SEPTEMBER 2012
eights
UTTARAKHAND AT A GLANCE
Population
1.01 Crores
Geographical area
65%
HYDRO POTENTIAL
1. IN 12TH PLAN TOTAL TARGET IS 88,425 MW- 71288
BY THERMAL,11897 BY HYDRO AND 5300 BY
NEUCLEAR POWER.
2. CAPACITY ADDED IN 11TH PLAN IS 54964 MW
AGAINST TARGET OF 78700 MW.
3. PER CAPITA ENERGY CONSUMPTION HAS REACHED
860 UNITS IN COMPARISON TO 768 UNITS IN 2009.
4. HYDRO POWER SHARE IS 19.3% FROM A LEVEL OF
26% IN THE PREVIOUS LEVEL.
5. IDEAL RATIO OF HYDRO TO THERMAL IS 40:60
4
Source: Magazine ENERTIA-JUNE 2012 and
INFRATRUCTURE TODAY-August 2012
HYDRO POTENTIAL
1. ASSESSED POTENTIAL OF UTTARAKHAND STATE
IS MORE THAN 27,000 MW.
2. BEFORE CREATION OF THE STATE, 1116 MW
HYDRO-POWER POTENTIAL WAS HARNESSED.
3. AFTER
FORMATION OF THE STATE, 2506 MW
HYDRO-POWER
POTENTIAL
HAS
BEEN
HARNESSED
4. THE INSTALLED CAPACITY OF THE HYDRO POWER
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IS 4011MW.
5. THE BALANCE HYDRO POWER POTENTIAL TO BE
HARNESSED IS 19406 MW.
5
UJVNL
CPSUs
IPPs
UREDA
ID
UIPC
PDA
State
Identified
Self
Identified
Total
(MW)
Under
Operation
1310.25
1800.00
508.25
3.64
3622.14
Under
Construction
174.00
3242.00
593.10
2.84
4011.94
Under
Development
3275.60
3238.00
1443.60
0.40
178.50
2136.70
6620.00
12.80
2500.00
19405.60
Total
4759.85
8280.00
2544.95
6.88
178.50
2136.70
6620.00
12.80
2500.00
27039.68
6
4
30000
TotalAvailability
Availability
-Total
without gas
CAPACITY
ADDITION
IN MU
CAPACITY
ADDITION
UTTARAKHAND SHARE
(UTTARAKHAND
SHARE)
5.1%
27895
3.1%
26553
-Demand
25347
25000
6.7%
@ 8% rise
24587
24284
6.0%
22765
22351
10.0%
21079
21473
20000
19517
GENERATION (MU)
0.6%
18189
18072
16733
15493
15000
15653
14346
-6.4%
13284
12862
13656
12243
12898
11232
-11.8%
11140
-10.1%
10333
10172
11408
10000
9965
9517
-11.3%
10475
10172
10630
-14.1%
-14.4%
@ 10% rise
12519
11140
-UJVNLUJVNL
without gas
11693(Excluding
HP Share)
9665
8066
8787
7262
-7.9%
-Central Pool
7988
6602
6003
4961
5000
5457
6447
4451
4413
4510
4100
791
791
0
213
2011
213
2012
4510
4791
5339
1089
791
5498
1089
1307
1498
1781
1781
1781
1781
1781
791
213
369
2013
2014
467
2015
467
2016
637
637
733
733
733
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
YEAR
733
733
2022
2023
12% share
above 25MW
Developing
Upto April- After Aprilagency
2013
Year
Total
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
41.50
3.50
120.00
11.30
366.30
292.00
400.00
0.00
210.00
0.00
660.00
2117.60
62.4
53.28
46.20
66.96
228.84
48.00
0.00
0.00
39.60
21.00
0.00
43.20
0.00
25.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
128.88
Total
1570.25
13.00
41.50
43.10
203.40
11.30
462.78
338.20
492.04
0.00
210.00
0.00
660.00
2475.32
Cumulative
Capacity(MW) in state
share
1570.25
1583.25
1882.55
2345.33
2683.53
3175.57
3175.57
3385.57
3385.57
4045.57
2012
2012
1306.25
13.00
216.00
Yearwise Capacity
Addition in state share
UJVN
Yearwise Capacity
Addition
2
CPSUs
Yearwise Capacity
Addition in state share
3
IPPS
Developing
agency
UJVNL
Yearwise Energy
Addition
2
Year
Upto
April2012
After April2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
4413
38.33
58.80
281.23
547.77
158.75
949.19
1618.47
2106.15
0.00
968.00
0.00
1379.00
8105.69
298
218
191
283
990.00
156
98
170
96
521
9616
CPSUs
Yearwise Energy
791.00
Addition in state share
3
Total
IPPS
Yearwise Energy
213.00
Addition in state share
Total
5417
38
59
437
943
159
1337
1809
2486
968
1379
Cumulative Energy
addition in state
5417
5455
5514
5952
6895
7054
8391
10201
12686
12686
13654
13654
15033
SWOT analysis
SWOT analysis (alternately SWOT Matrix) is a strategic planning method used
to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses/Limitations, Opportunities, and Threats
involved in a project or in a business venture.
Strength:
1. Strong history of hydro resource development in early 5year plans.
2. Substantial national and state water reserve potential for hydro development.
3. Presence of strong private sector along with PSU organization of centre and
state sector.
4. Massive interest in private sector under the PPP initiative with several
companies in development and construction of hydro projects like Patel
Engineering, HCC Ltd., Jaiprakash Associates, S&N Power, Bhilwara Energy,
L&T-ECC, Lanco Energy etc.
5. World class engineering and design expertise and availability of civil
engineers.
6. Global technology provider like Voith Hydro, Andritz Hydro, Alstom, Toshiba
corporation, BHEL, Kirloskar Brothers ltd
7. Low commercial generation cost and negligible emission impact.
10
SWOT analysis
Weakness:
1. Lack of national strategy with the state level integration for development of
hydro power potential and targeting towards 25-30% contribution in
national power generation mix by 2032.
2. Lack of potential will of scientific process for addressing R&R of project
affected families.
3. Sluggish clearance and red tapism at MoEF and other such Central and
State agencies.
4. Inadequate financing opportunities from local market for mega capacities.
5. Project cost and time overruns due to inordinate delay via e extraneous
factors.
6. Hydropower development conceive as a standalone concept rather than
linking it up with mega development, socio economic upliftment, life style
enhancement opportunity and moving it as an harbinger of economic
prosperity via development of the hydro reverse region and the PAFs stake.
11
SWOT analysis
Opportunities:
1. CDM mechanism and carbon credit rating for hydro projects.
2. Good RoI for hydro power developers thereby helping the PPP process.
12
SWOT analysis
Threats:
1. Environmental over- activism by anti dam activists.
2. Centre-State and interstate disagreements on development,
management and exploitation of water resources leading to conflict,
thereby affecting hydro power projects.
3. Chances of environmental impacts and their inadequate management
due to development of large reservoirs and basin at the dam based
hydro projects.
4. International subterfuge on hydro projects in India, thereby leading to
stalling of such projects.
5. Ingeniune and Fly-by-nights operator posing as hydro power
developers resulting in capacities on papers rather than developing in
reality.
13
PLAN
OF POWER
EVACUATION
THROUGH
STATE
ENVIRONMENT
IMPACT
ASSESMENT
STUDIES
FOR
14
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15
OF INVESTOR
FRIENDLY HYDRO
POLICY OF
VENDORS,
3. ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE
4. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT
TECHNICAL ISSUES
1. PREPARATION OF BANKABLE DPRs
2. GEOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTIES
3. NATURAL CALAMITIES
4.LESSER AVAILABILITY OF COMPETENT CONTRACTING
AGENCIES
5. SHORTAGE OF TRAINED MANPOWER
6. LESSER MANUFACTURING FACILITIES
17
2.
3.
4.
RESOURCE CRUNCH
2.
LAND ACQUISITION
3.
4.
UPFRONT CHARGES
5.
6.
INTER-STATE ASPECTS
18
ANNOUNCED ON 19-10-02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
20
ANNOUNCED ON 28-01-04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
21
(B)
22
6.
TO
COMMUNITY/
7.
MICRO
PROJECTS
ARE
RESERVED
FOR
DOMICILES
OF
UTTARAKHAND/GRAM PANCHAYATS/ SOCIETIES OF UTTARAKHAND
8.
9.
23
MODE OF DEVELOPMENT
1. DEVELOPERS ARE INVITED IN THE FORM OF JOINT
VENTURE / SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE
2. INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS MAY ALSO
EXPLOIT THE HYDRO POWER THROUGH BIDDING
3. INVESTORS CAN WORK AS EXECUTING / SUPPLING
AGENCIES
24
CONCULSION
1. THERE IS INADEQUATE QUANTITY OF GAS &
COAL IN COUNTRY AND NUCLEAR POWER
PROJECTS
ARE
HAVING
SERIOUS
SOCIAL,
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SECURITY CONCERNS. IN
SUCH A SCENARIO POWER DEFICIT CAN BE
ECONOMICALLY OVERCOME ONLY THROUGH
DEVELOPMENT OF HYDRO POWER PROJECTS WITH
SUITABLE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS BASED
UPON SCIENTIFIC STUDIES, FOR WHICH THE STATE
OF UTTARAKHAND IS FULLY COMMITTED.
25
CONCULSION
2. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, HAVING TAKEN
VARIOUS REFORM INITIATIVES, INVITES VARIOUS
INDEPENDENT
POWER
PRODUCERS
IN
ITS
DEVBHOOMI HAVING SACRED CHAR DHAMS, TO
JOIN HANDS FOR SPEEDIER DEVELOPMENT OF
HYDRO POWER PROJECTS IN THE STATE. SOME OF
IDENTIFIED
PROJECTS
WHICH
ARE
EASILY
APPROACHABLE AND ARE ON OFFER THROUGH
FORMATION OF JOINT VENTURES WITH UJVN
LIMITED.
26
27
28
29
3 X 66 = 198 MW
30
4 X 36 = 144 MW
31
3 X 30 = 90 MW
32