This article on a study of phonemic awareness and silent reading was very interesting. I
appreciated how it stated the fact that their findings could be skewed because of the limited
number of children and the fact that all of the children were average readers.
I felt that the findings that students with stronger phonemic awareness would be stronger
readers as they age were fairly easy to understand and easy to predict. It makes sense that the
students who have a stronger sense of phonemic awareness would be stronger readers later in
life. Phonemic awareness is one of the building blocks to being a good reader. The student with a
weaker phonemic awareness block would not be as good of a reader compared to a student who
has a very strong block.
I thought that it was a unique idea to track eye movement as students read silently. It
seems like a good way to see how well students can read without adding the extra element of
talking, especially because students are told to read silently in the classroom but are then tested
on how well they read aloud. I can see eye movement webcams entering the classroom in the
future and the oral reading tests becoming less common.
There are a couple ways that I can see immediately where the knowledge of this study
would be useful in my classroom in the future. One way is to ensure that phonemic awareness is
taught and emphasized in classrooms with younger students. Another way would be to help older
students who are struggling readers by seeing if they are lacking in phonemic awareness.
I thought that the article did not do a good job defining phonemic awareness. I feel like to
discuss a topic so heavily and to include it in a study, the definition of what is being tested
should be clearly defined so all of the researcher, parents, students, etc. are all aware of what the
researchers are looking for.