SUMMATIVE SURVEY FEEDBBACK

Programme: MHRM
Course: HRNM 6404 Training Systems & Instructional
Design
Lecturer: Dianne Thurab- Nkhosi
Date Administered: 24/7/14
Cohort: 19
Trimester: May 2014
Response Rate: 86% (6/7)
How satisfied are students with:
(Rating Scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest level of satisfaction)

Relevance:

Rigour:

This course is relevant to the programme.

This course is rigorous.

I was able to see the present or future value of what was taught to my personal or professional growth

The amount and level of course work done is consistent with expectations of a Masters in this area.

There is a clear link between the theories and practice.

The course required an adequate amount of reading and preparation prior to each session.
There is sufficient theory presented in the course.
The lecturer demanded adherence to the course outline (eg. due dates, quality of submissions etc)
The lecturer demonstrated the applicability of concepts and tools to the global context.
The lecturer demanded high quality contributions in the classroom.

The lecturer demonstrated the applicability of concepts and tools to the local context.

The lecturer constantly challenged my paradigms and/or my thinking.

The lecturer took into account the current and future business environment.

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

Command of Subject:

Course Delivery:

The lecturer has good command of the subject area.

Used digital technology to enhance the learning experience.

Made effective cross-linkages with other disciplines to give a broader understanding in classroom discussions

Used a variety of teaching and learning strategies in addition to lecturing

Answered questions confidently and with the sound knowledge of the subject area.

Created and maintained an environment that facilitated learning.

Was aware of the latest developments and state of the art practices/theories in the field.

Managed class time efficiently and effectively

Showed a command of the fundamental theories and concepts in this subject area.

Kept you interested and engaged in the subject matter

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

Page 1 of 3
7/1/2015 23:01 a7/p7

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

SUMMATIVE SURVEY FEEDBBACK

Programme: MHRM
Design
Lecturer: Dianne Thurab- Nkhosi
Trimester: May 2014

Course: HRNM 6404 Training Systems & Instructional

Date Administered: 24/7/14

Materials:

Cohort: 19
Assessments:

Assigned prior to classes enabled you to make meaningful contributions to the class

Instruments helped you to clearly identify your areas of strength & weakness.

Provided value to the course

Instruments provided an appropriate opportunity for you to demonstrate the skills acquired in the course.

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

Feedback:

Learning Outcomes:

Was obtained in adequate time to allow for necessary adjustments to your learning.

The affective outcomes for this course were achieved.

Helped you to understand how to improve.

The skills learning outcomes for this course were achieved.

Clarified areas of strength and weaknesses in your learning.

The knowledge learning outcomes for this course were achieved.

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

3.50 4.50
3.00 4.00 5.00

Comments/Suggestions for improving this course:

1. Once the incumbent is truly interested in teaching design, this course is truly
exceptional.
2. A truly unique and enriching program with the assistance of the lecturer.
3. Nkhosi is an excellent lecturer she truly has a firm grasp and command of the
subject matter.

Page 2 of 3
7/1/2015 23:01 a7/p7

SUMMATIVE SURVEY FEEDBBACK

Programme: MHRM
Design
Lecturer: Dianne Thurab- Nkhosi
Trimester: May 2014

Course: HRNM 6404 Training Systems & Instructional

Date Administered: 24/7/14

Section A - Relevance

95.00

%:

Section B - Rigour

97.00

%:

Section C - Command of
Subject

95.00

%:

Section D - Delivery by
Lecturer

100.00

%:

Section E - Use of Materials

97.00

%:

Section F - Assessments

93.00

%:

Section G - Lecturer Feedback

91.00

%:

Section H - Learning Outcomes

90.00

%:

FINAL SCORE:

94.75

Page 3 of 3
7/1/2015 23:01 a7/p7

Cohort: 19