Areas; Writing; Basic Reading. For basic reading, start students with Read Live and monitor from there to determine more
specific needs. If decoding needs are seen, there is a decoding component to Read Live that could be used and monitored
to determine the need for a more specific decoding intervention. If specific comprehension strategy instruction is needed,
students could be pulled between Read Live stories to work on a needed strategies. Writing should be a component of all
reading interventions.
Slevin
Lucy
M M
35 9 18 7 12 3
68 56 28 29 66 6
TOSWRF Percentile
Sp 12
Fa 12
Wtr 13
Sp 13
Fa 11 %
Wtr 12 %
Sp 12 %
Fa 12 %
Wtr 13 %
Sp 13 %
ISAT 2010
ISAT 2011
ISAT 2012
Place with
Kristy needs
further
monitoring
N 10 and screening
Reading
Intervention
Fa 11
Ralph
Direct
Instruction
Targeting All Wilson Just Wilson Reading
Writing
Basic Rdg
Areas of
Words
System
ISAT RDG MAP RDG PERCENTILES
F&P
Wtr 12
Gabric
First Name
Last Name
Targeted Rdg
Comp
strategies &
Writing
Place with
Kristy - Also
needs further
monitoring &
Wilson
Screening
Inferential
reading
comprehensio
n & Writing
Lantz Brittany
MohammedShahmir
Explicit instruction in rdg inferences and writing about what is being inferred.
Difficulty w/rdg comp, critical thinking, inferences, and writing about her
thinking. Math, comparing and ordering fractions and multi-step algabraic
equations
Ltd. Rdg. Comprehension on F&P; ADHD
reading skills are more developed than writing skills. Fluency is in the
average range. His reading comprehension as measured by CBM MAZE at
grade level is at the 10%ile. He is able to correctly identify the main idea
75%; details at 63%; and inferential questions at 50%
E 33 5 20 4 16 5
B M B
2 18 30 45 39 W W V
M B M 16 21 7
X W W U
6 20 28 U
B 24 33 24 6 24 16
Inferential Rdg
Comp Inst
Inferential
Rdg Comp Inst
Inferential Rdg
Comprehensio
n
13
Reading
System
Wilson
Reading
System
Wilson
Reading
System
13
Wilson
Reading
System
CamachoLeonardo grade
B M 7
1 49 45 16 V
Had R180 Lit and Wilson this past year. Unmedicated ADHD; No study
Colombo Samuel hall since he becomes frustrated w/school; explorattories keep him invested,
King Stephon
Little
Nick
B W
Q O O
N M
Parents prefer his study hall w/a math teacher, because he is in the higher
Land
Wilson Just
Words
Wilson Just
Words
P 35
Wilson Just
Words
P M 3
Wilson Just
Words
Jake level math. Has been very beneficial for his self-esteem & he's very active
outside of school.
B 68 70 52 76 64 58 V
M M B 77 60 24 18 16 33 W W U
60 39 41 56 61 45 T
Has pain in her arm causing her an inability to write; this would likely affect
Smith
Lauren her score on TOSWRF. Has gone through WRS Step 3, though 60-67%
scores on multisyllabic closed syllable words (3 syllable)
M M
41 62 41 48 41 40 T
Feeley
John
Halmon Fatima
fell within the low progressing / upper not-meeting range in the category of
Key Ideas & Details, which incorporates citing textual evidence and
reading/comprehending literature. Working on analysis, evaluation and main
ideas/details in reading comprehension. Only uses correct capitalization with
approximately 56% accuracy. Has struggled developing topics with facts and
details within his writing.
M M B 78 69 49 41 24 28
Usually only comprehends surface information and is unable to dig for deeper
meaning. In writing, her thoughts are put onto paper as a stream of
consciousness rather than organizing. Writes with many run on sentences.
Needs improvement in knowledge of concepts in writing in the content areas.
23 9
Hayes
Emma
Kelloway Collin
Rdg Comp
Strategies;
Writing About
Reading
2 24
Rdg Comp
Strategies;
Writing About
Reading
Performance on the "informational text" subtest has been in the low range for
the last two years.. Goal: analyze and describe the interactions and ideas
within a text. Goal: using homonyms and commonly confused words
correctly. Needs strategies she can use to make information meaningful for
her retention.
Good FLUENCY; limited comp; can decode words, but his lack of
knowledge of the meaning of those words negatively impacts his
comprehension. Extraneous noises are very difficult for him to filter, and
cause distractions
M M B 40 44 30 54 28 33
Rdg Comp
Strategies;
Writing About
Reading
Rdg Comp
Strategies;
Writing About
Reading
Rdg Comp
Strategies;
Writing About
Reading
19
16
20
20
18
Jaburek
Jack gain a deeper meaning. Writing includes detail, but is not organized and
includes many run on sentences and an abundance of commas.
M B
B 17 14 28 57 20 28 Z
Greenle
ADD; Comprehension Difficulties. Unsure if it's due to attentional issues or
Maddie critical thinking difficulties. Scores are typical of ADD.
af
M B
14 41 14 27 19 48 U
N 21 Basic Reading
Hezlett Maddie
M B
10 45 47 15 23 15 X W T
O 45 Basic Reading
NewmanShannon Enlarged print really helps her. Lacks in fluency, as well as comprehension.
13
9 20 26 S
Basic Reading
Ramirez Juliana Medicated for Siezures. Gen ed Tchr rpts trouble w/comprehension;
Rdg Sppt Tchr rpts trouble w/decoding
12 7
26 20 13 37 14 40 R
S
S
Basic Reading
P M 21 Basic Reading
Cox
Direct
Instruction
Addressing All
Areas of
Reading
Direct
Instruction
Addressing All
Areas of
Reading
Was in Lit R180 this past year. *Spelling: 98%; Comprehension: 72%;
Sherifi
struggles with questions about the main idea, details of the reading,
inferential and short answer responses. Gains at very slow rates, are very
inconsistent and have not been able to close the gap. Requires intense
Dashmireintervention support.. Requires much repetition and reteaching. . Given all
data, including the slow growth, a smaller more intense Lit class would
likely be more appropriate than the larger gnl ELL Lit class without
aides. This will be her 6th year in ELL.
Tolentino Andrea
Works very slowly; frequent absences Given all data, including the slow
growth, a smaller more intense Lit class would likely be more
appropriate than the larger gnl ELL Lit class without aides. This will be
her 6th year in ELL, too.
14
Direct
Instruction
Addressing All
Areas of
Reading
Direct
Instruction
Addressing All
Areas of
Reading
X W V
writing
Writing and
ELL Level 3
Class
Writing ~
(suggest
Writing about
inferential
reading)
Colliander Dain
Difficulty with elaboration in his writing, and at times the response may not be
B M
41 33 16 16 18
Ingold
M M M 33 16 16 38 29 36
SchumacherDavid
Reeval 4/2/13: eligibility is for writing only. In fall of 7th grade, scored 27
CWS, which placed him in the 10th-25th percentile range, which is below
average when compared to AIMSweb National Norms. In winter of 7th grade,
also scored 27 CWS, which placed him below the 10th percentile range and
significantly below average when compared to AIMSweb National Norms.
Writing
Seifert Nicholas Problems with working memory and executive functioning; inattentive ADHD M M
88 72 73 93 58 67 W T
25
Writing
Sullivan Rebecca
M M M
33 63 26 49 44
Writing