Anda di halaman 1dari 53

Carleton University, 82.

583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
1
Fire Dynamics II
Lecture # 2
Ceiling Jets & Ceiling Flames
Jim Mehaffey

82.583 or CVG****

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
2
Ceiling Jets and Ceiling Flames
Outline
Review of models for unconfined fire plumes
Models for ceiling jets (temperature & velocity)
Models for response of sprinklers / heat detectors
Model for ceiling flame (flame extension)
Flames located against a wall or in a corner

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
3
Review of Models for Unconfined Fire Plume


Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
4
Unconfined Fire Plume Comprises 3 Regimes

Persistent flame (flame is present 100% of time)

0.03 < z < 0.08

Eqn (2-1)




z = height above fire source (m)


= heat release rate (kW)

-
Q
-
Q
2/5
-
Q
2/5
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
5
Unconfined Fire Plume Comprises 3 Regimes

Intermittent flame (flame present < 100% of time)

0.08 < z < 0.20

Eqn (2-2)




Flame height = height where intermittency is 50%
(Correlation - Heskestad 1983)

l = 0.235 - 1.02 D Eqn (2-3)

D = fuel diameter (m)

-
Q
2/5
-
Q
2/5
-
Q
2/5
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
6
Unconfined Fire Plume Comprises 3 Regimes

Buoyant (thermal) plume (no flame is ever present)

z > 0.20

Eqn (2-4)




Assume heat is released at a virtual point source

z
o
= 0.083 - 1.02 D Eqn (2-5)

z
o
= height of virtual source above burning item (m)

-
Q
2/5
-
Q
2/5
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
7
Buoyant Plume Model (2)

Correlations often expressed in terms of

= convective heat released rate (kW)

Radius of the plume, b (m)

b(z) = 0.195 (z- z
o
) Eqn (2-6)


CONV
Q
-
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
8
Buoyant Plume Model (2)


Upward axial velocity, u
ax
(m s
-1
)


u
ax
(z) = 1.14 (z- z
o
)
-1/3
Eqn (2-7)

Radial dependence of upward velocity, (m s
-1
)

u(r,z) = u
ax
(z) exp(-r
2
/b
2
) Eqn (2-8)
-
Q
1/3
CONV
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
9
Buoyant Plume Model (2)

Axial temperature, AT
ax
= T
ax
- T

(K)


AT
ax
(z) = 26 (z- z
o
)
-5/3
Eqn (2-9)

Radial dependence of temperature, AT(r, z) (K)
AT(r, z) = AT
ax
(z) exp[-(1.2r)
2
/b
2
] Eqn (2-10)

Average temperature, AT
ave



AT
ave
(z) = 14 (z- z
o
)
-5/3
Eqn (2-11)



-
Q
2/3
CONV
-
Q
2/3
CONV
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
10
Buoyant Plume Model (2)


Total upward mass flow, (kg s
-1
)



(z) = 0.071 (z- z
o
)
5/3
Eqn (2-12)

****************************************************************

This is probably the simplest model available.
More complex models have been incorporated into
computer models or into standards for smoke control.


-
Q
1/3
CONV
p
m
-
p
m
-
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
11
Consider a Fire Plume Confined by a Ceiling



Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
12
Unconfined Ceiling Jet
Need to model ceiling jet in order to predict time to
activation of sprinklers or heat detectors
Properties of ceiling jet depend on
Rate of heat release
Diameter of fire base
Height of ceiling (above virtual source)
Models are available (Fire Dynamics I) to predict
Max. temperature as a function of radial distance
Maximum velocity as a function of radial distance
Time to activation of sprinklers or heat detectors if
they are subjected to max. temp & velocity


Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
13
Fire Plume Confined by Ceiling
Experiments - Alpert 1972
unconfined smooth ceiling
buoyant plume impinges on ceiling
steady fires / no hot layer
variety of fuel packages
heat release rate: 668 kW s s 98 MW
ceiling height 4.6 m s H s 15.5 m

Findings
max temp & velocity close to ceiling (Y ~ 0.01 H)
ambient temp for Y > 0.125 H




-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
14
Alperts Correlations - Ceiling Jets
For maximum temperature and velcoity


T
max
- T

= 16.9
2/3
(H - z
o
)
-5/3
for r s 0.18 H Eqn (2-13)

T
max
- T

= 5.38( /r)
2/3
(H - z
o
)
-1
for r > 0.18 H Eqn (2-14)

u
max
= 0.96 { /(H - z
o
)}
1/3
for r s 0.15 H Eqn (2-15)

u
max
= 0.195
1/3
(H - z
o
)
1/2
r
- 5/6
for r > 0.15 H Eqn (2-16)


r = radial distance under the ceiling (m)




-
Q
-
Q
-
Q
-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
15
Comparison with Buoyant Plume
Temperature in Ceiling Jet
Alpert: for r s 0.18 H { ~ area of plume impingement as
radius of plume is b(z) = 0.195 (z- z
o
)}

T
max
- T

= 16.9
2/3
(H - z
o
)
-5/3

Axial Temperature in Buoyant Plume

AT
ax
(z) = 26 (z- z
o
)
-5/3

or AT
ax
(z) = 20.5
2/3
(z- z
o
)
-5/3
-
Q
-
Q
2/3
CONV
-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
16
Comparison with Buoyant Plume
Velocity in Ceiling Jet
Alpert: for r s 0.15 H { ~ area of plume impingement as
radius of plume is b(z) = 0.195 (z- z
o
)}

u
max
= 0.96 { /(H - z
o
)}
1/3

Axial Velocity in Buoyant Plume

u
ax
(z) = 1.14 { /(z- z
o
)
}1/3

or u
ax
(z) = 1.01 { /(z - z
o
)}
1/3


-
Q
CONV
-
Q
-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
17
Proximity of Walls
Alpert correlations apply provided fire source is at
least 1.8 H from walls
For fire against wall, air entrainment into plume is cut
in half. Method of reflection predicts Alperts
correlations can still be applied with

2
For fire in corner, air entrainment into plume is cut in
quarter. Method of reflection predicts Alperts
correlations can still be applied with

4

-
Q
-
Q
-
Q
-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
18
Example of Use of Eqn (2-13)
Calculate the maximum excess temperature under a
ceiling 10 m directly above a 1.0 MW heat release rate
fire. Assume z
0
= 0.


46.42
(100) 16.9
=
C 36.4 T
0
= A
3 5
3 2
max
10
(1000) 16.9
T T =

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
19
Example of Use of Eqn (2-14)
Calculate minimum heat release rate of a fire against
noncombustible walls in a corner 12 m below ceiling
needed to raise temperature of gas below ceiling 50C
at a distance 5 m from the corner. Assume z
0
= 0.



( )
3 2
3 5
3 2
12
5
12 / 4
38 . 5 50
|
.
|

\
|
=
Q

MW kW Q 472 . 1 1472 = =

( )
3 2
3 5
3 2
max
4
38 . 5
|
.
|

\
|
=

H
r
H
Q
T T

Carleton University, 82.583


(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
20
Example of Use of Eqn (2-16)
Calculate maximum velocity at this position. Assume
z
0
= 0.



6 5
3 1
max
4
195 . 0
|
.
|

\
|
|
.
|

\
|
=
H
r
H
Q
u

6 5
3 1
12
5
12) / 1472 x (4 0.195
|
.
|

\
|
=
s m u 2 . 3
max
=
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
21
Motevalli & Marks Correlation
=Thickness of Ceiling Jet

= distance below ceiling at which
T - T

= 1/ e {T
max
- T

} with e = 2.718

Eqn (2-17)


for

H* = H - z
o


T

|
.
|

\
|
=
*
24 . 2 exp 1 112 . 0
* H
r
H
T

0 . 2
*
26 . 0 s s
H
r
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
22
Yuan & Motevalli Correlation
Thermal Profile of Ceiling Jet

y = distance below ceiling (m)

Eqn (2-18)

for

AT(r,y) = AT
max
(r) when y/l
T
~ 0.25

substituting into Eqn (2-17)

y / H* ~ 0.028 [1 - exp(- 2.24 r / H*)]

0 . 2
*
26 . 0 s s
H
r
(

+ =
A
A
T T
y y
r T
y r T

57 . 2 exp 094 . 0 24 . 4
) (
) , (
755 . 0
max
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
23
Other Correlations - Ceiling Jets
For maximum temperature

AT
m
= (T
max
- T

) =
2/3
(H*)
- 5/3
f(r/H*)



Replace
H H*
-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
24
Other Correlations - Ceiling Jets
For maximum temperature





Replace
H H*

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
25
Other Correlations - Ceiling Jets
For maximum velocity

U
max
=
1/3
(H*)
- 1/3
f(r/H*)



Replace
H H*




-
Q
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
26
Other Correlations - Ceiling Jets
For maximum velocity





Replace
H H*


Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
27
Thermal Response of Heat Detectors & Sprinklers
Simple model (convective heating)

= t
-1
(T
g
- T
D
) Eqn (2-19)

T
D
= temp of detector / sprinkler link (K)
T
g
= temp of ceiling jet (K)
t = time constant of device (s)

t = m
D
c
D
/ (h A
D
) Eqn (2-20)
m
D
= mass of detector / sprinkler link (kg)
c
D
= specific heat of link (kJ kg
-1
K
-1
)
A
D
= surface area of link (m
2
)
h = convective heat transfer coefficient (kW m
-2
K
-1
)

dt
dT
D
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
28
Thermal Response of Heat Detectors & Sprinklers
If T
g
is independent of time

Eqn (2-21)

t
r
= time of activation (s)
T
Dr
= manufacturers listed operation temperature (K)
T

= initial temperature (K)



t can be characterized by devices RTI
t = RTI u
-1/2
Eqn (2-22)
RTI = response time index (m
1/2
s
1/2
)
(

T T
T T
1 n l t
g
Dr
r
t
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
29
Thermal Response Index - Sprinklers
















BSI 94/340340, Draft Code of Practice for the Application
of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to Fire Safety in
Buildings, British Standards Institute, London, p 115
(1994)

Sprinkler Type
T
T
y
y
p
p
i
i
c
c
a
a
l
l
R
R
T
T
I
I
(
(
m
m
1 1/ /2 2
s
s
1 1/ /2 2
)
)
W
W
o
o
r
r
s
s
e
e
S
S
a
a
s
s
e
e
R
R
T
T
I
I
(
(
m
m
1 1/ /2 2
s
s
1 1/ /2 2
)
)
Fast response 30 100
Soldered link 150 N/A
8 mm glass bulb 200 300
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
30
More Detailed Detector Response Model


RTI = response time index (m
1/2
s
1/2
)
C = conductivity factor (m
1/2
/ s
1/2
)
C is a measure of heat conduction from heat sensitive
element to rest of heat detector or sprinkler
RTI and C can be determined for a detector
For C = 0, this model reduces to simpler model.
Simple model is often accurate enough.
(

|
.
|

\
|
+ =
D g
D
T
u
c
T
RTI
u
dt
dT
1
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
31
Detector or Sprinkler in a Channel
Delichatsios (1981)

In channel defined by corridor walls or ceiling beams

Eqn (2-23)



Eqn (2-24)



(

|
.
|

\
|

|
|
.
|

\
|
=
A
A
3 1
b
3 1
b
max
H H
Y
0.2 exp
H
0.29

imp
T
T
6 1
max max
102 . 0
|
|
.
|

\
|
A =
b
H
T H u

Carleton University, 82.583


(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
32
Detector or Sprinkler in a Channel
Definition of terms
T
max
= Gas temperature near ceiling (K or C)
T
imp
= Gas temperature where it impinges on ceiling
(K or C). Given by Alpert Eqn (2-13).
u
max
= Gas velocity near ceiling (m s
-1
)
H = Height of ceiling above fire source (m)
Y = Distance along channel from point of impingement (m)
2 l
b
= Width of channel (m)

h
b
= Depth of channel (m)

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
33
Detector or Sprinkler in a Channel
Limits of Application

For corridors correlations hold provided
Y > l
b
(gas is flowing along channel) (a)
l
b
> 0.2 H (ceiling jet impingement within channel) (b)


For beams must also have
h
b
/ H > 0.1 (l
b
/ H)
1/3
(no spillage under beams) (c)

or combining (b) and (c)
h
b
/ H > 0.17
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
34
Time Dependent Fires
In small room with slowly growing fire, Alperts
(steady-state) correlations can ue used with


In large industrial facilities
Travel time of fire gases from burning item to
detector or sprinkler may be > 10 s
If fire grows rapidly, steady-state model may
yield overly conservative results
Q

( ) t Q

Carleton University, 82.583


(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
35
t
2
Fire Growth
Growth of fire can often be characterized as

Eqn (2-25)

t
i
= time of ignition (s)
o = growth coefficient (kW s
-2
)

Design Fires, NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code
Slow
Medium Eqn (2-26)
Fast
Ultra-fast
( )
2
i
t t Q =o

2
t 0 0469 . 0 = Q

2
t 0 1876 . 0 = Q

2
t 2 0117 . 0 = Q

2
t 3 0029 . 0 = Q

Carleton University, 82.583


(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
36
Example of t
2
Fire

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
37
Transient Ceiling Jets
Heskestad and Delichatsios (1978)

Assumed

Dimensionless time

Dimensionless gas travel time
(fire source to ceiling location)

For AT
max
= u
max
= 0


2
t Q o =

t
H
0.489 t*
4/5
1/5
o
=
|
.
|

\
|
+ =
H
r
1 0.954
t
*
g
t
*
g
*
< t
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
38
Transient Ceiling Jets
Heskestad and Delichatsios (1978)


Eqn (2-27)




Eqn (2-28)



3 4
* *
5 / 3
5 / 2
max
313 . 0 188 . 0
14 . 7
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
+

= A
H
r
t t
H
T
g
o
3 2
* *
63 . 0
5 / 1 5 / 1
max
313 . 0 188 . 0
) / (
29 . 0
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
+

=
H
r
t t
H r
H
u
g
o
t
*
g
*
> t
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
39
Transient Ceiling Jets
Heskestad and Delichatsios (1978)

For AT
max
= u
max
= 0

For Early on, fire is small & transport time
relatively long, transient effects are
prominent. Eqns (2-27 & 28) apply.

For Later, fire is large & transport time
relatively short, transient correlations
revert to Heskestad and Delichatsios
steady-state correlations (p 2-23 & 25)







t
*
g
*
>> t
t
*
g
*
> t
t
*
g
*
< t
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
40
Example: Sofa p 2-35 with t
i
= 0 in room with H = 5 m.
Calculate AT
max
and u
max
for r = 4 m and t = 120 s.


11.41 120
5
) 1736 . 0 (
0.489 t*
4/5
1/5
= =
72 . 1
5.0
4.0
1 0.954
t
*
g
=
|
.
|

\
|
+ =
10 . 22
5.0
4.0
0.313 0.188
1.72 11.41
313 . 0 188 . 0
* *
=
+

=
+

H
r
t t
g
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
41
Example: Sofa p 2-35 with t
i
= 0 in room with H = 5 m.
Calculate AT
max
and u
max
for r = 4 m and t = 120 s.



T
max
= 84 K +293 K = 377 K = 104C
( ) K 84 10 . 22
0 . 5
) 1736 . 0 (
14 . 7
3 4
5 / 3
5 / 2
max
= = AT
( ) m/s 2.6 10 . 22
) 0 . 5 / 0 . 4 (
) 0 . 5 ( ) 1736 . 0 (
29 . 0
3 2
63 . 0
5 / 1 5 / 1
max
= = u
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
42
Example: Sofa p 2-35 with t
i
= 0 in room with H = 5 m.
Calculate AT
max
and u
max
for r = 4 m and t = 120 s.

Steady-state: Heskestad & Delichatsios (p 2-23 & 25)



3 4
3 / 5
3 / 2
max
313 . 0 188 . 0
1
75 . 2
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
+
= A
-
H
r
H
Q
T
K 104
5.0
4.0
0.313 0.188
1
5.0
) 120 x (0.1736
2.75
3 4
5/3
2/3 2
max
=
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
+
= AT
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
43
Example: Sofa p 2-35 with t
i
= 0 in room with H = 5 m.
Calculate AT
max
and u
max
for r = 4 m and t = 120 s.

Steady-state: Heskestad & Delichatsios (p 2-23 & 25)







u
max
= 2.8 m / s
3 2
63 . 0
3 / 1
3 / 1
max
313 . 0 188 . 0
1
179 . 0
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
+
|
.
|

\
|
=

-
H
r
H
r
H
Q
u
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
44
Thermal Response of Heat Detectors & Sprinklers
Simple model (convective heating)

= t
-1
(T
g
- T
D
) Eqn (2-19)

No simple solution when T
g
and u are time-dependent

Must solve numerically (with computer)
dt
dT
D
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
45
Detector Response for Simple Time-Dependent T
g
(t)
Assuming u is Relatively Constant

Eqn (2-19) = - t
-1
{(T
D
- T

) - (T
g
- T

)}

If (T
g
- T

) = | t = - t
-1
{(T
D
- T

) - | t }

Solution is (T
D
- T

) = | { t - t [ 1 - exp (- t / t) ] }

If | is small & time of activation >> t then for t >> t

(T
D
- T

) = | { t - t}

( )
dt
T - T d
D
( )
dt
T - T d
D
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
46
Confined Ceilings
For large industrial or warehouse facilities, models for
unconfined ceiling jet flows are often sufficient
In small rooms or for long times after ignition in large
industrial or warehouse facilities, ceiling jet can become
completely immersed in hot smoky layer
Hence ceiling jet entrains hot gas rather than cool air
temp of ceiling jet higher than for unconfined ceiling
Reduction in activation time of sprinkler or heat detector
To predict properties of ceiling jet, must know temp of hot
layer & height of interface between hot layer and cool layer
Analytical and computer models are available for such
scenarios

Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
47
Ceiling Flames


Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
48
Ceiling Flames
Flame impinges on ceiling & spreads out radially, even
if ceiling is non-combustible

Heskestad & Hamada ( 93 to 760 kW)

Flame extension, r
f
(m)
r
f
= 0.95 (l - H) Eqn (2-29)

Heskestad flame length (burning in open)

l = 0.235 - 1.02 D Eqn (2-3)
= Q

-
Q
2/5
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
49
Ceiling Flames
Ceiling flames may ignite combustible or damage non-
combustible ceiling elements, cables and pipes
Ceiling flames enhance thermal radiation to floor
augment burning rate of burning item
augment flame spread over burning item
augment heating or remote combustibles (targets)


Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
50
Ceiling Flame Increases Flame Spread & Burning
Consider burning of 0.76 m x 0.76 m slab of PMMA in an
enclosure allowing air access from four sides
Max rate of burning ~ 3 x open-burning rate
Achieved in approximately 1/3 the time




Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
51
Flames in a Corner
For flames above a burning object located against a
wall or in a corner (of non-combustible materials)
asymmetric and therefore reduced entrainment of
air have a major impact on the flame dynamics
flame length is increased
Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
52
Temperature above fires in 1.22 m high wood pallets (x)





Carleton University, 82.583
(CVG****), Fire Dynamics II,
Winter 2003, Lecture # 2
53
References
D. Drysdale, An Introduction to Fire Dynamics,Wiley, 1999, Chap 4
B. Karlsson and J.G. Quintiere, Enclosure Fire Dynamics, CRC Press,
2000, Chap. 4
R.L. Alpert, Ceiling Jet Flows, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection
Engineering, 3rd Ed., 2002

Anda mungkin juga menyukai