Suppose XYZ Software Company has a new application development project, with projected revenues
of $1,200,000. Using the following table, calculate the ARO and ALE for each threat category that XYZ Software
Company faces for this project.
ARO
52
1
52
4
2
12
1
52
calculate the ARO and
faces for this project.
Annualized loss
rate of occurrence (ARO)
SLE = asset value
4.0
0.05
0.1
0.1
ALE
$
260,000
$
75,000
$
26,000
$
10,000
$
10,000
$
6,000
$
5,000
$
78,000
$
10,000
$
12,500
$
25,000
$
50,000
ARO for programmer mistakes is 52 since a year has 52 weeks; for los of intellectual property is 1 because it
happens once a year, and so on with the same logic are the results in the table above in ARO column.
For programmers mistakes
the results are as shown in the
ALE1
CBA
60,000
37,500
180,000
22,500
6,000
-10,000
5,000
5,000
-10,000
-10,000
2,000
2,500
ARO18,000
5,000
1212,500
0.5
5,000
12
10,000
2
1
4
0.5
12
2
0.05
0.1
0.1
Question
-14,000
-12,500
45,000
-12,500
-5,000
10,000
30,000
1. Why have some values changed in the columns Cost per Incident and Frequency of Occurrence? (2 points)
Some of the values have changed because controls were implemented and they had a positive impact on the
protection of the assets of the organization and that brought the reduction of the frequency of occurrences.
2. How could a control affect one but not the other? (2 points)
For example the insurance and backups can reduce the costs but not the frequency of occurrence because a
flood or an earthquake can happen anytime.
3. Calculate the CBA for the planned risk control approach for each threat category. For each threat category,
determine if the proposed control is worth the costs. (3 points)
ACS is the annualized cost of the safeguard
CBA = ALE(prior) ALE(post) ACS
For exampleprogrammer mistakes
CBA=260,000-60,000-20,000=180,000 and so on with the same logic the results will be as shown in the table.
CBA > 0; Good
CBA = 0; Why bother
CBA < 0; No benefit, forget it
So we have programmer mistakes,loss of intellectual property viruses flood and fire are worth it.
And the others are not.