Some say that in Jeremiah 23:6 Jesus is the branch and if the branch is called LORD our righteousness then Jesus
is the LORD and therefore God.
For this to be correct all three of the following points must be true
1/ The title has to be proven to be referring to the branch in vs5, not Israel in vs6.
2/ The branch has to be proven to be a prophecy referring to Jesus.
3/ The title signifies an identity rather than a name with a significance.
I will show that this interpretation is incorrect and that Jeremiah 23:6 does NOT show Jesus to be God.
Whether you agree or disagree, in part or in whole, big or small, please email me any feedback to help improve this
study. I would also appreciate any help with its logic, grammar, typos, editing etc.
Before analyzing the passage in question, and the relationship of Christ with God, I am going to provide some
important evidence that has to be taken into account when interpreting our passage
Index
Part 1 A Piece of Land is called
"The LORD will Provide"
Part 2 An Altar is called
"The LORD is my Banner"
Part 3 An Altar is called
"The LORD is Peace"
Part 4A Who is the "righteous branch" prophesied in Jeremiah 23:5-6?
Part 4B The branch is called
"The LORD our Righteousness"
Part 4C Is Jeremiah 23:5-6 really a prophecy of Jesus Christ?
Part 5 A City, or a branch is called "The LORD our Righteousness"
Genesis 22:13-14
Exodus 17:14
Judges 6:24
Jeremiah 23:5-6
Jeremiah 33:15-16
Judges 6:24 Then Gideon built an altar there to the LORD and called it, The LORD Is Peace.
yiqra hu
Yhwh salom
Summary:
Judges 6:24 Gideon calls an altar the LORD is peace.
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
6 In
his days Judah will be saved, and Israel will dwell securely.
And this is the name by which he will be called: The LORD is our righteousness.
Zeh
hu sem
aser
qiqra
Yhwh nu sidqe
Passage Analysis:
The first issue to look at is, does this title definitely refer to the branch of vs5 or perhaps to Israel in vs6? It is
vitally important to compare Isaiah 23:4-5 shown here, to Isaiah 33:15-16 in the next part, there are four significant
differences.
1/ Ch 23 "in his days
Ch 33"in those days
2/ Ch 23 he will be called
Ch 33 it will be called
3/ Ch 23 Israel
Ch 33 Jerusalem
4/ Ch 23 Hebrew "sem - name
Ch 33 (missing)
(Ex 17:14 "sem" or name is here also)
1 & 2/ Should the passage say "his" or "those" days? should it be "He" or "It" will be called?
Should "LORD our Righteousness" in both passages refer to Judah and Israel/Jerusalem in 23:6 and 33:16, or
should both refer to each prior verse the righteous branch?
In chapter 23 "in his days" and "he will be called" must refer to the person who is a figurative branch.
In chapter 33 "in those days" and it will be called, can refer to a branch who is a person, or to countries/cities.
3/ The northern kingdom was Israel. The southern kingdom was Judah. Jerusalem was the capital of Judah and lay
in the northern part, only a handful of miles from the kingdom of Israel. These statistics were in place from between
the 7-9th century BC, and therefore in place when Jeremiah lived.
Because of these facts, the understanding of who or what the "LORD our righteousness" refers to, sways away
Israel or Jerusalem because of the lack of consistency.
4/ The Hebrew word "sem" which means "name" is in chapter 23 but not in chapter 33, I am unsure if this has any
significance on the understanding of the passage.
Summary:
Based on this information, Jeremiah 23:5-6, "the LORD our righteousness" refers to the branch from vs5 which is a
figurative name for a person. Not to Israel/Jerusalem.
Therefore the "righteous branch" is confirmed as Joshua the High Priest identified in Part 4A
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
All this being said, it is not completely convincing that the "branch" in Jeremiah 23 is a prophecy of Jesus. It is
certainly not beyond reasonable doubt.
2/ The Name he will be called:
Secondly, Jesus was never called The LORD Our Righteousness in the NT, there was no NT fulfillment of him
being given this title.
3/ Israel lived in Safety:
Thirdly, there was never a time while Jesus was alive that Israel "dwelt securely." There wasn't any redemption in
the days of Jesus. Forty years after his death, in 70AD, Jerusalem was totally destroyed by the Romans, the second
Temple was burned down, and the Jews exiled.
4/ Septuagint:
Jeremiah 23:6 In his days both Juda shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell securely: and this is his name,
which the Lord shall call him, Josedec among the prophets
This seems very strange that the translators in 200-300BC translated this passage in this way. It puts an entirely new
perspective on the way we understand it. Were the translators even close to being correct? How can it be so
different from the way we currently read it in modern English?
How did Jesus and the people of those days understand this passage? Could they have looked at the Hebrew text
and thought the text applied to Jesus and then looked at the Septuagint and thought the same thing? It doesn't seem
remotely possible to think so.
Summary:
We have identified four legitimate problems with Jeremiah 23:5-6 being a prophecy of Jesus.
1/ There is too much doubt surrounding the possibility the branch referring to Jesus in Jeremiah 23.
a/ Jesus was never called the righteous branch
b/ Jesus says he is the vine and we are the branch
To say Jesus is the branch referred to in this passage, is not beyond reasonable doubt.
2/ Jesus was never called The LORD our Righteousness, there is no NT fulfillment of this passage.
3/ There was never a time when Jesus was alive, and since, that Israel "dwelt securely."
4/ The Septuagint that was read alongside the Hebrew texts at the time of Christ had a very different interpretation
of 23::6.
Because of the totality of these four identified legitimate issues, it is not possible to say for certain that Jeremiah
23:5-6 is definitely a prophecy of Jesus Christ.
Does "the name by which it will be called" refer to the branch or to Jerusalem?
Because of the analysis shown in Part 4, for Jeremiah 23:5-6, the title "the LORD our Righteousness" refers to the
"righteous branch" which is a person in vs15. This is a repetition by Jeremiah of the same statement.
The "righteous branch" was Joshua in 520BC approx.
Summaries and Final Conclusion:
Part 1 Genesis 22:14 Abraham decides a specific and special piece of land is called The LORD Will Provide.
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
Part 2 Exodus 17:14 Moses decides a specific and an special altar is called The LORD is my banner.
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
Part 3 Judges 6:24 Gideon calls an altar the LORD is peace.
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
Part 4A 520-515BC Joshua is the subject, and fulfillment, of Zechariah's writings regarding the "righteous branch."
520-515BC Joshua is the "righteous branch" prophesied by Jeremiah 60-80 years earlier
Part 4B Based on this information, Jeremiah 23:5-6 "the LORD our righteousness" refers to the branch which is a
figurative name for a person. Not to Israel/Jerusalem.
Therefore the "righteous branch" is confirmed as Joshua the High Priest identified in Part 4A
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness
Part 4C Because of the totality of these four identified legitimate issues, it is not possible to say for certain that
Jeremiah 23:5-6 is definitely a prophecy of Jesus Christ.
Part 5 Does "the name by which it will be called" refer to the branch or to Jerusalem?
Because of the analysis shown in Part 4, for Jeremiah 23:5-6, the title "the LORD our Righteousness"
refers to the "righteous branch" which is a person in vs15. This is a repetition by Jeremiah of the same
statement.
The "righteous branch" was Joshua in 520BC approx.
Final Conclusion:
The titles given in these five passages The LORD etc are titles with a sense of importance, names given to
express holiness. They are not personal names, nor are they literal explanations or definitions. We dont draw the
conclusion that a piece of land and two altars are literally Jehovah, therefore we also don't draw the conclusion that
whoever the branch refers to is literally Jehovah.
Even without the huge doubt of whether Jeremiah is referring to Jesus or not, it is still just a title given to express
holiness and not a description of identity. Jeremiah 23 says he will be called not he "will be," or "is," something.
What happened is that God decided the "righteous branch," Joshua the High Priest, which is not likely to be a
prophecy of Jesus, is called The LORD our Righteousness.
This is a title with a sense of importance, a name given to express holiness.
Because of the evidence to the contrary, nothing in Jeremiah 23:5-6 says that Jesus is God.