IET llining Research Laboratori es, EMR, Ottawa