Anda di halaman 1dari 2

(PC) Johnson v. Vord, et al. Doc.

Case 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS Document 5 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 GARRISON S. JOHNSON, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS PC
10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
SULLIVAN’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION
11 v. OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT, TO COMMENCE FOLLOWING
12 THOMAS VORD, et al., SCREENING BY COURT
13 Defendants. (Doc. 2)
/
14
15
Plaintiff Garrison S. Johnson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
16
rights action. Defendant Sullivan (“defendant”) removed the action from Kern County Superior
17
Court to this court on April 13, 2007. In conjunction with his notice of removal, defendant moves
18
for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, commencing once the complaint has
19
been screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
20
Good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1. Defendant’s request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is
22
GRANTED; and
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS Document 5 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint until directed to


2 do so by the court, at which time defendant will be provided with thirty days to
3 respond.1
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder
i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
The court has a large number of cases pending before it and will screen the complaint in due course.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai