Anda di halaman 1dari 2

AUFA FAUZAN HIDAYAT

03111003091
TEKNIK KIMIA UNIVERSITAR SRIWIJAYA

COMPARISON THERMAL, CATALYTIC, HYDROGEN, AND STEAM CRACKING


Tabel 1. Perbandingan Proses Perengkahan Termal, Katalis, Hidro, dan Uap
Thermal Cracking

Houndry
Process
(HCC)

Thermofor
(TCC)

Fluid
Catalytic
Crackin
g (FCC)

Orthoflow
FCC

875-950

840-950

885-950

885-950

3447-4826

62-68

55-82

55-206

55-137

0.06-0.013
lb/bbl feed

0.06-0.013
lb/bbl feed

0.15-0.25
lb/ bbl
feed

Gasolin (8894 RON)

Gasolin
(88-94
RON)

Gasolin
(92-99
RON)

Variable
Fasa Campuran

Temperatur (oF)

Pressure (kPa)

750-900

2514

Fasa
Uap

10001100

<344

Catalys

Product

Gasoline. Gas-oil,
Residue

Olefin,
Aromati
k

Hydrogen
Cracking

Steam
Cracking

1050-1090

550-750

1562

1723-3102

8273-13789

Catalytic Cracking

Selektif

Nafta

UOP

Shell
TwoStages

HOC
KellogPhillips

Suspensoid
Catalytic
Cracking

920-960
(heay)
950-990
(light)

Nafta,
parafin

6-20: 1
(katalis:minyak
)

103-124

Platina,
Nikel,
Vanadium

Nafta, Jet Oil,


Diesel, Lube
Oil, Saturated
HC

Etana, Propana,
Nafta

Tabel 2. Perbandingan Produk Perengkahan Termal dan Katalis Secara Umum

Gambar 1. Konfigurasi FCC model lama

References:
Ismail, Ali Fasya. 26 Oktober 1998. Teknologi Minyak Dan Gas Bumi. Univeritas
Sriwijaya: Palembang
Gary, James H, Glenn E. Handwerk. 2001. Petroleum Refining Technology and
Economics Ed.4. Marcell Decker: New York

Anda mungkin juga menyukai