International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No.

2
ISSN: 1837-7823

A Note on Generalized almost Para-Sasakian Structure

L K Pandey
D S Institute of Technology & Management, Ghaziabad, U.P. - 201007
dr.pandeylk@rediffmail.com
Abstract
In 1976, 1977, I. Sato [5], [6] dicussed on a structure similar to almost contact structure. Also in 1979, K.
Matsumoto and I. Sato [1] discussed on p-Sasakian manifolds satisfying certain conditions and in 2011, R. Nivas and
A. Bajpai [2] studied on generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifolds. Recently, the auther [3], [4] studied on
Lorentzian special para-Sasakian manifolds and generalised Lorentzian para Sasakian manifolds.
T. Suguri and S. Nakayama [7] considered D-conformal deformations on almost contact metric structure.
In this paper generalized para-Sasakian manifold, Generalized special para-Sasakian manifold, generalised almost
para-Sasakian manifold and generalized almost special para-Sasakian manifold have been introduced and some of
their properties have been established. A generalized D-conformal transformation in a generalized almost paracontact manifold has also been introduced.
Keywords: Generalized almost p-Sasakian manifold, generalized almost special p-Sasakian manifolds, generalized
almost p-co-symplectic manifolds, and generalized D-conformal transformation.

1.

Introduction

Let be an n-dimensional differentiable manifold, on which there are defined a tensor field of type (1,1),
(n-1) contravariant vector fields , (n-1) covariant vector fields , where = 1,2,3, . . ( 1), and a metric
tensor g, satisfying for arbitrary vector fields , , ,
= 1
=1 () ,

(1.1)

= 0,

( ) = 1,

, () = 0,

rank =
g (, ) = g (, ) 1
=1 () (), where () = (, ),

(1.2)

`(, ) ( , ) = `(, ),
Then is called a generalized almost Para-Contact manifold (a generalized almost P-Contact manifold) and the
structure (, , , ) is called generalized almost Para-Contact structure.
Let D be a Riemannian connection on , then we have
(1.3) (a)

1
( `)( , ) + ( `)(, ) + 1
=1 ()( )() + =1 ()( )() = 0

1
(b) ( `)( , ) + ( `)(, ) + 1
=1 ()( )() + =1 ()( )() = 0

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No. 2
ISSN: 1837-7823
(1.4) (a)

( `) ( , ) + ( `) ( , ) = 0

(b)

( `) ( , ) + ( `)( , ) = 0

A generalized almost P-Contact manifold is called a generalized Para-Sasakian manifold (a generalized P-Sasakian
manifold) if
(1.5) (a)

1
( )() + 1
=1 { ()} + ( , ) =1 ( ) = 0

(b)

1
( `)(, ) + ( , ) 1
=1 { ()} + ( , ) =1 { ()} = 0

(c)

= + 1
=1 ,

This implies
(1.6) (a) ( `)(, ) + `(, ) 1
=1 { ()} = 0
(b) ( `) ( , ) + ( , ) 1
=1 { ()} = 0
1
(c) ( `)(, ) + 1
=1 { ()} ( )( ) + ( , ) =1 { ()} = 0

On this manifold, we have

(1.7) (a) ( )( ) = ( , )
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=1 () = `(, )
A generalized almost P-Contact manifold is called a generalized Special Para-Sasakian manifold (a generalized SPSasakian manifold) if
(1.8) (a)

1
( )() + 1
=1 { ()} + `(, ) =1 ( ) = 0

(b)

1
( `)(, ) + `(, ) 1
=1 { ()} + `(, ) =1 { ()} = 0

(c)

= + 1
=1

This implies
(1.9) (a) ( `)(, ) + ( , ) 1
=1 { ()} = 0
(b) ( `) (, ) + `(, ) 1
=1 { ()} = 0

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No. 2
ISSN: 1837-7823
1
(c) ( `)(, ) + 1
=1 ()( )( ) + `(, ) =1 { ()} = 0

On this manifold, we have

(1.10) (a) ( )( ) = `(, )
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=1 () = ( , )
Nijenhuis tensor in a generalized almost P-Contact manifold is given by
`(, , ) = ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )

(1.11)

`(, , ) (( , ), )

Where

2.

Generalized Almost Para-Co-symplectic manifold

A generalized almost P-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost P-Co-symplectic manifold if

(2.1) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + 1

=1 (){( )( ) + ( )( )} +
1
1
=1 (){( )( ) + ( )( )} + =1 (){( )( ) + ( )( )} = 0

3.

Generalized almost Para-Sasakian manifold

A generalized almost P-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost Para-Sasakian manifold (a

generalized almost P-Sasakian manifold) if

1
(3.1) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )+ ( , ) 1
=1 { ()} + ( , ) =1 { ()} +

( , ) 1
=1 { ()} = 0
Therefore, A generalized almost P-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized almost P-Sasakian manifold if
(3.2) (a)

( )( ) = ( , )

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=1 () = `(, )
(c) = + 1
=1
Barring X, Y, Z in (1.11) and using equations (3.1), (1.4) (a), we see that a generalized almost P-Sasakian manifold
is completely integrable if
(3.3) ( `)( , ) + ( `)( , ) + ( `)( , ) = 0

4.

Generalized almost Special Para-Sasakian manifold

A generalized almost P-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost Special Para-Sasakian

manifold (a generalized almost SP-Sasakian manifold) if

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No. 2
ISSN: 1837-7823
(4.1) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )
1
1
+ `(, ) 1
=1 {2 ()} + `(, ) =1 {2 ()} + `(, ) =1 {2 ()} = 0

Therefore a generalized P-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized SP-Sasakian manifold if

(4.2) (a)

( )( ) = `(, )

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=1 () = ( , )
(c) 1 = + 1
=1
Barring X, Y, Z in (1.8) and using equations (4.1), (1.4) (a), we see that a generalized almost SP-Sasakian manifold
is completely integrable if
(4.3) ( `)( , ) ( `)( , ) ( `)( , ) = 2( `)( , )

5. Generalized D- Conformal transformation.

Let the corresponding Jacobian map B of the transformation b transforms the structure (, , , ) to the
structure (, , , ) such that
(5.1) (a) =

(b) ( , ) = g (, ) + 2 1
=1 () ()

(c) = (d) ( ) = ()
Where is a differentiable function on , then the transformation is said to be generalized D-conformal
transformation. If is a constant, the transformation is known as D-homothetic.
Theorem 5.1 The structure (, , , ) is generalized almost Para-Contact structure.
Proof. Inconsequence of (1.1), (1.2), (5.1) (b) and (5.1) (d), we have
2
(, ) = g (, ) = ( , ) 1
() ()
=1

= ( , ) 1
=1 { ( )}{ ( )}
This implies
(5.2)

(, ) = ( , ) 1
=1 ( ) ( )

Using (1.1), (5.1) (a), (5.1) (c) and (5.1) (d), we obtain
(5.3)

1
= = 1
=1 () = =1 { ( )}

Also
(5.4)

= = 0

Equations (5.2), (5.3) and (5.4) prove the statement.

Theorem 5.2 Let and be the Riemannian connections with respect to h and g such that
(5.5) (a) = + (, )

(b) `(, , ) (( , ), )

Then we have

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No. 2
ISSN: 1837-7823
1
1 1
(5.6) 2 = 2 + [2 1
=1 () (Y) + =1 (Y) (X) =1 ( G) (X) (Y )}
1

+( 1) 1
=1 {( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + ( 1) =1 { ()( ) + ()( )

()(1 )() ()(1 )()}]

Proof. Using (5.1) (b), we get
2
(( , )) = { g (, ) + 1
() ()}
=1

Consequently
(5.7)

( , ) + (, ) = () g (, ) + g ( , ) + g (, ) +

2
1
() () + 2 ( )() () + 2 ( )()1 () + 2 ( ) () +
=1 {2()

2 ( ) ()}
Also
(5.8)

( , ) + (, ) = g ( , ) + g ((, ), ) + g (, (, ) +

2
g (, ) + 1
( ) () + 2 () ((, )) + 2 ( ) () + 2 ((, )) ()}
=1 {

Inconsequence of (1.3) (a), (5.7) and (5.8), we have

()g (, ) + `(, , ) + `(, , ) + 2() 1

=1 { () ()} + (

(5.9)

1) 1
=1 {( )() () + ( )() ()} + ( 1) =1 { ((, )) () + ((, )) ()}

Writing two other equations by cyclic permutation of , , and subtracting the third equation from the sum of the
first two equations and using symmetry of ` in the first two slots, we get

2`(, , ) = 2 1
=1 {() () () + () () () () () ()} + (

(5.10)

1) 1
=1 [ (){( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + (){( )() ( )()} +
(){( )() ( )()}]
This implies
(5.11)

2(, ) = 2 1
=1 [() () + () () ( ) (X) (Y)] + (

1
1) 1
=1 [{( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + ()( ) + ()( ) ()( )(Y)

(Y)(1 )(X)]
Substitution of (5.11) into (5.5) (a) gives (5.6).

References
[1] Matsumoto, K. and Sato, I. (1979) On P-Sasakian Manifolds satisfying certain conditions, Tensor N. S., 33,
pp. 173-178.
[2] Nivas, R. and Bajpai, A. (2011) Study of generalized Lorentzian para-Sasakian manifolds, Journal of
International Academy of Physical Sciences, Vol. 15 No.4, pp. 405-412.
[3] Pandey, L. K., (2014) Lorenzian Special Para-Sasakian manifolds, International journal of computational
Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 4-9.
[4] Pandey, L. K., (2014) Generalised LP-Sasakian manifolds, International journal of computational
Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 20-25.
[5] Sato, I. (1976) On a structure similar to almost contact structure I, Tensor N.S.,30, pp. 219-224.
[6] Sato, I. (1977) On a structure similar to almost contact structure II, Tensor N.S., 31, pp. 199-205.

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, February 2015 Vol. 6, No. 2
ISSN: 1837-7823
[7] Suguri T. and Nakayama S. (1974) D-conformal deformation on almost contact metric structures, Tensor N. S.,
28, pp. 125-129.