0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
167 tayangan1 halaman
The KAZA TFCA was represented in the trainings by Richard Aingura (Namibia), Tachinya Molatole (Botswana), Patricia Kalipa (Zambia) and Tinaapi Hilary Madiri (Zimbabwe) Communication with all the team members has been slow. However the National TFCA Network coordinators have been mobilised in order to get some progress update from them and to support them.
The KAZA TFCA was represented in the trainings by Richard Aingura (Namibia), Tachinya Molatole (Botswana), Patricia Kalipa (Zambia) and Tinaapi Hilary Madiri (Zimbabwe) Communication with all the team members has been slow. However the National TFCA Network coordinators have been mobilised in order to get some progress update from them and to support them.
The KAZA TFCA was represented in the trainings by Richard Aingura (Namibia), Tachinya Molatole (Botswana), Patricia Kalipa (Zambia) and Tinaapi Hilary Madiri (Zimbabwe) Communication with all the team members has been slow. However the National TFCA Network coordinators have been mobilised in order to get some progress update from them and to support them.
Change activity: Community based Natural resource management in KAZA TFCA:
building capacity for adaptive management in the change world Progress to date: The KAZA TFCA was represented in the trainings by Richard Aingura (Namibia), Tachinya Molatole (Botswana), Patricia Kalipa (Zambia) and Tinaapi Hilary Madiri (Zimbabwe). Communication with all the team members has been slow. However the National TFCA Network coordinators have been mobilised in Zambia and Zimbabwe in order to get some progress update from them and to support them. Unfortunately the TFCA also was unable to nominate a candidate for the process moderators course who perhaps could have catalysed action. The Zimbabwe component has provided more feedback than the rest of the team. On the Botswana side there were some organisational bottle-necks reported around the mandate of the trained officer. The officer was advised by the mentoring team to demonstrate to her supervisors how climate change fits as an integrated component of community livelihoods development as it is a reality that cannot be ignored. The Namibian participant has been out of reach despite repeated emails which were unanswered and unsuccessful attempts to phone. Several phone calls and emails were made with Ms Kalipa (Zambia) but no substantial feedback has been received. The participant indicated that the lack of contact with TFCA counterparts has been a bottle-neck for her preventing to proceed with the change project. She has been encouraged to implement the project component on her side and not to wait for the rest of the team especially in such a vast TFCA. On the Zimbabwean side the team decided on a holistic approach on climate change adaptation. They followed through with training of 25 local community members in conservation, sustainable hunting, fire management, and best management practices at grassroots level. Trainings also involved grassroots capacity in infrastructure development such as construction of boreholes because of water shortages in the community. This training is part of a holistic approach in integrating climate change adaptation and is progressing steadily. This is due to the fact that climate change has an impact on the entire livelihood and there was a need for diversified climate change adaptation strategies in order for the communities to become more resilient. Currently the TFCA is monitoring if there has been any impact in the changes including progress among the 25 community members that have been trained. Cross border communication and joint planning has been very slow, there has been little communication and collaboration across the borders. There has been no progress in terms of a joint CCA project yet.