Tetrahedron Letters
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tetlet
College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, 7-45 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-799, Republic of Korea
College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Geonggo-do 426-791, Republic of Korea
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 October 2013
Revised 1 December 2013
Accepted 5 December 2013
Available online 15 December 2013
Keywords:
Arylnaphthalene lactone
Intramolecular DielsAlder
Regioselectivity
Lignan
Daurinol
a b s t r a c t
Arylnaphthalene lactones are natural products which can be isolated from a wide range of plants and
have the signicant biological activities including cytotoxicity, antimicrobial, diuretic, and ion channel
blocking. The drawback of the previous intramolecular DielsAlder reaction of 3-arylprop-2-ynyl 3-arylpropiolates was to generate two regioisomers of arylnaphthalene lactone without selectivity. Herein, we
report a convenient and regioselective synthesis method in which the intramolecular DielsAlder reaction of an arylalkenearylalkyne and subsequent DDQ oxidation was used for Type I and Type II arylnaphthalene lactones, respectively. We demonstrated the synthesis of three lignans, taiwanin C (Type I),
justicidin E (Type II), and daurinol (Type I and anti-cancer activity).
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
O
O
MeO
Retrojusticidin B
OMe
Justicidin E
Retrochinensin
HO
O
MeO
Type II
OMe
O
O
MeO
O
O
O
O
Justicidin B
O
O
O
O
Type I
O
O
Corresponding authors. Tel.: +82 32 899 6111; fax: +82 32 820 4829.
O
MeO
O
MeO
O
O
O
Taiwanin C
O
O
Daurinol
819
O
O
A
Ac2O
O
140 C
B
+
O
B
Type I
BnO
B
O
O
A
MeO
Type II
O
BnO
46 : 54
Ac2O
140 C
O
O
OBn
O
O
Type I
Scheme 1. Intramolecular
arylpropiolate.
MeO
DielsAlder
reaction
OMe
43 : 57
of
Type II
3-arylprop-2-ynyl
3-
s-cis
OH
ArA
D-A
O
ArB
CO2 H
B
Type I
O
s-cis
CO 2H
Ar A
O
O
D-A
OH
ArB
B
Type II
CO2 H
Br
b-c
Br
O
1
O
O
OEt
OH
O
4
3 + 5
O
O
O
6
O
O
h
O
O
O
O
O
O
Taiwanin (8)
O
O
not isolated
820
major drawback of intramolecular DielsAlder reaction of 3-arylprop-2-ynyl 3-arylpropiolates as developed before was to generate
two regioisomers of arylnaphthalene lactone without selectivity.
Whereas in this study using arylalkene-arylalkyne, intramolecular
DielsAlder reaction in which arylalkyne moiety functions as only
dienophile afforded Type I and Type II dihydroarylnaphthalene
lactones regioselectively, followed by DDQ oxidation to afford the
corresponding arylnaphthalene lactones. Especially, we demonstrated with the synthesis of the representative arylnaphthalene
lactones taiwanin C (Type I), justidicin E (Type II), and daurinol
(Type I and anti-cancer agent). Further investigations of arylnaphthalene lactones and their analogs to enhance their properties as
potential chemotherapeutic agents are ongoing.
O
O
OH
O
OH
O
O
O
O
O
11
10
O
e
O
O
Justicidin E (13)
O
12
Acknowledgments
BnO
isovanillin
a-c
BnO
OH
MeO
Supplementary data
MeO
14
15
O
BnO
e
HO
O
MeO
f-g
O
MeO
O
17
1. Navarro, E.; Alonso, S. J.; Trujillo, J.; Jorge, E.; Prez, C.; Hernndez-Alzadilla, C.
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 10131017.
2. Lee, J. C.; Lee, C.-H.; Su, C.-L.; Huang, C.-W.; Liu, H.-S.; Lin, C.-N.; Won, S.-J.
Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 17161730.
3. Yu, Z.; Dan, W.; Jie, H.; Li, Z. Med. Chem. Res. 2010, 19, 7176.
4. Janmanchi, D.; Tseng, Y. P.; Wang, K.-C.; Huang, R. L.; Lin, C. H.; Yeh, S. F. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 12131226.
5. Chen, C. C.; Hsin, W. C.; Ko, F. N.; Huang, Y. L.; Ou, J. C.; Teng, C. M. J. Nat. Prod.
1996, 59, 11491150.
6. Weng, J. R.; Ko, H. H.; Yeh, T. L.; Lin, H. C.; Lin, C. N. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim)
2004, 337, 207212.
7. Leung, Y. M.; Tsou, Y.-H.; Kuo, C.-S.; Lin, S.-Y.; Wu, P.-Y.; Hour, M.-J.; Kuo, Y.-H.
Phytomedicine 2010, 18, 4651.
8. Gui, M.; Shi, D.-K.; Huang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Q.-M.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Feng, J.M.; Liu, C.-H.; Li, M.; Li, Y.-X.; Geng, M. Y.; Ding, J. Invest. New Drugs 2011, 29,
800810.
9. Shi, D. K.; Zhang, W.; Ding, N.; Li, M.; Li, Y.-X. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 47, 424
431.
10. (a) Hemmatia, S.; Schmidtb, T. J.; Fuss, E. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 603610; (b)
Schmidt, T. J.; Hemmati, S.; Klaes, M.; Konuklugil, B.; Mohagheghzadeh, A.;
Ionkova, I.; Fuss, E.; Alfermann, A. W. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 17141728.
11. Stevenson, R.; Weber, J. V. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 367375.
12. (a) Stevenson, R.; Weber, J. V. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 310314; (b) Anastas, P. T.;
Stevenson, R. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 16871691.
13. Sato, Y.; Tamura, T.; Mori, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43, 24362440.
14. (a) Eghbali, N.; Eddy, J.; Anastas, P. T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 69326935; (b)
Foley, P.; Eghbali, N.; Anastas, P. T. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 811813.
15. Nishii, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Asano, H.; Wakasugi, K.; Morita, J.; Aso, Y.; Yoshida, E.;
Motoyoshiya, J.; Aoyama, H.; Tanabe, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 26672678.
16. Gudla, V.; Balamurugan, R. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 99199933.
17. Kang, K.; Oh, S. H.; Yun, J. H.; Jho, E. H.; Kang, J. H.; Batsuren, D.; Tunsag, J.; Park,
K. H.; Kim, M.; Nho, C. W. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 10431057.
18. Although we tried the oxidation condition using MnO2 in CH2Cl2 instead of
DDQ, the result was unsatisfactory.