A PROFILE Mbt. svers-eniccs rvP€ moicaTor® |. srEP ir [MADDIE MCGARVEY Your Myers-Briggs® Step II” Profile gives you information about your personality type based on your answers to the MBTI? assessment. It fir indicates your Step I" results— your reported four-letter type, Next it shows your Step I results—your expression of five facets for each of the four Step | preference pairs. Your Step I” Results ESTIs tend to be logical, practical, realistic, matter-of-fact, and efficient, They tke to organize themselves and others. ‘They follow through and expect others to be dependable also, They run activities but focus more on tasks than on people, ESTUs are not interested in things for which they see litle use. Your reported Myers-Briggs personality type Your preferences EST) Extraversion | Sensing | Thinking | Judging CLARITY OF YOUR PREFERENCES: ESTO exreaversion @ TD © wreoversion suoane rerceins The length of the ines on the preference clarity index (pci) graph above shows how clearly or consistently you chose one preference over the other in each pair. The longer the line, the more often your answers Indicated that preference, and ‘the more Ukaly itis that the MBT assessment has accurately reflected your preference.AI SA PROFILE [MADDIE MCGARVEY mbti. svens-aniccs-rvee wotearor* | sree ur su Your Step II" Results ‘The graphs that follow show your Step I resultsyour expression of five facets for each of the Step I preference pairs. Be aware that a preference is broader than its facets and so your five facet scores do not add up to your Step | preference score. ‘The length of each line on the graphs shows how consistently you chose one facet pole over the other. The longer the line, the clearer your preference is for that pole, Scores of 2-5 that are on the same side as your Step | preference indicate In-preference results. Scores of 2-5 on the opposite side of your Step | preference indicate out-of-preference results. Scores of 0 and 1 are in the midzone and often mean a situational or muted use of either pole, EXTRAVERSION @ TFoveRsion Directing energy tomar tne outer wots Direcing ergy toward the nner wore ‘ot ectle ane ovecte ot experience ane eas IN- PREFERENCE MiOZONE _OUT-OF-FREFERENCE inmarina soeable conganat irveduce peo EXPRESSIVE Demonte casero row sof evesing GREGARIOUS ones elon, boss ele on gous active loveractve, want contac ister ond ioe ENTHUSIASTIC Urey. negate See oti RECEIVING Beste, wey CONTAINED ented, nrcerto kno proate INTIMATE eek nracy, one-on-one. Seana REFLECTIVE, Oniooxer peer space out aim ey sotude Sek bacgrouns sensinc inrertion ees Socata IN-PREFERENCE MIDZONE __OUT-OF-mREFERENCE CONCRETE ABSTRACT frat facts tera Furatve. smoot ‘angie pargiie REALISTIC IMAGINATIVE Sonstle, marche ferret erie PRACTICAL CONCEPTUAL Pragmatic resutsoreres, ‘Senolaly-ideacienes, eoted olecnat EXPERIENTIAL ‘THEORETICAL wanoston,empeat Seecpatera manera, ‘TRADITIONAL, ORIGINAL CComentonat customary - Grestuontonst torent "veda tue row ongunusuatd BA PROFILE Mbt, srers-eniccs ree woicator* | step i [MADDIE MCGARVEY THINKING. Basing conclusions on logit analysis ‘wana focus on oneetity FEEUNG n-pReFERENCE Locica, Imoarsonalseck impart, ‘ectve nays REASONABLE “Trurt cause-and-fiect sev prnetes QUESTIONING Pracse eran a wan seus CRITICAL Seestal want post rte Tous Frm. toughemnge, JUDGING Prolering decisiveness and elasure EMPATHETIC Perera sec harmony, coma ues COMPASSIONATE Taetul symaathete. (oa ACCOMMODATING Doron aareeabe, Sanna ACCEPTING Toler. using geenraie TENDER Gone tenserhesrtes PERCEIVING Prefenng entity ane spontaneity SYSTEMATIC Creer. sutures PLANFUL, Furure focused, oevance panrer mate vn sans EARLY STARTING owrates 9 slhaeiine. ‘ano progess ae sor sess SCHEDULED procedures na METHODICAL an spect to note suacie srsanses ‘our oF PREFERENCE ‘CASUAL, Fee. casing. ‘OPEN-ENDED Preset focused go wine ‘ow make feeb pare PRESSURE-PROMPTED stata by pressure burs ana ‘Burs eny sareunctmaatng SPONTANEOUS Wane varety.eney ne Unexpected, procacures hiner EMERGENT Purge nt tenes fomerge saiane SPP CPP Inc. | 8006241765 | wrwrepp.com | eF.1:50% somone onanKe &X PROFILE MADDIE MCGARVEY rot. YERS-BRIGGS TYPEINDICATOR® | STEP IT 0 Interpreter’s Summary PREFERENCE CLARITY FOR REPORTED TYPE: EST xraverson- Cleat 28) ‘Sensing: Mederate(10) ‘Thinking: Moderate 11) ‘Judging Very ler (28) FACET SCORES AND THE AVERAGE RANGE OF SCORES FOR OTHER ESTJs. ‘The bars on the graph below show the average range of scores that occurred for the ESTs in the US national sample. “The bars show scores that are ~1 to +1 standard deviation from the mean. The vertical line in each bar shows ESTiJs' mean score, The bold numbers show the respondent's scores. EXTRAVERSION INTROVERSION ° wating S| rece ¢ exonessve 21 contains GREGARIOUS BF : INTIMATE ACTIVE $ 1 i REFLECTIVE ENTHUSIASTIC a | z ourer SENSING INTUITION e concnere § 1 susreact e renssic 3 tmacinarve ancios 12 concerruas EXPERIENTIAL I 1 THEORETICAL TRAOTIONAL ® nica ° THINKING FEELING \ociea 1 unser ® rensowsate 1 onoxssionare vestionnc ' AecOMMODATING camicat ecermne rou at revoen ® JUDGING PERCEIVING feroune s | casin ° maw ss oPev-END=D emrstammne 5] ressune PROMPTED seneous 5 | srontaneous MeTHODIEA | Fema fencer SS aa Polarity index: 74 The polarity index, which ranges from 0 t0 100, shows the consistency of a respondent’ facet scores within a profile, Most adults score between 50 and 65, although higher indexes are common, An index thats below 45 means thatthe respondent has many scores in or near the midzone, This may be due to mature situational use ofthe facet. answering the questions randomly lack of selsknowledge, of ambivalence about ute of facet. Some such profes may be invalid Number of Omitted Responses: 0 SPP" COP, Inc. | 006241765 | wwespcom Hakata ceratnacnmce =