I.

Introduction
- Thesis statement (weh weh weh ulul)
II. Historical Antecedents
A. Artificial Insemination's Beginnings
i. How Artificial Insemination developed (science-y stuff)
ii. International laws
--- relevant cases/issues that lead to the creation of the laws (A and B had baby C the first ever test
tube baby bleh bleh)
--- other things to consider when said law was being created (religion, etc)
iii. International jurisprudence
--- cases that apply the laws after they have been passed
iv. Open-ended issues that need to be resolved (if any)
B. Development of Artificial Insemination Laws in the Philippines
i. What it used to be nung wala pang provision or AI (aka bare minimum)
ii. When was this first an issue? (if meron) (Juan and Juanita had baby x)
--- relevant cases and the points to consider
ii. When was a provision for this first introduced
--- things to consider
--- applying international laws/jurisprudence (aka part A of outline as applied to us)
C. Construing Article 164 (THESIS STATEMENT discussion somewhere here)
i. What were the changes brought up in the 1986 ConComm deliberation (if meron)
ii. What do we have now as a result of ^
iii. Relevant cases/jurisprudence
iv. What is lacking in the law? (in light of recent or future developments)
III. Conclusion
A. General evaluation of Article 164
B. Idk summarize the issues left unresolved siguro (iv of Part C)
C. Make recommendations (if applicable)