Abstract
The organisms of Phylum Mollusca possess several main traits that allow them to adapt to their
environment. Each of the four classes studied exhibit different combinations of traits. Class
Polyplacophora is most identifiable for their multi-plated shells. Class Bivalvia is most
distinguishable for their bivalve and burrowing foot, and unique for their filter-feeding
behavior. The organisms of Class Gastropoda are unique for the whorled shell of snails or
absent shell in slugs. Lastly, Class Cephalopoda includes octopuses and squids that have lost
their shell in favor of a pen, as well as nautiluses and cuttlefish that have retained a shell of
some sort; all use a modified foot in the form of arms and tentacles.
Table of Contents
Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 3
Laboratory Dissection: Phylum Mollusca...................................................................................................... 4
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
Phylogenic Relationships .......................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 6.1 Cladogram of examined molluscs. ........................................................................................... 4
Evolutionary Survey of the Animal Kingdom ............................................................................................ 4
Ecological & Human Impacts .................................................................................................................... 6
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 7
References .................................................................................................................................................... 8
List of Figures
Figure 5.1 Cladogram of examined Rotifers & Nematodes...4
Figure 5.2 Diagram of Philodina body organization....5
Shell w/ 7-8
plates
Class Cephalopoda
Class Gastropoda
Class Bivalvia
Class Polyplacophora
Phylogenic Relationships
Bivalve
Loss of
radula
Torsion
2 or less
shells
Possess mantle, foot, chambered
heart, and radula
Lophotrochozoan
Conclusion
I really liked this labbut maybe that was because they werent worms. I do think this was an
easier phylum to learn about because it seems more straightforward than some other phyla we
have studied because molluscs have a specific set of characteristics that each class has in a
special combination with different modifications. That made organizing the information much
easier to mentally organize, and this lab report easier to break down. Each class has a presence
or absence (or modification) of a trait because they have adapted to a certain feature of their
habitat, locomotive strategy, feeding strategy, or respiratory/metabolic strategy.
Learning about these adaptations and modifications helps me better understand how a group
of animals can be so diverse in characteristics and behaviors, yet still be related. I have actually
had a merging in some of my academic learning as we have started discussing the way genetics
and inheritance work in organisms. Phylogenetic trees and genetic pedigrees are very closely
related. While a genetic pedigree examines a specific organism or population for an individual
gene, a phylogenetic tree charts the relation of different classifications of animals and groups
them by evolution of traits that signal a temporal and genetic connection between different
species, genus, families, orders, classes, phyla, and kingdoms. The difference between these
charting techniques is a matter of scope and concentration. However, through a genetic
pedigree, it may be possible to explain larger concepts of evolution of a particular species.
References
Campbell, A., & Fautin, D. (2001). Polyplacophora. Retrieved from Animal Diversity Web:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Polyplacophora/
Kellogg, D., & Fautin, D. (2002). Bivalvia. Retrieved from Animal Diversity Web:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Bivalvia/
Mulcrone, R. (2014). Anguispira alternata. Retrieved from Animal Diversity Web:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Anguispira_alternata/
Taylor, R. (2002). Loligo forbesii. Retrieved from Animal Diversity Web:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Loligo_forbesii/
Wheeler, K., & Fautin, D. (2001). Cephalopoda. Retrieved from Animal Diversity Web:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Cephalopoda/