Campaign
Amanda Healy
Jen Himes
Mary Hoerner
Vince Klain
Lauren Shaw
Page
Kodak
2
Page
First Look
The Problem:
Consumer Insight:
If consumers knew Kodak sold affordable, user-friendly
digital cameras that take higher quality pictures than their
smartphone, they would buy Kodak cameras. If consumers
knew about the high quality of Kodak printers, ease of use,
and availability to the consumer, and then they would print
more pictures using Kodak printers.
Target
18-24 year
olds
All races
and
ethnicities
3
Page
Demographics:
Male &
Female
Consumers
in the US
Average
annual
income
between
$40k-60k
Living in
suburban/ur
ban
neighborhoo
ds
Psychographics:
People that care
about relationships
with family and
friends
Consumers
wanting to
document and
share their special
events with a
physical reminder
Scrapbookers
Consumers with a
special interest in
photography but
do not possess
professional skills
Budget-conscious
consumers
Enjoy user-friendly
electronics
Brand Imperatives:
4
Page
Kodak logo
A camera
A printer
#PictureThis
Tagline - Kodak
Moment
Price of camera$60-$200
Price of printer$30-$100
Innovation
Awards from the
Consumer
Electronics
Association
Objectives:
Selling Proposition:
Positioning:
Supports:
Creative
Focus on the
long-standing
Media Imperatives:
reputation of
Kodak
Page
Innovation
Shots of people
To
increase
To
increase
Awards from the
Focus on the
Shots
of people
Price of camera
Price of printer
Quality
of
photos
Consumer
taking pictures
phrase
printing
said
camera
printer
sales
Kodak sales
Electronics
of important
Moment
pictures
Association
by 15% byevents by 10%
by
Q2 2014.
Q2 2014.
Making the
brand image
appeal to a
young audience
6
Page
TV Commercial
Print Ad - Magazine
Cosmopolitan
People
Teen Vogue
Seventeen
Mens Health
Diving deeper
Page
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
o Iconic image
o Longstanding reputation
o Quality & affordable (93% of respondents are influenced by
price)
Weaknesses
o Kodak did not respond to needs of digital market
o Digital market does not fit Kodaks brand image
o Brand Image relies on non-digital characteristics of products
Opportunities
o Picture-taking trend (because of social media/camera phone
use)
o Digital market is pushing professional-grade cameras, where
Kodak can market as the affordable alternative.
Threats
o Smartphones/camera phones (95%)
o Other big name competitors, ie. Canon, Nikon, Fujifilm, etc.
o Consumers may already own digital cameras (65% of
respondents)
Page
Page
Quantitative Results:
Median
Age
Median
Income
01810
01886
02748
42.4
42
49
$109,400.00
$121,600.00
$59,400.00
11565
46.3
$112,100.00
11746
39.4
$98,600.00
12540
43
20015
Consumer
spend ($$ per
household)
Racial
Majority
$74,466.00
$75,471.00
$52,982.00
White
White
White
$71,516.00
White
10
Amount Zip
Code
Appeared in
Survey
Page
Zip
Code
$69,514.00
**White
$96,700.00
$68,234.00
White
45.7
$143,200.00
$74,196.00
White
24153
42.7
$47,200.00
$51,037.00
White
30005
36.3
$99,900.00
$67,353.00
White
34232
45.6
$43,200.00
$43,541.00
White
40241
43551
**43762
40.4
39.7
31.2
$75,800.00
$61,300.00
$47,300.00
$57,834.00
$50,186.00
$73,077.00
**White
White
White
44024
44057
44143
44.7
41.7
47.6
$60,700.00
$48,200.00
$59,300.00
$52,930.00
$46,036.00
$51,362.00
White
White
White
46184
34.7
$58,500.00
$48,046.00
White
48009
48840
48866
41.7
41.9
39.5
$81,600.00
$52,800.00
$46,900.00
$60,928.00
$44,689.00
$41,680.00
White
White
White
49024
49316
37.5
36
$57,600.00
$57,700.00
$49,641.00
$53,903.00
White
White
49331
49506
38.9
33.5
$50,500.00
$49,300.00
$47,628.00
$58,674.00
White
White
49546
39.4
$50,400.00
$55,012.00
White
53005
47.1
$78,300.00
$59,758.00
White
53029
40.4
$85,300.00
$62,347.00
White
53045
53059
53072
53150
47.4
43.5
43.5
42.8
$88,100.00
$57,500.00
$70,900.00
$78,700.00
$62,385.00
$45,888.00
$56,617.00
$58,399.00
White
White
White
White
53188
38.2
$62,700.00
$51,637.00
White
53189
39.4
$76,000.00
$57,554.00
White
53202
33
$35,600.00
$49,684.00
White
53405
55105
55318
37.5
34.6
34.8
$42,600.00
$65,000.00
$71,200.00
$45,748.00
$70,304.00
$56,642.00
White
White
White
55347
55410
55417
58078
60004
60010
60030
60035
60041
60044
38.8
40.3
38.2
34.3
42.8
46
38.1
45.8
37.7
44.8
$102,600.00
$83,800.00
$64,700.00
$61,300.00
$72,500.00
$106,200.00
$81,300.00
$101,400.00
$64,100.00
$82,200.00
$69,815.00
$64,632.00
$54,337.00
$51,704.00
$57,302.00
$70,080.00
$59,448.00
$68,168.00
$52,735.00
$62,484.00
White
White
White
White
White
White
White
White
White
White
2
8
Asian population
lower income, Older
population
extremely wealthy
Neighborhood
younger, more racially
mixed
extremely wealthy
Neighborhood
extremely wealthy
Neighborhood
slightly poorer
neighborhood
yuppie area, diverse and
wealthy
older, poorer
neighborhood
extremely diverse area
younger, poorer area
very young, very lower
class, highly white
average white, mid-class
lower to mid-class white
wide range of income,
older population
mostly white, middle
class
high income, highly white
lower income
highly white, average
income
mostly white
average income, mostly
white
highly white
average income, mostly
white, average age range
lower income, mostly
white
high income, older
population
highly white, higher
income
high income
highly white, middle class
mostly white
highly white, higher
income
one to two person
households
about one-quarter makes
over $100,000
one to two person
households, no children
Primarily white
pretty even spread of
ages
Wealthy
Even age spread
11
Page
12
Page
Creative Campaign
Strategy:
S e r ie s o f
c o m m e r c ia ls
fe a t u r in g d iff e r e n t
im p o r t a n t lif e
e v e n ts
S u r p r is e P a r t y ,
Fa m ily V a c a tio n
- H a w a ii,
C h r is t m a s ,
W e d d in g
C a m e ra p h o n e
u se r v e rsu s
K o d a k d ig it a l
c a m e ra u se r
T h e d ig it a l
c a m e ra u se r
t a k e s c le a r ,
q u a lit y p h o t o s
T h e c a m e ra
p h o n e u s e r is
u n a b le t o t a k e
q u a lit y p h o t o s
A t th e e n d o f
e v e ry
c o m m e r c ia l,
th e Ko d a k
d ig it a l c a m e r a
u s e r p r in t s t h e ir
p h o t o s u s in g a
K o d a k p r in t e r
w h ile t h e
c a m e ra p h o n e
u s e r is le ft w it h
a s e r ie s o f
b lu rr y p h o t o s
o n t h e ir
c o m p u te r
M a g a z i n e P r in t
Page
T V C o m m e r c ia l
13
Making it happen:
S id e b y s id e p r in t
o f t w o d iff e re n t
p h o to s
Ko d a k u se r
h o ld s a h ig h
q u a lit y p h o t o
u p in f ro n t o f
t h e a c t io n a n d
it m a t c h e s
C a m e ra p h o n e
u s e r h o ld s a
p o o r q u a lit y
p h o t o o n t h e ir
p h o n e u p in
f ro n t o f t h e
a c t io n a n d it
d o e s n o t m a tc h
L iv e E v e n t
W a ll, C a m e r a
S t a t io n , P r in t in g
S t a t io n
M u s ic Fe s t iv a ls
Page
14
Works Cited
"Imaging Company." Nikon. Nikon Corporation, 19 July 2013. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
Lucas, Henry C., Jr., and Jie Mein Goh. "Disruptive Technology: How Kodak Missed the Digital
Photography Revolution." Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18.1 (2009): 46-55.
Disruptive Technology: How Kodak Missed the Digital Photography Revolution. Science
Direct, Mar. 2009. Web. 05 Nov. 2013.
Tarr, Greg. "New Cameras Target Smartphone Users." TWICE: This Week In Consumer
Electronics 28.5 (2013): 8-26. Academic Search Complete. Web. 5 Nov. 2013.