The following paper will provide a sound argument in favor of the existe

nce of God. By demonstrating that an Atheist world cannot account for the precon
ditions of the laws of logic an Atheist cannot even account for a rational debat
e concerning the existence of God.
"The impossibility of the contrary", the best and only proof that the ne
sesary truth of the existence of God is his revelation of himself to us that mak
es it possible for us to use logic. This could be translated, using only nessesa
ry truths, into the form of:
L: (laws of logic)
G: (God exists)
if L entails G
L
================
G
Logic is "the laws of reasoning that God has established." If God has establishe
d these laws of reasoning that we call logic then how could the Atheist system a
ccount for the laws of logic. First they are immaterial and universal, and how
could anything immaterial and universal be accounted for in a naturalistic (matt
er only) universe. Second if God has established these laws of reasoning then th
ere would be no atheism. An Atheist wants to believe in laws of logic which are
universal in application, but in order to escape the ultimate implications of th
is idea ( there is a God who imposes universal standards of reason.), the Atheis
t will try to maintain that the "laws of logic" are merely "conventions" of gene
ral agreement amongst them. This is philosophically non-acceptable, if logic wer
e simply a matter of convention, it would be impossible to have any kind of rati
onal debate because either side could win by simply stipulating different laws o
f logic by convention. Therefore since universal laws cannot be changed by conv
ention since they hold constant in all possible worlds is it not fair to say the
n that there is a God who imposes universal standards of reason.