Gregor P. Eberli
University of Miami, Comparative Sedimentology Laboratory, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
INTRODUCTION
Grammer et al.
OUTCROP ANALOGS
AND LIMITATIONS
Outcrop models have typically been relied on to
generate a proxy for subsurface reservoir distribution
(e.g., Borer and Harris, 1991; Tyler and Finley, 1991;
Grant et al., 1994; Kerans et al., 1994; Grammer et al.,
1996; Tinker, 1996; Kerans and Tinker, 1997; Sarg et al.,
1999; White and Barton, 1999; McLaurin and Steele,
2000; Willis and White, 2000; Willis and Gabel, 2001;
Camacho et al., 2002). Although detailed outcrop models are invaluable for establishing high-resolution subsurface models, outcrop data are commonly somewhat
constrained by the limits of exposure.
Reservoirs in the San Andres/Grayburg Formations
of the United States Permian Basin illustrate the degree
of heterogeneity that can typically occur and the value
of outcrop analogs to address some key reservoir issues.
Permeability-thickness, pressure-contour, and recovery maps for San Andres/Grayburg reservoirs suggest a
strong aerial and vertical compartmentalization of flow
units in these reservoirs (Dulaney and Hadik, 1990;
Harris and Walker, 1990; Lucia et al., 1990; Major et al.,
1990; Purves, 1990; Ruppel, 1990). Low field recoveries
are in stark contrast to laboratory core-flood experiments
that commonly indicate waterflood displacement efficiencies of as much as 50% original oil in place (OOIP),
depending on the wettability and pore structures of
the various rock types investigated. This disparity in
laboratory and field-recovery efficiency, despite a high
density of wells, emphasizes the need for better characterization of flow properties and remaining fluid
distribution in the reservoir. Flow modeling on a wellcharacterized system of properties distributed in a geo-
logic framework will lend some insight into the observed differences in laboratory and field recoveries.
Whenever these differences cannot be explained, both
the distribution of flow properties and the flow simulation should be reexamined.
As an example, outcrop study of the Permian San
Andres Formation along the Algerita Escarpment of the
Guadalupe Mountains has shown that the San Andres
is highly cyclical and that the distribution of these cycles
may influence both vertical and lateral reservoir properties. The cycles in the San Andres are typically 3 12
m thick, with facies formed during relative rise and/or
stabilization of sea level, during which carbonate sand
shoals developed. The cycles consist of thin mudstone/
wackestone bases, overlain by burrowed wackestones
and packstones, and capped by thick massive to planar
or cross-bedded packstones and grainstones (Kerans
et al., 1994), indicating the potential for vertical compartmentalization. The outcrops also display lateral facies relationships in the cycles on the scale of hundreds
of meters, which are representative of those commonly
observed in analogous hydrocarbon reservoirs of the
Permian Basin.
Outcrop analog models of ramp-carbonate reservoir
heterogeneity (e.g., Grant et al., 1994; Kerans et al.,
1994) may provide some insight into subsurface recovery histories. At a gross scale, stratigraphic relationships can be used to predict the occurrence of welldeveloped cycles that may contribute the most to production during the earliest phases of a waterflood.
Conversely, poorly developed cycles in thin-bedded
and massive fusulinid zones, which retain most of the
bypassed oil and cause flow to be compartmentalized,
also can be predicted by a better understanding of stratigraphic relationships. Potential variations between the
outcrop analogs and reservoirs themselves, however,
occur for the following reasons: (1) aerial permeability
variations will cause significant reductions in the estimated aerial sweep; (2) permeability may be correlated
better laterally in discrete stratigraphic horizons in the
subsurface than observed in outcrop; and (3) significant
differences exist in average permeability in cycles, resulting in increased channeling of injected fluids and
decreased overall vertical sweep efficiency.
An important point to consider in either an outcrop
or reservoir study is the vertical scale of the various
stratigraphic units, i.e., the vertical scale of layers to be
used in a reservoir model. Cycles, groups of cycles, and
less distinctly cyclic zones are geologic layers that have
potential significance from a reservoir perspective. They
can be recognized in core and log studies and should
form the basis of a geologic framework in a subsurface
model. Once these layers are identified and correlated,
petrophysical analyses of lithofacies in individual cycles,
or less distinctly cyclic units, yield the basic data needed
to model and predict the timing and efficiency of oil
MODERN ANALOGS
AND LIMITATIONS
Modern environments are valuable as analogs for
conceptualizing the spatial distribution of reservoir facies in a single time slice and for obtaining a first-order
quantitative approximation of geometrical attributes
for potential reservoir facies. Combining remote sensing data, such as satellite images and aerial photographs,
with surface sediment maps provides facies trends and
dimensionality data that can be used to show patterns
and assist the modeling of a reservoir relative to simulated well spacing. These 2-D data are of even more value
when combined with results of coring studies, either
from modern environments where the spatial distribution of facies in a single depositional cycle is documented, or from detailed outcrop work that provides a more
comprehensive view of the third (i.e., vertical) dimension to the reservoir system. As with outcrop examples,
modern analogs have shortcomings when data derived
from them are to be applied to the subsurface. For example, the question of how well the facies patterns from
a Holocene example actually compare with a particular
reservoir or reservoir layer is always a cause for concern
and, therefore, a shortcoming. In addition, Holocene
studies are commonly insufficient analogs for portraying reservoir quality variations because of their limited
stratigraphic thickness and lack of diagenetic complexity. Many variables, such as variations in climate and
tectonic setting, relative variation in amplitude and
frequency of sea level changes, and, for carbonates in
particular, age-dependent faunal variability that may
result in changes in depositional architecture coupled
with complex diagenetic alteration are all limiting factors when incorporating modern analogs into a reservoir
model. Nevertheless, modern analogs have served as
Historical Perspective
Understanding the various carbonate facies types,
the controls on their formation, and their distribution
on carbonate platforms is, in large part, the result of
extensive study of modern analogs. Shortly after World
War II, the study of modern sedimentary environments
in carbonate (and siliciclastic) systems grew rapidly as
petroleum companies realized the value of applying
lessons from modern environments to similar ancient
reservoirs found in the subsurface. For carbonates, much
of this early study focused on the Bahamas, a broad expanse of modern carbonate banks southeast of the continental United States (Figure 1).
Studies in the Bahamas over the last several decades
have led to development of depositional facies models
for several settings, including platform interior, carbonate sand, reef, tidal flat, and marginal slope deposits
(see, for example, Illing, 1954; Newell and Rigby, 1957;
Purdy, 1963; Ball, 1967; Shinn et al., 1969; Ginsburg
and James, 1974; Hardie, 1977; Hine and Neumann,
1977; Beach and Ginsburg, 1980; Hine et al., 1981; Halley et al., 1983; Harris, 1983; Eberli and Ginsburg, 1987;
Grammer et al., 1993a; Major et al., 1996). In addition, significant insight has been gained about various
diagenetic processes and mechanisms in carbonates,
Grammer et al.
FIGURE 1. Location map for Great Bahama Bank (GBB), the Joulters Cays ooid shoal complex, and the Tongue of the
Ocean. Great Bahama Bank is separated from Florida by the Straits of Florida, through which the Gulf Stream flows.
Note also locations for the Western Line seismic data, the boreholes Clino and Unda, and the Ocean Drilling Program
drill sites.
including how they are recognized, as well as how they
may affect sediments from the standpoint of reservoir
potential (e.g., Harris, 1978; Halley and Harris, 1979;
Dawans and Swart, 1988; Anselmetti and Eberli, 1993,
1997; Beach, 1993; Grammer et al., 1993b, 1999; Melim
et al., 1995, 2002). Each of these studies has led to
further understanding of carbonate facies distribution
and early diagenetic modification that can enhance
both exploration and production strategies in subsurface reservoirs.
Recent stratigraphic and depositional studies of
GBB provide a fundamental understanding of the lateral growth potential and pulsed progradation of carbonate platforms. From seismic data, it is clear that
older isolated platforms coalesced to form GBB through
progradation along their leeward margins as a result
of highstand shedding of bank-top derived sediment
(Eberli and Ginsburg, 1987). The growth and diagenesis of platform strata are intimately linked to sea level
rise and fall, and on the platform top, the role of antecedent topography in initiating development of both
marginal reefs and sand bodies is strongly coupled to
the windward or leeward orientation of the platform
margin (Ball, 1967; Hine and Neumann, 1977; Harris,
1979; Hine et al., 1981; Halley et al., 1983). Likewise,
in the proximal slope environment, the sedimentary
makeup of facies (i.e., grain vs. mud-dominated) is de-
reader with an appreciation for the value of comparative sedimentology in reservoir analysis.
Grammer et al.
could ultimately lead to the formation of reservoir heterogeneity and the development of stratigraphic traps.
These carbonate sand bodies have been extensively
studied through surface sampling and shallow coring
(Harris, 1979, 1983, 1984) and have provided much of
our understanding of how ooid shoals develop and evolve
with changing sea level.
The Joulters example illustrates some of the difficulties associated with interpretation and correlation of
grainstones in subsurface studies of platform carbonate
reservoirs. The modern shoal complex, which extends
more than 400 km2, varies greatly in both thickness
and primary depositional fabric (Harris, 1979, 1983).
Antecedent topography and subsequent carbonate sand
generation varied greatly in the Joulters Cays area, both
during flooding of the platform and throughout development of the shoal complex during the latest rise of
sea level. Shoal growth, largely in response to the relative rise of sea level, records rapid expansion of ooid
sand belts, island formation and associated meteoric
diagenesis, development of marine hardgrounds, and
local shoal stabilization and reworking by burrowing
organisms.
A characteristic vertical succession revealed by coring the Joulters shoal (Figure 2) consists of scattered
lithoclast sands and pellet muds at the base, peloid sands
in the middle, and ooid sands at the top, showing an
upward increase in grain size, percentage of ooids, and
grain-supported fabric (Harris, 1979, 1984). This facies
sequence thins to the south over a shallowing Pleistocene surface and to the north and west as overall
sediment thickness decreases. Within the shoal complex, the thicknesses of the dominant facies are complementary; ooid sands thin in a bankward direction
as peloid sands thicken to form the thickest part of an
interplatform sheet. These facies changes resulted from
changing depositional patterns in response to rising
sea level (Harris, 1979). The shoal grew in three stages
(Figure 3): (1) an early bank-flooding stage, in which
muddy sands of peloids and pellets accumulated in
protected lows on the Pleistocene floor; (2) a shoalforming stage, during which ooid production began on
bedrock highs where bottom agitation was focused;
and (3) a stage of shoal development in which the production and dispersal of ooid sands established the
present size and physiography of the shoal.
FIGURE 2. Fence diagram modified from Harris (1979) showing the subsurface facies relations at the Joulters shoal complex
documented with extensive coring. Thin-section photomicrographs illustrate modern sediment equivalents of (A) ooid
grainstone; (B) ooid packstone; (C) peloid packstone; and (D) peloid wackestone. Photos are in plane polarized light.
FIGURE 3. Time-slice maps modified from Harris (1979) showing the complicated filling of accommodation space, both
regionally and locally, in the Joulters Cays area. With the rise of sea level during the Holocene, the Pleistocene limestone surface (shown in red at T-1) is quickly flooded. T-2: Burrowed muddy sands of peloids and skeletal fragments form
across the platform (orange), ooid sands (yellow) are localized on Pleistocene highs, and skeletal sands with reefs form
nearer to the platform margin (green). T-3: The ooid sand factory increases in size and dip width with continued sea level
rise; ooids are shown in the accompanying photomicrograph. T-4: Ooid sands have caught up to sea level over a broad
area, forming a vast, shallow, sand-flat setting (blue) and restricting the active ooid formation to a narrow belt along the
windward-facing sides of the shoal complex (yellow). The finer-grained nature of the sand-flat sediments is shown in the
accompanying photomicrograph.
Grammer et al.
FIGURE 5. Representative photographs from steeply dipping marginal slope environment: (A) lenticular bedding that
makes up the 35 458 slope deposits. Beds are a few decimeters to half a meter in thickness, extend downslope for tens of
meters, and are characterized by coarse-grained skeletal fragments and talus with high initial porosities; (B) thin-section
photomicrograph (plane polarized light) of skeletal grainstone from the interior of the steeply dipping slope deposits
with much of the original porosity occluded by bladed Mg-calcite cement (M); (C) thin-section photomicrograph
(crossed nichols) showing compound growth of pore-filling botryoidal aragonite (BA). Early and pervasive marine
cementation by aragonite and Mg-calcite tends to occlude much of the high initial porosities in these deposits; (D) SEM
photomicrograph of fibrous aragonite precipitated in 8 months at a depth of 100 ft (30 m) along the platform margin in
the Bahamas (see Grammer et al., 1999 for details); (E) SEM photomicrograph of fibrous aragonite precipitated in 20
months at a depth of 100 ft (30 m) along platform margin showing a well-developed isopachous rim of marine cement.
Results of analytical and in-situ experiments (Grammer et al., 1993b, 1999) indicate that marine cements may partially
occlude carbonate sediments at depths of 30 75 m in just a few months.
10
Grammer et al.
conformities. This assumption, i.e., that seismic reflections are time lines and thus carry chronostratigraphic
significance, is the basis for the concept of seismic stratigraphy (Vail et al., 1977). Use of seismic horizons as
time lines helps predict ages of strata in undrilled portions of a basin. Because of this predictive capability,
sequence stratigraphy overcomes the shortcomings of
lithostratigraphy, which is commonly time transgressive, and of biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy,
which are commonly unrelated to physical boundaries
in the rock. Vail et al. (1977) recognized the physical
surfaces on logs and seismic data and postulated that
rapid rates of eustatic change are the major controlling
factor on the timing of stratigraphic discontinuities.
Both of these important assumptions were initially
questioned, but numerous geological and geophysical
experiments have subsequently proved that they are
largely true.
One of these validating experiments was conducted
along the prograding margin of western GBB, with seven
cores in a transect running from the carbonate platform
top to the pelagic sediments in the Straits of Florida
(Eberli et al., 1997; Ginsburg, 2001). Geometries of 17
sequences in the prograding margin suggested that the
pulses of progradation are sea level controlled (Figure 6).
Facies successions in the seven cores corroborate this
seismic interpretation, indicating that global sea level
changes control the architecture of these carbonate sequences (Kievman, 1996; Betzler et al., 1999; Eberli et al.,
2001; Kenter et al., 2001). In particular, facies successions
in the cores contain indications of sea level changes on
two different scales. First, alternating high (as much as
20 cm/k.y.) and low sedimentation rates (<2 cm/k.y.)
record a long-term pattern of bank flooding (0.52 m.y.)
with concomitant shedding to the slope and periods
of bank exposure with reduced shallow-water carbonate production and largely pelagic sedimentation. The
pulses of bank-derived material coincide with prograding pulses that are recognized as seismic sequences.
Second, there are high-frequency alternations between
layers with more platform-derived material separated by
layers with more pelagic sediments. Spectral analyses
document that these alternations are controlled by orbital precession (Williams et al., 2002). Bundling of these
precession-controlled cycles into longer-term obliquity
and eccentricity cycles emerges as a mechanism to create
the lower order, seismically imaged sequences.
Ages of sequence boundaries at the seven sites yield
an excellent correlation between sites, documenting
the age consistency of the sequence boundaries and,
thus, the chronostratigraphic significance of the seismic reflections (Anselmetti et al., 2000; Eberli et al.,
2002). Seismic reflections marking sequence boundaries were dated by means of biostratigraphy in the five
deep-water sites and by a combination of biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and Sr-isotope stratigraphy
FIGURE 6. Line drawing from Western seismic line of the western margin of Great Bahama Bank illustrating the
progradation of the bank and the expansion of the platform facies across the former slope. In the Santaren Channel,
a drift deposit accumulates during the progradation. The wells of the Bahamas transect penetrated each environment.
Small letters indicate seismic sequences of the Neogene strata (modified from Anselmetti et al., 2000).
in the two bank-top sites. The seismic reflection horizons can be traced across a variety of facies belts, from
shallow-water carbonates over slope carbonates to drift
deposits in the Straits of Florida. Despite the fact that
the seismic reflections cross several facies belts, their
ages remain remarkably constant. The average offset in
all sites is 0.38 m.y. The age differences are the result of
biostratigraphic sampling frequency, the spacing of
marker species that required extrapolation of ages, and
the resolution of the seismic data. In no cases, however, do time lines cross seismic reflections.
The fact that the seismic reflections correlate
across the depositional facies transitions and boundaries without changing their chronostratigraphic positions implies that the seismic reflections image the depositional surface instead of lithologic facies. It further
implies that an impedance contrast is generated along
the entire platform-margin transect. To create impedance changes along the entire transect, the lithology
and/or diagenetic modification needs to change along
the entire transect. The investigated seismic reflections,
then, are sequence boundaries representing a fall of sea
level that dramatically changed the sedimentation and
diagenesis in this platform-margin setting (Figure 7).
Carbonate platforms are most productive during
periods of high sea level, when they export abundant
aragonite sediment from the flooded platform top to the
slopes below (e.g., Grammer et al., 1993a; Schlager et al.,
1994). During sea level lowstands, platform production
is reduced, and the relative amount of pelagic deposition, consisting of predominantly calcitic marine microfossils, increases significantly. On the upper or more
proximal portions of the slope, these lowstand units become densely cemented before the next pulse of highstand sediment accumulates (Grammer et al., 1993a,b;
Westphal et al., 1999; Malone et al., 2001). These alternations of well-cemented and less-cemented intervals
on the platform margin and uppermost slope produce
velocity contrasts. In the distal slope and basinal environments, lowstand deposits are generally diagenetically less altered and have lower sonic velocities (Frank
and Bernet, 2000). In addition, a small admixture of
siliciclastic material commonly occurs in lowstand deposits on the slope and basin that further reduces
sonic velocities in the lowstand packages (Isern and
Anselmetti, 2001).
In summary, variability of facies and diagenesis that
occurs in all facies belts along the transect (Figure 7)
are responsible for the acoustic differences and the impedance contrasts that cause seismic reflections along
depositional surfaces, thereby giving them a chronostratigraphic significance. The driving mechanism behind these changes is a fluctuating sea level that causes
changes in sediment composition and diagenetic overprint. Both parameters influence the petrophysical behavior of the strata and, therefore, can cause surfacerelated impedance contrasts.
Vail et al. (1977) cautioned that seismic resolution,
interference, and multiples can produce reflections without time significance. These problems are of increased
importance on the reservoir scale, when seismic resolution is typically pushed to its limit. For example, the
expansion over time of marginal facies over slope facies
along a prograding carbonate platform can produce
strong impedance contrasts and reflections that follow
facies boundaries instead of time lines (Stafleu et al.,
1994; Stafleu and Sonnenfeld, 1994). In some cases, selective filtering of the high-frequency component from
the low-frequency component of the seismic data increases the resolution, so that time-stratigraphic boundaries become visible even if the data is dominated by
lower-frequency components (Zeng and Kerans, 2003).
Seismic modeling of outcrop analogs has proved to be a
powerful method to assess the uncertainty stemming
from resolution problems that might create pseudounconformities (Stafleu and Schlager, 1995).
11
12
Grammer et al.
FIGURE 7. Schematic display of changes in facies, diagenesis, and fluid flow along a carbonate platform margin that
causes impedance contrasts along sequence boundaries along the Bahamas transect. The juxtaposition of sediments
with slightly different composition and diagenetic potential results in density and velocity variations that create the
necessary impedance in each facies belt (modified from Eberli et al., 2002).
Modern carbonates display a high spatial homogeneity of petrophysical properties (porosity, density,
and permeability) in each depositional environment
with a good correlation between mechanical energy
and primary characteristics of the sediment, such as
mean grain size and sorting (Incze, 1998). In modern
carbonate sediments, there is typically a negative correlation between porosity and permeability, i.e., the
finest grained sediments have the highest porosity and
the lowest permeability (Enos and Sawatsky, 1981).
This inverse trend is reversed in lithified carbonates,
where the coarse-grained rocks generally have the highest porosity, indicating that diagenesis alters the physical
properties significantly during diagenesis. One of the
first diagenetic processes is compaction, an especially
important process in siliciclastic sediments, which reduces porosity and permeability and thus increases velocity. In carbonates, however, other diagenetic changes
can occur more quickly than compaction, with the result that knowing the compactional history, burial
depth, and/or age is less important for predicting the
physical properties of the rock than in siliciclastics.
In carbonates, cementation and dissolution commonly occur before and simultaneously with compaction.
Application to Reservoir
Characterization
Seismic data has proved to be
increasingly important in reservoir
characterization. High-resolution 3-D
seismic surveys produce data sets
from which amplitude variations can
be used to interpolate between wells.
FIGURE 8. Illustration of the limited influence of compaction on sonic veReservoir saturation is evaluated using
locity in carbonates. There is a general increase of the lowest velocities with
amplitude variation with offset (AVO),
depth (stippled line); however, large velocity fluctuations at similar depths
and time-lapse surveys delineate prooccur. In Hole Unda, high velocities are present even in the shallow subsurface and are caused by early cementation that is faster than compaction. duction histories and assist in secIn addition, frequent velocity reversals with depth occur in both holes.
ondary recovery. Inversions of seismic volumes into a porosity volume
can be used to predict high-porosity
Marine cementation at depths of 60 m or more can parintervals. Because of the degree of uncertainty in these
tially lithify and transform carbonate sediment across a
geophysical data, accurate interpretation is dependent
platform at rates that are virtually instantaneous geologon the understanding of the rock physics in the imaged
ically (Grammer et al., 1993b; Grammer et al., 1999).
sediments (Mavko et al., 1998). Although sonic velocity
These early marine cements, coupled with shallow subis largely controlled by porosity, many factors, such as
surface processes of cementation, decrease porosity and
clay content and mineralogy, may complicate the readd stiffness to young rocks. The result is that velocity
lationship. This is especially true in carbonates where,
increases much more than would be seen in sediments
as discussed above, velocity is controlled by the comin response solely to compaction.
bined effect of depositional lithology and several postFigure 8 illustrates this phenomenon with logs and
depositional processes that cause a unique velocity disvelocity measurements on discrete samples from two
tribution (Rafavich et al., 1984; Anselmetti and Eberli,
holes located on modern GBB. Although there is a gen1993; Wang, 1997).
eral trend of increasing velocity with depth, velocity
Laboratory measurements from cores in the Bahainversions with depth are common, and values of commas display the porosity-velocity relationship in carbonpressional wave velocities can range as much as 4000 m/s
ates and, together with diagenetic studies, help explain
at approximately the same depth. Furthermore, Vp
the wide scattering of velocity data (Anselmetti and
velocities of more than 4000 m/s are found in shallow
Eberli, 1993, 1997, 2001). Velocity is strongly depenburial depths of less than 20 m at the shallow-water site,
dent on the rock porosity (Wang, 1997; Rafavich et al.,
Unda. At this location, frequent exposure and early ma1984). A plot of porosity vs. velocity displays a clear inrine cementation lithify the sediment prior to burial. In
verse trend; an increase in porosity produces a decrease
13
14
Grammer et al.
broadly categorized more by the stage the study represents in the progression toward an integrated reservoir model than by the type of reservoir. A brief
summary of the highlights from individual papers
follows.
Chapter 2. Depositional themes of mixed carbonatesiliciclastics in the South Florida Neogene: Application
to ancient deposits, by Donald F. McNeill, Kevin J.
Cunningham, Laura A. Guertin, and Flavio S. Anselmetti.
This paper presents results of a recent drilling project to evaluate the Neogene stratigraphy of south Florida and provides additional insight into the depositional controls and facies patterns of a heterogeneous,
15
16
Grammer et al.
biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic markers for determining sequence boundaries in some mixed systems
where no clear-cut disconformity exists; and (6) how
shallow burial and early diagenetic processes have produced almost identical acoustic signatures for the two
admixed sediment types.
Chapter 3. Predicting tidal-sand reservoir architecture using data from modern and ancient depositional systems, by Lesli Wood.
Tidally influenced shoreline and deltaic deposits
form some of the largest and most architecturally complicated hydrocarbon fields in the world, but few welldocumented ancient subsurface examples exist. This
paper synthesizes a large data set from the literature on
the dimensions and distribution of modern and ancient siliciclastic tidal sands and examines the utility of
that data set for predicting trends in sand-body dimensions, orientation, and distribution. The paper also presents a comprehensive data set on the dimensions of tidal
sand bars and tidal sand ridges from the Cretaceous Sego
Sandstone in the Book Cliffs of Utah.
Chapter 4. Sequence-stratigraphic and paleogeographic distribution of reservoir-quality dolomite, Madison Formation, Wyoming and Montana, by Langhorne
B. Smith, Jr., Gregor P. Eberli, and Mark Sonnenfeld.
The Mississippian Madison Formation is a classic example of carbonates deposited on a regionally extensive
ramp. The Madison comprises a single, unconformitybounded second-order supersequence that consists internally of a fourfold hierarchy of sequences and cycles.
This paper reviews the sequence-stratigraphic and paleogeographic distribution of porous dolomite in the Madison Formation of Wyoming and Montana and discusses
the implications for exploration-scale variability by
looking at the distribution of dolomite in the sequencestratigraphic framework.
Chapter 5. A laterally accreting grainstone margin from the Albian of northern Mexico: Outcrop model
for Cretaceous reservoirs, by David A. Osleger, Roger
Barnaby, and Charles Kerans.
Outcrop study of progradational, platform-margin
carbonate shoal deposits of Cretaceous age (Albian) in
northern Mexico provides insight into the architecture
of progradational shoal margins and the physical processes that operate along laterally accreting margins
surrounding muddy, intrashelf basins. Results of this
study are compared with subsurface reservoirs in the
Aptian Shuaiba Formation (Bu Hasa field) and the Cenomanian Mishrif Formation of the Arabian Gulf.
Chapter 6. An upper Mississippian carbonate ramp
system from the Pedrogosa Basin, southwestern New
Mexico, United States: An outcrop analog for middle
Carboniferous carbonate reservoirs, by David Sivils.
The Carboniferous (upper Mississippian) Paradise
Formation in the Pedregosa Basin is an outcrop analog
for subsurface reservoirs of a similar age useful for mod-
eling depositional systems, patterns of cyclic sedimentation, reservoir geometry, and diagenetic controls on
reservoir development. This paper focuses on a detailed
outcrop study of the Paradise Formation and how the
results of this study can be used to develop exploration
and exploitation analogs in a sequence-stratigraphic
framework for application to exploration and exploitation of age-equivalent carbonate ramp reservoirs.
Chapter 7. Sedimentology, statistics, and flow behavior for a tide-influenced deltaic sandstone, Frontier
Formation, Wyoming, United States, by Christopher
D. White, Brian J. Willis, Shirley P. Dutton, Janok P.
Bhattacharyra, and Keshav Narayanan.
This paper describes an outcrop study of a
Cretaceous-aged, tidally influenced sandstone exposed
in central Wyoming. The Frewens Allomember of the
Frontier Formation was deposited by a delta prograding into a narrow shoreline embayment between an
older wave-dominated delta lobe and a basin-floor
ridge that was created by subtle structural uplift and
consists of two 5-km-wide by 20-km-long coarseningupward sandstone bodies. Discussion includes details
of the spatial distribution of reservoir facies in outcrop, as well as methods to quantify geologic variability and to predict heterogeneities in the subsurface. Also included is a discussion focusing on the
development of flow models that integrate bedding
geometry, lithofacies, and petrophysical properties in
an appropriate structure for reservoir modeling. These
models were then used to analyze sensitivity of reservoir behavior to different geologic features and to
investigate methods for modeling and upscaling interwell-scale heterogeneity.
Chapter 8. A comparison of two early Miocene
carbonate margins: The Zhujiang carbonate platform
(subsurface, South China Sea) and the Pirinc platform
(outcrop, southern Turkey), by Phil Bassant, Frans Van
Buchem, Andre Strasser, and Anthony Lomando.
The early Miocene Pirinc platform in southern Turkey is an early Miocene carbonate platform-to-basin
transition exposed along the northern flank of the Mut
Basin. The interval formed in response to three highamplitude sea level changes of 100 150-m amplitude
that resulted in a steep-edged platform with prograding slope and margin geometries during highstands,
with thin carbonate platforms characterized by onlapping geometries during lowstands. Results of the outcrop study in Turkey are compared with the subsurface
early Miocene Zhujiang platform in China and lead to
exploration- and production-scale play concepts that
may be particularly appropriate to early Miocene carbonate reservoirs in Southeast Asia.
Chapter 9. Accommodation-controlled systems
tract-specific facies partitioning and resulting geometric development of reservoir grainstone ramp-crest shoal
bodies, by Victoria L. French and Charles Kerans.
17
18
Grammer et al.
models. Multiple-point geostatistics borrows multiplepoint patterns from what are termed training images
then anchors them to subsurface well-log, seismic, and
production data. The paper outlines the guiding principles of using analog models in multiple-point geostatistics and shows that simple so-called modular training
images can be used to build complex reservoir models
using geostatistical algorithms.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We extend our sincere thanks to the authors of the
papers in this volume for their interesting and timely
contributions to this memoir. Many thanks also to
AAPG, and especially the publications staff, who were
invaluable in resolving many of the logistical issues
faced by both the editors and the authors of the volume. We also extend our thanks to Tony Sandomierski
for assistance with figures and Susan Friel of Biotechwrite for editorial suggestions. Lastly, we would like to
thank the following individuals, whose critical reviews
of the manuscripts assured us of high quality and
comprehensive compilations of current progress in
this rapidly changing field of study: Rick Abegg, Dave
Barnes, Jennifer Beall, Terry Belsher, Jim Borer, Jean
Borgomono, Bryan Bracken, Trevor Burchette, Mary
Carr, Chris Crescini, Tim Cross, Steve Dorobek, Evan
Franseen, Ray Garber, Jean Hsieh, Jim Jennings, Chris
Kendall, Charlie Kerans, Rebecca Latimer, Marge Levy,
Bob Lindsay, Susan Longacre, Jerry Lucia, Sal Mazzullo,
Tim McHargue, Bill Morgan, John Pendrel, Carlos
Pirmez, Mike Pope, Dennis Prezbindowski, Gene
Rankey, Will Schweller, and John Weisenberger.
REFERENCES CITED
Amos, C. L., and E. L. King, 1984, Bedforms of the Canadian eastern seaboard: A comparison with global occurrences: Marine Geology, v. 57, p. 167 208.
Anselmetti, F. S., and G. P. Eberli, 1993, Controls on sonic
velocity in carbonates: Pure and Applied Geophysics,
v. 141/2-4, p. 287 323.
Anselmetti, F. S., and G. P. Eberli, 1997, Sonic velocity in
carbonate sediments and rocks, in F. J. Marfurt and A.
Palaz, eds., Carbonate seismology: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Geophysical Development Series no. 6, p. 53 74.
Anselmetti, F. S., and G. P. Eberli, 2001, Sonic velocity in
carbonates A combined product of depositional lithology and diagenetic alterations, in R. N. Ginsburg,
ed., Subsurface geology of a prograding carbonate
platform margin, Great Bahama Bank: Results of the
Bahamas Drilling Project: SEPM Special Publication
70, p. 193 216.
19
20
Grammer et al.
and L. A. Melim, 2001, Calibration of seismic sequence stratigraphy with cores and logs, in R. N.
Ginsburg, ed., Subsurface geology of a prograding carbonate platform margin, Great Bahama Bank: SEPM
Special Publication 70, p. 241 265.
Eberli, G. P., F. S. Anselmetti, D. Kroon, T. Sato, and J. D.
Wright, 2002, The chronostratigraphic significance
of seismic reflections along the Bahamas Transect:
Marine Geology, v. 185, nos. 1 2, p. 1 17.
Enos, P., and L. H. Sawatsky, 1981, Pore networks in
Holocene carbonate sediments: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 961 985.
Enos, P., and C. H. Moore, 1983, Fore-reef slope, in P. A.
Scholle, D. G. Bebout, and C. H. Moore, eds., Carbonate depositional environments: AAPG Memoir
33, p. 507 539.
Frank, T. D., and K. Bernet, 2000, Isotopic signature of
burial diagenesis and primary lithologic contrasts in
periplatform carbonates (Miocene, Great Bahama
Bank): Sedimentology, v. 47, p. 1256 1267.
Ginsburg, R. N., ed., 2001, Subsurface geology of a
prograding carbonate platform margin, Great
Bahama Bank: Results of the Bahamas Drilling
Project: SEPM Special Publication 70, 265 p.
Ginsburg, R. N., and N. P. James, 1974, Holocene carbonate sediments of continental shelves, in C. A.
Burk and C. L. Drake, eds., The geology of continental margins: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 137
155.
Ginsburg, R. N., P. M. Harris, G. P. Eberli, and P. K. Swart,
1991, The growth potential of a bypass margin, Great
Bahama Bank: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,
v. 61, no. 1, p. 976 987.
Grammer, G. M., 1991, Formation and evolution of Quaternary carbonate foreslopes, Tongue of the Ocean, Bahamas: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of
Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric
Science, Coral Gables, Florida, 375 p.
Grammer, G. M., and R. N. Ginsburg, 1992, Highstand vs.
lowstand deposition on carbonate platform margins:
Insight from Quaternary foreslopes in the Bahamas:
Marine Geology, v. 103, p. 125 136.
Grammer, G. M., R. N. Ginsburg, and P. M. Harris, 1993a,
Timing of deposition, diagenesis, and failure of steep
carbonate slopes in response to a high-amplitude/
high-frequency fluctuation in sea level, Tongue of the
Ocean, Bahamas, in R. G. Loucks and J. F. Sarg, eds.,
Carbonate sequence stratigraphy, recent developments
and applications: AAPG Memoir 57, p. 107 131.
Grammer, G. M., R. N. Ginsburg, P. K. Swart, D. F. McNeill,
A. J. T. Jull, and D. R. Prezbindowski, 1993b, Rapid
growth rate of syndepositional marine aragonite cements in steep marginal slope deposits, Bahamas and
Belize: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 63, p. 983
989.
Grammer, G. M., G. P. Eberli, F. S. P. Van Buchem, G. M.
Stevenson, and P. Homewood, 1996, Application of
high-resolution sequence stratigraphy to evaluate
lateral variability in outcrop and subsurface Desert
Creek and Ismay intervals (Pennsylvanian), Paradox
Basin, in M. Sonnenfeld and M. Longman, eds.,
21
22
Grammer et al.