Paul Binkley
Pam Coke
EDUC 463.001
2 May 2015
Unit Plan: Unit 5
The Pale Blue Dot Ecocriticism Unit
Unit Overview
(Note: You can use the navigation pane in Microsoft Word [ctrl+f] for easy
navigation between section headings)
Overarching Course Concepts
How does science fiction function as a critical examination of our past and present
society?
How can reading and writing science fiction enact interdisciplinary thought
experiments?
Please see the Course Overview page and the Course Rationale page for more information
Overarching Unit Concepts
What social, personal, and global conflicts are enacted through inheritance?
What are possible outcomes of humanitys treatment of the environment?
Lingering Question: Are these overarching unit concepts helpful? Are they
an effective balance of broad and specific?
Context
School: Berthoud High school, Berthoud, Colorado
Course: Science Fiction and the STEM Fields
Grade: 11th and 12th Grade
Please see the Course Context page for more detailed information.
Guiding Standards for Unit
Binkley 2
choice to provide a comedic or tragic resolution) contribute to its overall structure and
meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.11-12.7: Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information
presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words
in order to address a question or solve a problem.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.2: Integrate multiple sources of information presented in
diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make
informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each
source and noting any discrepancies among the data.
Duration
3 weeks (12 class periods)
Unit Goals
Texts
Nausica of the Valley of the Wind by Hayao Miyazaki (graphic novel, all 4 volumes)
Understanding Comics by Scott McCloud (book, excerpts)
Hyperion: A Fragment by John Keats (poem)
Pale Blue Dot by Carl Sagan (book, excerpt)
Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, episode 13 (video clip) This clip contains audio and
video for part of the Pale Blue Dot excerpt
Star Trek: The Next Generation episode: The Inner Light
Unit Calendar
Please see the linked Unit 5 Calendar on the course website
Binkley 3
Lesson Plans
These lesson plans have been constructed as if they were for a third-period class. Third period
meets Monday, Tuesday, and Friday from 9:14-10:01 (47 minutes) and on Thursday from
9:13am-10:51am (98 minutes).
M = Monday
Tu = Tuesday
Th = Thursday
F = Friday
Day 1 (Th)
(Understanding by Design template)
Client Organization: Berthoud High School Telephone: (970) 613-7700
Main Contact: Paul Binkley
Fax: N/A
VITAL INFORMATION
Author
Paul Binkley
*Subject(s)
Topic or Unit of
Study
*Grade/Level
*Summary
This lesson will introduce the basic concepts and questions that guide ecocriticism.
Students will then practice applying these concepts to Feed (previously read) in
pairs
STANDARDS
Binkley 4
*Standards
Become familiar with the principles and questions that guide ecocriticism
Understandings
Overarching
Understanding
Related
Misconceptions
Misconceptions:
Essential Questions
Knowledge
Binkley 5
Skills
By what criteria will performances be judged? Their chosen passage and analysis
will be assessed in terms of whether they accurately apply ecocritical questions and consider
ecocritical themes in their selection and analysis. In addition, students will be assessed on their
rationale for their chosen passage and their reasoning in analyzing that passage.
How will students reflect upon and self assess their learning: Students will
reflect on their learning as they move forward through the unit. Feed will provide a shared source
for reviewing these concepts to support their application to Unit 5s texts. Referring to and reflecting
upon their learning at the beginning
the unit will help students to better assess their own growth.
Goal Toofunderstand
the basics of ecocriticism and guiding questions for
applying this lens of theory
Role Reader and analyzer
Audience Peers and instructor
Situation In-class practice analysis
Product/PerformancePair-and-share
Binkley 6
Standards
How will you hook students at the beginning This lesson will open with us watching a clip from
of the unit?
Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, which is a video
accompaniment for Carl Sagan reading an excerpt
from his book The Pale Blue Dot. This is an eloquent
passage with engaging visuals, and it connects well to
the major themes of ecocriticism.
We will return to this clip later in the lesson.
Binkley 7
What events will help students experience and Students are immersed in a context that is increasingly
explore the big idea and questions in the unit? concerned with ecological issues and global warming
How will you equip them with needed skills
and knowledge?
Binkley 8
How will you tailor and otherwise personalize The paired work will allow students to receive support
the learning plan to optimize the engagement from a peer, and requiring only one of the two in a pair
and effectiveness of ALL students, without
to share allows more shy students to not be put on the
compromising the goals of the unit?
spot. Having fostered a classroom climate that is
highly supportive of students asking question (e.g.
making time for questions throughout a less and
endorsing the no stupid questions philosophy) will
help students seek clarification and/or assistance when
they are struggling.
During the paired work time, I will circulate
throughout the room and check in with students,
particularly those who might have difficulty with some
of the words/concepts presented in the PowerPoint.
Binkley 9
Well be reading all 4 volumes of Nausica and that means well need to move pretty quickly.
Remember, this is a graphic novel, so the reading load isnt quite as heavy as it looks. That said,
remember to carefully read the written text and the visual text. Next time well talk more about
strategies for reading visual texts.
Lingering Question: Does Berthoud High School use BlackBoard or a similar
program? I could not find out for sure. Some parts of their site seemed to
suggest they do, but I didnt find anything definite. If I want to answer this,
I may need to contact them directly.
Day 2 (F)
(Note: as I have previously mentioned, my lesson plans are often heavy on
words and somewhat script-like, but once I am teaching them I only use
these lesson plans as outlines; I do not read from them as if they were
scripts. It just helps me to think on paper in this level of detail).
Learning targets and standards will be projected at the beginning of every
class period.
Daily Learning Target(s)
Explore how space and panel design can be used to convey time in comics
Introduce main unit text: Nausica of the Valley of the Wind (graphic novel)
Become familiar with the expectations of Unit 5s culminating texts
Standard(s) Addressed
Attendance (2 min)
Binkley 10
WtL (5 min)
(Note: all overheads are documents to be projected from a laptop and/or
on a SmartBoard, unless indicated otherwise. These overheads will be at
least 16-point font, though they will be presented here in 12-point font)
(Project overhead):
Take a few minutes to respond to the following.
1. What was most surprising, exciting, and/or confusing about the pages we read for today?
Make sure to provide a specific page number.
2. What did you find challenging about reading the visual parts of the text? Or how/why
was having visual components helpful/insightful for you?
Share Out (5 min)
Ask 6 students to share, moving down the class roster. This will allow every student to share
eventually, allow students to know when they will be expected to share, and allow us to move
through this portion more efficiently than calling on every student.
If students do not readily do so, ask them to provide the page(s) that they are referring to in their
answers.
Comics: Time, Space, and Setting (15 min)
Using the doc cam, show pages 94-97, 100-103 from Scott McClouds Understanding Comics.
Page 94: emphasize the idea that a panel is not necessarily a single moment in time. Pair that
with:
Page 95, bottom panel: Just as pictures and the intervals between them create the illusion of
time through closure [that is, our brains filling in the action/information between panels, even
when we arent told exactly what it is see Ch. 3 for more details], words introduce time by
representing that which can only exist in time sound. With all its actions and reactions, a panel
such as this one could last a good half minute or so (95).
Page 100: In learning to read comics we all learned to perceive time spatially, for in the world
of comics, time and space are one and the same
Page 100-101: compare the different panel layouts/sizes to illustrate how they can give differing
impressions of time. Follow this up with similar points made on pages 102-103.
Apply to reading from Nausica:
Binkley 11
Contrast opening 3 panels (page 6) to the first 2-6 panels on page 9. The opening panels are
larger, which both help us take in the sweeping landscape (establishing important elements about
the setting, both in historical context [the skeleton of the giant] and giving the impression that the
panels on page 6 take longer than the panels on page 9.
On the other hand, this is not always used to establish the passing of time; it can also be used to
establish the enormity of some object and/or allow the artist to provide more details about that
object. Look at the example on page 15, of the Ohmu coming out of the forest. This presumably
happens very quickly, so the panel size instead suggests an emphasis on detail and the
significance of the even/object, rather than suggesting the passage of time.
Prompt students: What other panels do you see that are significantly larger than other panels?
Why do you think that is the case? What might the panel size/design be suggesting?
If students to not volunteer suggestions, some options include the first panel on page 37 (tall
panel suggests a third dimension of one plane circling over another) or the larger panels on page
41, which here suggest stillness and very limited movement (aligning more with indicating more
time passing in these panels)
Closing: As you read more over the weekend, take some time to reread some of the pages you
read for today. As you reread, consider what inferences you can make about the ecological past
of this world. In applying an ecocritical lens, what is setting telling you about the natural world
and humanitys relation to it?
Overview of Culminating Assignments (10 min)
Present the assignment sheets to the class, reading only the initial overview. Direct them to the
rhetorical breakdown (purpose, audience, etc.) that follows and the scoring guide for more
information.
For The Archive assignment, encourage them to consider what texts from this class would
qualify, but make it clear that they are not limited to just the texts weve read, and they are not
limited to only science fiction. This is their choice.
(Note: the Archive assignment will be turned in after this unit officially ends, but since it is a
larger project than the comic/short story assignment, and since it is closely aligned with themes
raised in this unit, I felt it was important to provide the assignment sheet now).
For comic assignment, plug additional pages from Scott McClouds book that will be made
available digitally, or students can borrow my copy. I will have high expectations for considering
the ideas McCloud puts forward.
Take questions that students prepared.
Assign Homework (3 min)
Binkley 12
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 13
Attendance (2 min)
Set Up/Group Up for Activity (3 min)
The last few class periods have involved a lot of me talking, so today well switch it up and have
you guide the majority of the discussion. I will assign you to groups. Take out the homework
your prepared (hypothesis, evidence, etc.) and take it with you to your group. Once youre there,
one group member will need to be the scribe, then 2 of your will be presenters to the rest of the
class once you finish with the group work.
(Break them into groups of 4, mixing varying proficiency levels in regards to students skills for
making inferences and citing evidence in the semester so far)
Group Analysis and Argument (20-25 min)
The following instructions will be projected throughout, and introduced once theyre in groups:
(Project overhead):
Using your homework, discuss your interpretation with your group. By the end of this group
work, your group must produce combined answers to the questions you responded to for
homework.
This answer should be a combination of more than one of your group members answers. One
group member will be the scribe to record your answers, two of your group members will present
your conclusion to the class.
In the pages you read for homework form inferences about the ecological history of this
world and its implications for an ecocritical reading. To do so, answer the following:
o In 2-3 sentences, provide a hypothesis on what you think this worlds ecological
history is based on details about the setting/environment (not dialogue).
o Provide at least 3 pieces of evidence (including page numbers) that support your
hypothesis. In other words: what makes you think your hypothesis is true? What,
specifically, led you to make that inference?
o Based on your hypothesis and the evidence you provided, write a minimum of two
sentences on what you think these details about the setting/environment might
suggest for an ecocritical reading of Nausica. It may be helpful to refer to your
notes from Thursdays overview of ecocriticism and the questions it provided for
conducting an ecocritical reading.
Your group must agree on the answers you provide. That may mean compromising on
some details and synthesizing multiple perspectives.
As students work: Walk around and listen in on groups. Offer support as needed, ask probing
questions if groups are struggling (particularly how do you know? what made you think
Binkley 14
that? to prompt them to pull in evidence to support their claims).
This will be used as a form of (primarily) unobtrusive, formative assessment.
Present to Class (15 min)
Have the two speakers from each group present their interpretation.
When your group is not presenting, take notes on how their interpretation differs from or aligns
with your groups analysis.
After each group has shared, ask the class to share what ideas/realizations/insight they had from
other groups interpretations, referring to the notes they took down as the other groups presented:
What trends did we see (if any) across all of the interpretations?
What were some significant differences?
What does this suggest about subtext?
o If the answers were mostly similar, then the subtext and implications of the setting
were clearly communicated and easy to interpret
o If there are many differences, that suggests the subtext was more challenging to
interpret (or, from an instructors perspective, it may mean students are still
struggling with the principles of ecocriticism, conducting close readings of visual
texts, and/or using evidence to support their claims).
(Note: Ideally this activity will work as both an unobtrusive assessment for
the instructor and self-assessment for students. I could imagine it still needs
some work)
Assign Homework (2-3 min)
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 15
Attendance (2 min)
WtL (5-10 min)
(Project overhead):
Take about 5-10 minutes to respond to the following questions about your experience in this unit
so far:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
(Collect the WtLs when theyre done; read through them for assessment and differentiation
purposes. Use the assessment info to shape future class periods, including assessing the need for
re-teaching/review)
Review Textual Connections (5 min)
For homework, you were asked to begin making connections between Nausica and
yourself/other texts/your world. These connections can help the reading be more memorable, it
can help lead you to deeper analysis of your reading, and it can offer material for future writing.
Before we move into a partner interview activity, Id like to take a couple minutes to review what
these connections are.
(Project overhead):
Here are three kinds of connections you can consider while reading. Remember: there are no
right or wrong answers in making these connections, but it is important to be able to explain
why you made this connection and why you feel that is significant. To do so, it is helpful to be
able to point to specific, textual evidence.
Text-to-Self: What does this passage, event, and/or character mean to you? Does it
remind you of something your life? Does it make you feel a particular way? Why?
Binkley 16
Text-to-Text: What does this passage, event, and/or character make you think of from a
different text? Does it remind you of something youve read before or experience in some
other text? What seems similar? Why?
Text-to-World: What does this does this passage, event, and/or character make you think
about in relation to our world? Does it seem to be talking about, alluding to, and/or
relevant to something that is happening in the world now or has happened in the past?
Might this passage/event/character matter to people outside of the text? Why?
Binkley 17
Assign Homework (2 min)
This homework is due once theyre back from Thanksgiving Break, so the reading load is a little
heavier.
Day 4 (Tu) Modified Lesson Plan (Fire Drill)
Daily Learning Target(s)
Standard(s) Addressed
Attendance (2 min)
WtL (5-10 min)
(Project overhead):
Take about 5-10 minutes to respond to the following questions about your experience in this unit
so far:
7. The most successful part of reading a graphic novel has been:
8. The most challenging part of reading a graphic novel has been:
9. The most successful/interesting part of applying ecocriticism theory has been:
10. The most challenging part of applying ecocriticism theory has been:
11. I am still struggling with:
12. I would like help with:
(Collect the WtLs when theyre done; read through them for assessment and differentiation
purposes. Use the assessment info to shape future class periods, including assessing the need for
re-teaching/review)
Review Textual Connections (5 min)
Binkley 18
For homework, you were asked to begin making connections between Nausica and
yourself/other texts/your world. These connections can help the reading be more memorable, it
can help lead you to deeper analysis of your reading, and it can offer material for future writing.
Before we move into a partner interview activity, Id like to take a couple minutes to review what
these connections are.
(Project overhead):
Here are three kinds of connections you can consider while reading. Remember: there are no
right or wrong answers in making these connections, but it is important to be able to explain
why you made this connection and why you feel that is significant. To do so, it is helpful to be
able to point to specific, textual evidence.
Text-to-Self: What does this passage, event, and/or character mean to you? Does it
remind you of something your life? Does it make you feel a particular way? Why?
Text-to-Text: What does this passage, event, and/or character make you think of from a
different text? Does it remind you of something youve read before or experience in some
other text? What seems similar? Why?
Text-to-World: What does this does this passage, event, and/or character make you think
about in relation to our world? Does it seem to be talking about, alluding to, and/or
relevant to something that is happening in the world now or has happened in the past?
Might this passage/event/character matter to people outside of the text? Why?
Binkley 19
Students will have more extended reading time next class period, but with the big idea books
(re)introduced, I want to give students an opportunity to write in them while catching up on or
refreshing their memory on the assigned reading.
Assign Homework (2 min)
This homework is due once theyre back from Thanksgiving Break, so the reading load is a little
heavier.
(Note: I forgot Thanksgiving Break fell here, so its caused me to shuffle up
some of my plan. These lesson plans are all the rougher for it and could use
revision)
Day 5 (M)
Daily Learning Target(s)
Standard(s) Addressed
Attendance (2 min)
Conferences and Reading Time (about 45 minutes)
Each students conference will be about 5 minutes or less, allowing us to get through about of
the class during this weeks conference time. Based on assessments I have conducted, I will
prioritize students who seem to be struggling with the content or format of this book/unit.
I would focus primarily on questions that would help encourage students to more complex
reading, while also gaining insight on how the reading has been going for them so far
(particularly when graphic novels may be a new and/or challenging genre for some students).
Binkley 20
I will not address each of the following categories or questions in a single conference. These
represent many options to choose from, depending on what is best suited to the students needs at
the time of the conference.
Questions for Conferences
The following are examples of questions I would choose from when conferencing with a student:
What strategy have you use when close reading this text? Was any one of them easier
than another? Was one of them particularly confusing or difficult for you to implement
for this text?
Do you find a multimodal form (e.g. a comic) to be a more manageable medium for you
compared to traditional texts?
What do you think your greatest strength as a reader is? What aspect do you feel you
need to work to improve/refine the most? Have either of those changed over the semester
so far?
I will also ask them a few, brief questions designed to help lead them to further reading:
Are you enjoying this book? If so, what are you enjoying about it? If not, what do you not
like?
Have you read a graphic novel before? Have you read other comics before? Are you
familiar with any of Miyazakis other work (e.g. Princess Mononoke, Spirited Away, The
Wind Rises, etc.)?
Would you want to read more books like this one? If so, can you think of any that you
think might be similar to this one?
What books have you really enjoyed?
(Adapted from Kittle 78-85 and my Teaching a Text project)
Assign Homework
Binkley 21
Fill out KWL for you knowledge about the overthrow of the Titans in Greek mythology
(see appendix page 42)
For setting up KWL: I know some of you may be more familiar with this topic than others, so Id
like to get a sense of how much you already know. Next time well be beginning John Keats
Hyperion: A Fragment which involves the Titans, and Id like to know how much background
information you might need.
Day 6 (Tu)
Daily Learning Target(s)
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 22
Reading Hyperion (about 20 min, more if less background is needed)
As we have previously discussed in class, books and poems can be paired together to support and
enhanced one another. Ive selected a poem that I feel is well-suited to Nausica, even if the two
are very different. Since the language can be difficult at times, and since you have enough
outside reading as it is, Im going to take the time to read some of this poem to you during our
class time. Ill happily take volunteers to read with me and/or I may ask some of you to read so
its not all me.
As I read, follow along in your copy and have your notebooks read and be looking for both textto-text connections and worthy material for ecocriticism. Of course youll be welcome to note
other details as well, but well be putting this poem in conversation with Nausica as we move
forward.
Read aloud from Hyperion: A Fragment
(I anticipate this getting us to about line 200, best case scenario, leave off at the end of Book I
about line 357)
Lingering Question: I was not initially planning to read this aloud in class,
but between my already heavy reading load for my students and the
student-teacher panels caution against assigning reading, I reconsidered
whether I should assign it as outside reading. Of the two major texts in this
unit (Nausica and Hyperion), the poem was much more realistic to read
in class. Still, I am feeling unsure about much of this plan.
Debrief Discussion/Prep for Next Time (about 10 min)
Pair up with a partner and discuss the following questions. This is a collaborative thinking
process; there is no single right answer Im after, even if I have my own ideas.
(Project overhead):
Pair up with a partner and discuss the following questions:
Have at least two pairs share answers to a question of their choice more if time allows
Assign Homework (2 min)
Binkley 23
Standard(s) Addressed
(Note: Half of this class period will be co-taught. As such, preparing for it
will require significant collaboration and co-planning. The lesson plan that
follows is what I would consider an ideal situation as far as colleague cooperation, but some of the finer points of the ecology component would
need to be filled in by the science teacher. The focus on slime mold is meant
to be a hook to connect this lesson to a weird and somewhat accurate
event/creature in Nausica)
Attendance (2 min)
This class period will be held initially in the co-operating teachers science classroom.
Hook Slime Mold Video (about 4 min including setup)
Our Nausica reading has recently featured a monstrous, land-consuming mold. While plenty of
that is outlandish and unrealistic, the way in which the mold hunts for food and moves in an
animal-like fashion to reach it (see Nausica vol. 2 pages 280 and 282) is not so farfetched. Lets
watch a quick video on how slime mold really behaves: http://bigthink.com/videos/consider-theslime-mold-how-amoebas-form-social-networks-2
Ecology Lesson Forest Ecosystems (about 30 min)
Binkley 24
This segment would be guided and designed by my science teacher colleague. As of yet, I do not
know the specifics of what we would cover, and I would have my colleague take the lead there. I
am considering an emphasis on forest ecosystems because they are the natural habitat of slime
mold (connecting to our hook). I think mold and fungi are also an important feature to consider
since they take on much of the reprocessing/reclamation within the ecosystem, and they can
process waste and pollution created by humans more than many other organisms in a forest
ecosystem.
I will ask my colleague to provide a general overview of how these systems work, with particular
attention to humans indirect (and de-centered) role in the ecosystem. In co-planning, I would
introduce my colleague to the principles of ecocriticism and together we will co-create how our
two disciplines can best intersect and interact on this topic.
I will also ask my co-teacher to prepare demonstrations and engaging activities, but I feel the
specifics of those activities would be best left to that teacher, as it is her/his area of expertise.
During this time, I feel I would be best suited to classroom management, differentiation, and
other relationship-based duties, as these would be my students which whom I have built a
relationship. I would also help my colleague develop language and writing components of the
lesson.
Conduct Research (15 min)
Using laptops, students will conduct research on current environmental/ecological issues, as set
forward by my colleague. They will be required to find credible, peer-reviewed sources as well
as popular sources. The evaluation and differentiation of scholarly and popular sources will be
supported by the 3 Rs, Key Questions to Ask for Evaluation, and the Continuum of
Credibility handouts (see appendix pages 56, 57, and 58) all of which are adapted from or
directly from materials provided to GTAs teaching CO 150 at Colorado State University.
Students will be expected to find, choose, and summarize at least one scholarly source and at
least one popular source on the environmental issue they select. These summaries must be no
more than 200 words, must be entirely in the students own words, and include in-text citation of
page numbers (if applicable).
For those who choose the short story option for the Comic/Short Story assignment, these articles
can support the 3-paragraph summary they will be required to include (see assignment sheet in
the appendix, page 43-48)
Read Aloud: Hyperion (15 min)
As class winds down, we will continue reading Hyperion aloud. As before, students will be
asked to follow along and I will welcome volunteers (including my cooperating teacher) to read
aloud in my place.
Binkley 25
I estimate that we will be able to get through about 90 lines. If our previous goal of reaching
Book II was met, that means we will end at about line 90 in Book II.
Assign Homework (2 min)
Remind students that this Tuesday is the workshop for the Comic/Short Story assignment. That
means they will need complete drafts (i.e. has the required components of the assignment, has
a beginning/middle/end, and is close to the length limit) for Tuesday. If they have not started on
this assignment, they should do so as soon as possible.
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 26
Attendance (2 min)
Conferences and Reading Time (about 45 minutes)
Each students conference will be about 5 minutes or less, allowing us to get through about of
the class during this weeks conference time. This week I will conference with the half of the
class I did not conference with last week. These students are ones I felt were having an easier
time with this units content/texts.
As before, I would focus primarily on questions that would help encourage students to more
complex reading, while also gaining insight on how the reading has been going for them so far
(particularly when graphic novels may be a new and/or challenging genre for some students).
I will not address each of the following categories or questions in a single conference. These
represent many options to choose from, depending on what is best suited to the students needs at
the time of the conference.
Questions for Conferences
The following are examples of questions I would choose from when conferencing with a student:
What strategy have you use when close reading this text? Was any one of them easier
than another? Was one of them particularly confusing or difficult for you to implement
for this text?
Do you find a multimodal form (e.g. a comic) to be a more manageable medium for you
compared to traditional texts?
What do you think your greatest strength as a reader is? What aspect do you feel you
need to work to improve/refine the most? Have either of those changed over the semester
so far?
I will also ask them a few, brief questions designed to help lead them to further reading:
Are you enjoying this book? If so, what are you enjoying about it? If not, what do you not
like?
Binkley 27
Have you read a graphic novel before? Have you read other comics before? Are you
familiar with any of Miyazakis other work (e.g. Princess Mononoke, Spirited Away, The
Wind Rises, etc.)?
Would you want to read more books like this one? If so, can you think of any that you
think might be similar to this one?
What books have you really enjoyed?
(Adapted from Kittle 78-85 and my Teaching a Text project)
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 28
Attendance (2 min)
Free Write (10 min)
As with other free writes, there is no right answer; this is only meant to get you thinking on
paper an positioning yourself within these questions.
(Project overhead):
Take a few minutes to write your thoughts on these questions. This writing is for your eyes only,
so outrace the censor and write without stopping yourself. Let your thoughts flow onto the
page. You do not have to answer all three questions, or stick to just these three, but do what you
can to write continuously for 10 minutes:
What social, personal, and global conflicts are enacted through inheritance?
Are we indebted to our ancestors by the world they built for us?
Is it only right that younger generations should supplant older generations in shaping and
leading the world, when the time comes?
(Note: I will write with them during this time on these prompts, as well as
my thoughts related to these prompts)
Fishbowl Discussion: Inheritance (20 min)
Write on the board: dialectical resolving issues or uncovering truth through a process of
examining opposing ideas or arguments
The purpose of our discussion today will be to bring various perspectives and (potentially)
opposing arguments together to reach a better understanding of the possible meanings within
these texts. This is not a debate that is focused on winning; were all here to better understand
the topic and your peers thoughts on it.
Binkley 29
Take volunteers to be the initial 5 members of the fishbowl. Remind them of the rules: only the
people within the fishbowl can talk, but after a person in the fishbowl has spoken at least once,
someone else from the class can tap them out.
Final rule: as often as possible, root the discussion in specific sections of the text.
(Note: If students do not do so, I will politely push them to point towards
particular parts of the text which led them to think of this idea and/or aligns
with something they already thought or felt)
Ask if any of the members of the fishbowl would be willing to begin by putting forward their
argument or thoughts.
If students are struggling to begin, or if the discussion stalls, I can put forward arguments like:
Younger generations should inherit the Earth and decide for themselves what policies and
ideas are best, regardless of what their elders think/thought.
Inheritance is a burden more often than it is a boon.
Etc. My intent is to inspire controversy and disagreement in other words, opposing arguments
to better understand the truth. As much as possible, leave this discussion as student-guided.
Collect Your Thoughts (5-10 min)
Following that discussion, take several minutes to collect, revise, or record thoughts you have
now. Has anything changed about your initial free write and/or the questions you responded to
for homework? Has this given you new ideas for either of the upcoming projects (Comic/Short
Story or The Archive)?
You can also quietly talk to a partner or small group, so long as you stay on task. Were all part
of a community of readers, writers, and learners, so exchanging and co-constructing our thoughts
can be productive.
(Note: the activities today will be obtrusive and unobtrusive assessments to
examine how well students understanding of this units texts and concepts
has developed)
Collect the writing they did for homework before moving on
Assign Homework (3 min)
Binkley 30
o The more you bring, the more useful feedback you will receive and the more your
peers will gain from workshopping your piece
Bring access to the Comic/Short Story assignment sheet, either digitally or as a hard
copy.
Review Responding Really Responding to Other Students Writing by Richard Straub
(linked on our BlackBoard page) for reminder on effective workshops and feedback.
Day 10 (Tu)
Standard(s) Addressed
Attendance (2 min)
Set Up Workshop (3-5 min)
Provide students with two copies of the workshop guide (see appendix page 59-60) and pair
them with a partner that I have chosen for them for the first round (students will primarily be
paired with students of similar proficiencies). Students can choose their own partner for the
second round.
Workshop (30 min, 15 per draft)
Have student exchange drafts with their partners. Put on music without lyrics quietly in
background.
Binkley 31
As students workshop, go around and check that they brought a complete draft as they were
instructed and record this in toward their process grade for the semester.
If a student finishes early, push them to keep digging deeper and dedicating their time to their
peers work. Work directly with such as student if needed.
Warn students as we approach the 3 minute warning before they need to switch with a new
partner. Ensure they fill out the workshop guide and provide full-sentence comments.
Revision Plan (5 min)
After each author has their draft back with two peers workshop guide/comments, have them take
several minutes to read through the feedback and develop a revision plan. Revision means reseeing: they dont have to accept every suggestion their peers made, but they should re-see
their work in light of that feedback to determine where changes should be made.
Remind them that concrete means specific, detailed plans. For example, if theyre going to
work on improving their dialogue, what about their dialogue are they going to work on
improving? How will they go about improving it?
(Project overhead Revision plan):
Revision Plan
Leave here with a minimum of TWO concrete revisions for your project (you can base your
revision plan off of comments from your readers or your own ideas the workshop has inspired)
Concrete: What specifically are you going to revise between now and next time? How
well are you meeting the requirements of this assignment?
How well do you feel you are measuring up to what the project guidelines and the scoring guide?
Go back through your project to see if there is anything you can strengthen. This is YOUR time!
Use it wisely
Assign Homework (3 min)
Finish Book III of Hyperion: A Fragment if you have not done so already
Revise the draft of your assignment that you brought today and bring the revised draft for
Thursdays Style and Convention Seminar (SCS).
Having finished Nausica, decide whether you support the decision she made at the end
of the book in regards to the Crypt. If you feel she made the right decision, be prepared to
produce evidence to defend that stance. Likewise, if you feel she made the wrong
decision, have evidence to support that stance.
o While Nausica would likely be the best source for textual support, you can also
bring in material from Hyperion, other texts weve read in class, other texts
Binkley 32
youve read outside of class, and your own writing. Whatever evidence you
choose, be ready to defend its relevance.
Lingering Question: More of a known problem in this case: the debate needs
better set up and preparation. I feel this would be best achieved by
restructuring the unit/course more broadly; this unit is too rushed and
needs to be expanded, likely at the cost of other units.
Day 11 (Th) Grammar Instruction
Daily Learning Target(s)
Standard(s) Addressed
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.11-12.2 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English
capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.11-12.2.a Observe hyphenation conventions.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.1.c Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions
that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or
issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative
perspectives.
Attendance (2 min)
SCS PowerPoint and Practice (60 min)
See SCS PowerPoint (linked on class page) for more details.
For Spock slide: Spock is nothing is not academic-sounding. Can anyone think of a simpler way
to rephrase what Spocks saying here? (Note: Both Star Trek and the song its
alluding to are aging fast. If students still get this joke, theyre not likely to
much longer)
Practice times: about 5 minutes each for rivet theory slide, Practice Time! #1, and Practice
Time #2!
Transition to hyphens: The word sci-fi usually has a hyphen, but science fiction usually does
not. Why do you think that might be?
Binkley 33
After overview of hyphen rules: Ask students if they have seen any examples of hyphenated
words in reading the non-fiction pieces, particularly ones they found on their own.
(Distribute example text for partnered practice see appendix page 61 for example text)
Give pairs 5 minutes to work through this. Afterwards, ask for a pair of students to volunteer
examples that they found, see if others found different examples and/or disagrees with the
changes the pair made.
Following the partner exercise, ask students why you might include hyphens in creative writing
(beyond youre supposed to because you have to follow the rules)? What unusual compound
adjectives can you create? What does that allow you to communicate that you couldnt achieve
as effectively otherwise?
This will hopefully segue to a the 5-hyphen activity. After giving them 3-5 min, ask a couple
students to share. Then shift to applying these concepts to their drafts.
If it was not previously answered, or if other would like to offer additional answers, return to the
question of why science fiction is not usually hyphenated but sci-fi usually is. If this has
been thoroughly addressed, skip the final slide.
Crypt Debate (25 min: 10 prep, 15 debate)
Have student begin by self-selecting which side they would like to take in the debate: for or
against Nausicas decision. If groups are significantly unequal, ask for volunteer/conscript some
people to take the opposing view.
With their group, theyll have 10 minutes to prepare their key points, including evidence. They
will need a 1-2 minute opening statement, and they need to also have additional information to
support the ongoing debate later.
During the 10 minutes prep time, Ill walk between both groups and help them brainstorm,
organize, stay on task, etc.
After 10 minutes, do a coin toss for which side speaks first. Then the other side can briefly
respond before offering their opening statement. Each group will have a minute or two to confer
with their team after each round or points and counterpoints.
At the end, ask if anyone has changed their mind/feels differently about this issue now.
Closure leading into next time: What matters more: preservation or appreciation? Does
preservation matter without appreciation? If something is saved, but no one values it and/or does
not share it, is preservation still worthwhile?
Binkley 34
Assign Homework (2 min)
Finalize your draft of the Comic/Short Story assignment. Bring a hard copy of all
components of that assignment.
Make sure to proofread for typos and other style/convention/grammar issues, including
the ones discussed in our SCS.
Day 12 (F)
Standard(s) Addressed
Binkley 35
4. Is there anything I should know as I assess this assignment?
5. How did the medium you chose (short story or comic) create new challenges and/or new ways
to convey your meaning? Do you feel this helped you be more successful with this project that
other media would allow? Why or why not?
(Lingering Question: Another known problem I cant fit this postscript and
the entirety of the episode. I have not yet decided whether to shorten the
episode or reshuffle my unit plan. Since I feel I am likely to revise my entire
unit, and the yearlong plan by extension, I have chosen to leave these two in
the same lesson for now)
TNG The Inner Light (46 min with setup time)
The Inner Light is the 25th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generations 5th season.
For those of you unfamiliar with Star Trek, this is the second series, titled The Next Generation,
which aired some fifteen years after the original. It was made in the 80s, so it isnt the flashiest
show ever made, but if you overlook some cheesiness and let you imagination ride with the story,
I think its an enjoyable, and even powerful, show.
The basic context: The Enterprise is a spaceship in the 23rd Century which flies around the
galaxy exploring new worlds and dealing with all kinds of issues. From a writing perspective, it
is largely a go anywhere, do anything sort of show. It does play by its own set of rules, but
those rules afford it enough freedom to write a wide variety of plots.
This particular episode involves all of the major themes weve been discussing: inheritance,
preservation, and an ecological apocalypse. To help you plug this text into the others weve been
reading and discussing, Ive prepared an organizer. Youll respond to some of it as we watch and
youll respond to some of it at home over the weekend.
(See appendix, page 62-63 for organizer)
(What follows are miscellaneous thoughts that cannot fit into this current
time slot) If time allows after making the changes noted above, discussing this when its fresh
would be valuable. It connects to our major concerns (as noted above), but it also relates to the
questions I asked at the end of last class: is preservation valuable if it cannot or will not be
shared? Does appreciation matter more than preservation? The people of Kataan, in designing
their probe, seem to favor appreciation over widely accessible preservation: Picard has lived a
life with them and has a lifetime of memories that is appreciation in a profound sense. But
when it fries the probe to transmit this experience, the cost of profoundly impacting one person is
to have him be the only person who will every truly know about them. Like the end of Nausica,
the people who preserved themselves on the cultural Ark cannot live again; their world is
Binkley 36
irretrievably lost. Unlike Nausica, the one most in charge of their legacy does cherish and
preserve it, in what few ways he can.
Assign Homework (2 min)
Complete the take-home portions of the organizer we used for the Star Trek episode
If you have not already done so, begin working on your Archive at the End of the
World assignment. We will be workshopping it this coming Thursday and constructing it
will take time and research.
Notes: As mentioned in the Archive assignment sheet, this lesson grew out
of a conversation with Anton on May 6th. After hearing my description of the
end of Nausica and my themes of ecocriticism and inheritance, Anton
suggested this episode (which is one of my all-time favorites why didnt I
think of this?!). After we talked in more depth, I began forming the idea
The Archive assignment to replace a previous multi-genre project idea.
When discussing this assignment idea with Anton, he suggested the debate
between preservation and appreciation. That questions is particularly
relevant to the subtext of The Archive assignment, which is somewhat
subtly about canonization and official art. Preservations v. appreciation is
also highly relevant to Nausica, where The Crypt is preserved exceedingly
well (for the moment, at least), but wholly unappreciated: first it is unknown
an inaccessible, then its world-saving gift is rejected by Nausica, in no
small part due to the sacrifice such a gift would entail.
So my talk with him was not formal planning, but I would say he contributed
at least as much as I did to this particular lesson, and his ideas significantly
influenced The Archive assignment. I consider this to be work I did as part
of a professional learning community, if perhaps not the one I was assigned
to.
Binkley 37
Reflective Commentary
How did you develop ideas?
This unit, like the rest of the course, grew out of the ongoing work Ive been going on my M.A.
project, which aims to design a yearlong course for high school students that uses science fiction
as a tool for interdisciplinary learning. I have designed this courses units to primarily be
thematically built around a lens of critical theory or a subgenre of science fiction. This unit got to
combine both: ecocriticism and graphic novels. When I began planning this course a little over a
year ago, the text I wanted to use for ecocriticism was Dune. While I still love Dune, I decided I
wanted a graphic novel and Nausica was a natural fit. I became more committed to my plan to
use Nausica as it became apparent most of the author and characters Ive chosen to focus on are
white men. While Miyazaki is still a male author, he is not American or European, and the main
character is a strong, three-dimensional young woman a welcome addition to my list of men
and teenage boys.
More generally, I developed ideas by thinking about them at length and thinking on paper in
my notebook. I also latched onto the inheritance angle while rereading Hyperion for Dan
Beachy-Quicks Keats and Celan class. I needed more poetry in the course Im designing, and
everything about Hyperion (from its emphasis on beauty/power/truth, a fallen generation
seeking futilely to reclaim their world from a younger generation, and dead/dormant giants) align
extremely well with the world of Nausica, and particularly with The Crypt and its foiled plan to
purify the world so the old humans could re-inhabit it. From there, I went down a long path of
abstract and messy planning, which periodically received substantial boosts from my peers.
How did you make decisions as you planned?
I began by building the culminating texts, which are overhauled versions of ideas I previously
had when making my yearlong plan. Once I had those end products in mind, I shifted to the
beginning of the unit to lay out the foundations of ecocriticism (for which I picked up The
Ecocriticism Reader, edited by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm). Once I laid out the end
point and the beginning foundations, I mostly planned by trying to stitch those two points
together while keeping the work relevant to the text they will be reading and vice versa.
Beyond that, my planning was far messier than I should half allowed it to be. This was more
rushed than I intended, and it suffered for it. I feel it has a fair number of strengths, but most of
its weaknesses were created or intensified by its rapid production. Overall, my assessment is still
lacking and other details are not well developed (such as The Crypt debate, which is still an
idea I like in theory but is only planned to a superficial level at this point).
How did you address questions including lingering questions?
Binkley 38
The questions I had before finalizing this draft I addressed either by conducting more research
(e.g. Ecocriticism Reader), reviewing old material (ranging from my notes for this course, to my
notes/textbook for EDUC 350, to my assessment portfolio a year ago), and by asking my peers
and advisor questions. Other lingering questions remain, and some will require ongoing work to
address them. One of the biggest things I can do to address the remaining questions would be to
spend more time on this unit, and I intend to do so over the summer. I need to adjust the layout of
my course, perhaps cutting a unit or two, then return to this unit and flesh out/revise some key
details.
As an example of a question I had specifically answered: I previously had an extended definition
multi-genre project as the culminating assignment for this unit. There are part I liked about it, but
the assignment felt a little forced and prescriptive. I turned to my peers for this one, where I
asked Anton for feedback. While he did not directly give me advice for changing that
assignment, our conversations led me to new ideas that I feel are more interesting (The
Archive assignment), particularly within the context of my yearlong course.
How do you think this unit plan will play out in the classroom?
That is hard for me to say, since my experience teaching in the secondary classroom is still fairly
limited. My course/M.A. project is fairly idealistic, and I know they will need adjustments for
many reasons, including administrator/district demands, the interests/proficiencies of my
students, and resources available. I think the level of reading I am expecting my students to do at
this point is unrealistic, based on what I heard from our student-teacher panel. So I imagine it
would be overwhelming for my students as it stands, and the unit could be improved through
revision.
I do feel it would have some strengths in the classroom. I am working in a fairly broad variety of
texts and media, which I feel will be engaging for students. The Archive project allows for
student choice and passion much more than my previous assignment, and student choice/passion
are a key part of the philosophy behind this course. I also feel like this unit aligns fairly well with
the dont assign anything you dont want to read philosophy; I am genuinely excited to see
what students might produce for both of the culminating assignments, particularly The Archive.
Anything else you want to share?
Some of my shortcomings on assessment may be due to my attempt to experiment with
lightening the grading load compared to how I structure CO 150. By lightening the load, I do
not mean I planned to assess less, just to assess more efficiently and selectively. I am not sure I
met that goal, and I do feel it contributed some of my assessments falling short.
Other than that, Id like to apologize for delivering such a messy job. It is less than my best
work, but due to all the craziness this semester and my last-minute stroke of luck in getting to do
my research (not to mention some bad time management on my part more generally, this was
Binkley 39
delayed far longer than it should have been. Large chunks of it were built in single sittings with
little sleep, and I feel it shows. I appreciate your patience in getting all the way through this draft
all the same. And I can assure you I will revise it, but not before it is due at this rate.
Binkley 40
Appendix
Questions to Guide Ecocriticism (Handout) ...41
KWL Chart: Titans .....42
Single-Scene Comic/Ecological Apocalypse Short Story Assignment Sheet...43-48
The Archive at the End of the World Assignment Sheet...49-55
3 Rs of Evaluating Sources (Handout)......56
Key Questions to Ask for Evaluations (Handout)..57
Continuum of Credibility (Handout)..58
Workshop Guide for Single-Scene Comic/Ecological Apocalypse Short Story...59-60
Student Sample Paper for Hyphen Exercise...............61
Star Trek: The Next Generation The Inner Light Organizer...62-63
EDUC 463 Self-Evaluataion..64-66
Works Consulted....67-68
Binkley 41
Question to Guide Ecocriticism (Handout)
In this class, we will use the following questions to guide our ecocritical readings. As you read
through a text, use close-reading strategies like the 6 Signposts to identify important places for
conducting a close reading. Those are often good times to apply principles of ecocriticism, but
you also want to pay particular attention to how setting is used and how nature is depicted and/or
discussed.
Our exploration of ecocriticism will be guided by the following questions:
How is nature affect humanity? How is it affected by humanity?
How can humanity cause ecological crises? How can we humanity avoid them?
How are setting and place operating in the text? (If nature is absent, why is it absent?
What does imply?)
What can ecology and science more broadly reveal about literature? What can literature
reveal about science?
What is our responsibility as inheritors of the Earth?
Binkley 42
NAME:
TOPIC
The Titans being overthrown by the Olympian gods in Greek mythology
Binkley 43
Binkley 44
Assignment Sheet: Single-Scene Comic/Ecological Apocalypse Short Story
You have two choices for this assignment:
You can choose to make a comic of a single scene from either an assigned text weve
read so far (except Nausica) or from one of the outside reading books you have read as
part of the outside reading you have done for this class.
OR
You can choose to write a short story featuring an ecological apocalypse based on a
current ecological issue
Both options must reflect your understanding of ecocriticism, as discussed throughout this unit.
If you choose to make a comic, refer to the material we read from Scott McClouds
Understanding Comics for concerns like representing space and time within a comic. This comic
should capture a scene from beginning to end, using the original dialogue and actions (if
applicable). The comic should be a minimum of 14 panels and offer your reader a thorough
understanding of the scene, including capturing all dialogue, action, etc. present in the original
scene.
If you choose to write a short story, you will be asked to produce two components. One is the
short story itself, which should be at least 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font) that involved
an ecological apocalypse, drawing inspiration from current ecological issues. The other
component is three-paragraph summary of the ecological issue you based your story on
(including citing at least one source) and addressing how this issue influenced your story.
This assignment is due Thursday, December 10th
Prioritized Standards
Binkley 45
Purpose: Comic
The purpose of the comic is to translate a full scene from a book into a different medium in this
case, a comic. You need to carefully read and analyze the scene from the original text, including
working out what necessary information is not explicitly stated. You then need to work to capture
the same events, dialogue, action, characters, and meaning within your comic.
Purpose: Short Story
The purpose of the short story is to construct a short piece of fiction by drawing inspiration from
non-fiction science writing on ecological issues. As with other forms of fiction, your purposes
involve engaging and entertaining your reader and you will seek to convey some message to
your reader.
Audience
For both assignments, your audience will be your teacher and your peers. That means you can
assume they have a certain level of background knowledge about literature, science fiction, and
ecocriticism. However, in the comic option, your audience may not be familiar with the outside
reading you chose to convert, in which case you should make sure to establish the context
necessary for understanding your chosen scene.
Genre: Comic
You will be constructing a short comic that is at least 14 panels long, but you can include more
than that. Remember our reading from Scott McClouds Understanding Comics and consider
how many panels you may need to effectively convey the passage of time and the movement
needed for this scene.
Genre: Short Story
This short story should be at least 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font). It should involve an
ecological apocalypse based on ecological issues you have researched. This story could be preor post-apocalypse. Depending on the choices you make, it could be very heavily influenced by
science fiction tropes, or it may have very few science fiction tropes.
You must also include a 3-paragraph summary of the ecological issue your short story was
inspired by (including citing at least 1 source for evidence) and a brief explanation of how that
issue influenced your story.
Organization
Binkley 46
In either genre, your organization should be logically chosen for the purpose and events of your
text. Since these are works of fiction, it is possible your events may not be entirely linear, but
make sure your audience is not likely to get lost of confused in your organizational choices.
A comic should be divided into several panels with careful consideration of how much content to
include in a single panel, when to begin a new panel, and how many panels should be used for a
particular action.
A short story usually begins in the middle of a larger sequence of events, but still offers some
degree of rising action, conflict, and resolution.
Style and Convention
Your writing should be carefully proofread and revised to eliminate any errors. Style and tone
should be chosen according to how you wish to depict the characters in the story. For your
comic, the style and tone should match the style and tone of the original text. For the short story,
carefully consider how your characters would talk to one another and any other factors that
would influence how they speak.
Timeline
Workshop (Comic and/or Short story): Monday, December 7th
Final draft due: Thursday, December 10th
Reflection
The following reflection will be completed in class after turning in your final draft.
As with other assignments in this course, I will ask you to reflect on your writing process.
This reflection will include our usual postscript questions (see below) as well as a
question to reflect on how the options you had for the medium of this assignment
influenced your process.
Postscript Questions
1. What was most successful about this project? Why?
2. Where did you struggle most? How did you address this challenge?
3. What did you do to revise? How did you use your workshop feedback?
4. Is there anything I should know as I assess this assignment?
5. How did the medium you chose (short story or comic) create new challenges and/or new ways
to convey your meaning? Do you feel this helped you be more successful with this project that
other media would allow? Why or why not?
Binkley 47
Scoring Guide: Comic
Prioritized Standard 1: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.11-12.7 Analyze multiple interpretations of a
story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry),
evaluating how each version interprets the source text.
Score
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
2.0
Binkley 48
3.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Binkley 49
0.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
2.0
End Comment:
Binkley 50
I have never been taught effective ways for assessing fiction writing,
and I have little knowledge on assessing visual texts. This was a
challenge in constructing this assignment and will be a challenge in
teaching/assessing it.
Binkley 51
Assignment Sheet: Archive at the End of the World Multi-Genre Project
(Note: This assignment will be turned in after Unit 5 has officially ended, but it will be
introduced and scaffolded during Unit 5)
Science fiction [is] a great way to pretend you are writing about the future when
in reality you are attacking the recent past and the present. You can criticize
communists, racists, fascists or any other clear and present danger, and they can't
imagine you are writing about them. - Ray Bradbury
In this unit, we have looked at a few different visions of the end of the/a world. Apocalyptic and
post-apocalyptic themes are common in science fiction. The popularity of those themes may be
connected to Bradburys claim above: showing how the world might end in the future can be a
very effective way to criticize our present. Or, it may be a popular theme because of the bleak
and dramatic backdrop such a theme brings to a story. However, in storytelling, darkness and
hopelessness alone is not very compelling; usually authors will give the reader some glimmer of
hope. One form this might take is an archive or an ark that will carry some preserved piece of
humanity into the future.
With our unit theme of inheritance, we have been talking about what gifts, responsibilities, and
burdens we might pass on to future generations. In this assignment, you will be asked to envision
an imminent, inescapable, apocalyptic scenario: the end of the world is upon us and it cannot be
stopped. However, humanity has the opportunity to preserve a few pieces of our culture in an
indestructible archive. We do not know who will find the archive or when they might find it, but
humanity has decided to collect a few, precious pieces of our culture to preserve for the future. It
is possible some future humans will survive and find this archive, or perhaps a visiting alien
species will be the ones to discover The Archive. For the sake of this assignment, we will assume
humanity has devised a way to ensure that anyone who finds The Archive can understand its
contents.
Humanity can choose only 10 pieces of our culture to preserve. These 10 pieces can be chosen
from fictional texts (from any era), poems, film, music, non-fiction and/or informational texts. In
addition to the 10 texts, The Archive will include an introductory text offering a greeting and an
explanation of why these 10 pieces were chosen.
You are charged with making the following, crucial decisions about The Archive:
Which ten pieces of our culture will you preserve (choosing from fictional texts, poems,
film, music, non-fiction and/or informational texts)?
o For each text, include at least three sentences from that text exemplifying why
you feel this text was worthy of being included.
o For music with no lyrics or a segment of film with no dialogue (if it best captures
why that film was worth including) write a description of the song/scene and
Binkley 52
write a 2-3 sentence rationale of why this song/scene was the best example (in
addition to the more extensive rationale below).
You will need to write a greeting for whoever finds The Archive as well as an explanation
for why you chose these 10 cultural artifacts. This component should be at least 4 pages,
double-spaced (12-point font). You may need more than 4 pages to thoroughly write this
component. If you need more than 4 pages, please take as much additional space as you
need.
At the bottom of this introductory piece, indicate how you imagine The Archive being
presented. Possible examples include:
o You may present it in a fashion similar to what we say in Nausica, where it is an
archive presented by a holographic interface.
o Or you may choose to present it in a manner like what we say in the Star Trek:
The Next Generation episode (The Inner Light), where one person gains
memories of directly experiencing these cultural artifacts.
o Or you may choose a completely different and original method!
There is no right or wrong answer to the tasks above. However, you will need to make a
compelling argument to defend your choices.
This assignment is due Tuesday, December 22nd
Prioritized Standards
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to inform future being about humanity and the cultural
artifacts that you chose to preserve. You will also be persuading these beings that these artifacts
and the glimmer of humanity they preserve are worthy of being saved and studied.
Audience
Binkley 53
Your audience is some individual or group of people who discover The Archive some amount of
time in the future. You get to take some imaginative liberties in regards to who might find it and
when they might find it:
Once youve settled on some details about who find it and when, consider the following to help
guide your argument:
What would these people/creatures need, value, and believe? How can you appeal to
these details in order to better persuade your audience?
Why might they search for/find The Archive? Do they find it by accident? Are they
looking for artifacts from past humans?
What evidence/reasoning would these being be persuaded by?
For one reason or another, these beings wish to unlock the secrets of The Archive. Remember,
humanity has also found a way to ensure that whatever beings find it, they will be able to
understand all of The Archives contents.
Genre
This will be a multi-genre project. It will have a 10 texts and an introduction/rationale. The 10
texts can be pieces of fiction, non-fiction, poems, film, music, or informational texts. The
Archive can only fit 10 texts, in addition to the introduction, so you need to carefully consider
which 10 are worth preserving. These texts can be chosen from any period in humanitys history.
Each text must be accompanied by at least 3 sentences chosen from the text which exemplify
why this text is worthy of being preserved/studied. All texts must be turned in with this
assignment. If this requires lending me these texts in some way, I will take good care of them and
return them to you promptly. If you can provide a link to these texts online, that is also an
acceptable way to turn them in.
The introduction/rationale will be a minimum 4 pages, double-spaced (12-point font). You may
need more than 4 pages to thoroughly write this component. If you need more than 2 pages,
please take as much additional space as you need.
Organization
Your introduction should have an introduction, body, and conclusion. The introduction
should include a guiding thesis statement which relates to your rationale for including
these texts/cultural artifacts. Your thesis should be supported by reasons, which should be
supported by evidence, and you should explain that evidence (refer to the TREX
argument structure).
Binkley 54
You may arrange the 10 cultural artifacts in whatever you order, but do consider what
sequence would be most persuasive and/or moving for this particular audience.
Style and Convention
Your tone and word choice should be formal and easy to understand. Be concise in your
writing and purposeful with the words you include in your sentences. Your final draft will
be carefully proofread to catch errors.
Timeline
Complete rough draft due for workshop on Thursday, December 17th
Final draft due Tuesday, December 22nd
Reflection
The following reflection will be completed in class after turning in your final draft.
As with other assignments in this course, I will ask you to reflect on your writing process.
This reflection will include our usual postscript questions (see below) as well as a
question to reflect on how this assignment relates to the larger literary discourse/context.
Postscript Questions
1. What was most successful about this project? Why?
2. Where did you struggle most? How did you address this challenge?
3. What did you do to revise? How did you use your workshop feedback?
4. Is there anything I should know as I assess this assignment?
5. What did this assignment reveal for you and/or make you think about in regards to how
literature is valued in our society? Do you feel you chose texts which would also have been
chosen by textbook makers and/or your teachers? What do those similarities and differences tell
you about how your tastes/interests fit into (or perhaps do not fit into) the larger contexts that
surround this assignment and this course?
Scoring Guide
The following rubric will be used to assess your assignment. Keep in mind that the various
rhetorical concerns are highly interdependent; if one concern is lacking, it may affect other
concerns (for example, an ineffective development for audience will weaken your ability to
achieve your purpose).
Binkley 55
Prioritized Standard 1: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.11-12.7: Integrate and evaluate multiple
sources of information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as
well as in words in order to address a question or solve a problem.
Score
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
2.0
Binkley 56
1.0
Include highly effective appeals to the audiences needs, values, and beliefs
Clearly and concisely establish background information needed for the
audience to understand the rationale
Offer insightful reflection and/or commentary on human culture, history, and
nature through the chosen texts
Choose texts which reflect a variety of time periods and cultures
The student will:
Include a rationale with textual evidence and appeals to the audiences needs,
values, and/or beliefs
Establish necessary background knowledge for audience to understand the
rationale and chosen texts
provide a glimpse into human culture, human nature, and/or human history
through the chosen texts
The student will:
Include a rationale with some textual evidence or some audience appeals
Provides a small amount of background information
Include texts that are somewhat limited in scope (historically and/or culturally)
With help, partial success at score 2.0 content and score 3.0 content
0.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
Binkley 57
1.0
Sequence the chosen texts in such a way that the transitions do not distract or
confuse the reader
The student will:
Write an introduction that is not out of place in its context (i.e. the end of the
world)
Choose excerpts which offer some insight into why the chosen texts are
significance
Sequence the chosen texts in a way that neither enhances nor detracts from the
reader understanding each text
With help, partial success at score 2.0 content and score 3.0 content
0.0
2.0
End Comment:
Standards-based grading is still very new to me, and I feel what Ive
outlined above isnt quite on the mark. It was a helpful exercise in
trying to get comfortable with the idea, but I feel it needs more work.
For one, I have things I feel I want to grade for/assess which are not
directly based on standards. I know that may not align with standardsbased grading in a strict interpretation, but what I like most about
standards-based grading is the emphasis on different levels of
proficiency and mastery, as well as the ability for students to revise
and receive a grade based on their mastery by the end (instead of a
one-and-done model).
This assignment breaks a little with the unit theme, as it doesnt
directly require the application of the core concepts behind
ecocriticism. However, this is meant to be more of a student-centered,
culminating project for the first semester, rather than solely for Unit
5.
Big shout-out to Anton for sending me down the path that led to this
assignment. When we workshopped/brainstormed together on May
6th, I mentioned the idea of preservation and inheritance in relation to
Binkley 58
The Crypt in Nausica. In response, Anton suggested I use the
episode The Inner Light from Star Trek: The Next Generation, since
it deals with an ecological apocalypse and Jean-Luc Picard inheriting
the memories of the destroyed world. While Anton didnt specifically
suggest this project, his recommendations inspired this idea and I
bounced some of the ideas for it off of him.
This assignment replaced a less-thought-out one that was using a
portfolio/multi-genre project design to construct an extended
definition of science fiction. There are parts about that old project I
still like, and Ill seek to work it in elsewhere, but this assignment
seems less prescriptive and more open to student choice. I can also
segue more smoothly into this project from Unit 5 and ecocriticism
than I could with the extended definition project.
Binkley 59
Binkley 60
Binkley 61
Very Skeptical
Skeptical
Less Skeptical
High quality mainstream
media: national daily
newspapers, newsmagazines, political and current affairs
magazines
Binkley 62
Binkley 63
Workshoppers Name: ______________________
Author of Piece: _______________________
Workshop Guide for Single-Scene Comic/Ecological Apocalypse Short Story
As you read through your partners work, consider the following. Write your comments on this
workshop guide but refer to specific lines/details within your partners work. Remember, this is
a global workshop; were focusing on big picture concerns right now. We will address style and
convention issues next class.
For each category below put one of the following symbols next to each item and provide
feedback expanding on your chosen rating:
0 : elements is missing entirely
- : element is present, but needs revision to meet requirements
: element is present and is meeting proficiency band of the requirements
+ : element is present and exceeds the expectations of the assignment
Single-Scene Comic Option
____
Comic has at least 14 panels that each contains necessary and meaningful content
Comments:
____
____
____
Panel design, size, and position enhance the authors meaning by helping to guide the
readers focus and/or establish the passage of time
Comments:
Binkley 64
Short Story Option
____
Story is at least 10 paged (double spaced, 12-point font) and has effective rising actions,
conflicts, falling actions, and resolutions for a short story.
Comments:
____
The story involves an ecological apocalypse (either pre- or post-apocalypse) and the
connection to current environmental issues is clear and meaningful.
Comments:
____
Characters, plot, and dialogue are believable and compelling. All are developed
effectively within the constraints of a short story.
Comments:
____
Author has included a 3-paragraph summary of the ecological issue that influenced this
story, including an explanation of how it influenced the authors story. The summary
includes at least one cited source.
Comments:
Binkley 65
Student Sample Paper for Hyphen Exercise
A mission to Mars would require a great deal of pre-planning. When Mars is at its closest
approach to Earth, it is only three light minutes away from Earth. That may sound small, but a
light minute is the distance light travels in a minute. So three light minutes is about thirty-threemillion miles! The fastest spacecraft humans have made so far is the New Horizons probe that
recently arrived at Pluto: the explanet at the edge of our solar system. At its fastest speed, New
Horizons traveled at about thirty six thousand miles per hour. If we could get a spaceship
traveling that fast, it would still take about forty days to get to Mars from Earth at the shortest
distance between them. If we someday figure out light speed travel or faster than light travel, it
would be a lot easier to get to Mars.
The problems dont end once we get there, either. The average surface temperature of
Mars is negative eighty one degrees Fahrenheit. There is also almost no water on Mars and very
little-oxygen, so we couldnt grow much of anything. There is also no realistic way to repair or
refuel spaceships. That means you will have to bring plenty of supplies and a way to get back
home, or youll be stuck on a dry, cold, oxygen starved environment. Bringing all those supplies
to Mars means adding a lot of weight to your spaceship, and the more weight you add on, the
more force you need to get into space. And dont get me started on the difficulty of getting the
money you would need approved by a do nothing, deficit-obsessed Congress!
Binkley 66
Name: ____________________
Star Trek: The Next Generation The Inner Light Organizer
As we watch the episode, use this organizer to take notes and consider thematic questions. For
homework, you will use these notes to write more extensive, formal responses to these concerns.
1. What textual connections come to mind as you watch (either abstract, random ones
or concrete, direct ones)?
Text-to-Self
Text-to-Text
Text-to-World
When it is absent (e.g. on the Enterprise), what social inferences can you make based
on that absence?
3. How are themes of inheritance functioning here? In what ways is it a burden? What
responsibility does Picard (the captain/main character) have in light of that
inheritance?
Binkley 67
Based on your notes, conduct an ecocritical reading of this episode. Below are possible
questions to consider, but you do not have to respond to all of them.
Write a response that is at least 3 paragraphs long. It should include a guiding thesis and
be based in textual evidence from the episode and/or other texts weve read.
Binkley 68
Self-Evaluation
EDUC 463: MethodsTeaching Language Arts
Self-Evaluation
Spring, 2015
Binkley 69
Professional Learning Community (70 points):
Weekly PLC Meetings (60 points): My first PLC rarely directly discussed the official
topics/Kunkel reading, but I still feel it was valuable time for all of us. Our conversations were
driven more by anxieties and things we were individually struggling with. I got the impression
we each walked away from those meetings feeling a little more confident/at peace, even if we
rarely had conclusive answers.
My second PLC often felt rushed, but we did get to exchange some helpful ideas. I feel my
contribution was sometimes a one-way street, with me offering ideas and not always receiving
ideas in return, but Im willing to accept most/all of the responsibility for that; I had ideas on
how to help my peers but didnt often ask specific questions for them to help me with.
Work with Co-Teaching/Co-Planning (10 points): Related to my comments above, I did not do
a lot of co-planning with my PLC. I got to bounce some ideas off of them about standards-based
grading, but I didnt bring up many other specifics. However, I did have one extremely
productive conversation/co-planning session with Anton on our last day. In about 15 minutes he
pitched me ideas that directly or indirectly gave me some excellent material for my Unit Plan,
including replacing one of my weaker culminating texts (what was the extended definition multigenre project) with a much more interesting one (The Archive at the End of the World). While
this new assignment may not be perfect, it will be enjoyable for me to read and it connects well
with the context that surrounds our course, namely questions of canonization and what
texts/genres are privileged in education. He also suggested using The Inner Light from Star
Trek: The Next Generation, which fit in surprisingly well with my other ideas/themes/texts.
Yearlong plan (105 points): I feel my finished product was a fine first draft of a YLP/major
component of my M.A. project. It was challenging but fun (in a sometimes masochistic way).
Even if it wasnt really a goal of the assignment, I enjoyed making my site visually interesting. I
am particularly lucky on that front, since any photo officially taken by NASA can be used
royalty-free. As usual, I struggled with meaningful and effective assessments and some of my
ideas havent solidified yet, namely the last two student-guided units. I want to stand by these as
valuable, particularly in light of the passion-based/workshop-based theories Ive been reading
about, but I dont know how to effectively plan for this model yet. Right now it is probably left
too open-ended to be productive. If I am lucky, my students will gladly and effectively take the
reins by the time we get to the end of the year, but I shouldnt count on that too heavily. Other
than those issues, I feel the YLP was relatively solid.
Unit plan (100 points):
I feel this was my weakest work in this course, and thats all on
me and my time management. There were some factors that got in the way of my work besides
poor work ethic such as getting to begin my research at the last minute and general CO
Binkley 70
150/grad school craziness but I must admit a lot of my poor performance is related to not
making enough time.
There are parts I feel very good about, such as how my texts (Nausica, Hyperion: A
Fragment, and The Inner Light) come together under my themes of ecocriticism and
inheritance. I cant guarantee these plans/texts will work as well for my students as they do for
me, but working on the Unit Plan made me feel I was truly onto something with these ideas, both
for this unit and my course more broadly. I want to do more work on it and I want to teach it:
both of which I consider to be a good signs. I also think I succeeded in making a more interesting
culminating text (The Archive); it may not align too directly with ecocriticism, but I think it
suits the theme of inheritance and the course more generally. Since this text is technically after
Unit 5, and acts as a culminating text for the first semester of this course, I think thats alright.
This Unit Plan needs work still, particularly in fleshing out some of my lesson plans. I plan to put
in more work on this and the rest of my project over the summer. So while that may not help me
for the sake of this course of grade, I feel I can make it considerably better for the sake of my
project and future teaching.
Final Course Grade: B+
That may be a little overly generous; well see what you think. Of course Id hope for an A and
its a shame not to get one, but cramming my Unit Plan may have rightfully brought my grade
down. So less than an A seems fair/accurate.
Comments: This course was challenging and time consuming, but as it is the capstone for my
English ed degree, that seems appropriate. More importantly (for me, at least) it afforded me
great opportunities to put in substantial work toward my project while still having that serve the
requirements of a course. That was helpful for keeping me on track and for having the time to put
in a good chunk of work on my project this semester.
As always, youre a wonderful teacher and your course has been very helpful/insightful. As for
evaluating myself, I think I did pretty okay up until the Unit Plan. I apologize for that
shortcoming, and I can assure you it was not caused by me feeling that this course/coursework
was not worthy of my time; I just didnt manage it well in the end.
Binkley 71
Works Consulted
Binkley, Paul. Assessment Portfolio. n.p. 27 April 2014. Microsoft Word file.
---. Coherent Assignment Sequence. n.p., 7 April 2015. Microsoft Word file.
---. P1 Style and Convention Seminar. n.p. 17 September 2015.Microsoft PowerPoint file.
---. P2 Style and Convention Seminar. n.p. 2 March 2015. Microsoft PowerPoint file.
---. Teaching a Text: Enders Game by Orson Scott Card. n.p. 11 May 2014. Microsoft Word
file.
---. Yearlong Plan. n.p., 8 April 2015. Microsoft Word file.
Glotfelty, Cheryll. Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Ecological Crisis. The
Ecocriticism Reader. Eds. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens, Georgia:
University of Georgia Press, 1996. xv-xxxvii. Print.
Hayao, Miyazaki. Nausica of the Valley of the Wind: The Perfect Collection. Trans. David
Lewis and Toren Smith. 4 vols. San Francisco: Viz Communications, 1995. Print.
Howarth, William. Some Principles of Ecocriticism. The Ecocriticism Reader. Eds. Cheryll
Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1996. 69-91.
Print.
The Inner Light. Star Trek: The Next Generation Season Five. Writ. Morgan Gendel and
Peter Allan Fields. Dir. Peter Lauritson. Paramount, 2002. DVD.
Keats, John. Hyperion: A Fragment. John Keats: Selected Poems. Ed. John Barnard. New
York: Penguin Books, 2007. 140-164. Print.
Kunkel, Sonya Heineman. Advancing Co-Teaching Practices: Strategies for Success. Cromwell,
CT: Kunkel Consulting Services, 2012. Print.
McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: William Morrow, 1993.
Print.
Playboy Interview: Ray Bradbury. RayBradbury.com. Harper Collins, n.d. Web. 8 May 2015.
Sagan, Carl and Ann Druyan. The Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space. New
York: Ballantine Books, 1997. Print.
Binkley 72
Shalom, Beth. What is Ecocriticism? Longwood.edu, 1 April 2012. Web. 7 May 2015.
Smagorinsky, Peter. Teaching English by Design: How to Create and Carry Out Instructional
Units. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2008. Print.
Unafraid of the Dark Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. Writ. Ann Druyan and Steven Soter. Dir.
Ann Druyan. 20th Century Fox, 2014. DVD.