RECEIVED DEPT. 48 Nov 64 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. HEMMING MICHAEL J. HEMMING, ESQ. SBN: 74538 333 West Mission Boulevard FILED Superior Court of Catomi Pomona, CA 91766 "County of Los Angeles (909) 469-6087 (909) 469-2732 NOV 20 2014 J i 1 i Attorney for Plaintiff i ges ee PPJ Enterprise, Inc., aon Puy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES-CENTRAL DISTRICT PPJ ENTERPRISE, INC., a Nevada ) CASE NO. BC427192 Corporation ) ) JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT Plaintiff, v, NARINDER 8. GREWAL, an Individual; NARINDER S. GREWAL, M_D., a Medical Corporation doing business as SANTA. CLARITA SURGERY CENTER FOR ADVANCED PAIN MANAGEMENT; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, Trial: August 12, 2014 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS —_) Judge: Hon. Elizabeth White ) Dept. 48 ) Action Filed: December 3, 2009 } Cross-Complaint Filed: June 7, 2011 ‘This action came regularly for trial on August 12, 2014, in Department 48 of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles - Central Division, the Honorable Elizabeth White presiding. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant PPJ Enterprise Inc. (“PPJ Enterprise”) and Cross-Defendant Chandana Basu (“Basu”) was represented by attorney Michael J, Hemming of the Law Office of Michael J. Hemming, and Defendants/Cross-Complainants, Narinder S. Grewal (“Grewal”) and Narinder S, Grewal, M.D., a Medical Corporation dba Santa Clarita Surgery Center For Advanced Pain Management (“Santa Clarita Surgery Center”) and Defendant G3 Healthcare Business Services, Inc. (“G3 Healthcare”) were represented by Jeremy O. Amnaiz of the 1 JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICTt Leer ta b 10 i 13 4 15 16 i 18 19 20 a 2 23 24 25 26 2 28 Law Office of Jeremy O. Amaiz and Frank Edward Harrigan Il jury of twelve persons and two alternatives was regularly impaneled and swom, and later, by stipulation of the parties, a jury of eleven persons with no alternatives remained. Witnesses were swom and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the Court and the cause was submitted to the jury with directions to return a verdict, ‘on special issues. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned into court voting with its verdict as follows: 1. Complaint, COMMON COUNT - FOR MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED AGAINST GREWAL AND SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER 1. Were Plaintiff PPJ ENTERPRISE and Defendant GREWAL and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER ina medical billing and collection relationship, whereby Plaintiff would perform medical billing and collection services for Defendant GREWAL and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER in exchange for a fee? _x__Yes ___No If your answer to question 1 is yes, then answer question 2. If you answer no, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 2. Did Plaintiff PP} ENTERPRISE claim that a sum of money was overpaid to Defendant GREWAL and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER? Yes No If your answer to question 2 is yes, then answer question 3. If you answer no, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 3. Were there overpayments made by Plaintiff PP] ENTERPRISE to Defendant GREWAL 2 JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT21 22 23 4 25 6 27 28 and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER? Yes No If-your answer to question 3 is yes, then answer question 4. If you answer no, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 4. Did Defendant GREWAL and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER acquire money (overpayments) which in equity or good conscience belongs to Plaintiff PPJ ENTERPRISE? x__ Yes No If your answer to question 4 is yes, then answer question 5. If you answer no, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 5. Were the overpayments made by Plaintiff PPJ-ENTERPRISE caused by mistake? Yes No If your answer to question 5 is yes, then answer question 6. If you answer no, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 6. _ Ifthere were overpayments, did Defendant GREWAL and Defendant SANTA CLARITA SURGERY CENTER retum all overpayments to Plaintiff PP] ENTERPRISE? Yes No If your answer to question 6 is no, then answer question 7. If you answer yes, stop here, answer no further question, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 10, What are the damages due to Plaintiff PPJ ENTERPRISE? 8 in damages Signed: __ William B. Clay Presiding Juror 3 JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT