Anda di halaman 1dari 7

Self Evaluation

Megacity Research and Website Task


Student name

Jacinta Reading 8B

Name of project:
Bangkok The Mega City

Time:
Outside of school, how many hours did you spend on this project?
Around 12-13 hours in total.

1. What did you enjoy most about this task?

I enjoyed designing the website by choosing layouts,


images and
more.

2. What did you enjoy least about this task?

Finding the information on my city was very hard.


Especially for the
Urban problems and solutions and innovations was
quite tricky.

3. If you did this task again, what would you do differently?

If I had to redesign my whole website I would probably


chose a
Different layout because the one I had was hard to work
with, I
Would also make my pictures colour match for a
cleaner look to my
Website.

4. Explain how this project has helped you develop a greater understanding of at least
two of Mentone Grammars values (Integrity, Respect, Caring, Resilience, Service,
Discipline, Endeavour).

I believe endeavour and discipline really helped me get


through this
Humanities task. I disciplined myself all throughout this
project
I would turn my phone on silent to re a sure I had
enough focus to
Complete this assessment. By not having my phone
with me while
Researching and designing for my website it allowed
me to focus
A lot more and it was an easier way to not being able to
get
Distracted from other things. Another value that helped
me apply
Myself to this project was Endeavour. I tried very hard
to get myself
Through the work and researching of this project. When
I had
Something else to do like see friends or do other
homework, I would
Make sure I got a small piece of my humanities project
done . I really
Did apply myself to make sure the website was my best
and I am
Really happy with the results of my weebly page.

Signed: _____Jacinta Reading__________________________ Date:


___28/07/2015____________________

Note: Please ensure you complete the criteria sheet on the next page and indicate what
grade you believe you should receive.

MEGACITY CRITERIA
Task: To produce a website that outlines the characteristics of an Asian
megacity.
Assessment
criteria

Excellent (5)

Very good (4)

Good (3)

Weak (2)

Poor (1)

Develop
geographically
significant
questions and
plan an inquiry

Highly organised
approach and excellent
development of
geographical question
and inquiry

Well organised
approach and
good
development of
geographical
question and
inquiry

Organised
approach and fair
development of
geographical
question and
inquiry

Inconsistent
organisational
approach and
development of
geographical
question and
inquiry

Organisational skills
and development of
geographical
question and inquiry
need to be developed

Collect, select
and record
relevant
geographical
data and
information

Very efficient and


relevant collection,
selection and recording
of data and information

Efficient and
relevant
collection,
selection and
recording of data
and information

Evidence of
relevant data and
information
collection,
selection and
recording

Some evidence of
relevant data and
information
collection, selection
and recording

Little evidence of
relevant data and
information
collection, selection
and recording

Content

The content contained


is the report is of a
very high standard. All
relevant information is
included.

The content
contained is the
report is of a high
standard. Most
relevant
information is
included.

The content
contained is the
report is of a
satisfactory
standard. Some
relevant
information is
included.

The content
contained is the
report is of a low
standard. Little
relevant
information is
included.

The content
contained is the
report is of a poor
standard. Little
relevant information
is included.

Analyse
geographical
data (including
digital data) and
other
information
using qualitative
and quantitative
methods

Very well developed


skills of data analysis

Developed skills
of data analysis

Some
development of
data analysis
skills

Needs further
development of
data analysis skills

Data analysis skills


lacking

Present findings,
arguments and
ideas in a range
of
communication
forms (including
digital)

Extremely able to use


data to draw
conclusions and
present information in
a website.

Well able to use


data to draw
conclusions and
present
information in a
website.

Able to use data


to draw
conclusions and
present
information in a
website.

Able to use data to


draw some
conclusions and
present information
in a website.

Unable to use data to


draw conclusions and
present information
in a website.

Very good
website /PPT
report; most
aspects of the
website work
technically.

Good website/PPT
report; some
aspects of the
website work
technically.

Spelling,
Grammar,
Writing style

Spelling, formal writing


style and/or grammar
are of a very high
standard.

Spelling, formal
writing style
and/or grammar
are of a high
standard.

Spelling, formal
writing style
and/or grammar
are of a
satisfactory
standard.

Spelling, formal
writing style and/or
grammar contain a
number of errors.

Spelling, formal
writing style and/or
grammar are of a low
standard with many
errors.

Bibliography

At least four sources


are used

At least three

At least two

At least two sources

Only one source

Excellent website /PPT


report; all aspects of
the website work
technically.

Website report/PPT
needs some
improvement; few
aspects of the
website work
technically.

Website report/PPT
has not met the
assessment criteria;
the website does not
work technically.

All relevant details of


sources are included in
a consistent Harvard
style.

sources are used

sources are used

are used

Most relevant
details of sources
are included in a
consistent
Harvard style.

Some relevant
details of sources
are included in a
consistent
Harvard style.

Few relevant details


of sources are
included in Harvard
style.

The evaluation
was analytical
and insightful.
Problems and
solutions were
identified.

The evaluation was


only occasionally
analytical and
insightful. Problems
were sometimes
identified

Self-Evaluation

COMMENTS:

TOTAL

38

No formatting used

The evaluation was


not analytical or
insightful. Few
problems or solutions
were identified