Thesis: ISIL has proven o be a belligerent group with truculent aims, by disregarding
international borders, killing hundreds, and causing mass destruction of towns and homes for the
basis of a new radical Islamic ideology. Although a U.S led coalition with our countries have
used limited warfare in the form of airstrikes to desolve ISIL, it has proven narrow and
ineffective in decreasing the amount of safe haven for ISIL. Direct intervention by the U.S and
other supporting countries like Britian, can effectively dissolve the terrorist group ISIS in a
shorter amount of time, that would lead to less direct money flow.
I.
Background:
A. What are the aims, beliefs, and influences of ISIL? Why is it a problem?
1. History of ISIL (BBC)
2. Motives of expansion to create a new Islamic State. (BBC RISE)
3. Capturing of western hostages. New York Times: ISIS Hostages tortured...
4. Hostages are used to fuel their propaganda machine to ward off foreign
intervention from western countries. (Atika)
5. ISIS captures hostages for ransoms or to send a message. (Callimachi)
B. What is Americas role in stopping ISIS?
1. Division of powers in warfare to combat ISIS. (Tim)
2. Killing of American Journalist James Foley. ( Before killing James Foley)
C. The outcomes of ISIS expansion into cities like Kobani.
1. ISIS has been trying to capture Kobani in Syria, a border town off the Turkish
Border. (ISIS focus launch multiple attacks on Kurdish Territory in Iraqi officials
say
2. U.S intervention to aid Kobani in its time of need. (Mcdonnell)
3. Civilians are forced to leave the battlefield and many can watch the war from the
Turkish border. ( Bulos)
D. Turkish standpoint of the border town of Kobani/ Syrian disorder and what
have they done in regarding ISIS
1. Revolts against current president in Syria. (Syria: The Story of the Conflict
2. Leon Panetta criticizes Obama and demanding boots on the ground. ( Richnick,
Michele)
IV. Conclusion
A: Restate Thesis:
1. The cost of war and the time it would be done, doesnt match with the alacrity of
direct intervention.
2. The people support it.
3. Ineffective airstrikes