Sumit Sarkar, “The Decline of the
Subaltem in Subaltern Studies” in
his Writing Social History. Delhi,
Oxford University Press, 1997,
The Decline of
the Subaltern in
Subaltern Studies
ttle may sound provocative, bu a one level it ino more
fn description, with no eeesariy pejorative implications
Aaa i en sr
IT erie ea
Fett on cisqus of Wesermeoinial por knowledge, with
imritetele
ia ire eo a
+ hae bei sei fiom the comments and ics of ie Aad,
uadip Romar Dts Mabad Maran od Tania Suhr
‘onccaing omy count te to cape in vlume va abou Rant
CGahs und hating Out a the fan, one by Terence Rane about A,
‘Peon (Saunt Dube) om outed the etl soup ~ wh lee
LER'Dand Hardiman on he Dang and Raat Gus hms on nana
Tiaaon/dcpting of batera a trouph xia boycott
‘DE OACLINE OFTHE THE SunaLTERN ®
with changes in academic (and poitia) moods tht have had a
virally global range.
‘Saban Stier emerged inthe early 1980 in a disdent Left
hm of orthodox Marist practice and theory
the retemion of 2 broad socialist and
Marsan horizon. There were obviour affinities with the radical
populist moods of the 1960s and 1970s, and specifically with effort
{o rte “histones fom below’. The common ground lay in
‘combination of enthusiastic response to popular, usually peasant,
‘ehelions, wth roming disilsionment about organized Let partes,
‘received versions of orthodox Mars deology, and the bureaucratic
state structures of ‘actually existing socialism’ In India, specifically,
tere wee the embers of abortive Maoist armed struggle in the
‘countryside, the spectacle of one of the wo major Communist Patties
supporting an authoritarian repime that was close to the Soviet
Unio, and then the hopes biely aroused by the post Emergency
letra out of Indira Gandhi. Among hstoriographica influences,
that of Bish Maraian socal history was probably the mos signk
ficant. Hill, Hobsbawrn and Thompson were mach admired by the
younger scholars, and Thompson in particular had a significant
Impact when he visited India in the witter of 1976-7 and addresed
2 sesion ofthe Indian History Congress? Ranajit Guha seems to
have often used “subaltern’ somewhat inthe way Thompson deployed
the term ‘plebeian” in his writings on eightenthcentury England
Ta the largely precapitals conditions of colonial India, class form
ation was likey to have remained inchoate. ‘Subalern’ would be of
help in avoiding the pital of economic reductionitm, while a the
‘in time retaining a necesary emphasis on domination and exploit
on) The dial, Thompronian, socal history ofthe 1970s, derpte
"asertons to the contrary which are made sometimes nowadays for
2 The paper he peed at ht eon wasp bythe jul the
tedan Coal of Historical Reseach olor, Anthropology, ed Social
tary, Indian Hara Rein (7
Gt Bm Ape of Pn many Cli Inde (ei 1983)
‘ren ted Thompron wh apron nd the erence gic wee
te Why and tanto andthe ayn for’ Fs rin» dence
Dipl Chaluabary of the re seis cio im Sea Sati, ome of
it fom onodox Marit standpoint pleted for gener opens 10 ale
faire aie of Mari’ and rected the bsupenctre meaphor i
tens teminicent af Thompaon "nwtaion toe Bulgar’ sn Guta od),
Stl Std TV (Debi 98), pp. 363375 Se ao Partha Chater, Mae
oF Toner Sone Chsiont in Sal Sant a, ebony 1985“ ven seta stony
polemical purposes, never really became respectable in the eyes of
Western academic etablhinent. fis not surpriing, therefore, that
the eatly Suton Sais volumes, along with Guha's Elementary
Aspects of Pesant Insure) in Coli Ind (1983), were largely
ignored in the West, while they arated widespread intrest and
(Ebate in Lefteaningintllecwal ccles in Tndia*
‘Things have changed much since then, and today a transformed
Subarus owes touch of ts prestige to the acclaim tis receiving
from that part of the Wester academe postmodernistic counterer
tablshment which s iterested in colonial and postcolonial mates
Its succes is fairly obviously related to an ability to move withthe
‘mes With the withering of hopes of radical transformation through
popula initiative, conceptions of seamless, all pervasive, virtually
Iresistible power-knowedge have tended to displace the evoation|
‘of moment of resistance central the histories rom below ofthe
1960s and 1970s. Domination is conceptualized overwhelmingly in
cltuial, discursive terms, 25 the power-knowledge of the post
Enlightenment West If tall seen a embodied concretely in insti
tons, it tends to get identified uniquely withthe modern bureaucratic
rationstate: further search for specific socioeconomic interconnee
‘ons i elt wo be unnecessarily economist, redolent of traces of 2
‘ow finally defeated Marxism, and hence disreputable ‘Enlighten
‘ment rational thus becomes the central polemical target, and
Maraism stands condemned at one more varcty of Eurocentrem.
Radical, Lefewing socal history, in other words, hasbeen collapsed
ito eulttal stodies and critiques of ealonial discourse, and we have
‘moved from Thompson to Foucault and, even more, Said
“The evolution has been recently summed up by Dipesh Chak-
rabarey ata shift from the atemp to write “beter” Marist histories
to an understanding that's critique of this nature could hatdly
afford to ignore the problem of universalism Eurocentizm that wat
4 Thus the October 194 isu of Sil Sosa journal with CPI)
Mision, pulsed clecve even eay on Sali Sido Twinn Wf
5 roup of young scholars of Det Ue. A sia reve of voles
nd Weare out othe se outa it Mach 96 Gahs and his colle
in sigan coma. were ignored by Molen Aion Stab till Roving
(anon Recneing the Subject Subd Staiesad Hore of Ren
tance Colona South As (2, 1980, snd the Footnote hace
‘lei demomat ht the tal eae around te poet ha Benen
‘win South Asn Wenn duction and sein bw prolferted ne then
Srhin fda, in coat thee bas been » ely deative alton, bt
othing remote eel he cel epagemet of the ea Ye.
Te DECLINE OF DHE Te sb TERN as
ea ee aa
lead to ange thatthe taectoy that bos tees
ine ‘hat has een outlined i
sda pecion nd fanny Chakeban hte
ng in both academic and poiial tans, Esplantions oe
Sf tepatos io changed Greumsens or oat inca
Se tte fone of ane oa co
les ‘exteral rein, hugh acer on con
tual ties and implicit ter wa frome
{lambs amplicons ihn the poe fe
1
eh the yy of Sen dn ef
ice mn eer, ea
Betas from the enormous condescension of recent adherents ike
efit de ce
ie mn artatime y o
Fore toc yer
CSc ee
iil miele ara alt ene
re Si et QO) co get
Si otc
cream henna
a ca te
tn ch mage eee
Sen a oem ce cua
Siem Sake pooner me
Querbon of Diference in Pabgraph 6/7, 1993. aa
eh i OE he wn oe
ee a cere
ain neonates
cn Otte ey
(Seer pl Seemed
Cepek at ase deers ‘WRITING SOCIAL HISTORY
and 2s idealistic or charismatic in national, historiography. Studies
(of peusant and labour movements, similarly, had concentated on
economic conditions and Left organizational and ideological inesges-
‘The new tend would seck to explore the neglected dimension of |
popular of rubstern autonomy inaction, consciousness and eure
Sbler Si roms beginnings was elt by many, with some
justice, tbe somewhat too dismissive sbout predecessors and con
‘emporaries working on not entiey dsimile lines and the elaims
of setting up 2 new ‘paradigm’ were certainly ovr flamboyant. Yet,
2 new theoreal ~ or atleast polemical ~ clarity was added t0
‘Sngoing effons 2 exploring histories fom below, along with much
‘empirical work at once solid and exciting. This Ranait Guha's
Siulyss of specific themes and movements the role of uous,
the interelatonships and ditnctons beeween crime and insurgency,
for aspects ofthe Santal rebellion and the 1857 upheaval, to ite +
few stay examples ~ were appreciated by many wha could not accept
«overall famework of Elementary Apate. The publications ofthe
Suhate Studs group, within, outside, and in some eases before the
onstiation of the project, helped to significanily modify the hi
toriogrphy of anticolonial nationalism through 3 common inital
cauphass on ‘presuter from below’. One thinks, for instance, of
David Hardiman’s pioneering exploration ofthe pessan aationalits
‘of Gujarat through hie meuculour collection of vilagelevel data,
GGyanendea Pandey’ argument about an inverse relationship berween
the stength of local Congress organization and peasant militancy
in Ucar Pradesh, and Shahid Amin analysis of emours concerning
this mizacle working powers tan entry point ino the proces
‘fan autonomous popular appropriation of messages from nation-
tliat leaders” Reioterpeetations of mainstream nationalism apart
daa
‘Goes Noth das Te Unie Prnen 1918-2 (New Bel, 178.
ity Ppa Menon ad Mada Lede Lat Ca ne Pens
sed Pps of «try fom Bow (Cet 198), dated bore he
‘ubleaton of heft me of Seen Sd | amptel clog of
Evalabervatchmaeal lev fr suc ads. 9) And the cue
{oul to mech ey Sel Sd of molt levers 3 orton
‘ten estaning mitant nam nates, ad been ge common nse ind
‘et Marat wing. ut noubl i RP. Dut nd Ty (Bombay, 1947).
* Ound Hainan, Pawn! Aetoalin of Gent Kise Di 1917 34
(Da 191Y Gyanenda Pandey, ede fe Congas on Unter Pade
'26-34(Dehi, 1978) Shai Amin, Gand m Mat: Gortpor Distt,
THE DECLINE OF THE THE sual ”
our hon and efor to ene aren more ihe oe ea
er ara i ee
Se
‘kind could seem repetitive, conveyir ann ap pated
comic adding of deta 1a contr the asl wiople ene
I, ct he ee aa ih
satay tye a en
icc nee
meagre ah i
‘cost more than a century of colonial rule and ove coe dene
Tce al eden
sc ee etd Spe
iuugaring tty wha hos wbqeniy eons
sana Ei men he ap
‘taten. Chater claimed that when's community sce ole
Fae UE. 12, Staton Sadi 198) My Mado
hy sa.
‘oe! nue he nen Suda pn
—
relied
ian gar
nh a i cea
Secu ein the Bhopor 7 abt Se
Bho The Metaiy of Sebati: Ratna ne ae
nei Kantanama or Rodhar' Soara vena soca TORY
etn i ret he
se
pans i Sr Pas
EER Seat tate dno
Sie Soh ht sos set
scm eae tc
‘repos ak ccna eee Pe
Se ye lth at nn